User talk:Luokehao

Welcome!

Hello, Luokehao, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links to help you get started:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Benon 09:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

– Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing this article. It's excellent. —Pengo 10:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm currently working on repairing links to disambiguation pages. In the Carlos María Cardinal de la Torre article that you are the main contributor to, it was unclear to me whether the word "evangelical" should link to evangelism or evangelicalism. Can you suggest which would be more appropriate?

Also, there is currently a suggestion that the page should be merged with Carlos Maria Cardinal de la Torre, which appears to be a more recent article about the same person. You may want to comment, and/or be bold and merge the two?

Thanks. Paddles ^T_C 08:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The unforgiveable thing about your creating Tyldesley, Greater Manchester was the fact that you did it using a copy&paste instead of a move command. I have now reverted the move and merged the edit histories. Given that the vast majority of links to Tyldesley refer to the place, I feel that the town article should be on the main title and the people should be banished to a dab page. I suggest you discuss on a talk page before attempting another move.

As a general point, please start to provide edit summaries. -- RHaworth 19:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:North China craton. `'Míkka 03:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for adding the references :-) --Matilda ^talk 00:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1950 Australian rainfall records, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Daniel (talk) 06:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. xenocidic (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, this is in regards to the POV-pushing redirects I had to delete today. xenocidic (talk) 14:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently added information about Mazahua phonology to the article about the Mazahua language. I would like to know where you have your information from. I ask because it is in contradiction to other published material - such as the articles by Hazel Spotts and Doris Bartholomew. PArticularly they agree with the number of phonemes - since they count h and ʔ as separate phonemes and the phonemes that you describe as glottalized and aspirated as consonant clusters. However I know that a few weeks ago a new Authoritative book about Mazahua phonology by Michael Herbert Knapp Ring was published and I wonder if your information comes from that book which I haven't had a chance to see my self? Otherwise I think it would be in order to present Mazahua phonology in a more balanced manner taking into account the different interpretations.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 20:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• The list of phonemes comes from Ian Maddieson's book Patterns of Sounds. It is footnoted in the text but when I was writing I was never sure where to put the footnote. luokehao

Since Maddieson has not himself done any work on Mazahua I would be interested in knowing which source he uses for his Mazahua data. could you put a reference to his references here at the talk page, just for my curiosity? ·Maunus· ·ƛ· 15:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At Talk:De facto, I have queried your close of the merger proposal. You merged the articles although most of the editors responding opposed the proposed merger. I believe that De jure should be restored as a separate article. JamesMLane t c 15:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for adding some interesting information to Martin's article. However, we're going to need some references, as there are several things you added which would be considered original research without those. Here's one example:

It has to be said that Martin was the fastest bowler playing county cricket at the time

Without a specific citation, that simply looks like your own opinion, which of course would not be acceptable for Wikipedia. If you can find a good quote from a reliable source saying that he was the fastest, then of course that's fine. But we really do need the sources. Thanks. Loganberry (Talk) 12:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

==AfD nomination of Little Star (Madonna song)==

An article that you have been involved in editing, Little Star (Madonna song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Star (Madonna song). Thank you. Paul75 (talk) 01:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Lost Ninja, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No evidence suggesting that this book has any notability of any kind

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Accounting4Taste:talk 02:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you 'please' provide references in regards to your information stating that destructive decomposition of aluminum phosphate yields phosphorus pentoxide and aluminum oxide? I can't find a reference for this information and if it has one then it is useful...however otherwise I can't prove it and all information on wiki articles 'need' references so it will end up getting erased.

Thank you, Qbmaster (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:39, 18 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Hello Luokehao! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Phillip Longman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:35, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Third Planet from Altair, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Third Planet from Altair. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Inside UFO 54-40, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside UFO 54-40. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:06, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Survival at Sea, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survival at Sea. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Underground Kingdom, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underground Kingdom. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Secret of the Pyramids, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret of the Pyramids. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:12, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Hyperspace (gamebook), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperspace (gamebook). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:13, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Space Patrol (gamebook), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Patrol (gamebook). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Lost Tribe (gamebook), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lost Tribe (gamebook). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Phantom Submarine, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phantom Submarine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:17, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Horror of High Ridge, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Horror of High Ridge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:18, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Mountain Survival, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Survival. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Curse of Batterslea Hall, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Curse of Batterslea Hall. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Dragons' Den, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dragons' Den. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Mystery of the Highland Crest, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mystery of the Highland Crest. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Secret Treasure of Tibet, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Secret Treasure of Tibet. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated War with the Evil Power Master, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War with the Evil Power Master. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Sabotage (gamebook), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabotage (gamebook). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Grand Canyon Odyssey, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Canyon Odyssey. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Deadly Shadow, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Deadly Shadow. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Danger at Anchor Mine, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danger at Anchor Mine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Forest of Fear, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forest of Fear. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Statue of Liberty Adventure, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Liberty Adventure. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:28, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Mystery of the Secret Room, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystery of the Secret Room. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Volcano! (gamebook), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volcano! (gamebook). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Mardi Gras Mystery (gamebook), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mardi Gras Mystery (gamebook). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Seaside Mystery, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seaside Mystery. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:32, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Terrorist Trap, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Terrorist Trap. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Silver Wings (gamebook), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver Wings (gamebook). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:38, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to the Bristol_405 article that you initiated in 2006, the Bristol Owners Club Forum has begun a debate as to whether the 405 early models did or did not come with overdrive. The only reference in support of early 405's coming without OD is the Wikipedia article, and it appears the "fact" was written by you in the original posting. It may be that 405's were shipped to Australia by the factory without OD, in which case your fact would be correct, or it may be that 405's now lacking ODs had them stripped by subsequent owners to provide parts for more fashionable Bristol powered cars like the Arnolt Bristol or the 404.

May I ask where you collected the information so we can get the record set straight?

PS: Your documentation is greatly appreciated. Keep up the hard work!

BristolRegistrar (talk) 21:10, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Sixties is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Sixties until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 15:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful with edits such as this. Manual °F conversions are inserted for a reason—EN dashes need to be properly displayed for subzero values.  The Tartanator  07:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC) I haven’t had any problems with these edits - I check them thoroughly. Thanks for notifying me, though, and I will try to be more careful in the future. luokehao 09:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I've felt it necessary to revert you again at Homer, Alaska. The table is breaking the format still, pushing all content down beneath all the other images, resulting in a huge mass of white space in the middle of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Luokehao! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Hi Luokehao; I reverted part of your changes, (just the addition, not your deletion) of information here.  Your deletion is of unsourced material so I fully agree.  Unfortunately, the information added is equally unsourced.  What I reverted to is also unsourced but seems short & general enough to qualify as common knowledge.
Additionally, I think it was a little too detailed for the lede section, but (if WP:V) would be a good addition to the article.  If you've got any WP:RS reference available (I find the Citation generator to be helpful), it might make sense to add it as a new "=== Climate ===" subsection under the "== Geography and ecology ==" section (IMO).  Just wanted to explain why.  Cheers & have fun! — Who R you? Talk 21:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Chronic inflation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli sheqel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Luokehao, I think you should reformulate your weatherboxes. By including the Reflist citation, you have forced the citations to completely appear underneath your weatherbox, rather then at the end along with all other references and citations. Consequently, I am reverting the Funchal and Madeira edits you made, until they have been resolved. Sorry. Ruben JC (Zeorymer) (talk) 01:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Zard-Kuh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Precipitation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Southern Scrub-robin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mallee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I appreciate your contributions on Iranian related articles such as Zard-Kuh. However, about this edit, I read the reference mentioned by you and didn't find any sentence supporting the claim that the glaciers of Zard-Kuh are the only glaciers in the subtropics outside the Himalayas and Andes. Please explain the matter. Regards.--M samadi (talk) 10:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Luokehao: I just wanted to let you know that I've reverted your edit to bird nest, because the reference you provided says that gull and tern chicks do leave their scrape nests! They do stay close however, so perhaps we can figure out some way to say they leave the nest but don't go far. Most raptors don't build a scrape nest, but those that do definitely do stay in the nest for a while, so you could change it from "most" to "all but scrape-nesting raptors" or something like that. Please feel free to make those changes!  :) MeegsC | Talk 03:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on - can we discuss this somewhere first? I actually quite like the principle of your idea but it's going to need a bit of organisation, especially since we want to keep it consistent and I'm not sure where we can find the exact dates for earlier elections. Frickeg (talk) 02:42, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Caprimulgiformes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lifespan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably aware that there generally are two methods to calculate the 24-hour average temperature: 1) Taking the arithmetic mean of the max and min (as done in the US and Canada). 2) Calculating an "integrated" sum, i.e. the average of each hourly temperature (as in East Asia). Even under the second method, Hailar, Inner Mongolia still falls under Dwb. That it was temporarily at subarctic is the doing of an IP that even claimed Harbin, which averages 23.0 °C in July, is subarctic! GotR ^Talk 08:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mervyn Keane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kevin Bartlett and Kevin Sheedy

1995 Sturt Football Club season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Advertiser

June 1947 Tasmanian floods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lake St. Clair

List of VFL/AFL records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Princes Park

Sturt Football Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Advertiser

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Acanthizidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incubation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi !! I saw that you changed the weather chart on Ferndale, California. The new chart you added was indeed much prettier with lovely pastel colors, however all the data was wrong, so I have reverted the page to what it was previously because the accuracy of the weather data is more important than the colors of the chart! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your useful addition to Goldcrest. Since this is a featured article, I've edited the reference to conform with the style of the others in the article, and with the Manual of Style (year, publisher. However, I don't know the page number(s), so could you please add? The format is p. for a single page, pp. for multiple, with the range separate by –, which displays as an endash –

thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dawei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chocó (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew (surname), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Christopher Andrew, Robert Andrew and William Andrew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Racing helmet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ventilation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1875 English cricket season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Shooter and William Clarke

Roller (agricultural tool) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shooter

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1961 in sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1931 in sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Melbourne Football Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chile Chico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Zona Central

La Serena, Chile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Zona Central

Monte Desert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to La Rioja Province

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:23, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Adelaide Football Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Cahill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inner Mongolia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ash and Hailar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1980 New Orleans Saints season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dick Nolan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Evening News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry Jupp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mount Wilson (Colorado), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sierra Nevada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I see from your user page that you're from Melbourne! A lovely place but far too far away from Northwestern California to understand the 1,000 microclimates of the area. While a page such as Humboldt County, California might benefit from sweeping generalizations about climate, each individual town in the region has particular climate features which are wiped out by the addition of climatology language which may be 100% textbook correct on a macroscale, but not correct on the microscale. As many regional editors have contributed to the local pages over the years, a good description of the regional microclimates have found their way into the project. I reverted your edits because - for one example - Ukiah cannot be compared to Eureka for weather. The two towns are 2 hours and 44 minutes away from each other by car at about 50 mph - about the same time to drive from Canberra to Sydney which of course are incomparable, too. Eureka and Ukiah are separated by several mountain ranges (which are about 80% as tall as Mount Kosciuszko) and their climate is in no way similar or comparable due not only to the great distance between them, but the variability of climate on the different sides of the mountains. Likewise other edits you made to towns in the region I reverted. I was unable to verify all the temperature information that you changed. Precipitation and snowfall information was in some towns completely wiped out or the values changed to the point where they just didn't contain the sense that they had contained before. I agree that some of your tables were prettier, but with the wrong temperatures, snowfall or precipitation, they had to go. Changing half of the converts from cm to mm also left some parts of the pages with half centimeters and half millimeters - both in the climate section! With so much confusion and so many data points massively changed the only safe course was to revert. Please take some time to be sure temperature, precipitation and snowfall data is correct before changing more pages up here. And please don't make sweeping generalizations about local microclimates based on some textbook definition from thousands of miles away. If you need help understanding the area before making more changes, please don't hesitate to ask. I'd be delighted to have "better" climate information for the towns, but it really has to be accurate. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:43, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

22 April 2013, 11:03 am

Thanks for your work on expanding the history section. JH (talk page) 09:25, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Buchanan (cricketer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you are working hard with editing and fixing the climate data in many articles and I want to thank you for doing this. The climate section is one of the most under edited parts. However, there is a discussion going on about the colours used for the weatherboxes because a consensus is needed in order to determine which colours should be used in the weatherboxes. This is considering the fact that a large number of weatherboxes have non-standard colours (eg. green or pastel) and more outside opinion is required to reach a consensus and that some of these edits may be controverisal to other editors. Any comments would be welcome.

Template talk:Weather box#RfC - Colours to be used in the weather box. Ssbbplayer (talk) 20:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a vote currently happening at the discussion on colours used in the weatherbox. More votes is required to reach a consensus. Ssbbplayer (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	You did an amazing job on the List of Los Angeles Dodgers seasons. It is greatly appreciated. SportsMaster (talk) 16:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Ages back, you contributed some quite substantial expansions to articles on Lancashire cricketers such as Harry Dean and Willis Cuttell. Your excellent words have pretty much stood the test of time in these articles... but they rather lack citations. You obviously had some very good sources when you did the work, and I wondered if you still had access to those sources, and if you might care to return and bring them up to scratch. I might be able to dig around and find some of them from somewhere, but I thought I'd ask first. Thanks. Johnlp (talk) 23:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1956 in sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stuart Spencer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1979 WANFL season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kevin Taylor and Phil Kelly

1981 WAFL season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to West Australian

1998 Westar Rules season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jubilee Park

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jason Heatley may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |Diamond Valley]] Football League in Victoria with 118 goals for North Heidelberg and [[zoning (Australian rules football|was zoned to]] [[Fitzroy Football Club|Fitzroy]] who rejected him as too

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. First of all, thank you very much for doing the hard yards in creating the season articles, I can see how much work you've put in there. However, the repeated linking of weather and scoring is synthesis or original research. The increase in the mid 70s may be due to training methods, the centre square or just a change in coaching tactics. To link it to climate change is tenuous. If you can find a reliable reference that makes that link (not just two separate refs that refer to dry years and another that mentions high scoring), we can't include it. Thanks again for all your contributions. Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 13:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 100 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:23, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You added this phrase to this article : " though W.G. Grace with his medical experience later wondered why many more players were not killed outright.[3]" referring WG Grace's memorial biography.

The actual extract is : "(George) Freeman thus spoke of it to me in 1894: 'Tom Emmett and I have often said it was a marvel the doctor was not either maimed or unnerved for the rest of his days or killed outright. "

It was spoken by Freeman about a Grace innings, not by Grace himself. Tintin 13:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Táibèi. Since you had some involvement with the Táibèi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 08:38, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a minor note/question: on your | recent edit to the Duluth, Minnesota page you corrected a bit about the climate (and thanks for that) but also changed the quotes around "The Air-Conditioned City" from straight to curly. The Manual of Style prefers straight quotes for a couple reasons, so if that was a manual change this is just an FYI. But if it was something automatic done by whatever browser/tool/interface you used to make that edit, I'm curious which editing program that was? I ask because it's something I've noticed before. Thanks. —Metadox (talk) 03:59, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you did a lot of the WAFL seasons and knowing how time consuming it is did you have a trick to do them faster? Thejoebloggsblog (talk) 13:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the tips and well done on your WAFL work. Thejoebloggsblog (talk) 03:53, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect American egg throwing. Since you had some involvement with the American egg throwing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tavix | Talk  01:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect American fatball. Since you had some involvement with the American fatball redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your Sturt 1995 page. Truly a magnificent season! Thejoebloggsblog (talk) 09:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating links to the specific team season articles. It makes sense in an article about a particular season like your edit to 2011–12 Los Angeles Lakers season. However, is there a particular rationale for linking the, e.g. [[2011–12 Oklahoma City Thunder season|the Oklahoma City Thunder]] It's not a common practice in NBA articles currently. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linking “the”

It is, to my mind, logical to link “the” if possible, although I know it is not normal practice. On the alternative web search applications Dictionary, words when clicked online to ordinary dictionary files, and this was my incentive for doing it originally as it could be annoying if one clicks in the wrong place. Moreover, since “the” is part of the noun phrase (“the Denver Nuggets”) it is reasonable to link it in my view, although I am well aware it is not possible to do it for ordinary linking purposes because the article has to be omitted in actual article titles.—luokehao, 00:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Consider WP:NOPIPE, which advises: "Avoid making links longer than necessary." Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 11:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read MOS:DASH, because you are confusing en dash (–) with em dash (—) in your edits. You use em dash (—) where it is not appropriate to use it. For example, in this edit, en dash (–) should be used for year ranges (1978–79) and results (4–3, 2–1, 85–80, etc.), while em dash (—) should only be used in sentences. – Sabbatino (talk) 15:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your improvements to the above. I'm sure we both agree that the 2014 NRL season article's first sentence quite rightly reads as "...was the 107th season of..." rather than as "...was the one-hundred-and-seventh season of...". And I'm sure we both agree that the 1909 NSWRFL season's first sentence should read as "...was the second season of..." rather than as "...was the 2nd season of...". But where it appears we might disagree, is the point at which we change from words to numerals. I think we should switch to numerals once it moves onto two words, i.e. from the 21st ("twenty-first") onward. Thoughts?--Gibson Flying V (talk) 11:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I generally switch to numbers only with very large, exact numbers. With two digits I feel spelling out is much more elegant and aesthetic than numbers, and even with three digits I will frequently spell out, especially if such numbers are only a minority of the relevant class (as with NRL seasons or suras of the Qur’an) or there are two or one words (e.g. “one hundredth” is clearly preferable to “100th”). luokehao 23:47, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted one of your edits where you changed straight quotes to curly quotes. The guidance is at MOS:CURLY. --David Biddulph (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I notice also that this was pointed out to you in another section #Curly quotes above. --David Biddulph (talk) 05:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diveball. Since you had some involvement with the Diveball redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 21:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't introduce curly quotes, as you have done in many places with this edit to George McGovern. These are against the MoS per MOS:CURLY and MOS:STRAIGHT. By introducing them you force other editors to either revert your entire contribution or to slog through and fix them one-by-one, neither of which is a desirable outcome. Thanks. Wasted Time R (talk) 09:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Luokehao for adding information to my election pages. I think it totally helps that you do some in depth research into some of these elections in particular 1924, 1944 and 1948. --Skim

Hello, Luokehao. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Honor culture, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

-- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 15:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does your source actually suppose that Yeats's lacking mathematical and linguistic ability were due to his tone-deafness? AFAICT the only remotely relevant negitive correlation is one between amusia and tonal language in societies (and Yeats would not have been taking Mandarin at the Godlophin school). Imuli (talk) 15:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States presidential election in Washington (state), 1976, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Margaret Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've created hundreds of presidential election pages in the past few months, and I've noticed your fantastic work on several of those articles. I was just wondering if you could show me where you get the sources for the county result tables? I was thinking if I knew where you got the information, I would be able to possibly start adding some tables myself. Again, thank you massively for your work, it really improves the page and Wikipedia in general. Thanks, PCN02WPS 03:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States presidential election in Texas, 1928, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Plains (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States presidential election in New Mexico, 1956, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page States' Rights Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States presidential election in New Mexico, 1936, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States presidential election in Montana, 1968, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States presidential election in Florida, 1892, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reconstruction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Australian Football League records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Windy Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are have been around WP longer than me and should be well aware of editting policies. I have reverted your edits to 1975–76 Buffalo Braves season. Please do not restore them until you can include WP:ICs from WP:RSs.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:05, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1983 Pittsburgh Steelers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Holt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the results on the Wikipedia pages, and they do match up with the data on Dave Leip's Election Atlas. ^[1] ElectionsGeek (talk) 09:22, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Quisqualis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Quisqualis (talk) 06:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your great edit at Owyhee County, Idaho. Are you able to source the text you added? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Season's greetings

I am looking for proactive copy edit support/input help any of the following (So far neglected but important topic) articles. If you can't spare time but if you know any good references you can note those on talk pages.

• Draft:Islamic advice literature

Your user ID was selected randomly (for sake of neutrality) from related other articles changes list related to Muslim Women

Thanks and warm regards Bookku (talk) 02:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC) Bookku (talk) 02:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for adding county result tables for so many presidential elections in Georgia. I'm sure it was a lot of work, but it is appreciated!

Hi there. You were mentioned in this edit. You may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:TylerKutschbach. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering and curious where you found county election results from 1880 to 1908 for states like North Carolina, Tennessee and Kentucky. I've been adding those results to the county results for each county and someone keeps removing them and doesn't believe that it was you who found the results. TylerKutschbach (talk)

Hello! I appreciated you updating the county tables for the results on the page for 1996 election in Iowa that I made the county table. I’m curious if you’re able to do it to the rest of those county table results like a few remaining ones for the 90s elections as well as the ones from 2000-2020. TylerKutschbach (talk) 23:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can’t you talk back? TylerKutschbach (talk) 00:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Djugashvili. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 5#Djugashvili until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked you - as far as I can tell this is a false positive. Please accept our apologies for the confusion. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Legalisation of illegal drugs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Legalisation of illegal drugs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Legalization of illegal drugs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Legalization of illegal drugs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good day! Waaaaaay back in 2017 you edited the page for Perry County, Tennessee to add some well detailed information on historical elections and its shift to the Republican Party in the early 21st century. Unfortunately, these edits were largely unsourced. I'm trying to get this article to GA standards and this stands out as the one major section of the article lacking in reliable sourcing. Would you be able to go in and provide the sources you used for the information you entered, in formatted in-line citations? Thank you! nf utvol (talk) 22:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the results on the Wikipedia page for the 1996 U.S. Presidential Election by County in Indiana. The results you listed and the results as listed by your source (Dave's Election Atlas) are at odds with one another. [1] Ndzski55 (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thing I have seen in the past several months is that you always mess up Infoboxes for Elections like Virginia for Example, you have the color for Wallace as being purple while the map shows orange, along with other changes (Like Eisenhower being an “Independent” in SC. And why do you do this? This only confuses people an why is one thing is another on the SAME PAGE. So I ask, can you just not? Qutlooker (talk) 03:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qutlook,

the reason I do this is because I want to show each individual state’s party label for each candidate, even if they were:

1. allied as an independent to a labelled party at the national level or
2. allied as one party to another at the national level

For instance, if you read America at the Polls, you will see regarding the 1952 election in South Carolina that:

“

Republican total includes 158,289 Independent and 9,793 Republican votes

”

(page 399)

Also, on Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas, Eisenhower is listed as “Independent” in Mississippi, though not South Carolina.

Re the 1968 Virginia presidential election, the colour for the American Independent Party on Wikipedia is purple, so I feel I was doing the right thing by changing the colour on the election site to the actual American Independent Party colour, not necessarily the colour used on the maps, which are more limited in their range if I am not mistaken. Luokehao (talk) 07:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, bottom line is that if you change the Color of a Party, then Change the Map too. Which aren’t limited in their range. So that it doesn’t confuse people and cause Conflicting info to spread. Qutlooker (talk) 14:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are other county results tables on some state presidential pages that still need to be updated like the ones in Connecticut, Delaware, Rhode Island and Massachusetts as well as the 1992 and 1996 pages for both West Virginia and Montana. Can you update more of those, you’ve been editing almost some of the same pages over and over again for the past few days. 174.207.38.178 (talk) 00:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 174.207.38.178,

I intend to update the presidential elections as I have done for states like Virginia, Kansas, Alabama and some others.

It is my view that any state with fifty or more counties should have its county table made collapsible as it makes it easier to read. The threshold actually could be quite a bit lower than that. The outside equals signs in the section do however need to be removed to make sure that the benefits of a collapsible table are seen equally in mobile and in desktop views — a problem I am aware of from reading in both formats on my Mac and my mobile regularly. Luokehao (talk) 12:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midheaven, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midheaven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Name A Game has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced article on an apparently now-defunct company. Searching for sources turned up nearly nothing - the best I found were mentions on message boards or Reddit posts. Without significant coverage in reliable sources, this fails the WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 06:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1991 Indianapolis Colts season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John L. Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]