User talk:Immanuelle/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Ahiratsu-hime, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 10:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justiyaya was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not sure if this is notable, source 1 contains 5 sentences (one small section in the newspaper), source 2 does not appear to be independent, source 3 also contains 5 sentences, and source 4 appears to be a blog post. I would say notability borderline at best, 2 more sources contributing to GNG would make an easy accept

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Montrose and District RFC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Montrose and District RFC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justiyaya 11:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, MaitreyaVaruna! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Justiyaya 11:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of edible disasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of edible disasters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Automatically watching articles I edit for six months, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Changed name and now messages are going to my redirect talk page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Weird table of contents on article way to small for a table ot contents, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Mirrors in Shinto, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 10:13, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Changing list defined references to inline references, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Wild Turkey (bourbon) into List of industrial disasters. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Regarding Bure kinship, which you proposed to delete, that kinship is definitely noteable. Im from Sweden so I know. See also the Swedish WP page. However, there are many myths surrounding this family history also. There is a good text about that on Riksarkivet, https://sok.riksarkivet.se/sbl/mobil/Artikel/17152 In short that text describes the myths surrounding the history. But then it says that even if we takes away all myths, the family kinship is still very interesting and amazing.

--Mats33 (talk) 20:38, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 01:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are mostly passing mentions, insufficient to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saverio Raimondo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saverio Raimondo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 06:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please cite reliable secondary sources that describe the draft's subject. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 22:25, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Star Game and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Star Game, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 22:25, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It is not clear whether the genealogy section is a summary of what sources say, or if it is a synthesis. The sources need to be presented in a form that makes them possible to verify. "Tagishimimi (Ancient Clan) & 2010 (2010)" is incomprehensible – is it a book, an article, a documentary, or something else? Sources do not need to be in English, but an English speaker should be able to understand what the sources are, at least.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamuyaimimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kamuyaimimi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 14:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 20:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Veles circle.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I was about to start an article on this, but I noticed you are translating the Russian Wikipedia article. I am just confused as to why you are doing this in the trashspace (I mean, draftspace)? The article is already usable to the readers and I think it should be mainspaced ASAP. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

@Piotrus it was moved into draftspace and I was afraid of discretionary sanctions due to Eastern European articles meaning I could get in trouble over it. Personally I agree it should be in mainspace Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 15:25, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

I doubt you can get in trouble for submitting material, only for restoring contested one. It does, however, illustrate how various discretionary sanctions create a chilling effect. In ru wiki, there's the fear of Roskomnadzor. If en wiki, there is the fear of ourselves... sigh. If you'd like, please submit the draft for a review, and I'll review it (and likely accept it). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

@Piotrus I just submitted it Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 15:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Another editor provided a review, I've added mine. If you can add references or remove the unreferenced content, I'd be fine with publishing this. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Kisumimi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HenryTemplo (talk) 15:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nigihayahi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nigihayahi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 07:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Metal Rooster, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 12:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Immanuelle. You add the references "中山 2009" and "文化庁編さん 2011" to Association of Shinto Shrines, but not the corresponding full cites. I've tried looking at jawiki but can't determine which ones they should be. Could you do the translation, or let me know what works these refer to? - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 20:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

I fixed them. The reason they were not in the jawiki article is that they came from the article Jingu-kyo which itself was translated from Japanese Wikipedia. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 21:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Shinto nationalization, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Aside from the lack of sourcing it seems like a WP:POVFORK of another article (t · c) buidhe 17:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is familytree.js deprecated, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruthenian Triad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ruthenian Triad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 09:55, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Nağılar, Shusha instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft was copied into article space. A history merge has been requested.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nağılar, Shusha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nağılar, Shusha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, MaitreyaVaruna! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hikoyai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hikoyai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 19:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

On 4 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Environmental impact of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some severe environmental impacts of the invasion of Ukraine can be seen from space? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Environmental impact of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Environmental impact of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Over half of the the is unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jimmu's Eastern Expedition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jimmu's Eastern Expedition, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 08:27, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello Immanuelle,

You should probably know this by now since you've been around for a few months, but categories go at the bottom of articles. This isn't a big deal - it'll be sorted out the next time a bot passes by - but there's no reason not to "do it right" the first time. You can see this if you edit the source of any random article - all the categories will be at the bottom of the page. I saw this from the various shrines you've marked as Kanpei-taisha.

Also, I reverted the move you made at Ostracism. If you move an article, you should always make sure the new title is compliant with article titling guidelines - if you're unsure, consider using the WP:RM process to invite the community to weigh in. If you do make the move on your own, you should always explain yourself in the edit summary. I presume it was due to other definitions of the word "ostracism", but Wikipedia is not a dictionary. There's a strong tradition that if there's no need for parenthetical disambiguation, it isn't done - just stick the article at the base title. SnowFire (talk) 05:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Buddhist memorial service requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi! This disambiguation is a bit confusing. Do these have articles on enwiki? Would be useful to link it. One of the items is not described at all. ~Styyx^Talk? 21:37, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

I was planning on translating at least one of them pretty soon, but decided it's better just to translate the one of them that was linked in another article. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 21:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amadeus (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Habibullah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Alexbrn (talk) 19:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on This world requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Wotheina (talk) 12:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

idk why this needed to be a speedy deletion over just a deletion Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 15:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Buddhist memorial service, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi there! I was reviewing new pages when I noticed you recently wrote Shintoin. I popped over to the Japanese wikipedia to see what the sources over there looked like, and noticed that in the lead of the Japanese article it says the reading for 神祇院 is Jingiin. Can you cite the English source where you got your romanization from in the article? And for future pages you create, can you add the appropriate wikiprojects to the talk page? It'll help other people interested in the topic find the page. Thanks! Mcampany (talk) 01:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Star Game. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:29, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

Large sections are content are unsourced. There is really insufficient references for such a large article. There is numerous harv errors on many references as there is no biblio section been added. There is no trans tags on any of the references, which is sloppy and makes them difficult to read. The lede section is far too small for the size of the article and doesn't adequately explain what it is. Image captions, some of them anyway, make no sense. There isn't sufficient detail. Give me a shout when you have referenced it correctly and completed the updates.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yamato Kingship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yamato Kingship, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 01:56, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yamato Kingship. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 10:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Novgorod cross and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 13#Novgorod cross until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please collaborate with a co-author whose native language is English.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyushu Dynasty Theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kyushu Dynasty Theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Constitutional Research Committee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Constitutional Research Committee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 23:08, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, last night you went though what appears to be every open GAN in the video games subsection and created the review pages as redirects to the main talk page. I have reverted all of these changes. I have no idea why you did that, but please do not in the future- review pages should only be created when the article is being reviewed, and certainly not as redirects. I'm assuming good faith that it was not vandalism, but please do not do so again in the future. --PresN 12:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

I will refrain from it in the future. My impression was that these were red links that were a product of a deprecated talk page system. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 12:52, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Family tree of the House of Hohenzollern, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

we are not a family history repository.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Family tree of the House of Hohenzollern and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Family tree of the House of Hohenzollern, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Yamato Kingship, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 13:09, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Environmental consequences of Russia's occupation of Crimea.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle,

Thank you for creating Shrines and Temples Bureau.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hello, your references cannot be links to Wikipedia pages. This is also the English encyclopedia so you should not use other languages to describe references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Here is one possible source for you.

Bruxton (talk) 15:29, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle,

Thank you for creating Himikoko.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Reference are unclear. They cannot link to other Wikipedia articles and be called references, also the majority are in foreign language but this is the English Encyclopedia

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 18:29, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

@Bruxton: was the phrase “don’t link to other Wikipedia articles” recently added to a template? I’ve gotten it a few times recently but no other times before. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 18:34, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes, Wikipedia cannot be a reference in our articles. We need secondary sources for verification. Bruxton (talk) 18:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Immanuelle: How goes it. I'm planing to give you a hand with this article. I'm going to create a bibliography section, so it fixes the refs. scope_creep^Talk 10:49, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

I tried to find the reference for 白石 (2002) which is Shiraishi (2002). Is that right. I can't identify it. If you put the full references as a cite, with the ref bit at the end of each references, just a raw cite without page number, I think that will fix reference 20. A good example of this technique is at Red Orchestra. If you look at the bibliography section, you see the raw cites with pagenumbers. When you click on a references anywhere in the article, it automatically takes you do the appropiate cite. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 11:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

@Scope creep I added the citation in the bibliography. I am not confident in translating Kanji of names into English, as there are often countless different readings of the Kanji so I prefer to keep them as is. That one for instance can be read as Shiraishi or Shiroishi. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 11:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

@Scope creep do you consider the article to have been sufficiently improved for mainspace? It is not perfect but I believe existing citations have been fixed and the lede. Still needs more citations though Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 21:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

@Immanuelle: Its getting there and is better than it was. There now seems to be reams of .[citation needed] templates everywhere. If some page reviewers when its reviewed in mainspace, it will be sent back. I'll have a good look at finding some references. Google books are good source and academic journal. Its a high quality article and its proper referencing to remain in mainspace. I know if a process, it takes a bit of time. Please keep at it. I'll give you a hand when I can. scope_creep^Talk 05:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

@Scope creep do you think it is sufficient now? Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 17:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

That is excellent work and is much better condition. I would have thought that would have taken a month to do that. The following still needs done:

1. Ref 14 needs a cite in the bibliography section.
2. Ref 30 needs replaced with a worldcat entry name and page number.
3. Ref 47 states: first= has generic name so that needs looked at.

Reference wise it is much better condition, but it still needs the following:

1. Related Shrines sections needs a reference or references for each of those entries, you can probably grab them the source article. Remember to give an attrubution by leaving a comment stating they cam from that article.
2. On "Seven-Branched Sword and the Monument to King Hirokaidou" section there is two citation needed fields, that need a reference.
3. The "The first half of the early Kofun period." has no references.
4. ""Yamato Imperial Court" Never use etc in Wikipedia anywhere. Remove it some somehow and put clarification text in.

There is another couple of citation needed entry. If you can find citations all the better. But that excellent work in the time available. Please give me a shout when your finished. I'll looking forward to promoting it. Thanks for taking the time to update it. scope_creep^Talk 19:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Completed the first part. Now moving onto the second one Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 09:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Only "The first half of the early Kofun period." and Related Shrines left Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 09:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

@Scope creep there it's done Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 13:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

@Immanuelle:. Pure class. I only two know people that work at that speed. Excellent work. I'll promote it now. The references are excellent!! scope_creep^Talk 13:09, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

I stumbled across mention of "King Hirokaidou", which strikes me phonologically as an unlikely name for anyone in the Old Japanese period, due to its confused combination of kun'yomi and on'yomi. I perused the section at Yamato_Kingship#Seven-Branched_Sword_and_the_Monument_to_King_Hirokaidou_(Late_Early_Kofun_Period), and despite the king's name right there in the section title, he isn't mentioned anywhere in the body. Who is this? Why is this relevant enough for a section title, but no body text?

Separately, the section talks about the Seven-Branched Sword as definitively dated to 369. The article about the sword itself describes the date as disputed, possibly as 369, possibly as 408. This page (Yamato Kingship) should be reworked to be in agreement with the Seven-Branched Sword page.

The first paragraph in this section ends with "... and the actual date was 372 when the zodiac signs were carried forward two orders." This is unintelligible. What does it mean to "carry a zodiac sign forward two orders"? This phrase has no discernible significance.

The second paragraph starts with "In any case, Japan had a close relationship with the Renna countries, especially Renna (Jinguan), and secured the iron resources produced in the region." More gibberish.

• "...the Renna countries, especially Renna..." This is nonsense. As in, non-sensible, not making sense.

"Renna" here links through to the Mimana article. In Japanese contexts, no one uses the name "Renna" -- that is pinyin for the Chinese name.

The Mimana article includes zero mention of any "Jinguan". What is "Jinguan" supposed to signify? Why does the text again use Chinese pinyin, when other English-language academic texts about these places use either romanized Japanese or romanized Koreanic names?

What does "secured" mean in this context? That the Yamato polity sent a group of people to take possession? That the Yamato polity engaged in amicable trade? Unclear.

⇒ On the whole, this text still reads like it has been poorly machine-translated from something else. This is not ready for prime time. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 21:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

World Elijah Evangelical Mission, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 18:43, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page The large inward-looking flower mirror to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. A loose necktie (talk) 10:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Articles like Naikokamonkyo are bit of a dog's breakfast, with content that is rendered kinda sorta phonetically (like the page title, which for proper romanization should probably be something more like Naikōkamon-kyō) instead of in proper English (which should probably be something more like "Flower-patterned Bronze Mirror"; the 内行 portion isn't particularly germane, since there doesn't seem to be any other kind of flower-patterned mirror that I can find in references). Then there's the strange grammar, sentences that don't make sense ("...there are also imitation mirrors made by Yayoi." ← the tense is odd, making it sound like a person or group named "Yayoi" is still making these; or "...with many examples being excavated especially in the early and middle Kofun period.", which erroneously states that the excavations themselves happened in ancient times).

I am curious what tool you're using to translate this content? Are you able to read the source text in Japanese at all? ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 08:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Daikyoin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Katashiro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 18:05, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Highly unlikely that the sources cited establish notability, and the way they are cited (each only once) is certainly not enough to support the article contents.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sheng Shrine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sheng Shrine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Serhii Filimonov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Serhii Filimonov, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 21:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Serhii Filimonov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 14:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle,

Thank you for creating Miko clothing.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There are numerous unsourced statements, which require inline citations per WP:BURDEN.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Meena}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– DarkGlow • 09:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle,

Thank you for creating Wajinden.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There are numerous unsourced statements, which require inline citations per WP:BURDEN.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Meena}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– DarkGlow • 09:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Daikyoin.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:23, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Toumakoku.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Flower Mirror.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Fumikoku.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Shujukoku.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Black tooth country.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Large Flower Mirror.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Chikushikoku.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Chikushikoku.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:29, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Itokoku.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Shin'okoku.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Kukochihiko.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Amatsukami and Kunitsukami.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Shrine Merger Policy.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs to prominently mention the country or authority that issued the policy. I marked as reviewed

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Alexievsky cross.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Kununokuni.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Nagakusa Tenjin Shrine.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs to prominently mention the country.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Amatsukami and Kunitsukami.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Shirahigetawara Shrine.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs to prominently say the country. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:39, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Shirahigetawara Shrine.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Need to prominently say the country of location. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:41, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Chinju no Mori.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Jewish economics.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This really doesn't have a distinct topic. Suggest conversion to a redirect.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating The civil war of the Keitai and Kinmeicho dynasties.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Moated settlements.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This appears to be about moated settlements in a certain area. It should probably either be renamed or broadened accordingly. If renamed, the redirects that go to it might need redirecting to more general targets. Happy editing

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Sanbo.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:52, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Jingin.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:54, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Izborsky club.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Shinto Taiseikyo.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice start. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Shinto Taiseikyo.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:46, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Shinto Secretariat.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Kannabi.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs more references. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Ministry of Religious Education.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Need to add the country / government that it is a part of. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Harima dynasty.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:50, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating World Elijah Evangelical Mission.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Leaf from a Manichaean book MIK III 8259. Thanks! ~Styyx^Talk? 16:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manolis Pilavov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leninsky district.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Leaf from a Manichaean book MIK III 8259, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 04:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Vast swathes completely unreferenced — where is this information coming from (translation? OR?) and how can we know it's correct? --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Comparison of Lao and Thai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Comparison of Lao and Thai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Tsukaikoku, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 05:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Ikikoku, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 05:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Ritual music system, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 12:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Patriarchal Clan System, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 14:07, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:Ancient_Korean_institutions has been nominated for merging. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_July_6#Category:Ancient_Korean_institutions. – Fayenatic London 07:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

I see that you have populated it now, so I will withdraw that CFD. Thanks – Fayenatic London 09:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Pravoslavie.ru.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't think it has been shown that the term is in widespread enough use in the English language, and that as a concept it is distinct enough to warrant an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Medallistics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Medallistics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patriarchal Clan System and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Patriarchal Clan System, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 02:35, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Immanuelle:, I came across your article Shendao which I'm reviewing at NPP. Currently it the references are a real problem. They are virtually useless to the average English reader. I tried to find a couple but couldn't. Can your convert them to English with proper cites in each one, in English? At the moment they are bareurl which makes the article draftable. scope_creep^Talk 12:53, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

@Scope creep I will work on them. Thank you for the notice Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 12:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Thats really good. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 12:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

This is an example, that just now came up for review: Sacrifice ritual. Refs 7-9, 19-26 are bare urls as. Fixing them would an ideal as well. Expanded and trans-title tags on each ref with a proper cite is needed. Hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 13:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Three Dynasties, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thingofme (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Gion cult, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 23:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Echizen dynasty.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:49, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Dignity taking, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 16:21, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Haji clan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 17:30, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Tanka association, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KylieTastic (talk) 17:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Première maison d’Orange-Nice, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yamatai Honshu Theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yamatai Honshu Theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fusou, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Simu Xin Ding, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:35, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Jewish economics, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 06:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Salidou, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Draft:Religious Confucianism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Why are AFC templates being added to articles I've created in draftspace?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dege31 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Unclear why this should be a separate article and simple definitions are for Wiktionary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kiki (Shinto) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kiki (Shinto), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dege31 (talk) 14:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reimu Hakurei, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Lekkerbekje, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 01:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, John Vervaeke, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 15:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Immanuelle, when examining the Religious Confucianism article there appears to be major problems that prevent it from being a quality article in the main space due to the nature of the article being translated from the Chinese Wikipedia. As such the article may need to be proofread by a second person who is fluent in Chinese to catch errors you may have missed. The article has a lot of detail that may be better off in articles of their own otherwise it may be too large to comfortably navigate. It also seems very nuanced and esoteric for the average English Wikipedia reader. Lastly, several citations are not properly formatted either lacking a period, existing before a comma, or be placed by a left over juhao mark. Thanks for the great article! FourPaws (talk) 04:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

@FourPaws It was a difficult article. Note that only part of the lede and the sections Religious_Confucianism#Late_Qing_Dynasty_and_Early_Republican_Views and Religious_Confucianism#Civil_War_to_Modern_Views are actually translated from the Chinese article. In the process of editing it I replaced almost everything else translated from Chinese. There are a lot of parts of the Chinese article that would be worth translation into English but probably in sub articles, such as lists of deified people and rituals. I put my translation attempts on the talk page but they are probably worth just redoing from scratch Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 15:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Oh and also this section Religious_Confucianism#Origin_of_the_term_Ru Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 16:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Chinese Divination, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 23:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Immanuelle. Me and others have recently draftified quite a few of your article creations. Honestly, I think quite a few of them are notable. However, they all lack the appropiate sourcing to stay in the mainspace. Can you please not create articles that have a majority of their texts unsourced or ones with a single source that don't show the subject's notability? I draftify them because they are likely to be notable, but it obviously takes some extra time to do all of this (and people blame me for draftifying too much). Cheers! ~Styyx^Talk? 23:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle,

Thank you for creating Chidi (god).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for the article! Consider also looking for some book citations online.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 17:42, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bone divination. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:51, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cāngdì, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Han.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Beccaynr (talk) 13:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle,

Thank you for creating Temple of Evergreen.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please provide at least two reliable references for this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 10:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Temple of Evergreen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 10:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle,

Thank you for creating Death in vain.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your contribution. However, this article has only vague referencing and provides little context to readers. For example, if it is specifically about Chinese beliefs, then this needs to be made clear

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 10:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Death in vain, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 10:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Death in vain. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

The article All good things come together has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article does not cite any source, and a WP:BEFORE shows nothing tangible.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 21:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Miao indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Hokuto Hoshi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 14:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Female (gender), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 14:45, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Immanuelle, are you okay with merging Si (Xing) to Si (surname)? I don't think we usually do (Xing)s, I know it's the pronunciation of 姓 (the Chinese word for surname) but I don't think it's commonly done... Justiyaya 13:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Considering it's a different surname 斯 rather than 姒 it shouldn't be merged, although the name can be changed to something like Shi_(surname_ 斯). I consider the notability of the surname to derive from it being a Xing though so I think the title is best left unchanged. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 13:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

ah okay eh a bit confused about this but does appear to have different articles in zh sooo yeah probably notable, thanks for clearing it up :D Justiyaya 13:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

(chiming in...)

• Both 斯 and 姒 are surnames, and both are romanized without diacritics as "Si".

Wikipedia article titles should generally not include non-Latin characters, so any article title that relies on Chinese hanzi as a disambiguation technique is a non-starter.

Thus, ostensibly, information about both surnames should go on the [[Si (surname)]] page, which should be reorganized to include different sections for the different surnames that can be romanized this way.

• @Immanuelle, I have noticed a concerning trend in the new articles you are creating -- many (most? all?) of them are badly machine-translated from other-language wikis, and you clearly do not have the linguistic abilities to fix all of the issues that this process introduces into the content. For instance, anyone fluent enough in Chinese and English to competently translate between the languages would never have created an article at [[Si (Xing)]], because (as @Justiyaya notes) this "xing" is just the romanization of 姓 ("surname"). See also the disambig article at Xing and the specific article at Chinese surname.

Moreover, your contribution history shows that you are generating these new EN Wikipedia articles at a rapid pace -- far too quickly for proper processing and cleanup of any translated content, be it translated by humans or by machines.

I have vetted some of your content sourced from the JA Wikipedia, and as a professional Japanese-English translator, I can say with sincerity that your content is problematic at best, and far too often it is flat-out wrong, showing that you are unfamiliar with both Japanese and the subject of the article.

Please slow down. Please stick to languages you actually know and are competent in reading. And ideally please stick to subjects that you are at least passingly familiar with.

‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 21:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: No reason at all, but since I'm already here, here's a gif I found funny

AnAkemie (talk) 00:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

This is the first time I've been trouted by anyone but myself. It makes me happy Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 01:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

It's an honour to be the first one. I hope you are trouted many more times in your life. AnAkemie (talk) 01:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beppo shrine 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:Chinese Thought has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 22:56, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Category:History of Chinese Thought has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 22:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Foundation Master requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

I wonder if you want to archive all these old threads that are now irrelevant. I know a bot that archives threads automatically. Maybe we can setup the bot together. AnAkemie (talk) 15:32, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@AnAkemie which bot? I've been wanting to start this too. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 18:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@Immanuelle it's the Lowercase sigmabot III. There's instructions on there if you want to learn by yourself, but I think I already learned how to configure it. AnAkemie (talk) 18:17, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Do you want it archived by pages (basically all threads are archived to the same page until it reaches a limit and then it gets archived to a page 2) or do you want it to be archived by month? AnAkemie (talk) 23:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@AnAkemie archiving by pages sounds best. My page is not a current events page so dates aren't that important. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 23:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@Immanuelle Alright, I hope you authorize me to place the code in your talk page. Then the bot will start picking thread older than 7 days (it's customizable so you it could be whatever many days you want) and it will add these old threads to User talk:Immanuelle/Archive 1. AnAkemie (talk) 23:45, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@AnAkemie I authorize you on this Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 23:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@Immanuelle Done. Not sure when the bot will start working though. AnAkemie (talk) 23:59, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@AnAkemie it worked pretty much all at once Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 20:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All good things come together is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All good things come together until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

happy it wasn't deleted Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 02:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Immanuelle! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I want to propose a merger, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dongye.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle

Thank you for creating Lai Yonghai.

User:Ovinus, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Passes WP:NPROF#C5 as a distinguished professor of a major university

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ovinus}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ovinus (talk) 19:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Emperor Huaguang, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 10:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Category:Chinese list of cults has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 11:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Heterosexual relationships among LGBT people, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Salidou".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Asian Thought indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:25, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Yamatai Kyushu Theory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 03:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Ren (ancient surname), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 12:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle,

If you accidentally create a page like this through a bad page move, it would be helpful if you would tag it for deletion. This page sat around for a month before another editor came across it and tagged it for speedy deletion. Please take care of accidents like this in the future. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Hey,

Thanks for your content translation work. Quick question: Are you fluent in Mandarin? The article Dongyue Dadi (lit. Dongyue (Great) Emperor) should probably be titled "Dongyue Emperor". Also, I'd appreciate if you could convert Chinese-style citations like 山北篤『東洋神名事典』新紀元社2002年、p.250 to standard English-language citation formats. Ovinus (talk) 19:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm not fluent in Mandarin. I took the title from the German Wikipedia entry https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dongyue_Dadi I've had similar issues with Tenno taitei where I had no clue what the optimal translation was and couldn't find any established one. I fixed that one. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 20:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Hm, okay. I see you've translated some articles from zh wiki; have you taken a Mandarin class of some type, or are you using machine translation? Respectfully, I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to translate content from languages which you can't speak/read. Ovinus (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

It is not a good idea and @Immanuelle is very much aware of this. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: Er, could you clarify? You mean they aren't using machine translation, or that this is an issue? Ovinus (talk) 20:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

I meant they are, or should be, acutely aware of this not being appropriate (ie. machine translations/translations of languages they don't speak) given their lengthy history. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

In that case, I'd ask Immanuelle to stop creating these articles in mainspace. There are too many issues with machine translation for this to be healthy. Ovinus (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

@Praxidicae and Ovinus: See also my earlier comment, now at User_talk:Immanuelle/Archive_2#New_article.

(Incidentally, I think the cadence of archiving on this page is too fast -- discussion (non-bot) content from not even a month ago should ideally still be left in place, no?)

I ran across Immanuelle's contributions several months ago after stumbling across the machine-translated messes left behind by SiliconProphet (talk · contribs). Immanuelle picked up a few of SiliconProphet's articles.

I am somewhat heartened to see that Immanuelle has been making earnest efforts to clean up these articles. However, the inability to read the source texts and the apparent unfamiliarity with the subject matter makes such efforts difficult at best. And the pace of creating new machine-translated articles is excessive. I do hope that Immanuelle slows down and takes a more careful and focused approach going forward. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 17:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

@Eirikr: I myself had already noticed that Immanuelle continued where SiliconProphet left off. Please see my critical remarks here. I also think there could be a good deal of invention in Immanuelle's articles. See for instance what they have been writing here: User:Immanuelle/Five Ancestors.--Æo (talk) 21:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Immanuelle: For Abdication system, how could you have read source #2, "Canon of Shun" (舜典), Classic of History (書經), traditionally first compiled and edited by Confucius (孔夫子), in about Fifth to Sixth Century BC, in what is now China. (ISBN of original unavailable.) ? I've draftified the article as it barely defines what "abdication system" means. Ovinus (talk)

• @Immanuelle: I have also found out that you have uploaded invented coats of arms for Chinese clans on Wikimedia Commons (e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tang_%E5%94%90_Arms.svg). I think it is a good idea that you fix the messes you made by cancelling all your contributions yourself. Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons are not your playground!--Æo (talk) 09:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

@Æo: Oh, dear. This is deeply concerning. The commons:File:Tang_唐_Arms.svg image is baffling, as is the fantasy recorded on the User:Immanuelle/Five_Ancestors page.

@Immanuelle: Creating articles and images that are fictional content is not allowed. Please review the Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes page. Please also review the Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought section, and the Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_blog,_web_hosting_service,_social_networking_service,_or_memorial_site section. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │^{Tala við mig} 17:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Looks like a systematic review is in order. From what I've seen thus far, the mainspace content is mostly nonfictional, but often very misguided translations, using idiosyncratic language which proper English-language sources would not use. The user space content may indeed contain some fictional stuff. However, I would like to hear from Immanuelle herself on her process for creating these articles. Ovinus (talk) 20:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Greatest Emperor and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 18#Greatest Emperor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:40, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Thearch of Thearchs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 18#Thearch of Thearchs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

The article Tenno taitei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsalvagable translated mess to the point of WP:TNT. Confuses Japanese and Chinese sources/information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ovinus (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Emperor Huaguang, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ovinus (talk) 19:12, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Pre-Qin indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Susa Shrine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DavidEfraim was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamuyaimimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DavidEfraim (talk) 10:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DavidEfraim (talk) 10:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beppo shrine 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:29, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Selection Dates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tenjin faith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 14:33, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Musuhi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Saijin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I am not seeing anything to change the previous articles for deletion decision to delete. I see a single article that isn't from around the time of his supposed death, and that has a one sentence mention. His role in the Chechen purges is also covered only in these retrospective articles. Well written bio article, but in my opinion does not pass WP:BIO1E; if there are articles about his role in the purges dating before his "death", that would push it over into notability for me.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Magomed Tushayev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 19:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 19:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Heterosexual relationships among LGBT people".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)