User talk:Jameshancock01

Hi Jameshancock01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

no evidence of general adoption

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Universal Process Notation (UPN) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Universal Process Notation (UPN), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 19:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My reading of the website terms at elements.cloud (terms hosted here: https://app.box.com/s/8rxngmcncj7acymonnosge5xt0p4v61l) is that this is a license that is not compatible with CC BY-SA 3.0 and you did not have the right to release the diagrams, created by someone else, used in Draft:Universal Process Notation (UPN). Before I tag them for deletion as improperly licensed, do you have an explanation that would make deletion unnecessary? — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am currently an Employee of Elements.Cloud so I assume I have an exception. And, while Elements.Cloud does offer UPN Tooling it is completely free to use and as such these references should not be taken as a form of advertising. It is also impossible to completely separate Elements.Cloud from UPN as the founding partners were also instrumental at Nimbus Partners in the development of the standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameshancock01 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, that does not sound like an acceptable assignment of the license. I'll have to work on asking that the license situation be reviewed on each of them.

Also, if you have this sort of connection with a subject, it is best if you disclose that fact with a statement on your user page, which does not yet exist. Click on your (red) username to create it. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, what do I need to do to get an acceptable assignment of the license then? I'll create a user page to show that I am a current employee as well. Jameshancock01 (talk) 08:32, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jmcgnh:, I have released the copyright permissions through OTRS on all diagrams and source material used. Does that mean all copyright violations have been resolved? And I can proceed to another review? Could you please let me know if there is anything else you think I should do... Thanks for all your continued assistance. Jameshancock01 (talk) 08:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Universal Process Notation may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:40, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Universal Process Notation may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clearfrienda ^💬 11:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Universal Process Notation may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 04:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jameshancock01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Universal Process Notation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]