User talk:Shadow311

This is Shadow311's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

Yes, you made a terrible mistake, I believe. Return the info I added!!! Here are just some of the sources about the shady privatization and illegal practices of Willi Betz, that "bought" the Bulgarian SOMAT:

https://www.mediapool.bg/shefat-na-somat-razpitvan-v-germaniya-po-protsesa-sreshtu-vili-bets-news127432.html

https://www.dw.com/bg/%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%B0-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%86/a-3200347 92.247.198.112 (talk) 17:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 17:16, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I did not realize the edit was correct. Shadow311 (talk) 17:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright it happens, just maybe try to check what the page looks like next time. The edit was not really needed, but it does make things go a little smoother for review. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The added external pages is directly linked to Inoue sensei organisation, today run by his son Kisho Inoue (official homepage: http://www.ryukyukobujutsuhozonshinkokai.org/index.html ) and the second external link is to verify the first MENKYO KAIDEN-diploma from Shinken Taira sensei to Motokatsu Inoue sensei, this page links to the organisation s UK branch chief Julian Meads homepage( https://www.rkagb.com/motokatsu_inoue) 81.233.237.195 (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You added bare urls to the body of the article. Please see WP:REFB. Shadow311 (talk) 16:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have responded to your vandalism notice on my talk page. My edit that you reverted was not vandalism. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 17:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you removed was not incomprehensible. Just because it is not easy to read, does not make it incomprehensible. Shadow311 (talk) 19:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HI there, I do believe that you made a mistake. I think its quite important that the fact that Emmanuel Lemelson was convicted of securities fraud be a meaningful part of the wikipedia entry and I have tried to source it correctly. Is there something else you'd suggest i include? 73.170.96.18 (talk) 18:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, you were not formatting the reference correctly. see WP:CS for information about how to cite sources correctly. Shadow311 (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for weighing in. I've been trying to get the editor(s) from the IP registered to the university to make an official edit proposal but they apparently prefer to argue rather than abide by Wikipedia's rules.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added a little more detail to the profile such as Bruna Da Silva wining the Musa contest Da Vila para o Caldeirão | Guia da Vila (tudoeste.com.br) Glennfrommer (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm the Marketing Director for WBQB. I updated our page based on our web content. B1015.com and B1015DigitalSolutions.com. The information listed is out of date and doesn't match with our web descriptions. I see that all the changes made were not accepted. I'd love for you to reconsider my changes so our information is correct. Additionally, our name is B101.5 WBQB. I'd love for that to be correct. Also, the logo is wrong. We created a new one about 3 years ago. I'd like to update that too. Any help you can give me is appreciated. I can provide credentials if needed THANKs! BuzzyBee1015 (talk) 16:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can propose changes to WBQB at Talk:WBQB using the {{edit COI}} template. Shadow311 (talk) 16:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shadow311!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ummm. . . I was just denied the user right less than a month ago... Shadow311 (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Tate (2nd nomination) as keep, but this is obviously a controversial discussion and shouldn't be done by non-admin closers. I think you should revert your close. (Personally, I also think you may also want to avoid doing any closes at all, since you have only limited AfD participation.) -- asilvering (talk) 17:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reporting path for stuff like this? James.folsom (talk) 23:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@James.folsom you can take someone to WP:DRV, or WP:ANI if it's really getting out of hand. -- asilvering (talk) 00:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This editor self-reverted one of these, so maybe it can just be handled that way. –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's my hope, yes. But the question was about the path for reporting. But can't uninvolved admins also revert an inappropriate nac? @Novem Linguae, that could be you... -- asilvering (talk) 00:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sisante_Wind_Farm as it's still too premature to decide on that as well, it hasn't even been re posted. James.folsom (talk) 23:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone the closes for sisante wind farm and tristan tate. If there are any more XFD closes of mine that I still need to revert let me know. Shadow311 (talk) 14:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am a member of this tribe, and in general we have made arrangements as tribal members. Reşwanaşireti (talk) 17:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any proof? Shadow311 (talk) 17:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok 132.147.193.157 (talk) 20:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize you currently are not blocked, right? Shadow311 (talk) 20:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Paducah, KY-IL micropolitan area was upgraded to a Metropolitan Statistical Area by the United States Office of Management and Budget in July, 2023. This includes the Kentucky counties of McCracken, Ballard, Livingston, and Carlisle and Massac County, Illinois, which would include all incorporated and unincorporated entities located in these counties. The OMB bulletin 23-01 was cited. Check this source and this should eliminate any question of accuracy. 199.36.132.34 (talk) 18:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shardow311,

This was the first edit I've done personally and wasn't aware of the Conflict of Interest policy; however, I've been trying to get all search engines and other web pages that redirect to our site updated with our new website address "https://www.fbcw.org". We've moved off the apex domain for DNS reasons and the complications resulting from trying to use the apex domain as a website host. You can verify that https://fbcw.org no longer works and that we have moved to https://www.fbcw.org for all main website pages. Unfortunately Google is taking a long time to implement our requests to re-index, so search results are all wrong still. Thanks for understanding our situation and forgiving our now understood inappropriate attempt to make this change ourselves.  FBCW777 (talk) 19:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Reverting edits faster than they appear for me. You're the goddamn flash man, good job. Personhumanperson (talk) 15:58, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you rate articles, could you try to add them to a project as well? Sometimes it's a bit difficult to come up with one, but usually you can. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do try to when I have time to think about it. Shadow311 (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you answered an edit request, you didn't mark the request as answered by setting |answered=yes. Thanks for completing the edit request itself; just a quick reminder to mark it as done. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. I've added my COI for Character.ai to my User page W12SW77 (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shadow311, I'm not sure if you saw but I made an updated infobox edit request on the Florida Power & Light Talk page after your last message there. Would you be able to take a look? I'd really appreciate it. FPL Daniel (talk) 14:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just wondering how you concluded the consensus was KEEP when most arguments were not strong, many clearly in breach WP:RGW and WP:ADVOCACY, and some from accounts created solely to comment. Thanks! WikiMane (TP2001) (talk) 17:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ThunderPeel2001 From what it looked like, no one was supporting the deletion of the article. Some of the people that were against the deletion had 50k, 18k, and 20k edits. Shadow311 (talk) 18:47, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]