User talk:GylonVisagie

Hi GylonVisagie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:IPhone 11 Pro, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. One message is enough, don't spam Jeb³_{Talk at me here}^{What I've Done} 15:49, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro Jpg.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro Jpg.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:52, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Xiaomi Mi 9t Pro Jpg.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:52, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Galatz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Survivor Series (2019), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 21:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2020 in professional wrestling, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:15, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Interstellarity. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to IPhone 11 Pro—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Interstellarity (talk) 16:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Galaxy Z Flip.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Galaxy Z Flip.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 12:46, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Galaxy Z Flip.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:42, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Huawei P40, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 09:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Pixel 5, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ktin (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Pixel 5, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Blythwood (talk) 17:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for writing this article! Unfortunately, there's a policy on Wikipedia called WP:CRYSTAL, which is that Wikipedia generally does not publish rumor articles on phones that may or not exist before they have been announced. You may want to take a look at the link to understand how this works. Hope this is helpful! Blythwood (talk) 17:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,I did notice,that you wrote,that All Out has been getting negative Reactions.Who said that?If someone said that,than you could give me a source to prove it.And who the hell is GylonVisagie?And if you are like a "AEW Hater",no one really cares about that,but we are working with sources and if you don't like it then do not,but it isn't supposed to appear on All Out(2020) MkIc (talk) 19:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pixel 5 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixel 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:07, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding content that is unsupported by the sources. June 21 retirement is sourced, as is Taker's statement that he is "officially retired" in a November 12 interview. Dory Funk (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reverted twice now as you removed information from the lead of this article. The first time you removed the information, you did not explain why. I reverted you and asked you to explain why you removed the information. However, you again removed the information without an explanation. I have again reverted you as you failed to explain your reasoning for why you removed this information despite being asked to explain why. Why are you removing this information? Do not remove this information again without providing a valid reason, otherwise, you will have violated WP:3RR, which can get you blocked from editing. --JDC808 ♫ 11:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We all know Pat Patterson created the royal rumble but that information isn't important or relevant. So stop with your unnecessary nonsense GylonVisagie (talk) 07:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there are plenty of people who do not know that he created it. And yes, it is relevant, whether you agree with it or not. You have once again removed the information despite being reverted twice now. If you remove it again, administrative action will be sought. --JDC808 ♫ 06:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rhain. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Last of Us Part II without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 11:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that game is not legendary enough to have a legacy section, I will just add a other media section. GylonVisagie (talk) 12:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a standard heading, consistent with other articles. Your opinion on the game is irrelevant. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 12:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You and your opinion are irrelevant, I would rather get banned from editing articles, than let the likes of you have the last laugh. GylonVisagie (talk) 12:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, my opinion on the game is also irrelevant. I am not attempting to "have the last laugh"; I'm just trying to help build an encyclopedia and do so with consistency. I assume you understand. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 12:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You people use the word legendary to loosely to describe everything, but fine have it your way.

But just know that game is far from legendary and doesn't deserve a "Legacy" section. GylonVisagie (talk) 12:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The word "legendary" is literally not used anywhere in the article, nor is that what "legacy" actually means, but thank you for your input. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 13:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i know the difference between legacy and legendary, luckily this game is not legendary. GylonVisagie (talk) 13:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you say so. Regardless, it does have a legacy. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 13:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuing to remove content without explanation, as you did at this edit. Is there a guideline- or policy-based reason for this blanking? – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 13:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I fixed grammar errors and I saw you deliberately added new things to that section GylonVisagie (talk) 13:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you did not fix any grammar errors. You did, however, delete a full paragraph (including several references) without explanation. Feel free to explain, or (ideally) self-revert. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 13:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes I did GylonVisagie (talk) 13:49, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, in the middle of this conversation, you did attempt to "fix" an error (not a grammar one) that you introduced (while deleting a full paragraph)—but that's not what this conversation is about. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 13:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bye, you are boring. Let me edit other pages where your annoying self won't find me. GylonVisagie (talk) 13:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it stops you from blanking and edit warring, then yes, please do. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 14:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Last of Us Part II. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Indagate (talk) 15:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (The Last of Us Part II) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Synorem (talk) 14:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GylonVisage, thanks for your message. Could you please clarify what content removal/merge you're referring to here? I'm not familiar with any such editing conflict, but forgive me if I've forgotten. Thanks. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 14:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Nicki Minaj, you may be blocked from editing. Thedarkknightli (talk) 13:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to add a different pic so I deleted that other one. I will add a different pic tomorrow. GylonVisagie (talk) 14:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]