User talk:JJonahJackalope


Your GA nomination of Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 22:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign

The article Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign and Talk:Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 02:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign

The article Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign for comments about the article, and Talk:Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 22:44, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign

On 14 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tom Harkin ended his 1992 presidential campaign just one month after he won a landslide victory in the Iowa caucuses, where he received over three-quarters of the total vote? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tom Harkin 1992 presidential campaign), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)

The article Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta) and Talk:Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 23:01, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike

On 18 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to The Atlantic, "the first widely acknowledged performance" of the song "We Shall Overcome" occurred during the 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1937 Fleischer Studios strike

On 19 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1937 Fleischer Studios strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1937 Fleischer Studios strike in New York City was the first major labor strike in the animation industry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1937 Fleischer Studios strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1937 Fleischer Studios strike), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Mike Christie, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 22:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays
Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 17:43, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)

The article Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta) for comments about the article, and Talk:Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 20:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paramount Theatre (Atlanta)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paramount Theatre (Atlanta) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 20:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reviews

Hi there. At the moment, you have promoted 46 Good Articles, and reviewed no nominations. Might I request you to occasionally review a couple? It would help keep the backlog down, and your nominations would also be taken up quicker. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interview request

I would be delighted if you answered some questions in Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/WikiProject report on WP:LABOR, given your prolific content contributions on strike actions. Feel free to directly edit/add any questions as you see fit. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 17:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill

Hello! Your submission of 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1987 Forsyth County protests

On 16 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1987 Forsyth County protests, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 1987 march attended by about 20,000 protestors in Forsyth County, Georgia, has been called one of the largest civil rights demonstrations since the civil rights movement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1987 Forsyth County protests. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1987 Forsyth County protests), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all of your work creating this article. —  AjaxSmack  16:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 14:23, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Paramount Theatre (Atlanta)

The article Paramount Theatre (Atlanta) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paramount Theatre (Atlanta) for comments about the article, and Talk:Paramount Theatre (Atlanta)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shrine of the Immaculate Conception

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shrine of the Immaculate Conception you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 19:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shrine of the Immaculate Conception

The article Shrine of the Immaculate Conception you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shrine of the Immaculate Conception for comments about the article, and Talk:Shrine of the Immaculate Conception/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 20:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike

The article 1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike for comments about the article, and Talk:1945–1946 Charleston Cigar Factory strike/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill

On 25 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill was discovered by two teenagers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lady Rainier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lady Rainier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Rainier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- RoySmith (talk) 21:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1834 Philadelphia race riot

On 7 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1834 Philadelphia race riot, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1834 Philadelphia race riot began at a carousel before spreading to other parts of the city? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1834 Philadelphia race riot. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1834 Philadelphia race riot), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 16,037 views (668.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Lady Rainier at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 04:11, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1834 Philadelphia race riot

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1834 Philadelphia race riot you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Nabisco strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Nabisco strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 2600:100D:B0CA:BC2:3D66:753C:73F8:915B -- 2600:100D:B0CA:BC2:3D66:753C:73F8:915B (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1834 Philadelphia race riot

The article 1834 Philadelphia race riot you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1834 Philadelphia race riot and Talk:1834 Philadelphia race riot/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1834 Philadelphia race riot

The article 1834 Philadelphia race riot you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1834 Philadelphia race riot for comments about the article, and Talk:1834 Philadelphia race riot/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lady Rainier

On 22 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lady Rainier, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lady Rainier has been raising a glass since 1903? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lady Rainier. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lady Rainier), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Apocheir -- Apocheir (talk) 00:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike

The article 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike and Talk:1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Apocheir -- Apocheir (talk) 02:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1913 El Paso smelters' strike

On 2 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1913 El Paso smelters' strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 1913 El Paso smelters' strike the Industrial Workers of the World and the Western Federation of Miners competed to organize the strikers with their respective labor unions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1913 El Paso smelters' strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1913 El Paso smelters' strike), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Americus Institute

Hi JJonahJackalope, I added a couple things to end of the Later years section about the school filing for bankruptcy (was researching Draft:Staley High School) but I am not familiar with the citation style you used. I tried my best but will you please double check. Happy to learn! S0091 (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S0091, thank you for your edits, I made some changes to the page to incorporate the works appropriately with the sfn reference style. If you want to learn more about that style of citing references, I'd recommend reading over the Help:Shortened footnotes page. Best of luck on your work on the Staley High School page, and keep up the good work. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 23:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike

The article 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike for comments about the article, and Talk:1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Apocheir -- Apocheir (talk) 21:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dyk of 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike?

Hello. I just wanted to know, do you ever plan on nominating 1912–1913 Little Falls textile strike to DYK? Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Nabisco strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Nabisco strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of HadesTTW -- HadesTTW (talk) 17:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the upload...

A nice thought all around. Nice work. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be fair use at the Jimmy Carter page? I don't know the rules so have no idea. Maybe you can pop it in there as well using a fair use tag. Thanks again. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page title of Statue of Stevens T. Mason

Hey, I stumbled across this article today, and I noticed in particular that the lede never states the title in full while giving the alternative name of Stevens T. Mason Monument. Is either the current article title or alternative name official in any way? I don't really know where to look for info like that. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Time for Kids logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Time for Kids logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Playboy, February 2016.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Playboy, February 2016.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've seriously got 51 GAs and zero reviews? Ain't it about time...

You've seriously got 51 GAs and zero reviews? Is that an error of some sort? If not, then ain't it about time you pitched in and shared the load? § Lingzhi (talk) 14:22, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 16:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DMARGE, December 2019.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DMARGE, December 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

The article 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1935 SMU vs. TCU football game and Talk:1935 SMU vs. TCU football game/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

The article 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1935 SMU vs. TCU football game for comments about the article, and Talk:1935 SMU vs. TCU football game/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964–1965 Scripto strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1964–1965 Scripto strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lingzhi.Renascence -- Lingzhi.Renascence (talk) 05:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)

The article Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta) and Talk:Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 13:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - this took less time than I thought. Have put it on hold and left some comments. Most are minor, it is clearly GA standard. The only one of substance relates to the Architecture, particularly the interior. Take a look and ping me. KJP1 (talk) 13:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)

The article Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta) for comments about the article, and Talk:Basilica of the Sacred Heart of Jesus (Atlanta)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 08:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

Hello! Your submission of 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 19:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DimensionalFusion -- DimensionalFusion (talk) 22:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill

The article 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill and Talk:2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DimensionalFusion -- DimensionalFusion (talk) 06:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

scripts strike, am traveling sorry

am traveling, sorry, will have computer access in maybe 2 days  § Lingzhi (talk|check refs) 08:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Penn Memorial Fire Tower

On 24 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Penn Memorial Fire Tower, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the William Penn Memorial Fire Tower (pictured) overlooking Reading, Pennsylvania, was built during the Great Depression with funding from the Works Progress Administration? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Penn Memorial Fire Tower. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, William Penn Memorial Fire Tower), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964–1965 Scripto strike

The article 1964–1965 Scripto strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1964–1965 Scripto strike and Talk:1964–1965 Scripto strike/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Revolution of the Ganhadores

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Revolution of the Ganhadores you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 16:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1964–1965 Scripto strike

The article 1964–1965 Scripto strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1964–1965 Scripto strike for comments about the article, and Talk:1964–1965 Scripto strike/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:43, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill

The article 2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill for comments about the article, and Talk:2020 Colonial Pipeline oil spill/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DimensionalFusion -- DimensionalFusion (talk) 21:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Revolution of the Ganhadores

The article Revolution of the Ganhadores you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Revolution of the Ganhadores and Talk:Revolution of the Ganhadores/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 12:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

On 19 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game, known as the "Game of the Century", was the first football game in Texas to be broadcast nationally? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1935 SMU vs. TCU football game. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1935 SMU vs. TCU football game), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Argosy, September 1953.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Argosy, September 1953.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1937 Fleischer Studios strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1937 Fleischer Studios strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 11:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1937 Fleischer Studios strike

The article 1937 Fleischer Studios strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1937 Fleischer Studios strike and Talk:1937 Fleischer Studios strike/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:03, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1987 Forsyth County protests

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1987 Forsyth County protests you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1937 Fleischer Studios strike

The article 1937 Fleischer Studios strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1937 Fleischer Studios strike for comments about the article, and Talk:1937 Fleischer Studios strike/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1987 Forsyth County protests

The article 1987 Forsyth County protests you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1987 Forsyth County protests and Talk:1987 Forsyth County protests/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1987 Forsyth County protests

The article 1987 Forsyth County protests you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1987 Forsyth County protests for comments about the article, and Talk:1987 Forsyth County protests/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 14:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike

The article 1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike and Talk:1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 15:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya just checking you've seen this Mujinga (talk) 09:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, sorry for the late response, but thank you for starting this review! I've read over your notes and should have the page edited accordingly by the end of the day today if that works for you! JJonahJackalope (talk) 12:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AEW Fight Forever original cover art.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AEW Fight Forever original cover art.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike

The article 1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike for comments about the article, and Talk:1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 12:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Revolution of the Ganhadores

The article Revolution of the Ganhadores you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Revolution of the Ganhadores for comments about the article, and Talk:Revolution of the Ganhadores/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of UndercoverClassicist -- UndercoverClassicist (talk) 11:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2021 Nabisco strike

The article 2021 Nabisco strike you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2021 Nabisco strike for comments about the article, and Talk:2021 Nabisco strike/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of HadesTTW -- HadesTTW (talk) 17:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

QPQ requirements

Hi ‎JJonahJackalope, in regards to Template:Did you know nominations/Mitch Love, you said hook will be approved as soon as QPQ is performed. This requirement is already met according to WP:QPQ as I have not surpassed 5 submissions to DYK. Cheers, IceBergYYC (talk) 19:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick fix :) IceBergYYC (talk) 19:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Market Square (San Francisco)

On 9 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Market Square (San Francisco), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Twitter's headquarters building (pictured) in San Francisco was built as a trade center for furniture wholesalers in 1937? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Market Square (San Francisco). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Market Square (San Francisco)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Revolution of the Ganhadores

On 10 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Revolution of the Ganhadores, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that African porters in Salvador, Bahia, went on strike after the provincial government passed a law requiring them to wear metal identification tags? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Revolution of the Ganhadores. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Revolution of the Ganhadores), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2021 Nabisco strike

On 19 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2021 Nabisco strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 2021 Nabisco strike, Kotaku published an article discussing the ethics of buying Pokémon-themed Oreos? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2021 Nabisco strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2021 Nabisco strike), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Time, May 26, 2016.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Time, May 26, 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 903 Peachtree for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 903 Peachtree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/903 Peachtree until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Darcyisverycute (talk) 19:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Savannah Protest Movement

On 13 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Savannah Protest Movement, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that future Georgia representative Edna Jackson was part of a wade-in to protest segregation at Tybee Island Beach? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Savannah Protest Movement. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Savannah Protest Movement), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Savannah Protest Movement

Very interesting article; I enjoyed reading it and learning from it. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike

On 22 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike, multiple cities in Minnesota banned members of the Industrial Workers of the World from their municipalities? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1916–1917 northern Minnesota lumber strike), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Royal magazine, June-July 2009.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Royal magazine, June-July 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering if you're related to Aleksei Stakhanov

The Organized Labour Barnstar
'73 Gravediggers' Strike ... brilliant start to 2024. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 21:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ellen Phillips Samuel Memorial

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ellen Phillips Samuel Memorial you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 14:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ellen Phillips Samuel Memorial

The article Ellen Phillips Samuel Memorial you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ellen Phillips Samuel Memorial and Talk:Ellen Phillips Samuel Memorial/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invited to GA review!

Hi JJonahJackalope, I want to personally invite you to review some of the GANs. With 60 good articles, you have a lot of expertise that would help get articles promoted more quickly. With the GAN drive happening during March, this is also an excellent time to get feedback on your first reviews (if you wish).

GANs cannot be promoted without a review from editors like you. Many editors have taken time away from their own projects to help your nominated articles get promoted. If you have any questions, feel free to ping me and I can answer any questions or concerns. Z1720 (talk) 16:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ellen Phillips Samuel Memorial

The article Ellen Phillips Samuel Memorial you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ellen Phillips Samuel Memorial for comments about the article, and Talk:Ellen Phillips Samuel Memorial/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 02:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Philadelphia magazine cover, March 2013.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Philadelphia magazine cover, March 2013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Statue of Alexander Macomb

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Statue of Alexander Macomb you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Statue of Alexander Macomb

The article Statue of Alexander Macomb you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Statue of Alexander Macomb and Talk:Statue of Alexander Macomb/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 08:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JJonahJackalope&oldid=1218861691"