User talk:Mananshah15

A tag has been placed on Reliance Digital Store requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bazj (talk) 10:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. 01:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 01:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Reliance Digital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyderabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Manan! My name is Aayush and I wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia. Also, thank you for signing up for WikiProject Jainism, we can definitely use more editors in the Jainism project! I also read your comments on Anish's talk page. I understand your concerns and I want to assure you that none of the articles are trying to project misleading information about Jainism. All the articles are clear that Jainism doesn't believe in a creator god. But terms like 'demi god' are necessary in these articles for lack of a better term.

Please feel free to browse through WikiProject Jainism, the Jainism Portal and other Jain articles to see which Jain articles are of interest to you and edit them where you see fit. Please feel free to contact me with whatever questions that you may have. Hope you have fun on Wikipedia!--Aayush18 (talk) 06:27, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Monuments of National Importance in Daman and Diu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise that I confused your actions for a conflict of interest, but in this context, personal aesthetic preferences don't matter. The default left align is standard protocol for Wikipedia. –Merqurial (talk) 21:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, there's still a conflict of interest. However, looking back a few months into the history, I can see that it's not your fault. –Merqurial (talk) 02:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mananshah15. You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've been making some efforts to rejuvenate WikiProject Hotels, and since you're a member of the project, please feel free to contribute there if anything comes to mind. Also, please feel free to discuss matters at the project's talk page. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have placed the article Jainism for peer-review. You might be interested in it. The link is here: Wikipedia:Peer_review/Jainism/archive4. Cheers, Rahul Jain (talk) 07:18, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reliance Digital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Digital until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:33, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vibhas Sen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are your comments on Dandi Swami's Greek Version? Pankaj Jain 08:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capankajsmilyo (talk • contribs)

• Hi, Meet-up for Mumbai Wikipedians has been scheduled on 21 Nov 2015 (Meet-up: Mumbai 21 Nov 2015). I request you to register for the meet. All details can be found on the meet-up page. Many thanks and hope to meet you on 21st Nov. Regards, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harkishan Mehta Institute of Media, Research and Analysis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujarathi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tatacliq.com, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tatacliq.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatacliq.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:22, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Tatacliq.com. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A tag has been placed on Tatacliq.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Tata CLiQ a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Tatacliq. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 10:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mananshah15. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mananshah15. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 03:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:SpacemanSpiff

I have been part of Wikipedia Moment for more than 5 years, have been learning and editing it in all honesty. Have no commercial interests involved with any organisations. Also, have been involved on and off with Offline activities within the community in Mumbai as trainer and volunteer in the past. I think your concern is misplaced. Do unblock me; Also, I will make sure to be more careful with wikipedia guidelines and rules before editing henceforth. Mananshah15 (talk) 06:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Skumarsys (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 04:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mananshah15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am using this account for 5 and a half years now; also an active user in Mumbai India and has been a part of community for some years. Also, I have taken trainings for wikipedia a multiple times. I would like to assure you that I have not created multiple accounts; Skumarsys (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) is not my account at all. Having said that, I will make sure to be more careful with wikipedia guidelines and rules before editing henceforth. Apologies.

Accept reason:

Based on agreement (or grudging agreement) by User:Vanjagenije and User:SpacemanSpiff below, I'm unblocking this account, subject to an indefinite topic ban on businesses and business people. See WP:Topic ban for details on how this works. Basically, it means you cannot create or add content to articles about businesses or business people, nor add content about specific businesses or business people to other pages. There are exceptions for removing vandalism or violations of WP:BLP. Please ask for clarification if needed; this is not a good time to kind of test the boundaries of what it means with a borderline edit. Fair enough? Also, apologies for the delay in replying, and thanks to SpacemanSpiff for pinging me and reminding me about this. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's a significant amount of behavioral overlap in topics and the advertorial nature of your editing. Even on the off chance that you aren't related to the huge group, your advertorial editing alone merits a block. —SpacemanSpiff 07:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:SpacemanSpiff,

I apologise if you would have felt that any of my edits have been advertorial, but in all honesty; I am neither related to any group nor have honestly wanted to make any promotional edits. That was never mine aim; just that bigger organisations have easier references that could be found. Having said that, I apologise on this front and I would like to assure that I will not make any edits to any of the pages that I have earlier made; since they somewhere have overlaps with said account. And also, make sure that I would learn and be careful with editing so that I can do not violate any guidelines. Also, do let me know if there is anything else that I can do to possibly convince you that I merit an unblock. Thank you Mananshah15 (talk) 07:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• {{Checkuser needed}}: Please, compare this account to Skumarsys and their socks. Vanjagenije (talk) 07:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CU results are  Inconclusive, sorry. Yunshui ^雲_水 10:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• @Vanjagenije and SpacemanSpiff: any thoughts on this unblock request, now that a CU has replied? It's been a while since they posted, we should probably answer one way or the other. Perhaps an unblock with a topic ban on businesses or businesspeople? (note, Mananshah15, I'm not offering this to you, I'm proposing it for the admins above to consider.) Also, Mananshah15, are you still pursuing an unblock? I know it's been a while since you've had a reply, sorry about that. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Floquenbeam I am obviously seeking an unblock. I was awaiting answers from everyone involved here. I would be one happy soul if i am unblocked in all honesty. Thanks Mananshah15 (talk) 09:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Floquenbeam, while I understand that there's a technical disconnect between the accounts, I'm quite convinced there's a behavioral match. THat said, I don't have an objection to an unblock that includes a topic ban on businesses and business people. —SpacemanSpiff 06:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Floquenbeam & SpacemanSpiff for the unblock. SpacemanSpiff - can I remove the sockpuppet tag from my user page and get my profile back?

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Mananshah15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Harkisan Mehta Institute of Media, Research and Analysis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Newslinger talk 04:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mananshah15! Since you're listed as a member of WikiProject: Retailing, wanted to let you know we're currently discussing importance assessment criteria for the project on the talk page. Thanks! Tfkalk (talk) 23:47, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mananshah15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Harkisan Mehta Institute of Media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My Name is Ashvin Borad Live Sura ,Work in Mumbai Film Industry .

Your meeting discuss for wikipedia in bombay such a photograph i saw me your team can add me .?

ashvinborad156@gmail.com Ashvin29 (talk) 08:58, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]