User talk:Inflationhawk

Hello-Sorry I'm not taking part in the discussion at Talk:Inflation. I don't have an opinion yet as to the edits in question, but I wanted to let you know that the editor PennySeven has a history of antagonism on that article and its talk page. I'm not saying they're wrong in their current arguments, just saying that you shouldn't let the tone sun run you off. CRETOG8(t/c) 19:12, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

However, you have not provided evidence that the external link is relevant to the article, as we define "inflation". The fact that the link uses the word inflation doesn't necessarily mean it's relevant to the article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]