User talk:Hdt83/Archive2

NOTE: This is an archive of my conversations between users. Messages left on here will not be read or received by me. If you need to leave a message please use my current talk page. Thanks.

It's great to know that someone can lay down the law when it needs to be laid down. Thanks for protecting the LPHS page, and helping Wikipedia retain a reliable standard. :D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PwnyPatrol (talk • contribs) 16:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Just wondering, from one high school student to another: How long does it take to really get good at editing? Thanks. Rockinbuddy 01:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rockinbuddy (talk • contribs) 01:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I appreciate your multiple reverts of vandalism from my newly created user page. I notice that you have some anti-vandalism program and I was wondering if it was easy to install/operate and if I should consider getting it.

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your valiant protection of the weak and going beyond the line of duty to eradicate vandalismTangoTheory 04:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TangoTheory 04:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC) TangoTheory[reply]

Thanks for the revert. :) Acalamari 23:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome ! User: Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 00:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing he vandalism! Wpktsfs 19:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :D User: Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 00:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

for returning the favor! Happy vandalfighting, --Hojimachong^talk 01:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome --- Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 01:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for the March 11 vandalism! --Hojimachong^talk 06:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Happy to help. Will (aka Wimt) 23:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. I'm not sure what I (user 24.something) did when editing the Crysis article. Could you explain what I should avoid doing? Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The assassin 47 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hey, thanks a lot for your responses. I wasn't expecting such a welcome. Thanks again for your reply, though I do have one more question. I have been on Wikipedia for a long time now, and have made alot of changes. But, I just became a user today. How do I transfer my former edits to my new user profile? (Instead of being an anonymous IP address) Thanks again for your messages! :)

The assassin 47 05:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wisconsin --Otheus 01:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Replied on their talk page: [1] --- Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 01:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly I was confused about something there. I thought... nevermind. --Otheus 01:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I guess the article I created for "Ksuat", (the Kansas State University Airsoft Team) was deleted. I'm still not entirely sure why though. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BrentK7 (talk • contribs) 05:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Reply is on talk page here

Excuse me, I thought this was a publicly editable encyclopedia. If you are going to decide what you want to filter and what you don't, I guess I was wrong! Please don't lecture me on ethics in a public forum again!

You commented to me that all entries must be from a neutral point of view... but, doesn't that mean that all articles shouldn't even have a criticism section? I mean, if people can just trash the subject of an article and call it 'criticism' or 'controversy,' it seems that sidenotes that counteract these entries only furthers the idea of neutrality in wikipedia.

... for the vandal revert of my talk page! Appreciate it :) - Alison^☺ 20:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! You would think that a "PROMINENT PROFESSOR" would know better then to go running around Wikipedia talking about his "constitutional right" to edit Wikipedia. --- Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 21:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that darktaz's reason for wanting to be unblocked is a very good reason, as you may know uncyclopaedia is a website running wiki that makes fun of everything so there vandalism is essentially encouraged, and both wikipedia and uncyclopaedia both are running wiki they do look essentially identical so I request that you would reconsider your reply to darktaz and don't be so rude, you moderate wikipedia so you should at least have some manners when communicating if you don't improve I will suggest that you are no longer a moderator. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.20.21.102 (talk) 19:34, 12 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Don't make dat bitch go upsida yo face boy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.214.170.242 (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, I am not a moderator or administrator so I cannot block or unblock anybody; the only thing I did was post a warning to stop vandalizing. If you have questions please ask the admin who blocked Darktaz or the one who reviewed the unblock. I agree that Uncyclopedia and Wikipedia can sometimes be confused for the same thing and if an admin was tired of having to deal with repeated vandalism he/she may just tell them to back off.

• Admin who blocked Darktaz: User:Nishkid64
• Admin who reviewed block (and posted the rude comment): User:Netsnipe

--- Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 00:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your warm welcome! I'm putting the following message on pages relating to Guildford Grammar School:

Just to let everyone know, I'm here to take over from Auroranorth as Wikipedia's resident Guildford Grammar School student. I've been editing for a while on my (ever-changing) IP address, and I decided to go all the way because Auroranorth got blocked for lying. I know him at school and he's rather loserish - but he got blocked for lying about pictures - lol. Anyway, I believe I can do a better job than him, and I'll see you in the future! Seventy dot 03:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) --- Hdt83 | Talk/Chat

Can you give me the names of some admins that are online when I'm online (usually around 10:00 GMT)? Thanks. Seventy dot 06:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here --- Hdt83 | Talk/Chat

I created a spoken version of the 'wiki' page, what I didn't notice since I was proofing things on headphones is that the base is too boomy, I corrected this but now am unable to over write En-Wiki.ogg, my guess is because its on a protected page. Please advise SpeakThings:Mellerbeck 15:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I got it taken care, I really am digging this Wikipedia thing, its fun!

OK, you're welcome! -- Hdt83 | Talk/Chat

Vandalism is on the rise. Crested Penguin 01:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me :D -- Hdt83 | Talk

for reverting vandalism on my page. I apparently got on a sockpuppeteer's badside, and the other person on his badside isn't online... sigh. Natalie 04:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am at a loss.NoOffenseBut 05:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you did something bad (like vandalizing) that got you blocked originally in the first place. What was your first account or when did you first edit here? -- Hdt83 | Talk

Don't you think if you or someone else felt it worthwhile to block me you should know what it was. My first account was in February 2003, and I edited just with my variable IP address at work. Does that help?NoOffenseBut 14:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't know because I'm relatively new here and I'm not a moderator. Instead of accusing people of deliberately blocking you and avoiding them by creating a new account, you should just take a break from Wiki for a while and then come back and contribute constructively. Nobody will do anything then to stop you. (Unless you start making trouble again) -- Hdt83 | Talk

Depending on their species, male deer are called stags, harts, bucks or bulls, and females are called hinds, does or cows. Young deer are called fawns or calfs. Hart is an expression for a stag, particularly a Red Deer stag past its fifth year. It is not commonly used, but an example is in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet when Tybalt refers to the brawling Montagues and Capulets as hartless hinds. "The White Hart" and "The Red Hart" are common English pub names.

That was my mistake. I was using Mike's Wiki Tool 0.9 and I saw common English pub names. I was going through pretty quick, and I found it odd that deer and English pubs would have anything to do with each other, so that is why I undid it. That was my mistake. Sorry, --Wikihermit 20:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. It was my mistake to look over it too quickly and change it. Thanks! --Wikihermit 20:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got a vandalism message for merely mentioning that Emma Roberts was Julia Roberts' relative, a true fact ! I would appreciate it if all these bots would just leave me alone.

I don't know about that. According to your IP address contributions [2], you didn't seem to make contrustive edits. Maybe you share your computer with somebody else? -- Hdt83 | Talk 00:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hope he doesn't get hurt from 512.Shindo9Hikaru 02:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really hope 512 isn't going to hurt him. Otherwise it could be the loss of another good editor. BTW, I found another sockpuppet of 512. Should I just keep reporting his sockpuppets to AIV? Maybe not, itll autoblock his IP address. -- Hdt83 | Talk 02:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He just made another comment on his page. Signing off for a little while,got to go do evil homework instead of contributing.Shindo9Hikaru 02:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you HDT of SIPB fame? Simsong 01:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not. Sorry.-- Hdt83 | Talk

PS: Just curious, who are you talking about?

Just so you know, WP:PROD tags are not allowed to be re-added to articles when someone removes them, including the author of the article. I've sent this one to AfD instead. Mangojuice^talk 03:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I didn't know that. Thanks for telling me. -- Hdt83 | Talk

Hi, I was changing the icon of {{Uw-bv}} since an editor expressed concerns about the consistency of the icons in the uw templates. Basically, uw-bv and some other use the "3D" icon whil the others use the "old fashioned". I don't want to edit war on an icon, so could you drop by at WT:UW#.22Stop_hand.22 to discuss the changes? -- lucasbfr talk 09:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I need a slap in the face I missed your message on WP:UTM... My apologies! -- lucasbfr talk 14:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. -Mschel 03:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I reported him to AIV; hopefully he gets banned.

How do you become a recent changes patroller? Please leave a message at 55555five55555 02:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Hdt83/Archive2 for reverting vandalism on my user page. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 04:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! - Hdt83 | Talk

It was a way of me thanking you for rvving Kzrulzuall's userpage. We were on my account at the time, and I accidently used the wrong link! --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 05:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for telling me! - Hdt83 | Talk

Hi. Do you know why we have two lists of Turok socks -- one of Turok 1, and one of Turok 19? It might be easier to manage one, huge, growing list. ( I left a similar query on User talk:HalfShadow). Flyguy649^talk_contribs 04:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't really know. I think it is because Turok created so many socks that it became hard to track all of them so we ended up with a huge list of socks. Hopefully he stops. What I don't understand is where or how he creates so many sock accounts. Usually whenever someone is blocked the IP address they are using is auto-blocked but it is clearly not happening in this case. - Hdt83 | Talk 04:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic IP? Flyguy649^talk_contribs 05:00, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I'm guessing or he somehow manages to change his IP address. Here is another sock: User:Godguy - Hdt83 | Talk 05:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right back at ya! Also, I just blocked Godguy. Copying HalfShadow's user and talk pages is pretty noticeable... Natalie 05:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. I'll keep at eye out. Any idea why this user targets HalfShadow? Natalie 05:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No idea. It just happens to be HalfShadow.- Hdt83 | Talk 05:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Hdt83. No more need to add the plethora of Turok socks. There's plenty for checkuser to determine the IPs. For now just keep track of the socks. Keep up the good work.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 05:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hdt83, I want to know when it would tell you that you're a recent changes patroller. I also want to know how to add warnings to articles and to other users. 55555five55555 03:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The advice given was really helpful. Thanks. 55555five55555 05:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see somebody watching vandals. The Ferrari page got wiped recently, too. Any way to block these idiots? Trekphiler 08:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Replied on Trekphiler's talk page-- Hdt83 | Talk 00:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, user blocked now. Keep up the good work! :-) Regards, Húsönd 01:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your help -- _Hdt83 Chat 01:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, It was also hard trying to have User:Lovevoltage on WP:AIV because he kept getting rid of his username to avoid blocks, and sometimes, when I put his name back, there were some edit conflicts which made it harder to put User:Lovevoltage on WP:AIV. And please click on the following link: [[3]]. Amos Han ^Talk 01:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Title says it all, thnaks, it's very appreciated. i've nominated shackleford for a block, because it's attitude definitely is only about vandalisng it seems.

Thanks for the tip. There's a couple that are asking for it. Trekphiler 06:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you're welcome. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat

Hello, you left a message on my board, do we know each other? Are you somebody I can request assistance from? What is the procedure to post pictures? Do I get limited amount of space? Dale4sail

Leave a test message at User_talk:72.70.94.99 and see if I get alerted by it (I'll check it periodically from another browser). -- Mufka ^{(user) (talk) (contribs)} 00:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got it. And interestingly, it won't go away, either??? I've click through 10 more pages since and closed the browser, but it keeps popping up. I won't worry about that, but it seems to work. 72.70.94.99 01:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In response to [4]. I'm glad that you found it referenced. Often, my biggest problem with issues like that is finding where they have been discussed. BTW, clearing the browser cache in IE7 or Firefox did NOT get rid of the bar for me. -- Mufka ^{(user) (talk) (contribs)} 01:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for quickly reverting the vandalism on my user talk page! I think we both did it at the same time though, because my edit summary says you commited the vandalism when you most certainly did not! Thank you again! Bmg916^Speak_Sign 00:58, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Vandal has already been reported and will probably be blocked soon-- _Hdt83 ^Chat 00:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely put! I mean it. At times its nice to put that and say "no really, your vandalism is POINTLESS, we can and will revert it. Your fighting a loosing battle. Grow up, read the articles, be constructive if you wish, otherwise leave it alone." Course some editors snap at you for saying anything at all construed as cross to a vandal, basically we coddle them hoping later they turn good. Some you can't see doing this after having to scroll down a page and half of warnings and blockings you shouldn't even have to keep dealing with. Anyway - nicely put.--Xiahou 01:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment :)

Yes, that is right. No, I don't know what is causing it, and I can't look into the problem any more then you can, since I am not a developer. I suspect it has to do with the message bar being cached, and then not loaded on each page, but I am not sure. If that were true, following a link like this would cause the bar to be displayed if an anon has new messages. Rob Church, who is a developer, has made a change to the bug, why don't you contact him, he can probably be far more helpful then I can. Prodego ^talk 03:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Developers are notoriously busy, the head two* are User:Tim Starling, and User:Brion VIBBER. Your best bet may be User:Werdna or User:Voice of All though. Church is still an active developer, though he is not editing. You may be able to reach him by email (his email address is on the bug). *Vibber is the actual lead developer. Prodego ^talk 03:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the help -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 03:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look at it if time permits. I've been busy with IPv6/revisiondelete/stable versions and various bugs. Voice-of-All 18:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd need a repeatable way to get it though. Voice-of-All 17:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and thanks for this edit you made to the Wiki Defcon. Whenever something is put into a template, it will be transcluded along with it to every page the template is located on. The little lock semi-protection icon was being transcluded onto the user page of every editor who had put the Defcon on their user page. Additionally, all those user pages were put into the Semi-protected category. To keep this from happening, place anything that should not be transcluded along with the template inside <noinclude> tags. I have done this to the Defcon to remedy the situation. Cheers! --Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 06:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I didn't know that it was going to be transcluded. Thanks for fixing it. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 21:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am the one who helped you get rid of the vandal User:Lovevoltage. Just to let you know that I am going to make my 1000th edit soon (this is my 999th edit). Amos Han ^Talk 02:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that above message I just left you was actually my 1000th edit. Amos Han ^Talk 02:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!! Hoe you have fun editing and fighting those vandals! -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 05:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:9999a9999 recently vandalized my page and put a warning in the discussion part even though I didn't do anything. What should I do? 55555five55555 09:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the history I found out that the "You Vandal!" section was made by User:9999a9999. He already did it to me once and he did it again to your discussion page again after you deleted it. I think that user is trying to put warnings on a lot of others' user pages so they would get blocked. Probably that user did it to us first because we both posted warnings on his discussion page. I already posted a couple of warnings, but he still won't stop. Is their any ways to block the user from editing Wikipedia? 55555five55555 09:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HOW DO YOU PASTE A PIC!! I see Images but How do I upload!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gregory-Smith-7.6.83 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

OKay thank you!

Just to let you know that User:9999a9999 left me a [level 4 warning] using your username as his signature, saying that I vandalized your user page. I believe that all the edits I did to your userpage is to add a [[5]]. Amos Han ^Talk 19:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reporting User:9999a9999. This user got blocked indefinitely by User:Natalie Erin. Amos Han ^Talk 20:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome!

As a side note: I apologise for replacing your warning on User talk:172.202.46.163, but I assumed a uw-delete template would more relevant. Madman bum and angel 21:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On my talk page, you stated "just ignore this guy". Were you talking to me, telling me to ignore Obscure who was trolling my talk page or him? Because he is still harassing me, now over that.-.-;67.163.193.239 21:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not harassing you, so stop lying. and I would like to know as well, I was just about to post this Obscure80 21:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

>_>; Anyone who reads your talk page and all the lies you've posted on it about me would beg to differ. You need to grow up and stop.67.163.193.239 21:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't hijack this user's talk page and stop being a child. you need to grow up and stop acting so childish, all you're doing is deleting my posts out of spite, which is pretty pathetic if you ask me. and anyone else can read as well that I'm not harassing you, nor am I acting childish Obscure80 21:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one hijacking. I came here to ask him a legitimate question, because you keep harassing me about it. You are the one who came in here and started attacking me. Again. You've done this everywhere else I have posted too. STOP.67.163.193.239 21:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See User_talk:67.163.193.239#Reported_to_WP:AIV -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 22:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding you reporting me here [6], I don't believe I have ever posted on your talk page until now, so I can't be disrupting it. Nor have I violated 3RR. Can you explain please? Thanks. Not a dog 22:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know as well, and how have either of us been giving personal attacks or edit warring? three revert, yes, but neither of us did any of those other things Obscure80 22:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And if I did 3 reverts it was to counter what I considered bad faith edits. Not a dog 22:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See [7] -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 22:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I never deleted nor edited ANY of 67.163.193.239's posts, so can you explain why I'M being banned? Obscure80 22:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First off, you are not being banned. Second, even after posting the WP:DENY, you still engage 67.163.193.239 by responding to his edits and not ignoring him. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 22:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because she was attacking me and editing my posts, and countless people have already reported her so I saw no reason to do it myself Obscure80 22:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, that was great. I noticed vandalism on the Linkin Park article and I was about to undo it, but there was an edit conflict. More vandalism, it turned out. I refreshed my watchlist and BAM, you reverted the vandalism. Nice speed. Paul Haymon 00:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:ESkog abuses his position —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.241.124.150 (talk) 00:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the quick revert! (ESkog)^(Talk) 00:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that with these obvious spam accounts, you should just put them on AIV and not warn them. They seem to make only 2 or 3 edits at a time, and if they are warned and then blocked before they edit again, someone could complain. Academic Challenger 04:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks for the tip! -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 04:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• It's pretty obvious that they've dozens of throwaway accounts and they basically want to avoid the three strikes and block ruling. As they're obviously socks and spam-only accounts, I'm indefblocking them anyway - Alison^☺ 04:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for reporting all those spammers. It's weird; each account spams two links to random articles. I've never seen that kind of behaviour before. Is it some kind of botnet or something? - Alison^☺ 04:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably they are trying to "avoid" the "final warning" policy before you block. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 04:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your hard work and having to deal with the User:9999a9999 problem. Because of your hard work and trying to keep him/her from vandalizing my page you recieve this award:

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		55555five55555 06:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Hdt83. And by the way User:9999a9999 had left a message of why he shouldn't be blocked on the discussion page. You can put some comments about it.

Thank you very much for awarding this to me. User:9999a9999 won't be vandalizing anybody else's pages anymore now. Happy editing! -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 06:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that when your reverted here you put it back in the vandalised version. The correct link is How to Make Love Like a Porn Star: A Cautionary Tale not How to Make Love Like a Corn Starch: A Cautionary Tale. I removed the warning that you left for Hellosarah and left one for Racecarlock. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know that how can one put colored fonts etc. on his or her userpage ? And can one put his/her picture on the same...? Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jon Ascton (talk • contribs) 16:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Comment: I recently found this post at the noticeboard and this is why fonts are annoying to some users. I like different fonts like these but if people request you to not use this font then at least use something else that won't annoy people. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 20:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for ur nice message. Do you have another font I could use? I am not stuck on Chiller, but Times is sooo boring. But I do want my words in green. I dont know how to change into just green. Lilkunta 21:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Well, u should use a diffrent font that won't annoy others. If you have a word processor (ms word, etc.) you can copy the fonts there over to Wikipedia. As for just having the words green you can use <font face = "Times New Roman" size = "2" color = "green">. Oh and I don't usually post in diffrent colors or fonts because they can really get people mad and some admins might even block you for it. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 21:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Im using your font now (Thx!) and usiing blue since u wrote in green. Do u have a problem with the way I post on ur disc page? Pls let me know.I wont use it here if u dont like it. I feel it is very unfair that metros is warning me about ur disc page ( see below ). If u dont have a problem with it, Metros should stay out of it. Wouldnt u let me know u had a problem instead of Metros jumping in? Lilkunta 22:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

R u an admin? Pls tell Metros to leave me alone. I feel S/he is stalking me. I posted on ur disc page but Metros is warning me 4 it. Metros was directed to take a wiki break but ignored the request. I just want to be left alone. Pls tell Metros to leave me alone! Lilkunta 22:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't have any problems with the fonts as long as they are legible. I suggest that you try to not provoke Metros bcuz he will block you if he really wants to. As long as you don't use the Chiller font or colors too much you should be ok. This event will clear itself in a couple of days provided you don't use fonts that they don't like. Hopefully what happened here doesn't discourage you from editing here. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 22:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to provoke Metros. If u look u'll c I repeatedly asked him ( I'm saying him bc u said he, I dont know what he is ) to stop posting 2 me . I think he is watching my page bc anytime I do anything he comments. He even repeatedly edited my disc page even after I asked him not to, then Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Lilkunta reported me bc I refused help that I never asked him 4! How is it fair for Metros 2 block me bc of a post 2 ur or some 1 else's disc page? If metros blocks me it is unfair. Lilkunta 22:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -

We are trying to figure out who used the computer to vandalize the page - can you tell me when the vandalism was done?

Here are all the contributions from your Internet address:Special:Contributions/69.158.157.49. Click the (diff) button to see what was added. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 04:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting the vandalism done to my user page. I was busy looking for my SMA4 game guide (to double-check some information for the project I've set up in my sandbox) at the time it happened, and I just found it. --LuigiManiac 01:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The above website is currently blacklisted by Wikipedia. Please do not add it as an example of a social network service as you did here. You may attempt to do so if or when the blacklist is lifted. Thanks. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 12:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[8] Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page! I appreciate it. =) – Lantoka (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Hope those vandals stay way. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 22:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't talked to you for a while; I just made my 2000th edit recently. You are also welcome to see my user page as well. Amos Han ^Talk 23:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar, I left you one as well for being nice. Amos Han ^Talk 00:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For reverting vandalism on my user page. Thanks very much Lradrama 08:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy editing! Lradrama 08:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait- did that souron kid delete the whole article? Sauronthegreat? --LtWinters 00:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yea I warned him after you, I saw that after I left that message. Thanks. Oh and if you look at his other message, he did the same to the page of Final Solution, you should really see this, after reading it I feel we should request he be blocked if he does anything else, because he did both on the same day --LtWinters 02:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]