User talk:Geotubemedia

1980 Iowa Democratic presidential caucuses, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will try my best for Wikipedia!

- Geotubemedia - Geotubemedia (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wikipedialuva. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2016 Rhode Island Republican presidential caucuses have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipedialuva (talk) 10:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Umm excuse me but, I have added some information, check it. Geotubemedia (talk) 10:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize; I restored your changes. Your edit was automatically flagged as possible vandalism. In the future, it would be helpful to leave an edit summary when editing to prevent confusion. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 10:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Your edit was automatically flagged as possible vandalism" bruh did you said that? DID YOU SAID THAT? Geotubemedia (talk) 10:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was using a program called AntiVandal, which uses automated scoring (like ORES scores) to detect vandalism for human review. Your edit was marked for review, and since I saw a large amount of data that is commonly removed when people are committing vandalism (AfC comments) being removed without an edit summary on a topic that is prone to vandalism (American politics), I originally misinterpreted your edit as vandalism and reverted it. However, in less than a minute, I corrected my mistake, restored your edit, and was in the process of reverting the warning when you responded. It's nothing personal; there is a large amount of vandalism on Wikipedia, and sometimes automated tools and human reviewers like myself make mistakes. Wikipedialuva (talk) 11:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. But, I have a personal question, are you a female? Geotubemedia (talk) 14:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use PROD for deleting redirects. It should only be used for deleting articles. See: WP:Proposed deletion, where it says: PROD is only applicable to mainspace articles, lists, set indices, disambiguation pages, and files not on Commons. Proposed deletion cannot be used with redirects, user pages (except user books), drafts, templates, categories, or pages in any other namespace. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Geotubemedia (talk) 09:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]