User talk:Gatewaycat

Archives

1

Hi Gatewaycat,

Sorry for the blatant spam, but you have yourself down as interested at WikiProject user warnings WP:UW. There is a discussion on going here that might be of interest to you about the future of this project. There are two strawpolls on the talk pages and the second one is about the future of the WP:UW project. Now we have the end in sight we are looking at wrapping up the project and merging it with Template messages/User talk namespace WP:UTM and creating a one stop shop for all userspace template issue. As you have yourself down as interested in this project we thought you may have some input on this issue, and would like you to visit the discussion and give any thoughts you may have on the matter. Cheers ^Khukri 10:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! I just wish I'd jumped on the boat earlier, but I really admire what you guys have done—UWTs really are alot more accessible now. Note: I was too ambivalent to vote on the latest strawpoll on redirecting old templates; like many, I find the jumble of old UWTs quite frightening actually, but I do have templates I'd like to keep (like welcome templates, and more specific messages), and I'm sure others do too. I'm sure a middle ground will be found. --gwc 02:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flux + Mutability.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it's funny that you removed the serial comma from the text of this article concerning serial commas ... I've always assumed wikipedia style is to include them, since that's the norm for most of English outside the sty lebook. - DavidWBrooks 00:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have merged your Wikisource sandbox into s:Catullus 64/Lines 50-253. It looks like it is nearly finished; any chance you could clean it up? John Vandenberg (talk) 13:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You put in a paragraph of quotation from Hou Hanshu (a translation by Mr. John Hill). I searched Hou Hanshu, but I could not find this paragraph. Where is this paragraph to be found, in ben-ji, zhi or lie-zhuan of Hou Hanshu?Suminxue (talk) 19:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cell potency, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bionity.com/lexikon/e/Totipotency. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating and adding to the article about Middlebury College. Please note that Middlebury is considered the first "operating" college in the state because it was the first to hold classes in November 1800. It was also became the first Vermont institution to issue a college degree in Vermont in 1802; UVM followed in 1804. UVM was chartered in 1791, but like many early institutions, it had trustees but no faculty or students for a decade. Aiken1986 (talk) 04:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's wonderful news! (Middlebury being first operating/conferring, not UVM having no faculty or students) Incidentally, it looked like this New Englander article wasn't already cited in the article, so I put it into citation style, paraphrased your nota bene, and put them into a footnote ref. --gwc (talk) 08:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the work that went into template chapter, and while it works fine for the three letter chapters, but for one and two letter chapters, both the word default has to be deleted and additional vertical bars have to added to force one and two letter chapters over to the correct positions. I'm using it on List of Alpha Tau Omega chapters.Naraht (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New York City mayoral election, 2013 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KDR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jamesjpk. I wanted to let you know that the Wikiproject Spoken Wikipedia, has been tagged with a semi-active tag. I am messaging you about this because you are listed under the wiki-project's list of active participants. Please contribute to the WikiProject if you want to keep it alive! I hope that it becomes active again! Jamesjpk (talk) 22:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gatewaycat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gatewaycat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gatewaycat! I am Galendalia and I have revived the WikiProject for Spoken Wikipedia. I noticed that you signed up at some point to be a participant and as I am reviving this project, one of my tasks is to get the participant list in order. Would you please go to the Participants List and add your name and language(s) you speak? If you are already there and do not want to be, please remove yourself. If you want to remain, please put remain next to your name. If I do not see anything, I will move you to the inactive participant list. I am putting a timeline of 7 days on this action to help keep things moving along. It would also be great if you would be willing to join the task force for Pronunciation that would be awesome, as there are troublesome words we run into. Thank you for considering joining us. If you decide to leave, I will be sad to see you leave as so many people have done a great job on the recordings and any work you have done makes a significant difference. Galendalia CVU Member \ Chat Me Up 22:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Centiday has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 13 § Centiday until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]