User talk:Hjemt

Hi Hjemt! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but if i need any help in the future then i'll probably reach out to people in the discord since i understand that stuff way better. Hjemt (talk) 17:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft currently lacks secondary, reliable sources. There is certainly precedence for articles like this, though—see Flag of the Church in Wales. If you can find two secondary sources that describe this flag and its history/role, I am certain that it will fulfill the GNG standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flag of the Church of Sweden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 19:45, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hjemt! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pbritti (talk) 19:45, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good with me. I've been looking alot but i just can't come across any other sources which even mentions the flag. The few sources i have seemed like more then enough for a small article though. Hjemt (talk) 19:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The article still relies on two sources published by the Church of Sweden (which are primary sources), with only one that is a secondary source of less than ideal reliability (it comes from a blog with editorial oversight). Please read the General Notability Guidelines to learn more about properly sourcing and establishing the notability of a subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flag of the Church of Sweden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 12:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be giving up on the article. I couldn't find any other secondary source which even mentions the flag in Swedish or English. Thank you for your time. Hjemt (talk) 12:53, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do some digging and see what I can scrounge up. Please feel welcome to stick around Wikipedia—we'd love to hold on to as interested a person as you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 12:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm quite new to Wikipedia and to how one scavenges for sources but i do believe that there is a lack of articles which mention this topic. I'm not going anywhere though, i'll be here on Wikipedia until i don't see a need for it anymore or when i lose interest. Probably not gonna be anytime soon though. Hjemt (talk) 12:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blekinge duck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blekinge duck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:04, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Yellow duck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Note IMDB is not a reliable source apart from a few cases see WP:IMDB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leif & Billy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't expect my draft to actually pass due to how early it is in development but thank you for taking your time to valuate it. Hjemt (talk) 22:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see much benefit in your removing categories from articles about ship types of classes. If they're clearly associated with a certain navy, I don't see why it would matter if the articles about individual vessels or not.

With that said, I think it's questionable to sort Swedish archipelago fleet ships as navy ships. They were separate organizations with quite different purposes and traditions. Perhaps a separate category for archipelago fleet ships might be in order. Peter ^Isotalo 16:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your perspective on having a separate category for individual ships versus ship classes makes sense. And yes, the distinction between the Swedish archipelago fleet ships and navy ships sounds valid too. Maybe a dedicated category for archipelago fleet ships could help maintain clarity? Hjemt (talk) 18:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that separate categories aren't really necessary for classes or types. But if *you* think it's called for, you should at least create replacement categories rather than just removing them.

Regarding af Chapman's archipelago vessels, I'm definitely in favor of a category separate from the navy. Just keep in mind that turumas and hemmemas were used by the Russians as well to some degree. Peter ^Isotalo 07:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there already is categories for classes and ships of certain classes. Hjemt (talk) 14:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of equipment of the Swedish Air Force—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 19:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hjemt,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Voorts, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, List of equipment of the Norwegian Navy, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at List of active Royal Norwegian Navy ships. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Voorts}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

voorts (talk/contributions) 20:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of vehicles of the Israeli ground tech tree in War Thunder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of vehicles of the Israeli ground tech tree in War Thunder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ A412 ^talk! 00:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I didn't actually expect the article to make it, i just made it for fun, hoping that it could perhaps become of something with a bit of help, but i suppose nothing came of that. I apologise if i made any disruption by creating the article, it was made with no intent to do that. I support the deletion of the article if that is what everyone else thinks is the best choice. Hjemt (talk) 10:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It might be a good idea that you do some reading about lists, set index articles and disambiguation pages. I have reverted all your edits of today.

Reading list:

1. Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists
2. Wikipedia:Set index articles
3. Wikipedia:Disambiguation]

That may prevent further accidents. Happy reading. The Banner talk 19:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,Hjemt

I was editing myositis, and coincidentally, you made another edit, and there was an edit conflict, so I thought to revert my edit, but by mistake, I did yours. I am really sorry for that.Thanks. Harvici (talk) 16:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, stuff like that happens and i get it. Edit conflicts can be a little annoying especially when you've spent quite some time on it. I really just reworded the introduction to the article so it wasn't any big and time-consuming edit on my end. Thank you for reaching out. Hjemt (talk) 16:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Swedish cruiser classes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Gjs238 (talk) 15:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lätt trossbåt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Xegma(talk) 10:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Swedish cruiser classes has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 14:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Altair-class training ship, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gorden 2211 (talk) 00:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hjemt. Thank you for your work on List of flags with Christian symbolism. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]