User talk:Jinyoungs/sandbox

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "sandbox" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Great Train Express is a planned higher-speed commuter rail network in the Seoul Capital Area project consisting of three separate lines, named GTX A, GTX B and GTX C, and scheduled for completion in 2025.^[1][2][3] The project was first envisioned in the late 2000s, and construction of GTX Line A began in 2017.

The line has been approved and is scheduled to start construction in late 2018. The section between Samseong Station and Suseo Station is already under construction, and service is expected to start between Samseong Station and Dongtan Station as early as 2023.

Station number	Station name English	Station name Hangul	Station name Hanja	Transfer	Line name	Distance in km	Total distance	Location
?	Unjeong	운정	雲井		GTX A	---	0.0	Gyeonggi-do	Paju
?	KINTEX	킨텍스	킨텍스			---	---		Goyang
?	Daegok	대곡	大谷			---	---
?	Yeonsinnae	연신내	연신내			---	---	Seoul	Eunpyeong
?	Seoul Station	서울역	서울			---	---		Jung
?	Samseong	삼성역	三成			---	---		Gangnam
?	Suseo	수서역	水西			---	---
?	Seongnam	성남역	城南		SRT	---	---	Gyeonggi-do	Seongnam
?	Yongin	용인역	龍仁			---	---		Yongin
?	Dongtan	동탄역	東灘			---	---		Hwaseong

Station number	Station name English	Station name Hangul	Station name Hanja	Transfer	Line name	Distance in km	Total distance	Location
?	Songdo Station	송도	松島	File:Seoul Metro Line ic1.svg	GTX B	---	0.0	Incheon	Yeonsu
?	Incheon City Hall	인천시청	仁川市廳	File:Seoul Metro Line ic1.svg File:Seoul Metro Line ic2.svg		---	---		Namdong
?	Bupyeong	부평	富平	File:Seoul Metro Line ic1.svg		---	---		Bupyeong
?	Dangarae	당아래	당아래			---	---	Gyeonggi	Bucheon
?	Sindorim	신도림	新道林			---	---	Seoul	Guro
?	Yeouido	여의도	汝矣島			---	---		Yeongdeungdo
?	Yongsan	용산	龍山			---	---		Yongsan
?	Seoul Station	서울역	서울			---	---		Jung
?	Cheongnyangni	청량리	淸凉里			---	---		Dongdaemun
?	Mangu	망우	忘憂			---	---		Jungnang
?	Byeollae	별내	別內		Gyeongchun Line	---	---	Gyeonggi	Namyangju
?	Pyeongnae–Hopyeong	평내호평	坪內好坪			---	---
?	Maseok	마석	磨石			---	---

Final plans are currently being reviewed by the government. There are plans to extend the line to Suwon Station and to Yangju New City.

Station number	Station name English	Station name Hangul	Station name Hanja	Transfer	Line name	Distance in km	Total distance	Location
?	Geumjeong	금정	衿井		GTX C	---	0.0	Gyeonggi	Gunpo
?	Gwacheon	과천	果川			---	---		Gwacheon
?	Yangjae	양재	良才			---	---	Seoul	Gangnam
?	Samseong	삼성	三成			---	---
?	Cheongnyangni	청량리	淸凉里			---	---		Dongdaemun
?	Kwangwoon University	광운대	光云大			---	---		Nowon
?	Chang-dong	창동	倉洞			---	---		Dobong
?	Uijeongbu	의정부	議政府			---	---	Gyeonggi	Uijeongbu

Category:Higher-speed rail Category:Rapid transit in South Korea Category:Rail transport in Seoul Category:Proposed railway lines in Asia Category:Proposed public transport in South Korea

1. No. I didn’t see the importance of the GTX, why it matters, what it contributes to the Korea society.

2. Yes. The author is introducing three lines of GTX, and she said it in the very first sentence.

3. No. The author didn’t talk too much about the following parts.

4. The importance of the GTX.

5. The history and development of GTX. Maybe could be a separate section.

6. Yes. The author talked about GTX A,B, C separately.

7. Yes. The three lines are of equal importance and equal length.

8. Yes.

9. No. The author is simply descibing the ongoing progress.

10. No.

11. No.

12. No.

13. No. I think the author did pretty well.

14. Yes. They are all from journals and worldwide news.

15. Yes. The 8th citation is cited quite frequently.

16. No.

The article is in a neutral tone and the sources are reliable. One thing I like is that the author provides detailed forms of the trail lines. (Is this original or adapted from other sources? If so, any citations?) Some drawbacks, however, are that the article is unbalanced in terms of citations--the 8th citation is cited several times and is much more than the others. Also some citations are repeated, the author could use cite from existed source instead of creating a new one. And the last sentence in section GTX B saying the mayor’s claims need to have a clear citation connected. There are some grammar mistakes needed to fix. What's more, at the begining of the article, the author introduces the history/development of the GTX, which could be a separate section or a separate pragraph. Overall, the draft is in a good shape! Weiwei961208 (talk) 22:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]