User talk:Horserice

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Gladly awarding this to Horserice for his dedicated editing to the Hong Kong, ensuring it meets the standards of Wikipedia's Manual of Style. MarshalN20 ✉🕊 22:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Horserice. I'm checking out the editing work you're putting into the Hong Kong article, and so I wanted to award you this as an acknowledgement of your work. Regardless the final result of the FA review, I think your editing reflects dedication. Good work!--MarshalN20 ^✉🕊 22:19, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MarshalN20, much appreciated! Horserice (talk) 04:14, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article British National (Overseas) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 18:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! Looking forward to your feedback. -- Horserice (talk) 21:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Horserice you seem to have quite a big knowledge base on canadian law is there a way to contact you? 197.211.137.47 (talk) 15:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article British National (Overseas) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:British National (Overseas) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 06:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	燒賣!
	Since WP:HK has nothing else other than a barnstar, I think this is a close selection of food for your first HK GA. Hopefully you'll get over the FAC hill for Hong Kong.  Nova Crystallis (Talk) 06:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article British Overseas citizen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 06:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article British Overseas citizen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:British Overseas citizen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 05:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		WikiProject Hong Kong Award
		Congrats on bringing British National (Overseas) to Featured Article status! Now, I also want to recommend you to nominate the article for "Today's Featured Article" on July 1, since it's probably the best date to do it.  Nova Crystallis (Talk) 18:32, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated, glad to finally have an FA done. Horserice (talk) 20:42, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article British protected person you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 20:40, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article British protected person you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:British protected person for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 07:21, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article British protected person you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:British protected person for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the British National (Overseas) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 1, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 1, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors up to the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:09, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great, will do. Thanks, Horserice (talk) 20:39, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Commonwealth citizen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 18:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article British subject you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cavie78 -- Cavie78 (talk) 17:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article British subject you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:British subject for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cavie78 -- Cavie78 (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article National without household registration you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:National without household registration for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Raymie -- Raymie (talk) 20:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article British subject you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:British subject for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cavie78 -- Cavie78 (talk) 17:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Right of abode in Hong Kong you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 18:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Right of abode in Hong Kong you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Right of abode in Hong Kong for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 06:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The new infoboxes you're proposing for England, Wales, Scotland & Northern Ireland are (IMHO) an improvement & consistent with other non-sovereign states articles. GoodDay (talk) 17:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: Glad to hear that you agree! I opened a discussion on Template talk:Infobox country UK if you'd like to voice your opinion there. Horserice (talk) 19:14, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article South Korean nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 09:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article South Korean nationality law you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:South Korean nationality law for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 12:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article South Korean nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:South Korean nationality law for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 13:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	Your Citizenship Has Been Accepted!
	You had enough motivation to help the page nurture. Always remember that your oldest of achievements from the past should still matter to you, even this one! Thanks for existing. Editoneer (talk) 08:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article New Zealand nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 06:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article New Zealand nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:New Zealand nationality law for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 23:41, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Horserice! The article you nominated, New Zealand nationality law, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Few understand how much work went into it, but I totally get it. SusunW (talk) 13:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to look at it! Glad to finally be done with that review. Horserice (talk) 21:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! I just have the time to follow up on this today. I am glad to see that the article is promoted eventually. --Taweetham (talk) 05:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Horserice, I had made some edits to the Taiwanese Nationality Law page, and I acknowledge that you found them to be disruptive. I hope I can explain my position a little more here. The section which I edited is actually a highly political topic in the ROC today. Specifically: "The Chinese government imposed ROC nationality on local residents in 1946, when the Executive Yuan declared the "restoration" of their status as Chinese nationals. Unlike the cession to Japan, Taiwanese residents could not choose which nationality to retain when the ROC took control."

You cited an article from the Taipei Times, which is a Pan-Green newspaper in Taiwan. The Pan-Green alignment is inclined towards Taiwanese localisation and independence. Some claims which have been made by Pan Green supporters include the illegitimacy of the Republic of China, and other ideas involving the idea that Taiwan should still belong to Japan due to some technicality in international law.

I apologize for previously deleting the segment. However, I believe that the phrasing of these two sentences is highly politically charged and also biased in favour of Pan Green politics. The status of Taiwan in international law is still moot and there are valid arguments on either side. I believe that the article should reflect a broad spectrum of information, which is why my final edit was to insert a line to the effect that the Taiwanese could not choose which nationality to retain, because Japan revoked their Japanese citizenship. This information is included in the article which you cited at the end of the sentence: "The Japanese government made public said that Taiwanese were to lose their Japanese nationality as soon as the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty — commonly known as the Treaty of Taipei, which did not enter into force until Aug. 5, 1952 — took effect."

The article places emphasis on the overlap between the restoration of ROC nationality in 1946 and the loss of Japanese nationality in 1952. However, there nevertheless appears to be no evidence that the ROC had removed any choice for Taiwanese residents, because if they had not granted ROC citizenship, then Taiwanese residents would not have had a nationality after Japan's retreat. Therefore, I believe that the ideal compromise for the page is to acknowledge that Taiwanese residents could not choose, because Japan revoked their Japanese status. If you disagree with this position, I would highly appreciate it if you could explain what options were open for the Taiwanese to choose, between 1946 and 1952, and we can work from there. I believe that it would only be correct to say that the Taiwanese could not choose, if the ROC actually prevented them from being able to choose a different nationality. An "imposed" ROC nationality can nevertheless be renounced if the individual were able to obtain another nationality, but this was not the case in Taiwan. The current phrasing sounds antagonistic towards the ROC, as it appears to associate the grant of ROC citizenship with a lack of choice.

Thank you for your consideration and I hope you would accept my edit, acknowledging that the lack of choice was due to Japan's revocation of Taiwanese residents' Japanese status. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.100.129.79 (talk) 22:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate your explanation! I've edited your added material slightly to fit the surrounding text. Please consider creating an account and editing under that. When other users see edits under an unregistered user that don't follow standard practice (lack of an edit summary, removing information or citations), you'll often find those changes quickly reverted. Happy editing, Horserice (talk) 22:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Israeli citizenship law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Artem.G -- Artem.G (talk) 15:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Horserice! I have not read your revisions in details but will be more than happy to support. There are two points that are in my mind at this moment.

Yeah no worries, thanks for taking a look.

• There is some important information from Procedures Advice Manual (PAM3) - only available to subscribers (and libraries). I have read it a long time ago. I will try see if anything should be included in there. If you can try to get a quick read by yourself, that would be great.

• It is probably not feasible for me to get a copy of that manual given my distance from an Australian library by an ocean or two, but please bring up whatever you find that's noteworthy in there.

• I remember reading a high profile case on ABC News (Australia). It was Quade Cooper. There may be a few other important cases in the past decades.

--Taweetham (talk) 05:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Added a little bit more on the recent athlete rule relaxation. I wrote it in a generic way since I typically shy away from adding any particular person's name into these articles unless they're part of some landmark court case or something along those lines. Let me know if that's good. Horserice (talk) 08:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Australian nationality law

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Australian nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Taweetham -- Taweetham (talk) 01:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the whole article and made the comments on the GA-nomination page. The PAM3 I mentioned earlier is actually for migration. If I remember correctly, the citizenship part is called ACI. It is part of https://immi.homeaffairs.gov.au/help-support/tools/legendcom. I do not have access right now and I do not think I will gain access to it in the next 7 days for this GA nomination. If you want to promote this further to Feature Article, I can try to look into it later. --Taweetham (talk) 04:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DYK

Are you interested to do Wikipedia:Did_you_know#Eligibility_criteria (See 1f) after GA approval? --Taweetham (talk) 07:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to check out latest version of LegendCom and see if I can assist with your work to promote the article to FA. It may take some time. BTW, the DYK has time limit, such as 7 days after promotion to GA or after creation of new article. Let me know what you think. --Taweetham (talk) 08:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Australian nationality law

The article Australian nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Australian nationality law for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Taweetham -- Taweetham (talk) 12:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Israeli citizenship law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Israeli citizenship law for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Artem.G -- Artem.G (talk) 10:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Australian nationality law, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that even though Australian citizens are no longer British subjects, they can still vote in elections and stand for parliament in the United Kingdom? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Australian nationality law. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Australian nationality law), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have listed New Zealand nationality law for TFA at pending. I have tentatively reserved a date for it for February, but if you would still like it be considered you will need to nominate it at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gog the Mild: Thanks for the reminder, added nom. Horserice (talk) 08:12, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Indian nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 19:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Indian nationality law you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Indian nationality law for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 23:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 5 February 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 2022, or to make more comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Indian nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Indian nationality law for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maltese nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pichemist -- Pichemist (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maltese nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Maltese nationality law for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pichemist -- Pichemist (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maltese nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pichemist -- Pichemist (talk) 21:04, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maltese nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Maltese nationality law for comments about the article, and Talk:Maltese nationality law/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pichemist -- Pichemist (talk) 21:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cypriot nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 09:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cypriot nationality law you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cypriot nationality law and Talk:Cypriot nationality law/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 07:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article German nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sims2aholic8 -- Sims2aholic8 (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article German nationality law you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:German nationality law and Talk:German nationality law/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sims2aholic8 -- Sims2aholic8 (talk) 23:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article German nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:German nationality law for comments about the article, and Talk:German nationality law/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sims2aholic8 -- Sims2aholic8 (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cypriot nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cypriot nationality law for comments about the article, and Talk:Cypriot nationality law/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The C of E -- The C of E (talk) 07:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Irish nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Morogris -- Morogris (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Irish nationality law you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Irish nationality law and Talk:Irish nationality law/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Morogris -- Morogris (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Irish nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Irish nationality law for comments about the article, and Talk:Irish nationality law/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Morogris -- Morogris (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Philippine nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:00, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Russian citizenship law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PizzaKing13 -- PizzaKing13 (talk) 00:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Russian citizenship law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Russian citizenship law for comments about the article, and Talk:Russian citizenship law/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PizzaKing13 -- PizzaKing13 (talk) 21:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Philippine nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Philippine nationality law for comments about the article, and Talk:Philippine nationality law/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Philippine nationality law, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that foreign nationals wishing to gain Philippine citizenship need to demonstrate proficiency in English or Spanish as well as a Philippine language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Philippine nationality law. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Philippine nationality law), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Horserice, as the FAC is languishing I think you should be bold and start canvasing potentially interested editors to take a look. Maybe go through regular contributors in the relevant project areas, and then request on their talk pages. Would hate to see a deserving candidacy wither. Ceoil (talk) 23:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ceoil: Hey there, sorry I was away for a few days. Just pinged a few people and the WikiProject Law talk page to hopefully gather some interest. I see you already posted on the WikiProject Ireland board but I'll try to poke around that project for some editors as well. Horserice (talk) 05:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'm currently doing a peer review of ministerial by-election and think you ought to be involved.

– John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 19:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Horserice! The article you nominated, Irish nationality law, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Four years!

Congratulations! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Irish nationality law (below), introduced: "Seeing as how it's almost St. Patrick's Day, I thought it'd be a good time to put this article forward for FAC. This article is about the history and regulations of Irish citizenship. Given the manner in which independence was achieved, it's interesting to observe how closely tied Ireland and Britain remained after independence and how that is reflected in nationality law."! - My little cotrib to St. Patrick's was The Deer's Cry ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 20 August 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 20, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:10, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Horserice, i had two quick questions regarding this article and the associated blurb.

• would it be more appropriate to avoid using a comma in "Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act, 1956"? the original text of the act appears to use it, but it seems that more recent references to the law tend to avoid using it. in particular, wikipedia seems to avoid using a comma in the titles of articles on irish laws, as seen in "Treason Act 1939" and "Companies Act 2014".
• is there a citation for the date that the act came into force? the date appears to be mentioned both in the article lead and the infobox, without a citation in both cases.

dying (talk) 22:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Jordanian nationality law in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 02:40, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
· · ·

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jordanian nationality law you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FenrisAureus -- FenrisAureus (talk) 02:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your tireless contributions to good and featured articles — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they) (talk) 23:03, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jordanian nationality law you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jordanian nationality law for comments about the article, and Talk:Jordanian nationality law/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FenrisAureus -- FenrisAureus (talk) 23:23, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Horserice! The article you nominated, Israeli citizenship law, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Horserice, nice work on Israeli citizenship law. I have scheduled it to run as the TFA on 29 February. I note that Sheila1988 has TFAP'ed it for 14 May, Independence day. Would you rather leave it as 29 Feb or take your chances with TFAR for 14 May? Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gog, between the two dates, I'd prefer 14 May. The Israeli independence day seems an appropriate day for this as a TFA. Best, Horserice (talk) 16:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Israeli citizenship law has been listed for TFA at pending for May. I have tentatively reserved a date for it, but if you would still like it be considered you will need to nominate it at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests, which is now open. Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]