User talk:Horsesizedduck

Welcome!

Hello, Horsesizedduck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 09:41, 5 June 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

Collaboration and consensus

I noticed that you made a change at Carl Friedrich Gauss, and after I changed part of it as not an improvement to the article, you came back within a few minutes and reverted, in order to reinstall your original version again. This is not how things are done at Wikipedia. It's fine to WP:BE BOLD and make a change you think will improve the article, as you did in this edit, but if another editor objects to part of it, as was the case here, rather than just revert in order to keep your original content, please go to the Talk page of the article and discuss any content disagreement with other editors. Wikipedia works by consensus, not by trying to force your changes into the article; that just leads to Edit warring. Please see the guideline at WP:BRD for details. Another thing you can do, is instead of making one large edit, with changes sprinkled all over the article, make several smaller edits, so that if only part of it is problematic, it's easier to keep the parts that other editors are happy with, and just redo the ones that need it. If you have any questions, feel free to ask here, or on my Talk page. And once again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 09:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome! Please consider this mistake mistake a consequence of inexperience and unfamiliarity. Hope I'll hear from you again. Horsesizedduck (talk) 13:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Horsesizedduck/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Horsesizedduck/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Jupitus Smart 02:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Horsesizedduck! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jupitus Smart 02:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Horsesizedduck! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:33, Friday, June 11, 2021 (UTC)

Favor?

I recently nominated Danganronpa 2: Goodbye Despair to GA and had to revise some sentences in the process. If you could revise it like you did with To Your Eternity I would appreciate it. Also, if you are interested Eternity was listed to be copyedited by the guild so it might be possible to nominate it too in the future for GA. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite! I'll take a look. Horsesizedduck (talk) 22:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It looks pretty good but suggest trimming a bit the plot section. Use Rurouni Kenshin as an example. That series has 28 volumes but the plot is quite smaller as early story arcs are briefly treated in sections like the friends Kenshin earns and rivals. When it comes to reception I recommend using Akudama Drive or X (manga) as examples. In these articles rather than saying "Writer X said something", each paragraph focuses on a different subject like formal letter like, premise, characters, art, finale, etc. The art of Chainsawman could be discussed in a paragraph. Kinda similar to what we did with To Your Eternity. I hope this helps. Happy editing.Tintor2 (talk) 11:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To Your Eternity is being copyedited now so if you are interested we might as well nominate it to GA once it's done. Also, in case you are interested I just have been created two character articles from Akudama. You think you could check the prose of Courier (Akudama Drive) if possible? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 14:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Tintor2: Sure! I may be a little tight on time for the coming weeks, so expect a little delay, but I'll see what I can do. Horsesizedduck (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Number of words

You can find the number of words of an article through Wikipedia:Prosesize#Installation and removal. :) I think the relevant output is the 'readable prose size'. Urve 13:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To Your Eternity

A Barnstar!
BarnSakura for excellent edits

To Your Eternity became GA :D Thanks for the help. You deserve the award with how many articles you edit. Keep up the good work.

|Tintor2 (talk) 00:13, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Tintor2: I'm having a great time with editing indeed. Always feel free to call on my services! Horsesizedduck (talk) 00:22, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not planning anything now although I tried expanding the old article Darker than Black.Tintor2 (talk) 01:12, 15 July 2021 (UTC) Courier went GA. Thanks for the edits. Are you planning to edit anything?Tintor2 (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the past months I created Hei (Darker than Black). While it is appropiately sourced and has coverage of most aspects of the character, its prose needs some clean up. If you could revise it I would appreciate it. Probably the section that needs the most clean up is characerization and themes due to the commentary provided through analysis. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

Discontent Content Issue 6

Expanding doi references

In case you did not realize, since you're fairly new -- There's an easier and faster way to expand DOI references than invoking the citation bot. If you're using the text editor in Wikipedia, click on Cite in the toolbar, select Cite Journal on the menu that pops up, and put the DOI in the DOI edit box of the infobox that appears and then click the button to the right. The DOI information will automatically be looked up to fill in most of the rest of the infobox.

Apologies if you already knew this -- I realize there are other reasons to invoke the citation bot than just convenience in expanding a DOI. Cheers! --Kent G. Budge (talk) 22:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

A barnstar for you!

The Invisible Barnstar
For your valued work in the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive, which, in a single month, helped to reduce the backlog by nearly 50%. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

Happy holidays

It's been long since I saw you. I'm currently planning to bring Jujutsu Kaisen 0 to GA as I think its size and coverage is enough. Feel free to revise like you did with Gojo. Happy holidays.Tintor2 (talk) 13:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

Title

Hi there, well, this might be completely unnecessary to write to you but, i just received your thanks for one of my minor edit on the article Attack on Titan (season 4). I just wanted to let you know i received it and it did bring a smile on my face knowing that my edit was helpful. Thank you for your thanks. Have a good day and happy editing on Wikipedia. paperpseudonym (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paperpseudonym Thanks for the kind words! I am happy to have made you happy! Your edits were indeed helpful. It was lovely to be a part of this positive feeling ouroboros. Happy editing! Horsesizedduck (talk) 19:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

Discontent Content Issue 7

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Horsesizedduck&oldid=1187228031"