User talk:Mattximus

Archives

1, 2, 3

Hi, Mattximus. I'm just posting to let you know that List of municipalities in Ontario – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 27. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Centrorhynchidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filiform (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mattximus. When you have a chance, I'd appreciate a re-review at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of largest cruise ships/archive1. I've significantly expanded the prose since you last looked at it. Thanks! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gigantorhynchus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tylototriton -- Tylototriton (talk) 09:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Moniliformidae you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tylototriton -- Tylototriton (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gigantorhynchus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gigantorhynchus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tylototriton -- Tylototriton (talk) 09:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I'm just posting to let you know that Municipalities of Chihuahua – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 12. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 01:33, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested in being in the Tree of Life Newsletter, I wrote some questions for you here. Let me know either way. Thanks, Enwebb (talk) 22:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Enwebb, sorry I have been away for the past several weeks, but I've completed the interview. Thank you! Mattximus (talk) 14:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Moniliformidae you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Moniliformidae for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tylototriton -- Tylototriton (talk) 00:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the Gigantorhynchus article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 23, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 23, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good timing ;) - thank you today for Gigantorhynchus, about "the second animal listed alphabetically using the taxonomy system (Animalia, Acanthocephala, Archiacanthocephala, Apororhynchida, Apororhynchidae, Gigantorhynchus)"! Have a good year 2021. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I'm just posting to let you know that List of municipalities in Newfoundland and Labrador – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 26. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and felicitations. Regarding this reversion of my preceding edit, I admit that my changing the title of the "Notes" section is generally non-standard to Wikipedia (I was unaware of the work on the list articles before your comment), but my moving of the "See also" section is in accordance with MOS:ORDER. (I prefer to clearly distinguish between notes that citations and those that are explanatory.) What would you think of asking for consensus along these lines, at least to fix the section order of the affected articles, and preferably to also clarify the titles of the "Notes" sections? I would be willing to do the work on all of the affected articles if we had consensus. —DocWatson42 (talk) 07:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, why not be bold? —DocWatson42 (talk) 11:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DocWatson42. I'm happy to comply with MOS:ORDER certainly. For your second suggestion, I don't think renaming notes to be "explanatory notes" is a good use of time, as "notes" is not only standard in all 30 or so list of municipalities, but thousands of other featured lists, and thousands more featured articles. I believe a long time ago there used to be different formats for references which involved notes, so your suggestion would have made sense, however all modern featured lists/articles uses the standard references/notes format. Mattximus (talk) 13:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are Acanthocephala-related redirects only one you have done? Or are there any other animal group yet? I hope you give valuable info because mass-deleting will be in progress (per User_talk:Estopedist1#Discussion_about_mass_redirects). The sidenotice, I agree that massive red links (ie species) in genera articles may be annoying, but creating species articles are predominantly the work for bots. There are over 20 mln species but maybe even 100 mln --Estopedist1 (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mattximus, just to note WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES if you are not aware of it. All properly named and described species are considered inherently notable and so worthy of an article. It has been agreed that fossil species can usually be treated in a single genus article, but extant species should have their own article. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Estopedist1: it does not follow from "species are inherently notable" that "there must be at least a stub article for every species". If an editor creates a species stub article, it is very unlikely to be deleted, but it doesn't justify bot creation of stubs that are unlikely ever to be expanded. I've certainly created species stubs, but normally only for a reason, e.g. to replace a redirect from the species name to the genus, or to fix incorrect synonyms. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I'm just posting to let you know that Municipalities of Jalisco – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 16. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 01:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating List of cities in Nevada. However, the work you performed left six inline citations with a "Cite error: The named reference Census 2020 was invoked but never defined" error. This is a Featured list, so hopefully you can correct it. Thanks for your consideration. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the same goes for List of municipalities in New Mexico. Before the sources were all in order (diff), but now there's a "Cite error: The named reference Census 2020 was invoked but never defined" for five citations in the refs section. This is also a featured list, but if it continues to degrade, it could unfortunately be delisted, unless it's fixed. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

North America I am aware, I brought both of them up to featured list. The problem is that I can't find the official citation from the US Census which I would like to add there. I have the raw zip file, but don't believe it's the best source to post here. Still a work in progress, if you want to help, please do! If you can find a better citation please do add it. Mattximus (talk) 20:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I wasn't aware that you brought them to FL. I will make a note to work on this when I get some extra time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, Municipalities of San Luis Potosí, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mattximus, I noticed on your userpage that you are working towards/aiming to get FLs for many municipality lists in North America. Those lists seem like something I would be interested in working on as well, so I was wondering: are there any lists I can immediately work on/that are being worked on currently? Also, are there any useful resources (obviously besides census data) to use? Thanks!

(P.S. I see the general format is talking about stats on the state/province/etc itself, then on how municipalities are defined within that subdivision, then some extremes of the subdivisions, followed by a gallery and the table itself. Is there anything I'm missing?)

(P.P.S I see Districts of Panama is listed, but perhaps the Corregimientos of Panama would be a better fit, being that the districts have seats that are corregimientos? Obviously it doesn't translate exactly, but Provinces of Panama seems to mention that they are equivalent.)

Thanks! --eviolite (talk) 00:54, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration sounds great User talk:Eviolite! I'm not super active at the moment, just trying to update some of the american ones to reflect the new 2020 census. Was there one that you would especially like to work on? We can approach it together if you want. Mattximus (talk) 01:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really have a specific preference since the lists should be pretty similar, at least within a country. Updating makes sense, though right now it seems I can only find the redistricting data on the census website, which isn't really immediately helpful. So, since I'm not really familiar with that, it might be simpler to do those after the data becomes more readily available. I see that all of the Canadian provinces/territories are done besides List of municipalities in Quebec, which I could start working on tomorrow as it's getting late. The table itself looks fine on that one (though after some research it seems the Region column may not be necessary, while the Regional county municipality column should probably include Equivalent territory). Thanks, eviolite (talk) 02:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it took me a while to find the official 2020 American census results, they are here [1] for Alabama, but you can search any state. You just have to click on "download" to get it into a usable spreadsheet. As for Quebec, User:Hwy43 has been the leading editor for all those municipalities, he is excellent and may offer some advice. Good luck! Mattximus (talk) 14:11, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For Quebec, I recommend any effort should wait until after the 2021 census results are released in February 2022. Hwy43 (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair, given that the American census is now somewhat accessible and won't change for a decade the states might be a better shot right now. eviolite (talk) 17:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
A few weeks ago you asked me to provide the source and date for when I took the data for the Rhode Island population map. I'd love to do what I can to get it back on the article, and on February 2 I added a source and date to the map on wikimedia. Is this acceptable formatting to put it back on the page? Let me know what I can do to get it up to standard.
Thanks Infrarrojo00 (talk) 16:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Here's the link to the map: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ri_towns_by_population.png

Infrarrojo00 it looks good now, I just had to take it down because it was a featured list and the data was unsourced, just make sure to indicated in the caption that it's based on 2020 census data and should be good! Mattximus (talk) 01:36, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I'm just posting to let you know that List of municipalities in New Brunswick – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 21. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, Municipalities of Querétaro, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I'm just posting to let you know that Municipalities of Durango – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 17. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 01:42, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've created a new list for Arkansas in the style we discussed at Illinois. I've got it in my sandbox here: User:Straughn/sandbox. Would you mind checking it out? The major issue in this table is the dates of incorporation, which aren't currently sortable. I've started adding them using Template:Date table sorting. I did not include the "Settled" column from the previous article because I didn't think it was relevant and there is no easy way to find that information. Thanks! :Straughn (talk) 20:49, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Straughn This is amazing work! And so quick, some of these articles will go a decade without anyone updating them. The date column I can fix but only manually, I'm happy to help with this if you want to move your list from your sandbox to them main article page I can work from there. Mattximus (talk) 14:11, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've got Delaware on my page now. Towns in Delaware seem to reincorporate on a regular basis, so we may wish to clarify that somewhere. Here's what I've got so far: User:Straughn/sandbox Straughn (talk) 16:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Straughn, the Delaware one is perfect again, I can't believe how quickly you are updating these lists. The Delaware one in particular was quite outdated, and I much prefer your table. Sorry I was unable to help much with incorporation dates on the Illinois one as I am currently on vacation! But please add the Delaware to the list, this is great work. Thank you, Mattximus (talk) 02:27, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delaware has been updated. I'll go through your list to see what's next. Straughn (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

edit | discuss

Municipalities of North America

120 articles

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi N

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, List of municipalities in Arkansas, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I'm just posting to let you know that List of municipalities in Nunavut – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 23. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Number of urban areas by country is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number of urban areas by country until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sativa Inflorescence (talk) 18:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, I have no problem changing the HKG flag to CHN but your reason is not valid and all editors have to agree with it. You cited the following reason: "then it is inconsistent, must use either national flags or subnational flags (like HK), can't have both in same list"

This is precisely what is being done as we are using the Hong Kong SAR flag - so I'm not sure what you're trying to do. No one says Hong Kong is a country, Hong Kong is a SAR of China and if you click the HKG flag it directs you to it. I also found the fact you left MAC alone double standard. If you want to speak consistency, both HKG and MAC should have been changed to CHN, but you only changed HKG. Let's not pretend your edit was not political.

Lastly, we follow GAWC and GAWC simply sites "Hong Kong" per its website. If it had said Hong Kong, China, we would have done what you suggested. Hong Kong is part of China, there is no denial on that - but it is a Special Admin Region of China, until this status changes, the flag stays. Kazuha1029 (talk) 20:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is simply consistency, Kazuha1029. NYC is part of the USA but we don't use the NYC flag. HK is part of China and so we don't use the HKG flag. Beijing is also a special province of China should we use a Beijing flag also? And yes we should change Macau to China as well, since it is a city in China. I've brought it up to the talk page. We either use subnational flags (like HK or NYC) or national flags (like China or USA), but mixing both is inconsistent. Mattximus (talk) 20:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pachysentis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 14:43, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Australiformis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Australiformis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Australiformis and Talk:Australiformis/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Xenomorph Star
	Great work, keep it up! Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Australiformis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Australiformis for comments about the article, and Talk:Australiformis/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australiformis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Type locality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pachysentis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pachysentis for comments about the article, and Talk:Pachysentis/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 10:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Australiformis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Australiformis semoni is a parasite that infests marsupials in Australia and New Guinea and whose infestation could cause debilitating ulcerative granulomatous gastritis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Australiformis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Australiformis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, Municipalities of Oaxaca, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pachysentis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that parasitic worms of genus Pachysentis have hooks on their heads (example pictured) and attach themselves to the intestine of the host? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pachysentis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pachysentis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The article you nominated, Australiformis, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, Municipalities of Sinaloa, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy and prosperous Onam!
	Hello Mattximus, may you harvest happiness, peace and prosperity on this joyous occasion of Onam. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a happy Onam and having a sadya with them next to a pookalam. Sending you heartfelt greetings for Onam. Happy editing, DreamSparrow Chat 08:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Onam greetings}} to other user talk pages.

DreamSparrow ^Chat 08:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 17 November 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 17, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November songs

my story today

Thank you today for the article, introduced: "This is my third featured article nomination for parasitic worms, which were chosen as they are the first animals listed alphabetically using the taxonomy system (Animalia, Acanthocephala...). This one appears to be missing critical sections (such as life cycle) but I believe I can claim close to comprehensiveness despite this due to the paucity of sources available."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mattximus. I'm just posting to let you know that Municipalities of Campeche – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 27. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Municipalities of Guerrero, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Mattximus, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, DreamSparrow Chat 05:36, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

DreamSparrow ^Chat 05:36, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mattximus. Thank you for your work on Cucullanorhynchus. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Neither of the two sources mentions this genus

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mattximus. Thank you for your work on Cucullanorhynchus. NotAGenious, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've found enough RS to prove that this is an accepted genus, and I'm thus marking this as reviewed. I'll also add the original publication as a source here, as it seems like that's where the information is coming for. Thank you for your work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|NotAGenious}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

NotAGenious (talk) 09:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, Municipalities of Guerrero, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heptamegacanthus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Type locality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in future it would be greatly appreciated if you could add rcats to redirects you create. Some rcats you may find useful are: R from species to genus, R to monotypic taxon and R from alternative scientific name. For the last two it would also be useful for you to add the organism type, for example: R to monotypic taxon|animal. Thanks! harrz ^talk 22:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not done this before, can I ask the purpose? They seem to link well without it. Thanks. Mattximus (talk) 03:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't affect the linking, but it's useful to document the reason for the redirect.

Generally you should not create redirects from a species to its genus as you have done (unless the genus is monotypic). All species are considered notable in their own right, and a red wikilink for a species in the genus article indicates that an article is missing. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter coxhead: While I agree this is the case for many species, for those that have almost no information available, surely it's better to link to the genus page which contains all the information of the species/genus rather than a broken link or a stub? Consider the redirect for Apororhynchus aculeatus or Pachysentis angolensis. Any user looking those up would benefit far more from a redirect to the featured article or good article than do a blank page or a stub. Creating a thousand stubs or leaving redlinks is worse for the reader than redirects to higher quality genus pages *which contain all the information they may be looking for*. These species in particular are often defined in contrast to others in the genus, so it makes sense to group them. If there is more than a paper or two on a species and the genus page grows, there is no harm then removing the redirect at that point, but it would be worse for the reader to remove the redirect prematurely. Mattximus (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue of species redirects to genera has been discussed a number of times in the Tree of Life Wikiproject. As per this discussion, the problem is that unless you have set your user preferences to show a different colour for wikilinks that are redirects, you can't tell that the species article doesn't exist and so needs creating. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's an interesting discussion and some other users echoed my point above, for this specific case I think it would be worse for wikipedia readers as a whole to fail to redirect users to a page containing *some* information rather than a stub or a blank page that will likely never be created. At the very least there was not a consensus reached. I do agree that you are correct for most species, but for super obscure ones, some information is certainly better than none. Mattximus (talk) 01:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main reason is so that the reason for the redirect's existence is documented. Also, WP:RCAT states that redirects "should be placed into categories" and explains why rcats are useful. If you need any further help don't hesistate to send me a message or ping me in a reply here! harrz ^talk 22:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Heptamegacanthus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Mattximus! The list you nominated, Municipalities of Puebla, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heptamegacanthus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Life cycle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Heptamegacanthus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Heptamegacanthus and Talk:Heptamegacanthus/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 00:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Heptamegacanthus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Heptamegacanthus for comments about the article, and Talk:Heptamegacanthus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]