User talk:Höyhens

Welcome!

Hello, Höyhens, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask a question at the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome, and good luck!

-- Kirill Lokshin 12:19, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 06:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested, yes. I'll see if I have still time to that. Thank You for invitation. --Höyhens (talk) 03:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thought it best to get consensus. Personally, I think it looks like rubbish. Peridon (talk) 12:37, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. --Höyhens (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Euraasian talousunioni

Hei, jonkun täytyy olla lähestulkoon sokea, kun Euraasian talousunionia käsittelevä artikkeli on nimetty suomenkielisessä Wikipediassa Euraasian unioniksi. Heti artikkelin alussa ja infolaatikossa lukee ihan selvästi "venäjäksi: Евразийский экономический союз, valkovenäjäksi: Еўразійскі эканамічны саюз, kazakiksi: Еуразиялық Экономикалық Одақ, armeniaksi: Եվրասիական տնտեսական միություն" ei "Евразийский союз, Еўразійскі саюз, Еуразиялық Одақ, Եվրասիական միություն". Lisäksi kaikki muunkieliset Wikipediat käyttävät oikeaa nimeä Euraasian talousunioni. --85.76.3.8 (talk) 23:42, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This should be discussed in Finnish Wikipedia, and it has been to an end. --Höyhens (talk) 20:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Niin pitäisi, mutta miten täällä onkaan toimittu? --85.76.4.156 (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We should talk here about the topics in English. Matters of Finnish Wikipedia should be considered there only. If You have been hindered there, try Your own page, please. I won't discuss more here. --Höyhens (talk) 07:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Höyhens. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Höyhens. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Höyhens. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Käkisalmen lääni

Hei, miksi Käkisalmen lääni on laitettu Suomen alueeseen kuuluneeksi? Samoin täällä. --Area shifts (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a matter of discussion. The sout-eastern borders of Finland have been quite unstable in the history between Novgorod/Russia and Sweden. Well, Finland was hundreds of years only one province (maakunta) of Sweden. Käkisalmen lääni (Kexholm County) was 1580–1595 and 1617–1710 an administrative area of Sweden, like the other Finland, but not exactly a part of Finland. In i.e. Finnish Wikipedia has a map there are mentioned Swedish Slottslän organization in Finland in 1600's, without Käkisalmi area. Later the towns of Priozersk (Käkisalmi/Kexholm), Viipuri (Vyborg) and Sortavala belonged to Finland, but in Viipurin lääni (Vyborg governement, or as in English Wikipedia Viipuri Province. Now the most parts of these belong to Russia, excluding the northernmost parts of ancient Käkisälmen lääni, like towns Mikkeli, Kuopio, Savonlinna, Joensuu, as a part of Finland. So, as if great parts, the northernmost, of old Swedish Käkisalmen lääni are still a part of Finland, the lääni itself has never in fact been a part of Finland, but a part of Sweden. I am aware that this kinky point has other opinions, too. It is good to understand, that the words lääni (län) and maakunta (province) mean different things. --Höyhens (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On totta kai selvää, että Suomen läänit ovat eri asia kuin Suomen historialliset maakunnat ja Suomen maakunnat. Yhtä selvää on myös, että Käkisalmen lääni ei kuulunut Ruotsin alaiseen Suomen alueeseen, vaan hallittiin suoraan Ruotsista kuten Inkeriäkin. Siksi nämä vanhojen versioiden palautukset ihmetyttävät: Suomen läänit: palautettu takaisinpäin ja Provinces of Finland 1634 - 1640, 1650 - 1721.svg sekä myös Provinces of Finland 1640 - 1641.svg, Provinces of Finland 1641 - 1642.svg, Provinces of Finland 1642 - 1646.svg, Provinces of Finland 1647 - 1648.svg ja Provinces of Finland 1648 - 1650.svg. --Area shifts (talk) 18:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tätä olen minäkin ihmetellyt tuloksetta. --Höyhens (talk) 13:25, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Höyhens&oldid=939436823"