User talk:Lydiafox19

What is "Secretoxy" anyway? The article which you have created doesn't say, and Google search returns nothing relevant. I have marked the article for deletion under the criterion A1 - article lacking sufficient context to identify its subject. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:35, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Secretoxy, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Talk:Secretoxy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.  —SMALLJIM  15:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Laurity, Lydiafox19!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please complete the article.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 08:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your sandbox is here: User:Lydiafox19/sandbox. Please use it.

I have nominated Laurity and Talk:Secretoxy for speedy deletion, if you create other such pages then they'll be deleted too, because you've already been warned about it but you don't seem to listen. "Laurity" is not a valid topic because it doesn't mean anything. If you want to work on some information tables then please do that in your sandbox. Talk:Secretoxy is a talk page of a deleted article, you're not supposed to use those for testing either. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 08:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you re-created Talk:Secretoxy after it was deleted and you're still not reacting to messages. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 13:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. Some of your editing has been blatant vandalism or nonsense, and the rest has been dubious editing, unsupported by any sources, and very likely vandalism. You have never made any attempt to respond to messages, or to explain what you are doing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:58, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Lydiafox19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #16209 was submitted on Jul 23, 2016 17:43:17. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]