User talk:Lummie

Welcome!

Hello, Lummie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

--LesleyW 07:05, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The "for some unknown reason" bit was pov. I agree that it's worth noting that there has been no announcement, and that's why I left that part in there. Elwood00 ^{T | C} 15:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought the "FSUR" bit sounded like personal exasperation, instead of a simple statement of fact that there's been no announcement. Elwood00 ^{T | C} 21:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should is all I will say. --Hamedog^Talk|@ 10:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will try and get onto it when I have some time. Thanks for the suggestion. --Lummie 03:23, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't find one source about it, how about creating about it yourself with an article, section of an article, and/or template; or asking the administration/moderation board to create about it? 69.227.173.21 09:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot, look into The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King or any other article, click the "edit the page" tab, and see it for yourself. 69.227.173.21 12:29, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They were obtained through Google news searching, thats why not all of them have been posted. Cvene64 13:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove that? It was pretty relevant. --Hamedog_Talk|^@ 11:57, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to join this WikiProject? Cheers --Gizza^{Chat ©} 12:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 16-June, you blanked Traci. Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. I agree that this is incorrect redirect, but instead of blanking, you should follow the redirect portion of the deletion procedures in cases like this. I have nominated this one for deletion. You may wish to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion#Traci .E2.86.92 Tracy Brookshaw. If you have questions, please let me know. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 13:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. -- JLaTondre 14:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have seen you doing some edits on rugby union related articles, and was wondering if you would be willing to participate in Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby union/Collaboration of the fortnight. The current article is International Rugby Board.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 14:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Underminer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Angr 20:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rulesofa.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 00:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:SarahShephard.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 21:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know the picture that is currently up is not the one I submitted so technically its not there anymore. Just a heads up. Lummie 03:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:AnthonyCooper.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Allaussietitle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Generaldposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Hank’s Cowboy Movie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Handbaghaka.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Adirregardingsteve.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:G rating (Office of Film and Literature Classification, New Zealand).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 19:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Murphy's Law (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Murphy's Law (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]