User talk:Holidayruin

A tag has been placed on DJ Sabrina the Teenage DJ, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article's been moved to Draft:DJ Sabrina the Teenage DJ so you can work on bringing it up to standard and then submit for review. Deb (talk) 09:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You challenged the notability and referencing of the Leah Boyd article. What specifically were your concerns?--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 12:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3family6 -- The article is about an individual who is most notable for being a state-level beauty pageant contestant and running a Twitter account with 20k followers. She's probably a lovely individual but this does not meets the standards for WP:N. Regarding the sourcing and again per WP:N, only the Christianity Today source would be a reliable source to get information from for a notable figure. Going through the rest of the sources, one is a unnotable local-level profile on a high schooler, one is her own personal website which should not be used as a source, the The Economist article is unrelated to her and would be considered original research (WP:NOR), and the rest are simply beauty pageant results. Holidayruin (talk) 16:22, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Being profiled in the flagship publication for American evangelicalism is certainly significant and notable. That feature alone I'd argue is enough to demonstrated notability in this case. The additional mention in The Economist, which is significant coverage, helps bolster that. The Madison Record is certainly a reliable source, so the reliability tag is erroneous. That source also helps bolster the notability provided by the CT source. Boyd's webpage is being used here as a primary source by the subject about themselves to make straightforward factual claims, which is a legitimate use of primary sources per WP:PRIMARY. It is not being used to demonstrate notability at all. I agree that the pageant reporting itself would not provide notability, but those sources are being used to make verifiable claims about the subject, not support notability (although they might also bolster the notability of Boyd as supplements to the CT report). Lastly, it appears that another editor has weighed in and removed that tags (also keep in mind that several editors had already viewed the page and the article went through the DYK process).--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 22:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, your claim about The Economist reference being original research is false - Boyd was sought out for a quote regarding the subject of the story.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 22:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you recently removed content from Skin-walker without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 22:30, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't remove anything. I reorganized the information so that there's no floating quotation, which is unfitting Wikipedia's style. But no information was removed. Holidayruin (talk) 22:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hwang Kyo-ahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People Power Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 46 (album), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:46 Kino album 1983 release.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already knew about this Gallup Korea poll, thank you for mentioning it anyway. I updated the statement, I wrote that sentence on my first day of wikipedia when I was even more unsure of what to write than I am now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hong kuslauski (talk • contribs) 00:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hong kuslauski: I did move your new edit about the poll to later in the introduction, where I think it better fit. But info like that is important in talking about his modern legacy in South Korea. Holidayruin (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC) (edited this statement Holidayruin (talk) 06:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks a bunch God Bless! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hong kuslauski (talk • contribs) 03:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 05:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL: I believe this is in response to the discussion regarding the usage of "Chōsen" in infoboxes. Fine by me, site-wide changes regarding this topic should not be promulgated by a single individual without wide objective consensus. For the record, I only made one article edit regarding this issue, which was then reverted. I only hope that the sanction rule applies to all parties heavily involved, and that sanctions will be lifted after the matter is said and done on a wider level. Holidayruin (talk) 06:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[Thank you for the ping] No, it's because you weighed in here. It's nothing special since I have literally given this notice to every other person in that discussion.
For the record, you are not in any trouble. This is just a procedural thing to make sure everyone is formally aware of the additional restrictions regarding infobox discussions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 06:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roh Moo-hyun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Holidayruin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DJ Sabrina the Teenage DJ, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Holidayruin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DJ Sabrina the Teenage DJ".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Holidayruin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:46 (album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Holidayruin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "46".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:04, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at United States v. McMahon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 14:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Holidayruin please don't remove the 2nd part of the sentence "that tells a "Romeo and Juliet tale" of young Ukrainian Hutsul lovers trapped on opposite sides of a Carpathian family blood feud." This statement is taken straight from the source attached to that sentence: Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors. Turner Classic Movies. 2021 (https://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/490774/shadows-of-forgotten-ancestors#overview). Please don't remove statements backed by sources.

I reversed your edit and returned that statement https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shadows_of_Forgotten_Ancestors&diff=1102029708&oldid=1100245455 - please don't engage in further edit war and please leave that statement there. Thanks. 38.88.221.163 (talk) 01:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Holidayruin, I don't feel particularly strongly about such a small change. I do want to make sure that you don't mark reverts of others edits as minor edits as you did in this edit. You can read more about minor edits here. Anyways, I think the meaning is perfectly clear without the extra word, as space is at a premium in infoboxes. Shall we ask the talk page and see what others think? Grey Wanderer (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Grey Wanderer: Gotcha about the revert and minor edit mark. Honestly I don't care much either, but I changed it because upon reading the article because the wording immediately struck me as awkward and just a little vague. I just don't want the article to leave the same impression with others when it could be smoothed over with a single word. Holidayruin (talk) 17:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do see your point. I’ll defer to you, assuming others could be similarly struck. Grey Wanderer (talk) 18:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, I noticed you have some experience with Korean content. If it catches your interest would you mind taking a look at Mun Choi, an article I created about a Korean-American? Other users have added details overtime, and I'm not educated enough on Korean culture to verify some of these details, such as his Korean name, possible birthplace, etc. Thanks, and no pressure if you don't have the time. Grey Wanderer (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Grey Wanderer: Hey there, thanks for reaching out. For Korean-Americans like Choi pretty much all information would be in English, so I believe there's not much of an information gap between us. I did verify his Korean name given the Korean-language source (although I can't verify the Hanja spelling because I don't know Hanja... Hanja is basically unused nowadays). I also found a local news article that stated his birthplace as Seoul, so I added that and a little about his immigration. Holidayruin (talk) 17:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking it out! Grey Wanderer (talk) 18:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you revert your second-to-last edit please? He isn't the first ethnic minority PM, ...nor will he be our first ethnic minority prime minister – that was achieved by Benjamin Disraeli, who was Jewish... - The Telegraph. GhulamIslam (talk) 16:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GhulamIslam: This is a good point. It appears that my edit was reverted anyways, and a discussion is underway in the talk page about this. But thank you for bringing this up. Holidayruin (talk) 17:42, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of presidents of the Congress of the Republic of Peru, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PK650 (talk) 09:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, - You reverted my edit saying that Salem is apparently her cat. But The Guardian explicitly says "Sabrina picked the stupidest name she could think of, and began work on Makin’ Magick, her debut album, with some help from her sibling, who she refers to as Salem", and Alt Press mentions "the two brainchildren behind the project — who go by DJ Sabrina and Salem". Alt Press also mentions a cat but says it's "not canon, per se". Do you have a source that explains whether or not Salem is, in fact, a cat? HarryKernow (talk) 05:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Australia, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moxy- 23:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Saul. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Remsense聊 00:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but your criticism of the edit is not relevant to the actual edit itself. It was a simple change to a sentence that never went against MOS. This is in bad faith and I know it. Holidayruin (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's that the edit was confusing and ungrammatical and I wanted to be polite about it. Remsense聊 01:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Park Jong-cheol.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]