User talk:Koplimek

Hello Wikipedians, without much adieu I want to say welcome. I love information which is why I'm here, so feel free to drop a line on topics that may concern you. I would also like to say lets keep verbage civil and everything should be just fine. thanks for posting! Koplimek (talk) 21:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Koplimek! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Koplimek, thanks for the message and always glad to be of assistance - just let me know if there is anything that I can do. Take care and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

RE: Aquitania

Hi, thanks for the message i am trying to find the evidence about the Aquitania design, i think it is mentioned in one of the former Cunard commodore autobiographies (possibly Harry Grattidge) - when i find it i will let you know!

Regards

msa1701 (talk) 14:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you know the name of the maritime site that listed the Kichemaru shipwreck [1]? If you know the site name or domain, it might be possible to recover the info as someone might have archived it or it might be on archive.org. Ha! (talk) 04:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I've created an article on the SS Dakota that you mentioned in the AfD. Ha! (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

see reply to User_talk:Koplimek#Kickermaru. Ha! (talk) 14:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I liked the link to the image [2] of the Dakota that you added (then removed) from the Project Gutenberg site. If it's from Project Gutenberg, isn't it very likely to copyright free and so able to be added to the article directly (like in an info box). Do you know what book it came from on Project Gutenberg. There's also an image here [3], although that one says it was scanned in 1999 and you need to pay for copies of it so it can't be used. I think the source they come from will be public though, so it's just a case of finding a copy that someone scanned or photographed and didn't copyright.

++ I found a whole bunch more links by searching for Steamship Dakota instead of SS Dakota (why I didn't think of that before I don't know). There should be a fair bit to build the article up

• http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9E05EEDC1E3BE631A25754C0A9649C946597D6CF
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_W._Taylor
• http://www.prairiepublic.org/programs/datebook/bydate/08/0208/020608.jsp
• http://www.secstate.wa.gov/history/newspapers_subjects.aspx?s=111 (needs DejaVu plugin)
• http://www.immigrantships.net/1800/dakota18761002.html (this is a ship from 1876 - odd)
• http://www.jcameron.com/personal/smithen/AnnLaws.htm (and again, from 1876)
• http://www.mnhs.org/collections/manuscripts/pres.htm
• http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mruddy/jomfuneral.htm
• http://content.lib.washington.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/ic&CISOPTR=349&CISOBOX=1&REC=1
• http://books.google.com/books?id=5taHoMjDc6IC&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=steamship+dakota&source=web&ots=0ukqpv9dp-&sig=x7v4xjDIkVu-kKbxH7x80jRWzt8&hl=en
• http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/rescue/timeline/index.html (added sig - Ha! (talk)}

I was also thinking that a page should be opened up on Dakota's identical sister ship "Minnesota" who saw a longer service life up to 1923. Minnesota was also called "Troy" during her World War One service.Koplimek (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, good idea - go for it. If I find anything I'll it your way. If you need a hand creating the article I'll be glad to help. Ha! (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one signed I'll assume it's Ha. I removed the Gutenberg photo (I liked it too) cause there was copyright problems even though there shouldn't be since the photo is from 1907 and way before the 1923 cutoff year for copyrighted pictures. I found the sharper Dakota photo on Google Images by typing in "Dakota Steamship" just like you were doing. I agree 'SS Dakota" doesn't always work. Sometimes you get different results by typing "S.S. Dakota". i didn't think there'd be a problem with just 'linking' the photo as opposed to uploadingit onto Wikipedia without permission. Thankfully the photo exists in a number of versions in contrasty to sharp versions. Koplimek (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you say, it's OK to add a link to it, as long as it's not displayed as a photo in the article it can't break any copyright. I've seen a couple of different images (maybe some of them were just flipped around or mirror images actually) of the Dakota sinking on postcards, there seem to be a few of them around. Ha! (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Koplimek! I noticed your contributions to SS Dakota, and thought you might be interested in WikiProject Ships, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of ships of all kinds. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Maralia (talk) 03:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added a {{cn}} request for " As it was a single pump was used to vacate water from different compartments with the use of a nozzled hose". Can you remember where this came from?--Old Moonraker (talk) 23:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion here. (Actually, it's a restart of a prior discussion that went cold; you can just scroll directly down to my most recent post in that section if you want.) Can you offer your thoughts? It's very important. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, but that's not what the discussion in that section is about. It's about whether list-type articles should have sources cited in them just as any other article. Can you read my last post at the bottom of it and give your opinion there? I'd really appreciate it. Nightscream (talk) 00:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Zeffie Tilbury has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=b (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You're welcome for fixing the link and no, I'm not related to Ms. Suratt. Pinkadelica^♣ 21:49, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for identifying that the Fool's Paradise image was not Theodore Kosloff-- that still never really looked like Kosloff to me, but I couldn't say who it was. Glad to see that someone could step in and make a positive identification. Avram (talk) 07:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Devil's Pass Key (1920 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 12:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. 6 march 2009 you edited the lusitania article and added a detail about ships sunk by U20 before lusitania, here [4]. Ive just been reading Beesly, Room 40, p 102 where he observes that U 20 sank a three masted schooner clalled 'the earl ot lathom'. i was wondering therefore about the discrepancy and where your list of names comes from? Sandpiper (talk) 22:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Now all I have to worry about is whether its Lathom (as Beesly has it) or lataham as it also appears elsewhere. Sandpiper (talk) 21:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. We're quite appreciative that you have chosen to write an article for Wikipedia, but there are a few concerns in White Gold (1927 film) that you might consider addressing. For film articles, it's not enough to show that the film simply exists. It is always best to show through references that the subject has received critical review and/or coverage in multiple sources in order to meet notability criteria for films. First and foremost is proper sourcing for the article, as Wikipedia requires that information in articles be cited back to reliable sources (not blogs, not facebook, not twitter, not myspace, not IMDB). Please consider visiting my essay on films to see how to gauge if your article meets inclusion criteria. And always feel free to ask for input or advice from editors at WikiProject Films on the project's talk page. Best regards, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koplimek. I saw the The Incorrigible Dukane article while I was patrolling new pages, If you can increase the article length to 1500 characters of prose (so not including the references or infobox) then it would make a good WP:DYK candidate as the oldest surviving John Barrymore film. It would need a better reference than ImDb mind... Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:55, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be happy to help you improve any articles that need more referencing or anything like that. Just hit me up on my talk page whenever something comes up. Silverseren^C 16:57, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated The Incorrigible Dukane, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		Good Fellowship Award
		I am honored to present you with this Award of Good Fellowship for your cooperation with other editors in improving the article The Incorrigible Dukane. Encouraging other's continued participation through positive and supportive action is one of the surest ways to both keep editors and to make Wikipedia a better place... and you have done both. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced the Connecticut Yankee image with one properly named. Sorry for the original typo. It was late. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:11, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It took a little time, but the articles you listed HERE now all have images uploaded and added. I also gave the articles a few very minor tweaks. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:43, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Incorrigible Dukane, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 1915 film The Incorrigible Dukane is the oldest surviving movie starring John Barrymore? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that the correct place to post to me is on my talk page... not my user page. I have thus moved your recent posting and responded there. Best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:01, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on the list here and am making some progress. I am most proud of my efforts at turning this stub into a decent start class article. Lots of fun. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More

Lots of great sources found for The Devil's Pass Key. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Smouldering Fires (film), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Clarence Brown's 1925 silent film Smouldering Fires starring Pauline Frederick is considered a cautionary tale? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

• Cool, huh? :) Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We're bumpiing edits at White Shadows in the South Seas. If you would not mind, may I go through and add sourcing? Then invite you back for further cleanup? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added the image

Added the image and then gave it a few tweaks. Nice job. I expect others may build on it.

After that I got an itch and began to scratch. Check out what is growing HERE. I figure its time to turn a LOT of redlinks to blue. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I blame this on you :)

That Clyde De Vinna now is a sourced article in mainspace, I blame on you. Thanks. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 10:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And if you want to learn some amazing stuff about De Vinna, take a look at this online preserved book form 1941... Chapter 5 and on.[5] An amazing fellow. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You recently mentioned diff that Legagneux committed suicide, rather than having died in an accident. Do you have a reliable source for this? In Popular Mechanics Feb. 1915 on page 195 his name is listed as a aviation-related death on 6 July 1914. Are you saying that he committd suicide by deliberately crashing his aircraft? If you have a reliable source stating that this is the case, it would be very interesting, since I have been unable to confirm this via online sources. Thanks. --TraceyR (talk) 10:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link, which states "... il se tue à Saumur en tombant dans la Loire en essayant un avion, victime de sa passion."

My knowledge of French regrettably leaves a lot to be desired, but my understanding of this sentence is that "he died at Saumur when he crashed into the Loire while testing an aeroplane, a victim of his passion" (i.e. for flying). I came across this reply to a question about whether "se tuer" implies suicide:

Re: "se tuer" vs "se suicider"

In English there is usually no difference between to commit suicide and to kill one's self

He killed himself by taking poison.

se tuer - accidentally kill one's self

"Il s'est tué en voiture" would mean "He was killed in a car accident".

Based on this, and the fact that no other source mentions suicide, I don't think that we can claim that Legagneux commited suicide. --TraceyR (talk) 00:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is "appareil" suposed to be "apparel"? -- AnonMoos (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'd had some in the works and your refs did help. I just thought he was a fascinating character. If I find anymore, I'll put it on the page. The picture of Bellew in a dress [6] is real as far as I know (even though Bain News Service can be somewhat unreliable). I think it was for his role in 1902's "School for Scandal" or 1910's "The Scandal" where he had to dress in drag briefly, but he sure looks good for a 60-year-old man! The later play was a critical flop, but must have been somewhat entertaining. I also nominated the article for DYK. Froggerlaura (talk) 15:47, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 June 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kyrle Bellew, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that British stage-actor Kyrle Bellew (pictured) was accused of being Mrs. Leslie Carter's lover at her 1889 divorce trial? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

thanks so much for letting me know.Koplimek (talk) 14:17, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are cordially invited to User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines as I feel its going live is imminent and I value additional eyes and input. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for what it's worth, I created the category because it was already sitting as a redlink on seven or eight film articles (which isn't supposed to happen, as categories aren't supposed to be added to articles until they actually exist, but I digress). For what it's worth, any filmmaker who's directed a reasonable number of films that have Wikipedia articles of their own is allowed to have a comparable category, so there's no reason why you couldn't create one for Chautard as well — but for Chester Franklin, I'd suggest concentrating on an actual article about him before worrying about whether there's a dedicated category for his films or not. Bearcat (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

check The Garden of Eden (1928 film) :) Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When coming across an image that is overly large, I have found the free tool "Resize Magic App 2.1" to be invaluable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All but one. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bloggers in the outside world are not nearly as concerned with copyright and attribution as we are at Wikipedia. For The Isle of Lost Ships (1923 film) someone had made a collage of multiple images. And while the collage assemblage itself might be the intellectual property of the blogger, the included original poster from Associated First National is not. So I used an online tool to remove the unattributed-by-blogger image and present it as the single poster intended, shared by, and properly attributed to Associated First National. And while happy you solved the Flickr problem, look at the cautions on THIS page. Certainly the Flicker user could not assert a copyright on someone else's work, but that does not prevent them from tagging images uploaded there with a "all rights reserved" tag and locking it from download. It would seem that Flicker does not investigate misuse of such tags. I felt it better to avoid that can of worms.

And as you are so proactive in preserving early cinematic history, might you consider being a coordinator for WikiProject Films? We need more editors who have a grasp of the importance of preserving film heritage. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:38, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Single Wives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Touch Of Light (talk) 01:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Koplimek! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Just Another Blonde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Hugh Bennett

Traveling Salesman (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Robert Dudley

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koplimek, and thanks for your message about that category! Thanks for noticing. I guess I was just surprised that silent films weren't already organized this way, and the work of doing it has been instructive, and sort of fun. A super-wonky kind of fun. That's not a bot, that's me. My thinking on the "American silent films" cat is to clean it completely out and keep it. As to that image.... well, sorry to say that's not my area of expertise either! All best -- --Lockley (talk) 18:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frozen Justice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Ullrich Haupt and Arthur Kay

An American Tragedy (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Charles Middleton

The Cheat (1923 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Jack Holt

The Cub (1915 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Extant

The Red Widow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Channing Pollock

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I updated those disambig. links. ThanksKoplimek (talk) 15:10, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Roy Overbaugh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shore Leave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although it was a faithful reproduction, it was still a replica F2B that somewhat bizzarely appears in Death Hunt, not at all what pilot Wop May was really flying in the actual Mad Trapper air chase. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 06:09, 13 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Upstairs, Downstairs (1971 TV series) characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Nettleton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As you have shown an interest and ability in improving articles on early films, thus preserving cinema history to serve the project and its readers, might you perhaps assist in copyedit and sourcing the article The Lawful Cheater? Thanks much, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael, Happy New Year. Sure, I'd be glad to. Thanks for alerting me.Koplimek (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Men (1918 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Alfred Moses and Robert Cain

The Secret Game (1917 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Ogle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for publishing the new article Sally of the Scandals, and increasing Wikipedia's coverage of notable lost films. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Hell Diggers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lois Wilson

The Man Who Fights Alone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lois Wilson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I saw what you did there! Thanks for adding citations. We always need more of that! --RichardMills65 (talk) 01:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

To the Last Man (1923 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Richard Dix

Wallace Eddinger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Margaret Lawrence

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gambling Wives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marjorie Daw

The Climbers (1927 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Paul Stein

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Vernon Steele, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrician (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Sawdust Ring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Ince (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited National Red Cross Pageant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eugene O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Tree of Knowledge (1920 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Forman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for creating this! I've been working on Ivan Abramson film articles on and off for a while, glad to see another one created, and of a film which we know is actually preserved! Cheers.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gentle Julia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marsha Hunt

New Morals for Old (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Elizabeth Patterson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, very interesting. You'd think they would have awarded it sooner. Maybe if there's a good reference, a brief sentence could be added somewhere in the article. DonFB (talk) 22:24, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not add material to articles without citations of reliable sources, especially regarding matters of suicide, as you did with this edit to List of suicides. No disrespect intended, but having accumulated over 21,000 edits since 2006, you should be acquainted with WP:V and WP:CS by now. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:33, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add links to this website to the "See also" section of article, since this section is only for links to other Wikipedia articles. The proper place for them to go is in the "External links" section, and I would appreciate your moving the ones you've already posted.

It's also possible that your link may not be acceptable under our external links policy, but I'm not going to pass judgment on that. You should just be aware that another editor may decide that your links are spam and remove them entirely because of that. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Holiday Cheer
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

What a very nice message on my talk page. Thank you so much. Tim riley (talk) 16:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Silentera.com: reliable source? Plus other issues. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Koplimek. First I want to compliment you on the huge amount of work that you have done adding and editing silent film articles here at WikiP. My request regards this article The White Flower. There is an external link for a foreign film poster that uses the title Havaii Girls but there is no mention of this alternate title in the article. I am wondering if you can add a bit of info about this with a proper source. If not no worries I will just leave things as they are but I thought that with your excellent research skills you might be able to enhance the article. Thanks for your time and thanks again for all your efforts here. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 21:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I guessed that the poster was for TWF but that there was some quirk to the translation. I think that you have figured things out. My only concern was that another editor might remove the link since there was no info about this alternate title in the body of the article. On the other hand that might never happen. Thanks again for taking the time to reply to my request. MarnetteD | Talk 01:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Her birth year came from the 1949 John Adams Comstock genealogy book. I've also seen 1868 listed as her year of birth as well as 1873. Unfortunately I no longer have access to certain records that could help point to the correct year. As to Adele Ritchie I was not aware of a previous article.John F. Barlow (talk) 21:05, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your early film actor bios and others. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:29, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Michael.davies1. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Evelyn Ellis, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Mike 20:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you can help me. I’m not sure of the correct procedure concerning right of precedence with Lightnin' (play) that I recently created, and the existing article Lightnin' which is about the 1925 film based on the play. I’m also interested in removing the redirect to The Silent Voice that links to the playwright of The Silent Voice (play). Thank you John F. Barlow (talk) 21:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just seen your addition to this page, and I have some concerns. It's interesting material certainly, but I'm not sure that so much detail is necessary in an article which is a biography of Blériot: possibly it could be added in this detail to Daily Mail aviation prizes, and also to the article on the Wright Brothers. I also have concerns about its accuracy: for instance there's a 3 Nov 1908 letter from Wilbur to Orville in which he talks of the prize, saying that winning it would "practically end the necessity for further demonstations next year", so the £1000 cannot really be called 'paltry'. I also don't think it's very well integrated into the article: it leaves the para about the Channel having been crossed by balloon as a non-sequiter. Imo the topic would be best integrated into the para about his rivals for the crossing. TheLongTone (talk) 22:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, thought I'd left a not saying I'd done that edit...glad you approve & thanks for clearing up some of my (typically) sloppy editing. I still think a thousand quid a lot of money...it's not to be sneezes at today, and in those days would have cought you a couple of Gnome engines & was the annual salary of the Director of the Royal Aircraft Factory.TheLongTone (talk) 15:07, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Melbourne MacDowell and South River, New Jersey, there seems to be no source associating him with South River, either in his article or in the article for South River, and a source is required in both places. Do you have any source to support the claim that Little Washington became South River, and can that source be added, as well? When you add the source for McDowell in the South River article, can I ask you to put the entry in alphabetical order? Alansohn (talk) 00:45, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for reordering by alpha. Can you add a source for McDowell to the South River article? The Strang source would be appropriate, and it would be even more useful if you had a version of the source that was available online, perhaps through Google Books. I do see versions of the book online, but perhaps you know of an online accessible version of the specific 1899 version. Thanks again. Alansohn (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:LISTPEOPLE specifies that notables included in articles, like the one for South River, are to have reliable and verifiable sources establishing a connection between the person and the place. I'd always prefer a source that can be confirmed by clicking a link, rather than by searching in an archive for a book more than 100 years old and long out of print, but the one thing that's needed is a reliable and verifiable source. The source should be added as soon as possible, otherwise WP:LISTPEOPLE specifies that the entry should be removed. Alansohn (talk) 03:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just wanted to let you know I had undone one of your recent edits to Ada Rehan I think the edit was in good faith however, I thought that information about that particular external link was unnecessary. If you have any other questions please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Roborule (talk) 02:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We've gone through this before. If a film is lost, a reliable source should say so. If the only source you can find says the status is unknown, that's not lost and it should not be categorized as such. I asked this on the film Wikiproject and was told the exact same thing. If you want to seek a new consensus about it or bring the topic back up on the Wikiproject page, feel free to do so and I'll even add my two cents again but I don't think saying "it's well known that the film is lost" is how we should go about categorizing films. Film articles are held to the same standards as other articles and I'm sure I can't go to any page here, add some content I think I know to be true without a source and expect others to take my word. I know sources exist that support this kind of information because I've found them myself for numerous articles. Pinkadelica^♣ 19:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I understand your last message. It's not semantics to say a film is lost. Lost means just that - its whereabouts are unknown. I wouldn't say a lost person is dead just because I don't know where the person is. I can presume they're dead after a reasonable amount of absence but I cannot definitively say the person is gone forever unless there is proof. As I said above, I asked the community and was told we don't say a film is lost unless a reliable source says so. That's pretty clear to me but if you want to debate this, let's open it back up the community because it seems like you think this is my personal opinion and I'm pulling this "rule" out of the air for kicks. I'm not trying to give you a hard time about this but we obviously don't see eye to eye and some sort of common ground needs to be reached before this goes forward. Pinkadelica^♣ 19:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

or lobby card for Rustlers (film)? I am having a difficult time doing so. Thanks in advance. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A confusing issue, but we have sources citing Ford for Rustlers and Barker for The Rustlers. Apparently the two men worked closely together at Universal,[7] and it appears that Barker directed and Ford found talent and was producer. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I decided to do a redirect to The Dancers since there is no page-and it does link to some pages for the film, problem is apparently now it also links to adult films, oops, not sure what to say now! Wgolf (talk) 01:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't actually know, sorry. A lot of films of that vintage are missing so the chances are quite high that it is now lost. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 23:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Charles Lindbergh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[RADM]]) [[Richard E. Byrd]]'s famed North Pole expedition, but apparently his bid came too late.)<ref name=Berg>{{cite book|last=Berg|first=A. Scott|title=Lindbergh|year=1999|publisher=Berkley/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly give your source for this? Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. Yes, please do let me know if you find anything more. I suspect that, at a minimum, Love and Loraine performed together in other shows, and it would be good to know more about that. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:20, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Let me know if this leads you to a WP:RS that mentions Mary's being married to the other Loraine. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ora Carew may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''Beyond the Crossroads]]'' (1922)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Riders of the Night may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''''Riders of the Night''''' is a 1918 silent film drama directed by John H. Collins] and starred his wife [[Viola Dana]]. It was produced and distributed by the [[Metro Pictures]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Plot: A man devours a bar of soap and later vomits everywhere he goes." Might be the most unexpectedly hilarious phrase i have ever read in a wikipedia article. Roidroid (talk) 04:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Georgiana Drew may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Georgie and Ethel were staying in 1893.<ref>Barrymore, John; ''Confessions of an Actor'' c.1926(John Barrymore recalls the elderly woman telling him about Georgie when he was visiting [[Nassau,
• recalls the elderly woman telling him about Georgie when he was visiting [[Nassau, Bahamas|Nassau]](probably filming ''[[The Lotus Eater (1921 film)|The Lotus Eater]]''(1921)</ref> It was 14 year old

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Telephone Girl (1927 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• com/arneparamountpictures.html ''The Telephone Girl'' at Lost Film Files: Paramount - 1927]]</ref> 1927 silent film directed by [[Herbert Brenon]], It was produced by [[Famous Players-Lasky]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wanted: A Husband may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• html The Library of Congress American Silent Feature Film Survival Catalog: ''Wanted: A Husband]]]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:59, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baby Mine (1928 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] and is her third feature film, she having made two previous films in 1916 and 1918. <ref>[http://www.silentera.com/PSFL/data/B/BabyMine1928.html ''Baby Mine'' at silentera.com</ref> <ref>''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Madge Kennedy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''The Fair Pretender'' (1918) )(*extant; Instituto Valenciano de Cinematografia(Valencia))

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Madge Kennedy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''The Danger Game'' (1918)(*extant; Instituto Valenciano de Cinematografia (Valencia)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Louisa Lane Drew may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• unrecognized-drew/ The Unrecognized Drew by Talia Myers] Retrieved September 9, 2014</ref> <ref>[http://imagesearch.library.illinois.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/actors&CISOPTR=1513

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:35, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elinor Glyn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''The Career of Katherine Bush'' (1916) (*film: ''[[The Career of Katherine Bush]]'') 1919)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) We hope (talk) 15:50, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Koplimek! I have to commend you on all of the article creation you have been doing. A very impressive line of work! I just have a question for you. Where are you getting the {{Infobox film}} parameters from? It looks like you may be using an old template, since we now use "name" in place of "title" and "image size" in place of "imagesize". Not a huge concern but it is causing some funky things to happen, like The White Sister (1915 film) has the disambiguator in the infobox when it shouldn't. I would also point you to the use of the "screenplay", "story" and "based on" parameters. We have moved towards using these more specific parameters when in the past we would use parenthetical modifiers in the "writer" parameter. Let me know if you have questions. BOVINEBOY2008 15:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry this is sort of late. Had to be out of town for a bit without laptop and internet access. Still have some RL things going on but will try to get up to speed again soon. When it comes to determining if the poster is post-1923 public domain, it depends on either the film company didn't mark their posters as copyrighted, or in the case of the poster having a copyright, that the film was not renewed by the movie company.

We have quite a few posters here which are licensed as non-free; when I'm able to find a large enough copy that hasn't been cropped so I can see if there are really any copyright marks or not, I'll change the license and upload a larger copy of the poster. If you're interested, there are some films whose posters do have copyright marks but when you get hold of a large enough copy of the lobby cards for the film, the movie company didn't copyright the lobby cards. ;) When Subway Sadie was at FA review, it had a very small copy of the film's poster. I couldn't find anything large enough to prove that the poster didn't have a copyright mark, but a very nice, large lobby card for the lost film did surface and it's what you see in the infobox there. :) I keep looking and either change licenses when I can or if I find something we don't have and it's not marked, I upload the poster or lobby card. We hope (talk) 22:36, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Willard Robertson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''[[Dark Hazard]]'' (1934

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:36, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lawson Butt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[Beyond the Crossroads]]'' (1922

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Isabelle Keith may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[You'd Be Surprised (film)|You'd Be Surprised]]'' 1926)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mary Boland may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Women trailer.jpg|thumb|left|in the trailer for ''[[The Women (1939 film)|The Women]]'' (1939)]]..]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:24, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revised. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Spring Is Here (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• for free download at [https://archive.org/ Internet Archive], along with ''[[Tanned Legs]]''(1929

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:28, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this consensus discussion? I know you did this last month, but it wasn't a formal consensus discussion, but now it is. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please join me so I don't have to drink alone. :-) Have found a copy of the Dearie poster--they're really tough to find a copy of. The problem is that it's in sort of rough shape in spots, especially the background where there's been a lot of old folds and creases. If I can't work things out with it, I'll upload it and ask for one of our graphics people to lend a hand. Hope you'll also have a wonderful holiday season! We hope (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barrymore is at Peer review now. You can comment there about any changes that ought to be made to the new version of the article. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dearie poster.jpg This is the only copy I've been able to find on the internet. It's now at the Graphics Lab, so cross your fingers someone will be able to work with it soon.;) We hope (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:RY for guidelines as to which births and deaths should be included in year articles from 2001 on. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:14, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you like it-thought it turned out very nicely too. Here's where I found the poster and it's very easy to get lost in just looking here as there's so many posters, card and stills. Am trying to work my way through it and upload what we don't have that's PD, but need to also keep up with what's around in the non-silents, television shows, music and trains. What a mixture! :)

Was recently working on Don Terry with Dr. B. An old film magazine told about how he was a tourist discovered in the old Café Montmartre at lunch, hoping to see some movie stars. The way he got into films was amazing, but somehow I wandered over to his Find-A-Grave page and started reading a bio of his wife. She was a daughter of the founder of Star-Kist Tuna. He reverted to his birth name and went to work for the tuna company after he came home from WWII. They were philanthropists who gave over $30 million to USC alone over time. Can you imagine--being discovered as he was and then being so well-off through his marriage? I was stunned, because so often you read stories like this and there are no reliable sources--this one has them. I'd been hoping to get the Dearie poster up (without all the wrinkles) for the holidays and am glad we can all enjoy it and them! We hope (talk) 01:46, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

What a pleasant surprise, to receive a Barnstar for an article long done. Once upon a time, I had pretensions of taking Berthold to FA status, but tired of the inanities of the assessment process, and moved on.

I was moved by the sheer blind patriotic courage with which he persevered. I also enjoyed ruining that old myth about him being strangled to death with his Blue Max's ribbon.

Georgejdorner (talk) 17:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

BTW, if you have the patient knack of dealing with assessment, this article could probably reach FA status with no substantive changes. Certainly, it is under-rated at B Class. Info in it comes from the most recent sources.Georgejdorner (talk) 20:09, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

	Wishing you-
	and a wonderful New Year too! We hope (talk) 19:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To you and yours

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)}[reply]

		Happy New Year !!!
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

I noticed that you've been pretty active on silent film articles (including creation / development of some of the J. Gordon Edwards stuff that's long lingered on my to-do list). I finally pushed a J. Gordon Edwards filmography live, and by and large I'm extremely happy with the work I've done there, but I have lingering concerns over the Edwards scenerist credit for The Queen of Sheba. I've explained the situation more thoroughly at the article talk page. I'd value your input on the issue (along with anything else you'd like to point out about the filmography in general). It'd be nice to get stuff settled here, before I start moving down the list of the remaining Edwards films and then pushing for my ultimate goal of GA icons for the entire body of his work. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 04:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for all the work you've done, in adding articles about silent films to Wikipedia. However, when adding new articles, could you please include a relevant stub tag, and/or the {{WikiProject Film}} banner on the talk page? This will help the article be included in the appropriate categories and task forces. Also, please consider joining the Silent films task force, where you can collaborate with others interested in improving silent films, and find out about updates. We'd love to have you! Fortdj33 (talk) 17:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I clicked a link while I was at your Amazon link and see there are quite a few offers to sell copies as very reasonable prices. The best bet looks like the "Like New" for $4.99 & shipping. Until McFarland made the generous offer to donate books, I'd looked at prices for the Perry Como biography, which is out of print. Some people with copies were asking $50 and up for them on eBay and the like-Wow! :-) We hope (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Since you're a member of the Silent Films task force, I thought you might be interested in joining a discussion about Georges Méliès and how best to cover his pioneering films on Wikipedia. I've started the discussion here: Talk:Georges Méliès filmography#What about the redlinks?

I'd greatly appreciate your thoughts and advice!--Lemuellio (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your removal of the advert for Down Home (1920) from the James O. Barrows article as a mis-identification in the advert: I rechecked the source for the image, page 10 of the Jan. 8, 1921 Duluth Herald, and it lists James O. Barrows in the image caption. Although I disagree with the edit, since I cannot verify the accuracy of the identification as Barrows, I will not challenge your good faith edit. Thanks for your work, Deanlaw (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get going on these ASAP. Can tell you now that the Scarlet Seas choice #1 is a large enough scan for me to see that there are no copyright marks, so that's easily PD. The PD or not question from 1923 on is whether you can find a full copy (borders not trimmed as this is usually where any copyright marks are found) to determine that they didn't copyright the poster or card.

We have posters and lobby cards for many films which have had their copyrights renewed, but when the posters or lobby cards were originally printed, they were not copyright marked, so they're in the public domain. The next step for me with a small or trimmed card or poster is to see if copyrights for the film and its materials were renewed. If that's the case, it can be licensed as copyright not renewed. Will also try to see if some larger copies of some of these can be found; even if they're not in such good shape, if they're large enough and have the borders, they can tell us if it's PD or not.  :) We hope (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My only rules are: if we can find 'em and in the case of those from 1923 onward, if they're large enough so I can read the fine print at the bottom (this is where the copyright information, if any, would normally be). Will get started on your list ASAP. ;) We hope (talk) 21:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a couple more yet to do and would like to explain why I did some substituting. When the images were small, I tried finding larger ones, to see if any were not copyright marked. While I was looking, other posters and lobby cards for the films turned up which were large enough for me to tell they had no copyright marks. So we needed to go with the ones clearly not marked as copyrighted. I'll probably have some "extras" (lobby cards) for some of these in the near future. We hope (talk) 02:16, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much for your kind words! I think we're now caught up on all the posters. I used the French poster for The Barrier because it might be a bit confusing to people to see a book cover there for a film. Tried locating a US poster for that and The Next Corner, but no luck as yet. Did get a lobby card for The Hottentot, though :) Can't believe that summer's coming to an end soon-a friend told me her daughter goes back to school on the 11th of this month, so it must be. Peace and happy editing to you too! We hope (talk) 19:41, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Charles Lindbergh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• php Inflation adjusted and depreciation on Orteig prize money; Dave Manuel's Inflation calculator)]retrieved December 15, 2015</ref> was first offered by the French-born New York hotelier (

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		Wikiclaus greetings
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you the happiest of Wikipedia cheer from Wikiclaus himself. This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiCheer, and hopefully makes your day just a little bit better. Choose to spread smiles, fellowship, and seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings and the happiest of holiday spirit from Wikiclaus.

Hello K. I pinged you at User talk:Gilliam but it may not have worked so I wanted to follow up here and let you know that it wasn't Gilliam who put the warning on your talk page. It was posted by a now blocked troll name Giililam (talk · contribs). This oerson was using a name close to Gilliam's to try and cause a problem just like this. The real Gilliam is on vacation. Cheers MarnetteD|Talk 00:02, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koplimek, i have just added a couple of tags - notability and need references to the above article. As the creator, do you have any sources that can be added? thanks Coolabahapple (talk) 10:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Timothyjosephwood. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Broadway or Bust, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. TimothyJosephWood 20:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What I got was an ad for the film from an old copy of Motion Picture Daily. ;) If you spend a little time here at Lantern, you'll see a lot of old film magazines and and the like. Many of the copies of older magazines have come from the Library of Congress. The publishers had to deposit a copy when filing for original copyright protection. LOC has been scanning the non renewed copies and uploading them to Internet Archive. (The Lantern interface is a much better place to do searching then IA.) We hope (talk) 16:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let me take a look to sort out what doesn't have copyright marks and any that might. Will try looking into this a bit later. ;) We hope (talk) 20:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...without providing a source. Please see WP:Verifiability:

All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed. (emphasis added)

In addition, in the material removed, there is no showing of relevancy of the information to the specific film the article is about. It is a general statement that, even if it was sourced, would still not necessarily apply to the subject.

Finally, please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Thanks, BMK (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has been initiated at Talk:Stark Mad#Unsourced material. BMK (talk) 19:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 17:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Koplimek! I've noticed that you have quite the large talk page! I'd like to suggest that you have a bot archive old discussions for you. Large talk pages can make it harder to start new discussions, and increase the page load times. The Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines suggest archiving once a talk page reaches 75,000 bytes, and your page was 241,257 bytes large before I wrote this message. Instructions for talk page archival, including how to have a bot do it for you, are at WP:Archive. Happy editing! -- AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 17:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Clark Gable, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:19, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Durkin (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Durkin (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 14:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing images and some work with articles (fixing dead links, updating where needed), but not writing content as before. Every time I'd try doing something like that, another "box war" would start up somewhere in FAs and GAs. I stopped here. There's more which could be done with it; just don't feel like doing that or more work on other articles I've worked on unless it's to maintain them. Also got tired of the behavior of an editor.

• message on my TP
• snooper acts
• my reply to editor who asked
• has the brass to post to the TP

About James Durkin, my reading shows he had 3 wives. There was one before Maude Fealy. The marriage broke up because of a romance between Durkin and his leading lady, Frances Starr. Copies of this story made news throughout the US. I'm trying to get more archived right now so it's not lost, but will start on your list and add more news clippings to Durkin as soon as I can. We hope (talk) 15:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Vamp (1918 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thomas Ince and Robert McKim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kate Mulgrew shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 22:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did some work on an article you created. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your additions to List of suicides. However, you didn't include citations with them. as I explained to you in 2010 and 2012, material like this requires citations, and that also holds for list articles. Please don't add information without proper citations, or it will be removed. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 14:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. In the future, when you add material, it should conform to the same format as the other entries in the article. Nightscream (talk) 18:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let me get to the end of this page so I know where I stopped. The person uploaded a lot of posters, many of them from Republic. Republic didn't copyright mark any of their posters or lobby cards, so they're PD when you find one large enough to be able to use as proof. Have been working at changing them to PD today and will probably stop for now after that. We hope (talk) 01:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just took a look and there are scads of the Republic posters. This means I will be doing them gradually because it's like an assembly line. ;) We hope (talk) 01:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Dub, you also have 2 lobby cards; File:Dub lobby card.jpg and File:Dub lobby card 2.jpg. I'm going through my archived material along with the list to see what may be in my archive-the 2 cards were in "my stack". ;) We hope (talk) 16:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Son of Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Steele. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Ad & lobby card-you choose.
• File:Main Street lobby card.jpg Main Street 1
• File:Main Street lobby card 2.jpg Main Street 2

I'm not going to be working here because of the infobox issues, but will upload PD posters at Commons and will post links here. We hope (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand how you must feel after losing all of that! It's like losing a friend, and in a sense it is, because you worked with the material for a long time.

What I'm not doing any more is editing articles. Fine with me to edit files and so on. If I do, decide not to have an infobox and take the article to GA or FA, then there's the chance that the hue and cry over not having one starts. It inflames tempers on both side of the issue and wastes a tremendous amount of time as well as the arguments go on and on; some are even regularly "recycled" on many articles. I'm tired of having my time wasted in this way, so if I don't expand it, send it for GA or FA, I've won the personal battle of not wasting time. WP may be the poorer for it, but until there are some hard and fast rules about bothering editors about the infoboxes which aren't required, that's it for me re: editing articles.

Many of those saying they want boxes are also pushing (some profusely) for text content creation/expansion, but one can't do both at the same time. The time spent talking boxes is time that can't be put into creation/expansion. If you do both-talk boxes at one article and create/expand another, the box issue may start all over-at the newer article, and the conundrum continues.

I can upload Betty in Search of a Thrill here at WP with a PD-1923-abroad license; PD in the US but perhaps not other places. Those with watermarks can be uploaded here and sent to Graphics for work, then moved after work is done. The Lillie Langtry one is easy. CardCow keeps an archive of sold and unsold cards on their website.

Am also trying to reorganize the images I have archived and start uploading more of them. There are hundreds-enough to make any older film buff happier than happy! :) Here's 3 I recently uploaded: We hope (talk) 14:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Valiant lobby card.jpg
• File:The Terror lobby card.jpg
• File:Flaming Flappers poster.jpg

I think the Elvis article really needs to be split with some of it being spun off into separate articles; know I had to cover a lot of ground with Skelton because he was a performer for 70 years before retiring. (Went into the business as a young boy.) When we worked on the Waldorf-Astoria hotel article, there was so much material. It wound up with 2 separate articles-the original hotel from beginning to 1933 and the present hotel from 1933 onward. There's enough material on many of the key figures like George Boldt and Oscar Tschirky that we could easily expand their articles. John Warne Gates was one we did expand and take to GA.

I have some State Street Sadie cards "on hold" and will get them uploaded for you. Are you most interested in the "lost" films? Took a look through a poster sales site the other day and found a lot of material you just can't find elsewhere, particularly on the "lost" films. Many cards for A Harp In Hock, among others. The one bad thing about their archive is it can only be searched by title; searching otherwise means page by page and they have over 20,000 listings. I'll post my uploads here on your page and you can see if anything might have been something on your list. File:Man Who Laughs poster.jpg This just went to Commons-hang in there! :-) We hope (talk) 18:42, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK-this one worked out. File:State Street Sadie lobby card.jpg The lobby title card, unfortunately, didn't because it's been trimmed. The copy on the border (most often on bottom border) is what we need to have to see if it's PD. I tried the next step, which was to see if the film had been renewed, and it was. I see that so many times with the lost films-they knew it was lost but renewed it anyhow. See if there's anything you were looking for here, as I uploaded quite a bit today. We hope (talk) 02:11, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:State Street Sadie lobby card 2.jpg another for Sadie. We hope (talk) 03:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So far- :) We hope (talk) 21:53, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Great Secret magazine ad.jpg
• File:Great Secret lobby card.jpg
• File:Merry Madcap Betty in search of a thrill poster.jpg
• File:Too Much Johnson poster.jpg
• File:Linger Longer Letty poster.jpg
• File:House of Lies poster.jpg
• File:Lillie Langtry His Neighbor's Wife.jpg
• File:His Neighbor's Wife 2.jpg film photo
• File:His Neighbor's Wife 3.jpg another film photo

The article Hearts of the West (1925 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Prudence the Pirate photo.jpg
• File:Prudence the Pirate photo 2.jpg
• File:Prudence the Pirate photo 3.jpg

I archived these some time ago. The larger 2 look like they're lobby cards. They were said to be from the film but there was nothing for me to be able to officially connect them. The other day, I was at Lantern and searched; this came up along with this one. Two nice accounts of the plot and a way to attribute the photos because they were published then. We hope (talk) 00:55, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RY and general consenus at WP:YEARS, anniversaries are not listed in year articles unless the celebration of the anniversary is (expected to be, for future years) internationally notable. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re this move, please see WP:JR. Dicklyon (talk) 06:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Storm 1916 poster.jpg New name for the 1916 Storm poster. Until now, both the non-free and PD file had the same name. Will work on the rest. ;) We hope (talk) 00:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Inner Shrine poster.jpg Just uploaded this. :) We hope (talk) 00:30, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dempsey. I see there were at least 3 styles of the poster and that it was used when showing film of the 1921 Dempsey fight in theaters. I need to work on this re: finding decent source(s) to prove this is from 1921. Am hoping to get this for at least 1 of the 3 posters I've now seen. We hope (talk) 01:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When you look at the posters, they say something re: 5 reels of action. Rickard knew how to make money. He made money on those who bought tickets, sold the radio broadcast rights, filmed the bout and showed that in theaters and had lantern slides of it for sale too. We hope (talk) 01:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here's an ad for the 5 reel film. Is the poster above OK with you? We hope (talk) 02:12, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think we tend to forget how it was for those back in that time. If you didn't go to the event itself, there was only one way to really see it even though it was after the fact and that was via film. They had no pay per view or even closed circuit at a local theater. I found a letter from the Chicago Federation of Labor asking that the ticket price of $1 per person to view the film be lowered because they thought it was too expensive for quite a few people. We hope (talk) 18:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dempsey Carpentier 1921 fight film poster.jpg Here you go! :) We hope (talk) 19:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Dempsey one is by Otis. After you look at enough of these, you get to know which ones were contracted by which companies. MGM almost always dealt with Tooker Litho in NY for posters. Some dealt with Otis, some dealt with Butts of NY and some with Morgan. There was also a Miner Co. in NY who printed film posters.

Not a lot of signed lobby cards but First National dealt with Ullman in NY for most of theirs. Others like Paramount had cards done by Wyanoak, NY. Some 1920s MGM cards were done by Lubin, NY and American Multi Color of NY. Later on, those printing the cards didn't have their names on them. We hope (talk) 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are right. Since our conversation on my talk page I have checked a good few photos of him, and I think it fairly obvious that the man in the D.5 is not Dunne. I can also tell you that his granddaughter is of the same opinion. Sadly, Wikipedia requires facts to come from sources deemed reliable and the Museum is one such. I have changed the image for a different portrait photo. Thank you for pointing out this anomaly, and my apologies for giving you such a runaround. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:50, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Koplimek (talk) 00:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hearts of the West (1925 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hearts of the West (1925 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 01:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When you edit silent movies, could you make sure that each American film has the category's "American films" "American silent short/feature films"?Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

From Stave one of Dickens A Christmas Carol Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail. Mind! I don’t mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the Country’s done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that Marley was as dead as a door-nail. So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD|Talk 23:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oh Yeah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Armstrong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	A happy, healthy and peaceful 2018 to you! We hope (talk) 00:31, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See you are busy adding links to the French Wikipedia articles in the list of pilots awardes an AeCF brevet...good work & should prompt some of these characters to get an article in English wiki. Might do one or two myself. TheLongTone (talk) 16:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for those gracious words. And this is just the year 1910 alone. Happy editing.Koplimek (talk) 00:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of course the earlier they got their brevet the more likely they are to be notable. I think I might have a go at Tabateau... the name is familiar.TheLongTone (talk) 14:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean to create this in the template namespace? It's been a month since you last edited it. I'm guessing you got distracted and forgot about it? --Derek Andrews (talk) 23:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you had created Template:Rupert Hughes in the right namespace immediately after accidentally creating the navbox in the wrong one. I'm just letting you know that I've nominated Works by Rupert Hughes for speedy deletion to clean up. Harryboyles 08:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did it for you.Koplimek (talk) 14:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's me again. I just have one favor to ask of you. Could you make sure that every new film article you create has the category "American Black - and - White films". I'm going through the long and tedious process of adding them all myself. Scorpions13256 (talk) 04:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koplimek,

I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join New Page Patrol, and from your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; we could use some additional help from an experienced user like yourself.

Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR.

Cheers, and hope to see you around, — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 21:12, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to List of suicides. However, the edit had to be reverted, because as I'm sure you know by now, Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material, and this indeed includes list-format articles, especially List of suicides, for which we had a discussion on this point years ago. If you want to restore your addition, please do so only with the proper citation accompanying.

Also, one other thing: If you can, please observe the format in which each entry is written. They're not written in full sentences, and therefore, don't end in a period. Rather, the general description of the who the person is, followed by the method. The reason is usually not given, especially when it's depression, since that's probably the reason for most of the suicides. It's also redundant to say "self-inflicted", since well....you know. :-) Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the two entries before and after yours, as examples:

• Nick Santino (2012), American soap opera actor, overdosed on pills^[1]
• Carl Sargeant (2017), Welsh politician and former member of the Welsh Government, hanging^[2]

Okay. Sorry if I jumped the gun. (No pun intended.) Nightscream (talk) 00:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add uncited entries to the List of suicides article, as you did with this edit. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 13:34, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The source for the death of Porciia says "live coals", however I changed it to "burning coals" as well as adding another possibility. However you should be cautious about removing words that are directly from the source given. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koplimek, I noticed your changes to The Eternal Mother (1917 film) and The Eternal Mother (1920 film), and wanted to discuss it with you. I changed the hatnotes to '[[The Eternal Mother (disambiguation)|The Eternal Mother]]' following WP:HATNOTERULES. Including the '(disambiguation)' indicates that the link to the disambiguation page is intentional and doesn't need to be replaced with a more specific target. Personally, I prefer to simply write out the full name, 'The Eternal Mother (disambiguation)', but if the article already has the shortened version, I usually maintain that to respect the previous editor's work. The result is the same for the reader. Leschnei (talk) 12:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Dark Romance of a Tobacco Tin.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please add your references. Imdb is not a reliable source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneKoplimek (talk) 20:59, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Her Dad the Constable.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please add your references. Imdb is an unreliable source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneKoplimek (talk) 20:59, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Playwright (1911 film).

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:14, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneKoplimek (talk) 21:25, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Unknown (1913 film).

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneKoplimek (talk) 21:36, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Who Is the Savage?, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneKoplimek (talk) 23:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Koplimek! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AmericanAir88(talk) 00:53, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy Christmas!
		Hello Koplimek, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always. She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?" My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 02:04, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
	Hi Koplimek, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,    –Davey2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 18:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What was your source for this edit? I disagree: he married Winifred Allen. Please always cite your sources. Thanks. PamD 12:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Effie Shannon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Tie That Binds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Koplimek,

Thanks for creating A Girl Spy in Mexico! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references and why this film meets WP:NFILM or WP:GNG.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Koplimek,

Thanks for creating All Dressed Up (1918 film)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Young (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Halliday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article F. Harmon Weight (director) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F. Harmon Weight (director) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank Jonasson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Fighting Coward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milla Davenport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Davenport (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You may already be aware of this, but the appearance and stability of your recently created articles like Robert Conville and Alexander Carr can be improved by using External link templates instead of direct urls, e.g. {{IMDb name}} and {{IBDB name}}. By simply adding the ID number, this ensures that if the URLs ever change (which is very possible), the links can still function without changing every single one. Also, Find a Grave should generally not be used as references: as a user-generated source with no editorial oversight, it is not a reliable source, and often has factual errors (wrong dates, misidentified family members, etc.). More reliable sources such as books or newspapers should be used instead. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 01:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AnimalParty, I appreciate your concern. But templating doesn't always work when the urls change or even when the urls don't change, that's why I'm always upgrading and correcting other peoples' mistakes particlarly the coding for IMDb and IBDB. Both seem to go from unsecure-http to secure-https, it's an ongoing manual job keeping wiki updated and relavent and protecting links from 404error. That's another reason for placing info/urls in External links so important material gets archived by Wayback and that seems to work really well, not always but well enough. I wish I had done that in early years at Wiki ie 2008-12. Some great material has been lost. But ordinary in-line b/w citations bypass all of that but even with that you have no way of knowing if a source link is still active or defunct without actually typing it in to search. Thanks AMBest.Koplimek (talk) 01:39, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Let's keep this conversation on one page for convenience) I see, although I don't know if I agree. While archiving links is certainly good for stability (even if the source is unreliable), the purpose of Wikipedia isn't in and of itself to generate archived links, and you can always archive URLs directly and instantly by typing them into sites like https://archive.org/web/ or http://archive.ph/ or http://archive.st/. And while I don't have a lot experience with the inner-working of templates, the logic should go that changes/corrections/ to all links governed by templates can be managed centrally, to prevent 404 errors like you say, and reduce the need for ongoing manual jobs (WP:LINKROT explicitly recommends not using bare URLs). And I don't see why going from unsecured to secure https would be a problem, it should be an improvement. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

to respond to earlier post about findagrave, while some(not all contributors) don't encourage findagrave as a citation, it is not forbidden. Some findagrave entries are better than others especially on long lost players, actors, their cemeteries etc. In other words it's a place to start not to use singular without other backup sources. Templates; there have been a few people who were excellent contributors who retired from Wikipedia over the issue of templates. When I created the Alexander Carr article, there was a pink box placed on a previous draft article using the name Alexander Carr preventing an upload of any article with that name, which is why I augmented my upload to Alexander Carr (actor) to bypass the pink draft block. It has since been normalized to Alexander Carr by I think FloridaAmy. I don't archive or harvest links on Wikipedia that are not relavent, I and many other contributors use the same sources repeatedly because they adequately verify information; there's no rule against that. For instance IMDb is used in External links on almost every movie and personality in the business dead or alive(it is sometimes citated as well). This issue with IMDb came up several years ago because a few people complained it wasn't perfect. Some of the issues are petty as Wikipedia has many arbitrary rules(ie rules that are not consistent). The LINKROT WP page also actually says 'do not delete a page because the URL to the source does not work any longer'. Keep in mind WP LINKROT is a page that can be edited by anyone so it might say one thing today and another tomorrow. The https/http is a problem because it's not consistent, it's not Wikipedia's fault, some sites will work with either and like I said others won't. HATNOTES: Citation Hatnotes/Headnotes are a real chore as many contributors and or bots put these up without being made to dig up the sources. They litter many a article even when articles may be adequately source. You're kind of new, stick around, turn a few white pages into articles, gain that experience of making a page of information viable. Koplimek (talk) 03:07, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I hear you. And, yeah, I guess only active for 6 years, and only among the top 1,000 most edits is pretty new. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 03:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry This hot Tom and Jerry is an old-time drink that is once used by one and all in this country to celebrate Christmas with, and in fact it is once so popular that many people think Christmas is invented only to furnish an excuse for hot Tom and Jerry, although of course this is by no means true. No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well K. MarnetteD|Talk 02:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas Koplimek
	Hi Koplimek, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,    –Davey2010talk 00:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Unmarried Wife, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Koplimek

Thank you for creating José Mora (photographer).

User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This needs at least one more reference to meet the GNG. While References 1 and 3 seem reliable and discuss the subject with significant detail, they are not independent of each other (the biography details are identical copies).

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 21:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, still working on it as it has just been created. Feel free to improve or add info if you will. I don't know what is meant by citations 1 and 3 are not independent of each other. #1 is a write up from a major university giving good detail on his early life and #3 is the findagrave that lists the cemetery he's buried at. Koplimek (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dot and Jim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable children’s books. WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of reliable, secondary, substantial coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Film Award
		I, Scorpions13256 (talk), hereby award Koplimek the WikiProject Film Award for their valued contributions to WikiProject Film. I don't know if you'll ever read this, but thank you so much for all of your contributions to WikiProject Film. Your contributions meant a lot to me in my early days. Wikipedia is not the same without you. Awarded 04:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas Koplimek
	Hi Koplimek, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,    –Davey2010Talk 19:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking to use this poster for the lost film The Wild Olive now a public domain film. How do you to submit to Commons to take the watermark out. The Wild Olive poster link any help would be appreciated. Thanks! Koplimek (talk) 18:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not at all aware of a method to remove an embedded watermark, especially if you do not have the original altered graphic (I assume that by carefully using only watermarked images is how they were able to get a good price for the original poster at auction, if it is truly a one-of-a-kind poster). Only advise (which you already know): suggest asking for assistance at the Silent Films Task Force page, or perhaps at one of the graphics task forces (which I have not researched) for assistance, if it can be done using the website image than it is more likely they might know how / have the graphics programming tools to do it. I know GettyImages uses watermarks, and are able to charge what seem to me to be high prices for use of their original out of copyright images. Good luck, and best wishes on this endeavor! Deanlaw (talk) 22:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just visited the article on Pedro de Cordoba and noticed that a few years ago you edited it to add "Pietro de Cordoba" as his birth name. What was your source for such information? I haven't been able to find any reference to his birthname being "Pietro" that didn't go back to the Wikipedia article. Thanks, AuH2ORepublican (talk) 22:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited D. W. Griffith filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thou Shalt Not.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I reverted your edit on August 12 as any changes or additions to days of the year pages now require citations and any that aren't are being reverted, please see WP:DOYCITE. The guidelines were changed due to the high number of errors and the number of links to articles with no or little reliable sources. Any names or events added before these guidelines were implemented are currently in the process of being referenced or removed. If you'd like to find it more, please see WP:DAYS. Suonii180 (talk) 23:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per Template:Find a Grave#Usage guidance, WP:GRAVE#When adding information to articles and WP:External links/Perennial websites#Find a Grave, please avoid adding links to findagrave. If the pertinent information cannot be found in a reliable source, then it is sometimes useful to add a link if there is a photograph of the person's tomb but in most cases it is not useful. Thanks. DrKay (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Precursors of film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brevity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Forest Ranger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. No reviews found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 21:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DonaldD23 talk to me 02:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Koplimek. I saw you worked on the David Shepard (film preservationist) entry and I was wondering if you or any of your page watchers could help with this draft? I left a note onnthe talk page about the apparent tie between the two subjects. Thanks . FloridaArmy (talk) 13:44, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lester E. Holt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the notability guideline. Currently cited to two sources: (1) Find a Grave, in contravention of WP:RSP#Find a Grave (2) A hand-waved collection of 30 newspapers, seven of which repeat the same information that amounts to "airplane tester died in crash".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

— Fourthords | =Λ= | 04:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Seas genre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carey Wilson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing in the article or anywhere else. And we don’t gibe dates of birth for BLPs without multiple reliable sources. Note that I need an answer. You don’t seem to respond here, not a good look for someone with your experience. Doug Weller talk 19:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't appear you respond to comments here, but in case you wanted an explanation for reverting you: I don't believe aveleyman.com is appropriate as an external link in general, and certainly not in a BLP article. See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_334#Reliability_of_Aveleyman.com and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#aveleyman.com_spam --Hipal (talk) 00:17, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]