User talk:Harshamaturu

A tag has been placed on Ishita Nadipalli, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meisterkoch (talk) 21:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Ashrita Maturu, you will be blocked. Acroterion _(talk) 21:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Caversham Primary School, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caversham Primary School. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Blueboy96 21:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Cps.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the page Reading F.C. appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. This isn't the first time you've done this here, but I hope it'll be the last. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 04:47, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Congenital heart defect. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Congenital heart defect was changed by Harshamaturu (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-28T13:24:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Congenital heart defect, you will be blocked from editing. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 14:44, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caversham Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caversham Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]