User talk:JOptionPane

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please refrain from adding commentary or your own personal analysis, including opinions, assumptions, and other peacock terms. Such edits aren't adhering a neutral point of view. Use the sandbox for testing instead. Thank you. ZooFari 16:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC) ZooFari 05:17, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jan V van Virneburg. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. --75.47.140.245 (talk) 08:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Thrummy-Caps. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --75.47.140.245 (talk) 08:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Thrummy-Caps, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --75.47.140.245 (talk) 08:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jan V van Virneburg. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --75.47.140.245 (talk) 08:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why move a page that's just going to be deleted? Eeekster (talk) 08:36, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JOptionPane (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was undoing vandalism edits from someone who kept inserting "delete this vandalism page" templates on valid redirects that were linked to in article space.

Decline reason:

As was pointed out to you here, you are not supposed to remove speedy deletion tags from pages you created. I can see why someone may think that the redirect was vandalism, although I can tell it probably wasn't. The correct procedure is to place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, explain on the talk page why you think the page shouldn't be deleted, and some admin will make the decision (which, it turns out, was not to delete). After you were told not to remove the tag, you were further told not to edit war. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|1=I was undoing a vandal. I should not be blocked for undoing vandalism. See this edit by the vandal tagging a redirect as vandalism. See how an article links to the redirect. See this edit by the vandal tagging a redirect as vandalism. See how two articles link to the redirect. See this edit by the vandal tagging a redirect as vandalism. See how three articles link to the redirect. If I get blocked for undoing vandalism, then I will no longer contribute here.}}

Ok, I think it was inappropriate for those redirects to be tagged with {{db-g3}}. But perhaps which deletion template was used had more to do with inexperience. And while I can't fault you for removing the speedy tag once, I also can't call the replacement of the tags vandalism either since people are supposed to refrain from removing speedy deletion tags from pages they created themselves. So IMO the edits you were reverting were not, at least, obvious vandalism that grants a 3RR exception. And Od Mishehu is right about how you should have proceeded after a revert didn't gain traction. But then, I think you made this error in good faith. So I'm reducing the block to time served. Please use the {{hangon}} tag from now on. Mangojuice^talk 19:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:99.239.34.33, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Willking1979 (talk) 02:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:HELP, I'M BEING RAPED! (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. HyperCapitalist (talk) 07:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined the Category for deletion as it is not a category, but however have proposed it for deletion per below. Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 07:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on HELP, I'M BEING RAPED!, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

I have declined the speedy deletion as it is not patent nonsense, but however have proposed it for deletion per below. Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 07:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. HyperCapitalist (talk) 07:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article HELP, I'M BEING RAPED! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:DICDEF, Wikipedia is not a place for dictionary definitions

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 07:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]