User talk:Kurisumasen

01:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

15:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Mr. Men, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mr. Mean. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at List of Mr. Men. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I am sorry.--Kurisumasen (talk) 20:38, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I might have done it again…Kurisumasen (talk) 21:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The IP who has been "edit warring" has responded to your actions. He says the following: The actions you have performed to me is overreacting. I don't want any thing terrible to happen, but YOU are causing it to happen. Just stop it." He obviously isn't happy about it and wants you to stop, do you have a response to that? Thatoneguylol101 (talk)

Hi. I am not sure what your relationship to this person is, or how you can speak for them, but all I want is to reach a consensus and leave the article alone. If they had talked to me in the first place, as I repeatedly asked, we could have done it without the trouble. As I understand it, if we can reach an agreement the admin report can be closed with no further action. What do they suggest? Kurisumasen (talk) 21:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He says: "If you look at the changes to Kane, it was changed to HOF/Free Agent, which I agree he is. So really, nothing else. Everything with Kane is fine. Thank you" Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 6:06, 15 July 2021 (EST)

OK great. Let’s leave it there then. I will update the report. Kurisumasen (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Good night. I'm looking at your time, that's why I say good night. Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 6:18, 15 July 2021 (EST)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicka Chicka Boom Boom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loop.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Fixed it! Kurisumasen (talk) 09:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chicka Chicka Boom Boom

added a link pointing to Looping

Thirteen Heavens

added a link pointing to The Sun

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I "tagged" in this? Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 21:24, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Thatoneguylol101: You said that, do not know why. And why is this there? --Kurisumasen (talk) 23:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was given a notice saying I was mentioned in this Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 22:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Thatoneguylol101: Okay.--Kurisumasen (talk) 22:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, it was just reminding me about you mentioning me during the IP address issue Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 22:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who want to tax the rich has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who know where their towel is has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21#Category:Wikipedians who know where their towel is. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Gonnym (talk) 23:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! --Kurisumasen (talk) 23:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I did it again.--Kurisumasen (talk) 23:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gigglebiz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Practitioner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I knew that. Kurisumasen (talk) 09:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gigglebiz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trouble and Dan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A potential source here [1] to use in Pikachu's promotion section. 118.222.145.85 (talk) 01:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can’t help.Kurisumasen (talk) 01:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Kurisumasen (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everything alright? You appear to be edit-warring with yourself :) Slywriter (talk) 22:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I remembered that I have more edits coming soon… Kurisumasen (talk) 22:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Mixels characters, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:19, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added a reliable source and moved it back. Kurisumasen (talk) 17:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Mixels characters, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (List of Mixels characters) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. You are continuing to add (and edit war to restore) completely unsourced material. Per WP:V and other Wikipedia policies, you cannot do this. Please ensure that any material you add to articles in the future has an inline source. Black Kite (talk) 13:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurisumasen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do good edits.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 17:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]