User talk:Jumbo Snails

It is a legitimate part of StarCraft, and highly revered, I need to know why its being removed from a "Starcraft" Article, if not there, where CAN I put it?

To be honest, I'm not sure. You're better of posting this on the StarCraft talk page. But blanking the article is not likely to help your cause. Jumbo Snails 04:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're unblocked now... CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 03:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Regards, --Alphachimp ^talk 03:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted an edit I made, and perhaps you didn't see my reason on the discussion page. "Usual sexual orientation" does not seem to be neutral point of view (WP:NPOV), nor does it appear to be verifiable (WP:V), because the usual sexual orientation is subjective and cannot be reliably externally measured. Also, survey data regarding stigmatized or deeply personal feelings or activities is often inaccurate. Participants often avoid answers which they feel society, the survey-takers, or they themselves dislike. Mwhorn 02:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not realise I accidentially deleted half the article. :D Mwhorn 02:21, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my Wikipedia page. =) --SonicChao talk 23:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You just beat me to it! :)--Spartaz 23:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed you had taken an interest in rave related articles. I also noticed that you have an infobox for anti-vandal unit. I was hoping you might be able to help me, or at least point me in the right direction. (Every time I start the process of reporting this person I get lost in the rules of "this is not that" and "don't report this here"). There has been a vandal causing problems with the page Phat pants (along with several others). I have been trying to fix problems they have been causing since 21 August 2006. They have gender issues, insisting that only men wear phat pants when verifiably this is not the case. They usually make edits in a variety of usernames, not describing the edits, making edits that go around in a circle and full of typos and spelling mistakes. Sometimes they make edits using an IP usually in the 88.108 range. They have spammed my userpage among others. They go to the images related to phat pants and change their details including licensing deliberately removing[[1]] licensing that was clearly stated. I have previously raised these problems with a request for assistance from an AMA which was agreed to by Addhoc Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/September 2006/tiggertrouble who originally said if I support my claims everything would be fine. To which I responded I have supported my claims with numerous references clearly shown on article in question and broken down in point form on talk page. Addhoc later filed Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Theradioguy. Help. Please. I can provide more information if necessary.

I just became aware of the project so I joined and I have reactivated it from its status of inactive – Wikipedia:WikiProject Rave. __meco 10:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F. Thank you. Delivered on behalf of user:xaosflux 01:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you say you are a Communist Jumbo Snails. I would like to invite you to my Communist Discussion forum http://marxistforum.12.forumer.com/ and hope that if you do decide to join, you will bring Comrades with you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chargh (talk • contribs) 03:39, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hear that you and Chargh are both Communists. Are you two the only Communists? If not, can you name anyone else that is so?

Mecha G 1 —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Don't listen to him, he is just intolerant. I actually do have links to Communist Wikipedians, but I am not going to expose my Comrades to this nonsense. Stay strong Comrade! Comrade Hamish Wilson (talk) 21:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my friend's behavior. He's a little uneasy when it comes to Communism. ----Commander Lightning

If you are are interested, I have a Communist discussion forum open and I am eagerly looking for members: http://marxistforum.12.forumer.com/. Comrade Hamish Wilson (talk) 18:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]