User talk:Lizzie656

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Sharon Weiss-Greenberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Lizzie656, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lizzie656,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pam Scheininger for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sarah Hofstetter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pichpich (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bat Sheva Marcus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're going on here, and you may mean well, but the "articles" you've been writing are heavily promotional. This is not acceptable.

First, articles must be neutral in tone and content. Yours have not been, in part due to the use of pull quotes to finish up sentences. Summarize, and do it neutrally, don't use quotes like that. Also, don't use long, fluffy pull quotes that don't add appreciably to the informational content of the article.

In addition, I note a lot of peacock terms, especially things like "leader" and the like. We don't have any need to fill up articles with adjective overload like that. If they do lead something, just neutrally describe what it is (e.g., "was Chair of the Board for Example Group from 2005 to 2010").

Finally, the articles are written in the style of a CV rather than a biography.

I strongly suggest you write any future articles first as a draft, to allow more experienced editors to review them for issues like this. However, even drafts are subject to deletion if they are blatantly promotional. That must be toned down. Some of these might actually be appropriate article subjects, but we do not allow promotion of anyone or anything, including hagiographies. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will take you advice on submitting as drafts and on trying to write in an overall more neutral tone---However, I don't know how many times I have to stress this, I am not writing anything on Wikipedia for Promotional reasons. I don't know if you've heard of Wikipedia's WikiProject Women in Red, a project whose goal is to add notable women to Wikipedia since there is a huge lacking of women on the site. I am an Orthodox Jewish Women I'm also a Jewish Feminist. I did not decide to add a profile on myself (which would be promotional) but rather am adding profiles of other Orthodox Jewish Women and Jewish Feminists, who are notable and deserve recognition. The only thing I'm promoting is equality. The only thing I'm trying to do is add more profiles of women. It is very clear to me why this movement even exists in the first place, because no matter what any woman did she is not considered notable.

I rather believe you that you're not just intending to spam. If I thought that was your only intent, I probably wouldn't bother trying to help, I block several spammers on most days. But it has nothing to do with women or anything else, or even with notability. It's entirely possible that some of the people you're writing about actually would pass notability standards. G11 deletion only has to do with an article being promotional, and would apply even if the subject were unequivocally notable. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 21:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I would not resubmit as there's still not going to be enough actually establishing his own independent notability; there's no inherited notability from any other people or groups.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcel Lindenbaum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lawrence Krule has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 20:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the page from Draft:Dr. Rabbanit Rachel Levmore to Draft:Rabbanit Rachel Levmore as wp:naming conventions preclude the use of "Dr." and such from titles. Also, the use of "Dr." in articles should be avoided per wp:credential. After the first use of the full name, use only the surname per wp:Surname Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:31, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Did not know that, thank you so much!! @Jim1138: Lizzie656 (talk) 18:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lizzie656, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Introduction to Wikipedia; and Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia; and Wikipedia tutorial; and Getting started
• Wikipedia:Avoiding common mistakes; and How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; and Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style; and Wikipedia:Manual of Style
• Wikipedia:List of policies; and Wikipedia:List of guidelines
• The five pillars of Wikipedia; and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not; and Wikipedia:Words to watch and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch
• Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources; and Wikipedia:Verifiability; and Wikipedia:No original research; and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
• Wikipedia:How to copy-edit; and How to create your first article
• Help:Referencing for beginners; and Help:Footnotes
• Help:Introduction to talk pages; and Help:Using talk pages; and Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines
• Wikipedia:Copyright Problems; and Wikipedia:Copyright violations; and Wikipedia:Images; and Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Help:Contents and Wikipedia:Questions provide guidance and links to pages where help can be requested. Also see Wikipedia:Teahouse.

You also may find there are some specific rules in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, in particular, that apply to certain situations.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages (but not article edits) by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. I hope this is not too late to help you and that you will not be discouraged when you learn more about Wikipedia.

Welcome! Jim1138 (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is unfortunate, because I think you mean well. However, when I told you that you may not write promotional material, I meant it. You've continued to do that, and I've just gotten done deleting some more of it. Since the warning didn't seem to work, I've blocked your account from editing.

You may appeal the block by using the steps at the guide to appealing blocks. Alternatively, I would be willing to unblock you if you will agree to the following two conditions: You may only create new articles as a draft and must have them approved by articles for creation before moving them to mainspace, and you must stop using quotes in articles, since you are in the habit of using them to make the article promotional. While not specific unblock conditions, you'd also need to stop throwing things in like "prestigious" to describe an award. Stick to dry, plain facts, don't throw in peacock adjectives. And don't write articles on people as a CV. They should be a biography, not a resume. If you'd be willing to agree to those two conditions, please respond here (you can edit your own talk page even while blocked, and I've got it on watch and will see it). Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited...
	Women in Nursing editathon & Women Labor Activists editathon Hosted by Women in Red - September 2016 - #wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage[reply]

October 2016
	Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ntb613 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Shalom,

Aside of reads like an advert few other issues

* I think it's also being used as WP:COATRACK for JOFA & JOFA Conferences.

* It reads like a list of sentences, instead of an wiki article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabbanit Rachel Levmore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ntb613 (talk) 00:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016
	Announcing two exciting online editathons Women in Food and Drink and Women Writers as well as our strong support for articles on women in connection with Wikipedia Asian Month Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

File:Roza Shanina.jpg December 2016
	Two new topics for our online editathons Women in Aviation and Women in the Military Our geographical topic of the month is Caribbean Women During the period of 21 Nov - 8 Dec, we are also supporting BBC 100 Women Women in Red

(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

January 2017
	Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

February 2017
	Black Women & Women Anthropologists online editathons Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		Welcome to... Women's History Month worldwide online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red
		March 2017 Featuring: "Art+Feminism" and "The Women You Have Never Met" Feel free to add articles in other languages too (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		Welcome to Women in Red's April 2017 worldwide online editathons. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Psychology" "Book Artists" "CEE Countries"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) ----Rosiestep (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2017 worldwide online editathons. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Organizations" "Sports" "Pacific islanders"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		Welcome to Women in Red's June 2017 worldwide online editathons.
		File:Nefertari.jpg "Met artwork by women" "LGBTQ women & Wiki Loves Pride" "Pre-20-century women"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		Welcome to Women in Red's July 2017 worldwide online editathons.
		File:60C0074BA4FF-1 Джемма Халид.jpg "Women in dance" "Women in music" "Women from India"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		Women in Red is pleased to introduce... A new initiative for worldwide online coverage: 1day1woman
		Create articles on any day of any month Cover women and their works in any field of interest Feel free to add articles in other languages, too Social media hashtag campaign: #1day1woman (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 03:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		Welcome to Women in Red's August 2017 worldwide online editathons.
		"Indigenous women" "Women in peace" "Canadian women"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --

A new WiR initiative starting in August

		Introducing... WiR's new initaitve: 1day1woman for worldwide online coverage Facilitated by Women in Red
		Create articles on any day of any month Cover women and their works in any field of interest Feel free to add articles in other languages too (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		Welcome to Women in Red's September 2017 worldwide online editathons.
		"Hispanic and Latina Women" "Women in the Olympics" "Women from New Zealand"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

		Welcome to Women in Red's October 2017 worldwide online editathons. New: "Women and disability" "Healthcare" "Geofocus on the Nordic countries" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Begin preparing for November's big event: Women World Contest
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marcel Lindenbaum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marcel Lindenbaum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lizzie656. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marcel Lindenbaum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  » Shadowowl | talk 18:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avi Finegold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avi Finegold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kyuko (talk) 17:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]