User talk:M.K/Archive4

There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 17:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vilniaus diena.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't. //Halibutt 10:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The 25 DYK Medal
		Congratulations! Here's a medal for you in appreciation of your hardwork in creating, expanding and nominating 25+ articles for DYK. Your nearly halfway to 50 already, M.K! ... I understand there are a few notable subjects about Lithuania that still need an article! (Despite your wide ranging coverage of castles, people, birds, fortresses and conferences!) Keep up the good work -- Victuallers (talk) 09:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know that one other DYK contributor was so keen to get a medal that he stubbed his toe?

:) Thanks! M.K. (talk) 11:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Laimingų naujųjų metų! Novickas (talk) 14:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a proposed move of Scottish kings at Talk:Kenneth I of Scotland that I thought I'd bring to your attention. I think you have had things to say on this subject in the past. Probably won't be successful, but that's wiki for you. Best regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MK, I'd like to start working on this, a few questions. 1) The first sentence is a combination of several elements - pronunciation, dates, alternate names - and this combination is not directly addressed in the WP manual of style page. So we need to find an acceptable example somewhere. 2) Somewhere out on WP is a map showing areas ruled by Mindaugas and areas under his influence, but I can't find it just now. Could it have been made by Knutson? Anyway, this would be a good addition if we could find it. 3) Organization - maybe origins first? We could put the LT background information here that was requested by the reviewer. Then there is good bit about family in House of Mindaugas that could be incorporated, but where will take some thought. 4) The bribe of Andrius Štirlandas - it would be good to state what that involved, but it will take me a good while to go thru the LT reference. Later, Novickas (talk) 14:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about your scanner...at least it wasn't the furnace that decided to take a vacation...Novickas (talk) 16:45, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction on the SSRs, last second edit change which I seriously blew! Hope the section reads better than before. —PētersV (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Battle of Orsha (1514-09-08).jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Battle of Orsha (1514-09-08).jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Battle of Orsha (1514-09-08).jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Adamkus decorates Yushchenko with Order of Vytautas the Great.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alex Spade (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Adamkus and Yushchenko.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alex Spade (talk) 16:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M.K.. Hope all is well. Per chance, if you can, what Lithuanian names would be Russianized as Гердень and Эрдивид? All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 17:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Neither is this guy then? Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 21:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I encountered them when I was transliterating names for the Prince of Polotsk article. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 14:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Act of the Re-Establishment of the State of Lithuania, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 15:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lithuanian Electricity Organization, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 12:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:David,larry.JPG		My RFA
		Thank you muchly for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth! Kidding btw. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Armia Krajowa killings 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think tables should be sortable... So I suggest using some simple table with lots of columns. Renata (talk) 19:25, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, do you know anything about interwar coins? Renata (talk) 15:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pics & any other info (when, what kind, etc). I was trying to look for it, but I could not find a solid source. Renata (talk) 17:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What does "purely" Polish mean ? Also who did you mean by "Jew killer"  ?--Molobo (talk) 10:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, blocked, keep me posted :) Renata (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dubingiai massacre, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 13:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Armia Krajowa killings.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I would like to know what you think about this map. Thanks, Renata (talk) 05:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I am totally horrible when it comes to choosing colors... I can easily spend two hours fiddling with them and the result will be similarly pathetic. Can you help me here? You can edit svg with Inkscape. Renata (talk) 08:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any better? Renata (talk) 16:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note, I'll take another pass through the article later in the week, this past weekend was very busy and only left enough energy for some minor edits here and there. Baltic history, in any aspects, requires much more than Internet searches... But you knew that! —PētersV (talk) 13:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No intent on my part to move anything over until the entire sandbox is agreed to, yourself and Piotrus being two of the prime editors involved. —PētersV (talk) 12:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I see a new "face" I usually have a look a their user page, and I noticed a new userbox on yours that says "This user believes sarcasm is the highest form of wit."

I need to tell you that I have ceased exercising my mine since I discovered that my wit is not easily translatable into other people's whim (a sudden idea) ;O)--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 10:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep removing the Polish name of the cemetery? The Antokol and Rossa Cemetery entries have the Polish name, why not this one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.113.128 (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{Refimprove}} is for the entire article {{Refimprovesect}} is for a section.--Dr who1975 (talk) 17:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this one is should go into article. Thanks for correcting, M.K. (talk) 08:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a scholarly index of historical names that might be useful: [1]. Note its international editorial board and the careful distinctions made: the preferred name goes first, followed by alternate name(s) in parentheses; some versions of names are simply redirected. The introduction is a bit too advanced for my LT skills, but it seems to explain the naming protocols. Novickas (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will look around, M.K. (talk) 07:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for clarification, but still i`m not that experienced user to see the difference between opened and closed poll. I`v got one more question: if majority voted for move, why there`s still old name? At now i`m more interested in Union of Horodlo and not in moveing, voteing etc. but in expandeing it, soon i`ll try to expand other unions stubs. I just don`t get why people write huge explanations why to move or why not to, instead of writeing some better articles. Thanks for link, i`v added my vote, but still i think that official name should be considered in the first place, Commonwealth, but not the Polish-Lithuanian, rather of Both Nations (only Latin name can be translated like that). Greets Mikołajski (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Am working on a version in User:Novickas/sandbox2. Please check it over as I go along - when done, we can copy it in a section at a time, so that it's not too much of a shock to the reviewers, altho there won't be major changes. Best, Novickas (talk) 13:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pls feel free to edit it at any point. The layout I messed up there and will fix (if the fortress spanned rivers, one can presume bridges, would be good to clarify that). But the number of Holocaust victims - the numbers from the US museum [2] don't agree with this ref [3] - to my eyes. What to do, don't know at this point. RL will occupy some time here. Best, Novickas (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Declaring done for now. Tried to address the numbers issue by listing various sources. Maybe you could contact the reviewer? Later, Novickas (talk) 14:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I only need a good drink. LOL, M.K. (talk) 17:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some pienuko (milk) with the cookie? :) The architects' statements need some polishing - will call my sister. CE otherwise done. Both articles - nice work and useful. Novickas (talk) 11:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kaunas University Hospital, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vilnius Guggenheim Hermitage Museum, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 00:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats!! Alternatively, ho-hum, another one. Novickas (talk) 00:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Viktorija Čmilytė, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 07:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Juozas Urbšys, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Veldamas, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 07:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sapieha beaker, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 02:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Japan-Thailand relations, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 16:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tornadoes in the United States, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Jamie^☆S93 14:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've reviewed your DYK submission for the article Jurgis Bielinis, and made a comment on it at the submissions page. Please feel free to reply or comment there. Cheers, Olaf Davis | Talk 09:07, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jurgis Bielinis, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 14:00, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Martynas Jankus, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Thanks for nominating, PeterSymonds (talk) 13:22, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vytautas Kazimieras Jonynas, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Thanks for nominating, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ictineo II, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 07:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He knows he will be blocked again if he continues this sterile edit warring. He has yet to make a single comment on the talk page and this type of behavior is obviously not tolerated. Regardless of whether he breaks 3RR, he can still be blocked for 3RR gaming as well (which he was trying to do the first time). So far he is only made two reverts since his unblock, but please notify me if things get out-of-hand. Khoikhoi 02:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Avro 533 Manchester, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai (talk) 06:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Easiest way to get a copy-edit is to leave a message on a potential copy-editor's talk page. Have you considered requesting a copy-edit from some of the many capable copy-editors listed at WP:MHL#COPYEDIT? For instance, AnnaFrance is very good as is Blnguyen. Otherwise, you could try EyeSerene: he does a lot of good Milhist work. Other good copy-editors you could contact include: Regents Park, VolatileChemical, Gosgood, Jamie, RC-0722 and Vishnava. I do hope you manage to get something sorted: the article really deserves A-Class. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 17:37, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted. Well done, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 10:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Novickas (talk) 13:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats x2! :) Renata (talk) 09:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks! I need to revived my other staled projects :) M.K. (talk) 12:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus 2/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Coren ^(talk) 22:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Annals of Quedlinburg, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 09:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Seimas of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 09:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on improving Lithuanians in Chicago! Looks much nicer!

		The Minor Barnstar
		message Orestek (talk) 04:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Neo-Byzantine architecture in the Russian Empire, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article St. Michael the Archangel Church, Kaunas, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi M - I agree with the opposer that it's not the best prose. Don't know with certainty that I'll have the time to work on it in the next week or two, either. So withdrawal and re-nom within a month or so is OK with me. I'm not discouraged about it, just a delay. Novickas (talk) 16:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding. I hope someone else will step in to help, because it's clearly the most thorough treatment to be found anywhere in English at this point. Novickas (talk) 15:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you please copy edit Kaunas Fortress article and improve style of it as asked per this FAC. I would be very grateful, M.K. (talk) 11:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love too but will probably not be able to start until mid-December. If this is too long for you to wait, I can suggest names of copy-editors who may be able to start earlier. Thanks for thinking for me, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The remedies that have been adopted are as follows;

• Should Alden Jones (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) resume editing Wikipedia, he shall be assigned a volunteer mentor, who will be asked to assist him in understanding and following policy and community practice to a sufficient level that additional sanctions will not be necessary.
• Alden Jones (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is limited to one revert per page per week, with the exception of simple vandalism; and is required to discuss all content reverts on the relevant talk page. Should he violate this restriction, he may be blocked by any administrator as provided in the enforcement ruling below.
• Boodlesthecat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned from Wikipedia for a period of one year.
• Deacon of Pndapetzim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is admonished to avoid edit-warring.
• Greg park avenue (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned from Wikipedia for a period of one year.
• Irpen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is urged to avoid interacting directly with or commenting about Piotrus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) under any circumstances, except for any necessary commentary in the course of bona fide dispute resolution.
• Irpen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is limited to one revert per page per week, with the exception of simple vandalism; and is required to discuss all content reverts on the relevant talk page. Should he violate this restriction, he may be blocked by any administrator as provided in the enforcement ruling below.
• Lokyz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is admonished to avoid edit-warring.
• Should Lokyz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) make any comment deemed by an administrator to have been incivil, a personal attack, or an assumption of bad faith, he may be blocked by any administrator as provided in the enforcement ruling below.
• Piotrus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is urged to avoid interacting directly with or commenting about Irpen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) under any circumstances, except for any necessary commentary in the course of bona fide dispute resolution.
• Piotrus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is cautioned to avoid using his administrator powers or status in situations in which his involvement in an editing dispute is apparent.
• Piotrus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is admonished to avoid edit-warring.
• Poeticbent (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) shall be assigned one or more volunteer mentors, who will be asked to assist him in understanding and following policy and community practice to a sufficient level that additional sanctions will not be necessary.
• Relata_refero (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is admonished to avoid edit-warring.
• Editors are reminded that when editing in subject areas of bitter and long-standing real-world conflict, it is all the more important to comply with Wikipedia policies such as assuming good faith of all editors including those on the other side of the real-world disputes, writing with a neutral point of view, remaining civil and avoiding personal attacks, utilizing reliable sources for contentious or disputed assertions, and resorting to dispute resolution where necessary. Wikipedia cannot solve any of the national, ethnic, historical, or cultural disputes that exists among the nations and peoples of Eastern Europe or any other real-world conflict. What Wikipedia can do is aspire to provide neutral, encyclopedic coverage about the areas of dispute and the peoples involved in it, which may lead to a broader understanding of the issues and the positions of all parties to the conflict. The contributions of all good-faith editors on these articles who contribute with this goal in mind are appreciated.
• Editors who find it difficult to edit a particular article or topic from a neutral point of view and adhere to other Wikipedia policies are counseled that they may sometimes need or wish to step away temporarily from that article or subject area. Sometimes, editors in this position may best devote some of their knowledge, interest, and effort to creating or editing other articles that may relate to the same broad subject-matter as the dispute, but are less immediately contentious. For example, an editor whose ethnicity, cultural heritage, or personal interests relate to Group X and who finds himself or herself caught up in edit-warring on an article about a recent war between Group X and Group Y, may wish to disengage from that article for a time and instead focus on a different aspect of the history, civilization, and cultural heritage of Group X.
• Administrators who utilize the #wikipedia-en-admins IRC channel (or other IRC channels in which Wikipedia-related matters are discussed) are reminded that while the #admins channel has legitimate purposes, they should bear in mind whenever using it:

(A) That discussing an issue on IRC necessarily excludes those editors who do not use IRC from the discussion (and excludes almost all non-administrators from the discussion if it takes place in #wikipedia-en-admins), and therefore, such IRC discussion is never the equivalent of on-wiki discussion or dispute resolution;

(B) That the practice of off-wiki "block-shopping" is strongly deprecated, and that except where there is an urgent situation and no reasonable administrator could disagree with an immediate block (e.g., ongoing blatant or pagemove vandalism or ongoing serious BLP violations), the appropriate response for an administrator asked on IRC to block an editor is to refer the requester to the appropriate on-wiki noticeboard; and

(C) That even though the relationship between the "wikipedia" IRC channels and Wikipedia remains ambiguous, any incidents of personal attacks or crass behavior in #wikipedia-en-admins are unwelcome and reflect adversely on all users of the channel.

• Following the conclusion of this case, the Committee will open a general request for comments regarding the arbitration enforcement process, particularly where general sanctions are concerned. Having received such comments, the Committee will consider instituting suitable reforms to the enforcement process.
• Following the conclusion of this case, the Committee will convene a community discussion for the purpose of developing proposed reforms to the content dispute resolution process.
• Following the conclusion of this case, the Committee will publish guides to presenting evidence and using the workshop page.

Please see the above link to read the full case.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 10:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Piotrus_2 is renamed Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern European disputes by motion.

For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | ^{Blast him / Follow his steps} 10:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been having problems in the past few days of people just copying and pasting whole scale text into the article. I am thinking about protecting it again if it doesn't stop. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 22:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vladas Jurgutis, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 15:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vainly threaten me with 3RR rule. As you well know the undos in question are only undos of undos of my edits. Undos done without any discussion and without any factual basis. My edits are based on established facts. Need references? Your undos seem to be based on not liking facts. That is fine but do not force others to be likewise. 85.5.94.26 (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do YOU consider something I added to be false? If so what specifically? I attract your attention to the fact that the corrected subjects not only had no references neither but also constituted historical revisionism. Eg groups of Lithuanian men - in reality dozens of thousands of Lithuanian nazi collaborators and criminals. Now I inserted references but this does not prevent people form undoing my work as if they thought that they can erase history as easily as well... --85.5.94.26 (talk) 19:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi just to let you know there are some new stubs on painters that need translation from Lithuanian. Your help is needed! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Isabella Grinevskaya, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 18:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 April, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Supreme Committee for the Liberation of Lithuania, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 08:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do we know whether or not Vilnius was predominantly Polish speaking in 1655? This era is not really my area, but it'd be interesting to know what the evidence is for this period. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 16:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well according to 19th century statistics Vilnius department was predominantly Lithuanian. M.K. (talk) 17:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Polish became the main language of social life and contacts in Vilnius during the 18th century, while the rural population around the town continued to speak the local Lithuanian vernaculars." [4] Novickas (talk) 17:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Novickas, I also presented statistics regarding Vilnius department in 19th century. For those are clear that majority of people there Lithuanians. M.K. (talk) 18:22, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Vitebsk Voivodeship#Map. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:28, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Lithuanian Special Operations Force at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 06:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]