User talk:Majun e Baqi

Please check the article, I have tried to solve the neutrality issues. Mahusha (talk) 08:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on respective pageMajun e Baqi (talk) 09:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is this Wikipedia guild of copy editors.... Mahusha (talk) 11:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Requests Majun e Baqi (talk) 11:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mahusha: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Requests here you can ask experienced editor for copy editing, usually editors use this option before promotion either to featured article or good article, thanksMajun e Baqi (talk) 11:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Majun e Baqi

Thank you for creating Khwaja Hasan Sani Nizami.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

North8000, thanks lots of loveMajun e Baqi (talk) 06:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I hope you are well. I see you have moved Budget Cuts to draftspace, but I wanted to clarify. This article was brought up at AfD shortly before the draftification, where lots of sources were present. Moving the article to draftspace isn't really suitable, as it feels that it's an attempt to circumvent the AfD which was withdrawn/keep. I've retained the article back into mainspace and added the sources, but thought I'd let you know what went on with the article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Vilenski, I am fine, sorry for haste I was moving the undersourced article to the draft space and mistakenly moved it into draft space. the article was undersourced when I moved it to draft space . Hurrily not seeing the Afd notice. Lots of loveMajun e Baqi (talk) 10:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Vilenski, Having no intention to skip deletion process. Majun e Baqi (talk) 10:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not an issue. I thought I'd let you know. Draftification is a good measure, but sometimes a quick WP:BEFORE search is all that's needed to fix the article and keep it live. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Vilenski, Thanks for your trustMajun e Baqi (talk) 11:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have been putting citations marked "siasat.com" into articles.

These are actually to a proper newspaper called The Siasat Daily (see [https://www.siasat.com/editorial-standards/ the paper's website), it is a good source. When you cite it, you need to help the reader to understand that it is a good source. Please could you amend your citations to that site, in the following ways:

• Please change {{cite web | to either {{cite | or {{cite news |.
• Please change website=siasat.com to work=[[The Siasat Daily]]
• Please put the dates in normal format: e.g 4 September 2019.
• If the article being cite has a "by line", you need to add the name of the author to the citation. For example, if the by line says "BY MOHAMMED HUSSAIN", then you need to add |first1=Mohammed |last1=Hussain. It there are several authors, you should list them all.

If you do this, it will improve the article, and give the reader a greater feeling of confidence that what he/she is reading is true.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If there is something you do not understand, ask.

Wikipedia is collaborative. Sometimes it may seem adversarial, when people ask you for proof - but the challenge is to improve the article where that is possible.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toddy1, I have tried to establish its notability a bit, kindly have a look If you can improve more, lots of loveMajun e Baqi (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GeneralNotability: It is not a good idea to block anybody, just having the same area of interest, it is the mental harassment for someone, Kindly unblockMajun e Baqi (talk) 19:18, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Majun e Baqi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It is quite strange for someone to blocked as a sockpuppet of someone, It is clearly harassing a good faith editor, if someone is sharing an interest in a same topic it does not mean that they are the same person or sockpuppet of someone, quite strange , kindly unblock me please Majun e Baqi (talk) 19:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. You have to address the evidence against you. Yamla (talk) 19:39, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Majun e Baqi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yamla,

evidence intrest in South Asia and Sufism I think Sufism is a vast topic of intrest and South Asian topics are also not very narrow so many can be intrested in the said topic

evidence spacing error which is not my habbit, can be committed by anyone in haste or hurry so not an issue

evidence I have set rating from top to low for the so called 'pet articles' so not only a high on rater.

evidence seeking help of experienced editor is a basic manner one can learn after joining wikipedia, so I think these are enough to Justify this unjust and unkind decision of blocking, lots of love

evidence quite funny concerning about mobile editing, It is quite easy for someone to use a mobile while editing and mobile can be used by thousands of editors on wikipidea, think that the advance mobile editor is not something which is invented by the the so called sick masterMajun e Baqi (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:12, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Barkeep49: kindly help me in this regard, thanksMajun e Baqi (talk) 21:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jpgordon, you are lying here, If you do not want to unblock, kindly do not lie here , although I have the multiple accounts which have been confirmed but I have not use , rather I have created this after retiring of Anonymous roleMajun e Baqi (talk) 22:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Majun e Baqi, sorry this is not my area of expertise so I am not the right person to consider your unblock request. I will give you one piece of advice: accusing an administrator of lying will make other administrators less likely to consider what you write. Barkeep49 (talk) 22:51, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Majun e Baqi, the question is not whether you have used multiple accounts - there is checkuser confirmation that you had no fewer than four accounts. "Anonymous role" wasn't retired (as you claim), it was blocked (which means that this account should be blocked regardless since it is evading a block). The only question is whether you are the same person as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Khadim_ahlesunnah_waljamaah. To be frank, it doesn't matter too much whether you're the same person or not, but for bookkeeping purposes I think you are. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the email that you sent on Friday 17 July 2020 at 23:15, whose text was as follows:

I understood the game you had played with me,

Which was unexpected from a nice editor like you, If you were having any problems with me so why should you not directly contact with me??? Instead of playing this game to block me, I think I was fine with you and working nicely with you, it is really disgusting, May Almighty see you for this bad work of yours

Actually, once I realised that you were Khadim, it was much easier to work with you. My impression is that Khadim is a nice likeable person,[1] who has yet to learn that he/she would be better off keeping to the rules. As far as I can tell, Khadim is committed to improving Wikipedia. So all those good thoughts carried over to you.

You react to things in more-or-less the same way as Khadim. This gives you away when you edit in the same topic area as Khadim. Please stop sock-puppetry, take a six-month break, and then apply for the standard offer using your original account.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:33, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Majun e Baqi,

Thank you for creating Khwaja Hasan Sani Nizami.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Date of Birth and Death not added.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Obaid Raza}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Obaid Raza (talk) 16:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Majun e Baqi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mysticism in Shia Islam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Majun e Baqi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nabi Musa Festival".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

non notable student organized event

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bangla Olympiad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bangla Olympiad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 04:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Majun e Baqi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 04:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Majun e Baqi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bangla Olympiad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Majun e Baqi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bangla Olympiad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Majun e Baqi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gyarvee Sharif, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Majun e Baqi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gyarvee Sharif".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]