User talk:Jèrriais janne

Hello, Jèrriais janne. Thank you for creating Touristification. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on this article, keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, I've gone ahead and moved the article, if there are any further changes you'd like to make now that the move has gone through. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you were wondering, until very recently it hasn't been acceptable to use the word 'city' for Milton Keynes : any such use would promptly get changed to "town", which would be seriously confusing. I'm afraid that there are quite a few more instances of that verbal gymnastic around for you to find.

By the way, I see nobody ever welcomed you and, after more than two years, its a bit late now. But in case you would like to know what you missed, see {{welcoming}}. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PayByPhone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PayByPhone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RPI2026F1 (talk) 16:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited English Channel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cornish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Social production of space requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://apass.be/books/details/95.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Anglicisation (linguistics), is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: I'm raising an objection to this under Wikipedia:DRAFTOBJECT and therefore requesting it to be moved back to mainspace (unfamiliar with this process, I'm unsure whether I should do it myself, or if the reviewer needs to do it).

The page does not meet the criteria for "the article does not meet the required standard" at Wikipedia:DRAFTIFY:

2a - the article is ready for mainspace, given that it is a split from a longstanding article on Wikipedia

2b & 2c - the sheer length of the article and number of reliable sources cited demonstrate that it is neither unimportant nor unlikely to be of interest to multiple people

2d - the article was not created by an experienced article. Given that it is a split of content which is older than 90 days from Anglicisation, the content also, in my view, fits the "older articles should not be draftified"

I recognised your concern about the amount of uncited sources, but there is content cited to reliable sources. So, I put the "needs additional citations for verification" template at the head of the page. Jèrriais janne (talk) 21:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article was not moved to lack of notability, but for not complying with WP:VERIFY. As I said in my note above, I thought that moving it to draftspace, rather than deleting the non-referenced material was less disruptive, as it would give you time to add the required sourcing. It appears I was mistaken. For future reference, you can simply move an article which has been draftified back to mainspace, and simply give "DRAFTOBJECT" as the rationale in the edit summary. I've moved it back and removed most of the unsourced material, as WP:VERIFY is a core policy of WP. And please remember, that as per WP:BURDEN, please do not re-add unsourced material, without providing a valid reference. Take care.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jèrriais janne (talk) 19:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might find this document published in February 2023 as a useful reference. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Guernsey, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Guernsey, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you the user who in January 2023 on said page disqualified the United Kingdom section pertaining to its various island territories? UnknownBrick22 (talk) 20:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yes, I am, and you can verify that contribution on the page's edit history. Why do you ask? If you wish to discuss the article content, I suggest we have a discussion on the article's talk page so other editors can contribute. Jèrriais janne (talk) 14:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:23, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Politics of Mali, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a Request Move discussion about William IV. Since you participated in the previous move discussion involving William IV, I thought you might want to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1955 United Kingdom heatwave, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]