User talk:JacHarv

Hi JacHarv! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lyle, Lyle, Crocodile (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Heather Leviara (aka Green 34) 16:44, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I be more careful next time. JacHarv (talk) 20:26, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Lakeshore Entertainment, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 21:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Dorsetonian (talk) 14:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Ma&Ya’s, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 07:43, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Sorry! JacHarv (talk) 08:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to M&M's, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 10:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to DreamWorks Classics. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Vyond. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have now started a conversation on the Talk:Vyond page. Feel free to join in. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Proposed acquisition of Warner-Paramount merger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A merger has not been formally proposed by either company, only reports at this point. WP:CRYSTAL. Title is malformed and not a good redirect candidate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DigitalIceAge (talk) 08:06, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, I think it's in our best interest to wait for either WBD or Paramount to formally announce the merger. For comparison, we did not create Proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft until Microsoft made their annoucement. DigitalIceAge (talk) 08:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proposed Warner Bros. Discovery-Paramount merger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proposed Warner Bros. Discovery-Paramount merger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DigitalIceAge (talk) 23:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]