User talk:LittleOx

I'm Ammarpad and I want to welcome you to Wikipedia!

Wikipedia is an amazing community adventure which is constantly being edited. There are many different versions of Wikipedia for many different languages, and the English version has 6,818,684 articles which are written by volunteers like you and me! Making your first steps on Wikipedia can be hard sometimes, so if you need any help, don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page or ask a question on your talk page under a {{help me}} tag. Someone will help you soon!

Wikipedia has five pillars which summarise Wikipedia's fundamental principles:

1. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
2. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view
3. Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute
4. Editors should treat each other with respect and civility
5. Wikipedia has no firm rules

Discover more about Wikipedia and how to take part in this project by looking at the links on the right →
Or click here to find a random, short article you can improve.

I hope you have a good time here on Wikipedia, whether reading or contributing.

Again, welcome!

Thank you.)LittleOx (talk) 11:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of countries by wealth per adult, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.I add.)LittleOx (talk) 05:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bank of Italy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Matthew_hk tc 08:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on National wealth. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You reinstated the names of "Host Leaders" of future Group of Seven meetings to be held in 2019 & 2020. Can you provide your source for this superlative piece of future perception for the article, otherwise it will be construed as vandalism and be removed again. Perhaps you have a TARDIS at your disposal and travelled forward to these meetings and took note of the host leaders then? Or do you have some other time machine at your disposal? Perhaps you simply have some mystical super human powers that allow you to see into the future and know who the leaders will be? I'm sure everyone on wikipedia is waiting with bated breath for your references for the claims you have made on the article, but until they are provided, the article must stand. 203.223.198.169 (talk) 13:58, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop with your desruptive edits, seems that you dont see the reality and seems that you are so Patriotic, You make me remeber someone called Benniejets LuigiPortaro29 (talk)15:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ,now i know your opinions.LittleOx (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Regional power, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of states with nuclear weapons. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:28, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ,but stop him disturbing.LittleOx (talk) 19:29, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. My warnings are directed at you. Be constructive or stop editing, altogether. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i agree.I noticed he is envious of me.LittleOx (talk) 19:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is accusing other users of vandalism and spreading propaganda without any basis. GMG^talk 18:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of European countries by average wage shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Based on your history of warnings, please understand that I could have simply blocked you. Start using the talk page. -- ferret (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I notified what do to.Thank you.LittleOx (talk) 08:35, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]