User talk:H4x

Chlorophyll' more like borophyll. Cute, but grows old after seeing it a few times. Is this the in joke in biology class these days? You should consider editing some topics you actually care about. You may find it fun :shock: Good luck with your future edits. David D. (Talk) 10:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, from Billy Madison, now i understamd why have seen that edit so many times. Are you going to check out the Potter pages? David D. (Talk) 04:14, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you noticed the Harry Potter portal? I just noticed it recently. I also found this template that links to some of the more important pages in wikipedia. David D. (Talk) 21:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Henry^Flower 08:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Star Trek, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 06:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it is time for your joking to end. You are potentially offending people, both here in the Wikipedia community and the wider readership. What you are doing could be seen as vandalism and you could get blocked from editing Wikipedia for it. You might not get another warning before having a block imposed, so be careful and be serious from now on.

--TeaDrinker 19:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 05:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to That's So Raven, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. It is getting to the point that you might get blocked indefinitely if you keep up this behavior. --Nlu (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Aflius, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kubigula (talk) 04:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Spk.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Aflius.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Aflius.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Aflius.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Zafrilla. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 00:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Osama bin Laden, you will be blocked from editing. Mbc³⁶² 01:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]