User talk:GagaNutella

Hello, Raulkul! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Born This Way (album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. –Chase (talk / contribs) 22:49, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Chasewc91:I just did that because no one answered me. I've listed many sources on Born This Way (album)'s talk page, if you want to see. Sorry for any mistake, I'm new in Wiki and I'm just trying to improve Gaga's articles with good edits.

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Cheek to Cheek Tour, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please understand this is a community of editors. If you disagree with another editor's contribution to an article, I suggest you strike up a conversation with them. This way, you clear the air of any confusion and you both can work together to come to a consensus. Granted, my addition to the article was adding the poster, I do not disagree with the previous editor's additions, that is why I am adding them back into the article. I will not play tit or tat with you as you've been warned of similar behavior before. The way you are choosing to handle the situation is not the best. You have to be a team player. Itsbydesign (talk) 05:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Itsbydesign: oh, great! You come to my talk page and call my edits as non constructive? First, thank u for adding the poster and improving the "set list". Now let's face the facts. All Gaga's articles about her tours have the same structure. The way you edited looks very misplaced and confusing. Some of those jazz festivals are unknown, so keeping the name of the festival instead of the venue it happens, is better for people who come to read the article. I think our conversation is very unnecessary, I mean, this is something so little, we should remain some of your edits with some of the previous. And no, I'm not playing anything, I'm just seeing what is better for the article.Raulkul (talk) 06:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed that poster. Its a poster sourced to Gagadaily.com a fan website and does not come from Gaga's management. And Itsbydesign, leaving a message like that without checking someone's credibility and contribution is pretty rich seeing your WP:OWN issues and the number of times you were blocked for this. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@IndianBio: I didn't know that images from "Fan Sites" aren't acceptable. Whatever, I really give my best here on Wiki. Of course sometimes I make mistakes, because I'm new and I know just the basic. Sorry for anything. And thanks IndianBio for coming here and explaining and put things right!Raulkul (talk) 06:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Raukul, remember that nothing from fansites are acceptable as they are all copyright violating content. And don't worry, I appreciate your contributions a lot and you are a great learner. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit just wanted to let you know "never ever" update that list without discussing first in the talk page. It follows strict guidelines and norms which has to be followed. Please refer the talk page and try to understand what it says regarding how the list is compiled. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@IndianBio: thanks for letting me know about that. I would do the "talk page thing", but I tought how I had a very reliable source, it wouldn't be a problem if I updated Gaga's numbers!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello Little Monster (you are the one, right?)! I have seen your work on Lady Gaga videography and I must say it's quite nice. Some time is all you need (to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines and polices and also WP:FLC and how it works). And then you'll turn it to FL in no time. That's what I think. Paws up bitch. -- Frankie talk 17:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you so much for this, I never tought I would get one. I've been working and giving my best on Gaga's articles, mainly on her awards, videography and tours. It means a lot you are recognizing my "job" (may I call this way). And yes, I'm a Little Monster :) Paws up Frankie!!! GagaNutella (talk) 18:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're a Little Monster, so am I and I want to see all of her sub-articles FL. If you need some help or assistance, I'm all yours. :) -- Frankie _talk 18:18, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. There is still a long way, but I'm sure we are on the right track, baby. I've been working on her lists, including the List of songs recorded by Lady Gaga. Maybe in a very near future we can make it all happen! GagaNutella (talk) 18:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GagaNutella! My name is Musicpoplover12, and I would like to thank you for you contributions on The 1989 World Tour page. I also want to say, "You're welcome!" because I work so hard trying to find the correct references for the page, especially the special guests section. I would like to talk to you about what's been happening the page when we aren't around when we edit. It seems that we are the only two accounts that always put correct information while other accounts are either vandalizing for no reason by putting information that is not true or they are people who think they have correct information, but don't have a source for it. The question I would like to ask you is, do you know if there is a way that we become admins of the page? I would like to work with you to stop anyone that keep breaking the rules. Thank you, and happy peaceful editing!!! Musicpoplover12 (talk) 22:45, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Musicpoplover12: Hi, I also would like to thank you for your effort to keep that article with correct and reliable sources. I've noticed those vandalisms and unnecessary edits, mainly by IPs. The best for us is ask someone to protect the article. You can ask it on the talk page. I suggest you to read this article first, Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. I'm sure you're gonna learn more about "protection page". Thank you again!!! GagaNutella^talk 23:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@GagaNutella: Hi again! I'm getting really irritated with the vandalism that has been happening, but this time, it's from accounts. The IPs aren't a problem. It has come to the point where trying to protect the page won't work. I'm not sure why these accounts keeps vandalizing, and I just edited to where I had to fix the cities, venues, attendance, and gross revenue all to the correct information. We have to try and find a way for us two to become admins of the 1989 World Tour page. I found this, Wikipedia:Administrators, so if you are in, let me know! Thanks! Musicpoplover12 (talk) 03:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Musicpoplover12: I was traveling, that's why it took me some days to reply you. I don't think is that easy to become an administrator. The article is already protected and you've been doing a great job. Keep doing it and if an account insists in vandalizing, you can read this and learn some ways to respond to vandalism. Remember, I'm here to help. Bye! GagaNutella^talk 04:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, GagaNutella I provided the source for the tribute to Jamey Rodemeyer on the artRave talk section. The source is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKG2WB2xQJM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.207.51.32 (talk) 03:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GagaNutella may I ask one help from you? The above article has many dead links which you can find using the {{featured article tools}} template. Can you try to add the archive links for those dead links using Internet web archive? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:59, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. I will try to find more sources for this case and archive them. I've changed and added many sources there recently. I still need to work at the "Guinness" section too. Thank you for asking me. GagaNutella^talk 15:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've just edited more things and I realized there is still a lot to do. Also, there are some awards we won't be able to find reliable sources. For this case, is better leave with the "^{[citation needed]}". GagaNutella^talk 04:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GN, I believe we should not keep ^{[citation needed]} tag at all. If there are some awards you are not able to find reliable source or archives, please delete them. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@IndianBio: Ok, I will keep working on it and if necessary I will delete the awards. GagaNutella^talk 05:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No! Don't delete the notable awards, just because ya' can't find sources. I have watchlisted the page and will soon begin working on it. -- Frankie _talk 16:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: We didn't delete! Instead, we improved the whole article with new and better sources, tables and more. I mean, we know what we're doing! We've already worked A LOT on it and I'm very happy with the final results. It still needs some minor fixes, specially on the Guinness section, which I will be working really soon! Thank u GagaNutella^talk 16:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why you gotta be so rude! I haven't seen what you have done and what not. As I saw above, I said not to delete any notable award. That's all! -- Frankie _talk 16:56, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: Don't you know I'm human, too?, Why you gotta be so rude?, I'm gonna marry her anyway... Hahaha I wasn't rude darling, I just explained to you. Anyway, be free to join us and improve the article even more! GagaNutella^talk 17:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Like you, I have been planning to expand [improve] her lists since a long time. But, I have not been able to do that, because of my commitment to other projects. And now after Brad Pitt filmography, I am taking her lists for WP:FL, but I have been working on her lists these days. I have come across you during work on the lists, and we have not been quite good to each other. Thus, I would like to let the bygones be bygones, start anew, and should focus on her lists to turn them into FL. I have forgotten and forgiven everything happened between the two of us, and I am hoping the same from you. Yours truly, Frankie _talk 19:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: As long as we respect each other, I'm totally in to keep working with you. I've already apologized you. Both of us made mistakes, and that's fine, because that's human all about. But the most important, we learned something with it. I'm also working very very very hard on Gaga's article and I really wanna see them FL/FA. Now, it's time to forget the past and keep forward. Again, my apologies to you. GagaNutella^talk 19:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IndianBio and SNUGGUMS. I want to ask you one thing. I would like to know if you want to create an article about Bennett's film The Zen of Bennett? Gaga is in it, so I thought very interesting to make it happen. I've found MANY sources we could use:

• http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/24/movies/the-zen-of-bennett-featuring-tony-bennett.html?_r=0
• http://www.zenofbennett.com/
• http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/zen-bennett-film-review-382075
• http://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-zen-of-bennett
• http://www.ew.com/article/2012/10/23/tony-bennett-zen-of-bennett-amy-winehouse
• http://nypost.com/2012/10/26/review-the-zen-of-bennett/
• http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/01/entertainment/la-et-mn-zen-of-bennett-20121102
• http://www.washingtonpost.com/gog/movies/the-zen-of-bennett,1240357.html
• http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/26/tony-bennett-on-the-zen-of-bennett_n_2018599.html
• http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/immaculate-noise/posts/tony-bennett-talks-britney-spears-lady-gaga-and-the-zen-of-bennett

PS:feel free to invite more people if you're in! GagaNutella^talk 22:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting idea, but I'm currently focused on other Wiki-things. Might work on this later on. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lol first give me a download link from where I can watch the film. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OMG hahahaha IndianBio you can watch on Netflix, ITunes, Amazon or here. It would be amazing to make this happen!!! GagaNutella^talk 16:51, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Carly Rae Jepsen. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Completely reverting a major and accurate edit (especially by much more experienced editor) and saying "not needed" is disruptive and not how to edit, interacting and collaborating with other editors. (Also see WP:ROWN & WP:REVEXP) I could have removed all the unsourced that you added (which would have been according to MOS), but I was trying to be nice by waiting for you to add them. What is "not needed" are descriptions of the awards, but I don't revert them, because that is not how editors are to treat each other. Musdan77 (talk) 02:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Musdan77 Dude, do whatever you want, I was just trying to improve the article, which I did. I don't want to keep a conversation with you, I'm sorry, but very unnecessary you come to my talk page and say things like this. See my edits and compare the before/after. I reverted your edit because you changed the tables, and that was "not needed". Anyway, I finished my work there. Bye GagaNutella^talk 02:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you wanting to improve (and then improving) the article - I really do. And you should appreciate my efforts as well. What you did was unnecessary and just wrong. I said those things to help you - so that hopefully you'll know better about how to properly edit in the future. Let's all work together, all right? --Musdan77 (talk) 02:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Musdan77 That's fine, even I don't plan to keep working on that article. But what do you think about a future FL? GagaNutella^talk 03:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit here, please do NOT call other editors "stupid" or anything of the sort per WP:Civility and WP:No personal attacks, no matter how frustrated or upset you are with someone. Please take caution in the future and I hope this doesn't happen again. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:07, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That happened once, and I had my reasons. Anyway, I've seen some people, with experience on Wiki doing the same. But believe me, it won't happen again. GagaNutella^talk 19:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it no plausible for one to add grosses at the top section? I mean c'mon look at movie box office. Don't say tours and movies are different here, we're talking specifically of box office content. Take for example, Jurassic World which is still in theaters and is still earning revenues yet the box office grosses are displayed at the top nevertheless. Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation, Minions and hundred more films are playing across the globe and they're box office grosses are still displayed at the top despite not closing in theaters. So why is it not possible to add revenue grosses for a tour till it finishes a leg? Is there a rule laid down in Wikipedia that refrains contributors to do so? Or its just an arbitrary decision? If its laid down in Wikipedia guides and rules than your revert is justified. However, if not so than don't give minor excuses such as "its already written below" or "don't add the gross here". Please support you revert.

@Josephlalrinhlua786: Hello. Thank you for coming here and ask very gently. Wikipedia and experienced editors recommend to wait the tour finishes and then add the total gross. I don't know if you know, but the biggest difference between tours and movies is that the gross of the movies is updated daily, while the former is provided by Billboard, in which not every update there is the boxscore of that tour. Cheek to Cheek Tour is a great example, because it has already finished but Billboad still didn't provide the total gross. I mean, it doesn't make sense to add it, when the tour is already happening. GagaNutella^talk 14:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No actually box office are not reported daily for every movies. Especially for movies released overseas. Let's take the current example of Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials. Since no site really maintains a daily tabulation for films outside of North America, only numbers are in from its opening weekend. Other than that, the next figure you'll hear from the film is next weekend only when it opens in 41 markets (from Monday - Thursday you won't be getting any box office news from it). However, any films released in the US (Box Office Mojo) maintains a daily tabulation. So on a consensus it would be ridiculous to say that "movies" are being tabulated daily. One will sound steriotypical by saying so. And this applies also to thousands of films released outside of North America. They may be tabulated daily but it is implausible for over 100 countries to report daily grosses fro hundreds or movies everyday and they usually NEVER display it on the internet so it's equivalent to not being tabulated digitally (but maybe on papers for records).

Josephlalrinhlua786 I've seen you have some experience with articles about films, and that's amazing. I'm sorry, but I'm not very interested movie gross, or tabulation, Box Office Mojo... If you really want to add the 1989's total gross, I would suggest you to go here and talk about it. A big discussion on my talk page won't lead us anywhere. Good bye and keep improving Wikipedia. GagaNutella^talk 15:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		Thanks for all the help on getting Lady Gaga videography to featured list status, and congrats on your first FL! Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SNUGGUMS. It was a big honor to work with you on this list. More things to come!!! GagaNutella^talk 02:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed there is more to come. I look forward to it. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:53, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs recorded by Lady Gaga, GagaN, nominate it like right now!!!! :P —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IndianBio you can make it, I'm already with one opened! The only thing I can be is a co-nominator. GagaNutella^talk 04:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cebr1979: I can't believe I received this massage for that minor thing (dr. and -) that happened hours ago. Anyway, thank you for letting me know about being blocked. GagaNutella^talk 04:19, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say you were being blocked, I said you could be if the reverting continues. There are three of you edit-warring back and forth about different things on the same page and it's disruptive.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cebr1979: I see. It was just because that user was making poor edits for the article. But that's fine, I hope he stops. GagaNutella^talk 04:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you perhaps invite a few (maybe three) reviewers to comment on Lady Gaga songs list FLC. It's been ten days and I am afraid (if this continues) it will go into waste. -- Frankie _talk 18:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: Sure, tonight I can do it! GagaNutella^talk 21:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG:  Done I've just invited four reviewers. GagaNutella^talk 21:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We need more pruning tbh. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@IndianBio: sorry for the delay, I've just edited the article again. What do you think now? I think it's good because "Chutes" is a 73 minutes episode, which is a very long one. GagaNutella^talk 02:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're totally right. I try every day to better myself, some days are better than others. — Cirt (talk) 04:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: Oh yes, definitely. I've already been part of some "edit wars" here, and I've learned with them. You're very nice tho, something rare around here. GagaNutella^talk 04:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much !!! Also, funny username man. — Cirt (talk) 04:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: I'm a huge fan of LG, and I know she loves Nutella. Actually, when I attended the BTWBALL I gave her a t shirt, which she was with a dress made by Nutellas lmao oh, just for you to know, my next step is take her awards page to FLC. I hope to see your review. GagaNutella^talk 04:45, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome yeah I like her music too. Any chance you like Bill Nye the Science Guy ? — Cirt (talk) 04:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest I've never heard, Cirt. Do you? I prefer TV shows like How to Get Away with Murder, The Walking Dead, American Horror Story, Bates Motel etc GagaNutella^talk 04:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eh nevermind, I was working on an awards list for that TV show, was gonna ask for your help with referencing. The Walking Dead is pretty good, seen the first 2 seasons. No worries, — Cirt (talk) 05:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: I might help you. I'm kind busy with university during this week but link me to the article and I see what I can do to help you. GagaNutella^talk 10:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment I'm working on it, here. I'm using IMDB as a ref for now as a temporary measure, but I'd like to replace any refs cited to IMDB with other refs, if possible. Also going to add more to table Daytime Emmy Awards, a lot more. What do you think? — Cirt (talk) 10:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: It looks good. I have some experience with sources, actually my last FL was all about it. I can help you with that asap. When I have a free time, can I edit the article without worries? GagaNutella^talk 10:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please, just take a look at how I've used WP:CIT templates for the referencing, already, and let me know what you think. I'll add more to the tables soon so you can have more to source. Basically, I modeled it after a prior WP:FL I recently did, so once the tables are filled out, and all sourced, it will pretty much be FL ready with nothing else needed to do. — Cirt (talk) 10:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: It needs some fixes and I personally don't like books sources. The tables are correct, the only thing I think is not necessary is explain them. Anyway, when you finished to add the awards please let me know that I would like to help you to improve this list. GagaNutella^talk 12:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hesitate, and respectfully disagree, everything was directly modeled after Featured List that I did previously, at List of awards and nominations received by Penn & Teller: Bullshit!. That included descriptions, use of books as sources, etc. What other fixes do you think it needs? Confused why you don't like book sources? — Cirt (talk) 12:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: Not a problem. I don't know how to explain but I usually don't use book sources, it's something personal. But for example my FL Lady Gaga videography there are many book sources and I didn't complain with the pet her contributors, I just prefer to use cite web. At me moment, I think your list is fine. GagaNutella^talk 12:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, how about we hold off on modifications until I'll let you know once all the tables are all done and ready for better sources? — Cirt (talk) 12:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: It sounds great. I don't want to bother you lol just let me know and I give you a support. GagaNutella^talk 13:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful, thank you so much !!! I'll keep you posted, — Cirt (talk) 13:07, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, page is all filled in, at link. All that's needed is to phase out all the IMDB citations with better cites, and then it'll be ready for FLC. Can you help me with that research? — Cirt (talk) 16:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: Amazing, I'm gonna take a look on the weekend and change the sources. Thanks for noticing me. GagaNutella^talk 17:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay yeah, the only cite that should be changed is that IMDB cite (number 9 at the moment). All the other ones are good. :) — Cirt (talk) 17:38, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: I've already fixed some things. I tried to find sources for the Emmy Awards and I have to say it's gonna be difficult. I'm gonna try again asap, but at the moment, the article looks great and I think it's ready. GagaNutella^talk 01:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know it's ready otherwise, and thank you for the kind words !!! But I think the main thing for improvement is replacing those IMDB cites with better ones. Let me know if you find better referencing. If not, I'll work on it some more myself over the weekend. :) — Cirt (talk) 01:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cirt: And you're right. I let you know if I find them, but Daytime is not that easy :( GagaNutella^talk 01:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, especially this far in the past. I'm thinking of creating a quite similar List of awards page, for Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey, and that one will be much easier to find refs for. — Cirt (talk) 02:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think your edit of this was a little bit rude? I think the IP removed the images in good faith and I believe you could have made an explanation in the summary. It's okay, however, to revert with a neutrally worded summary. -- Frankie _talk 22:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: I would but I was on mobile, which is terrible to write. So I couldn't do the "good faith" thing. Anyway, it wasn't rude. GagaNutella^talk 22:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All I would say is to "always" use an edit summary unless the reversion is for a bad-faith edit. -- Frankie _talk 22:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice, FrB.TG. GagaNutella^talk 22:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GagaNutella, My twitter is @EmoJoshy1, I don't know if you have twitter or not but I saw that you edited the Lady Gaga Awards page and I've been making a list of all the awards she has and it's at almost 300 while the wiki itself is missing a lot of them. You're really good at editing and understand all this (It took me forever to even get to this page) I really hope you see it and contact me so I can give you the list and help you find sources so you can add <3 Please contact me on Twitter or if not, my kik is EmoJoshy6

Please don't reply here, I will have no clue how to get back XD #LittleMonster — Preceding unsigned comment added by JosueMonster (talk • contribs) 01:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OMG WHATS THAT LMAO IM AFRAID. LETS SEE WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY. GagaNutella^talk 01:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reported the user that has been causing so many problems on AHS: Hotel, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Kworbi_reported_by_User:LLArrow. I thought you might like to go and voice your opinio of them. LLArrow (talk) 19:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the promotion of this list. It looks fantastic and makes a great addition to Wikipedia! Keep up the great work. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Another Believer. Next step is promote Gaga's awards list! GagaNutella^talk 16:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recently saw that you capped a reviewer's comments in Gaga songs FLC. Please note that per talk page guidance, "nominators should not cap, alter, strike, break up, or add graphics to comments from other editors". I know it is made in good faith but it is discouraged in FAC/FLCs. -- Frankie _talk 12:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: U kidding? I really didn't know that. My bad! GagaNutella^talk 12:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was already resolved it wouldn't make a lot of difference, but WP:FLC quotes otherwise. -- Frankie _talk 13:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind leaving some comments? It'd be much appreciated, thanks. Azealia911 _talk 15:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Azealia911: Hi, of course not. I might do it tonight! GagaNutella^talk 16:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou! Azealia911 _talk 16:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For List of songs recorded by Lady Gaga :). And to IndianBio, SNUGGUMS, FrB.TG.  — Calvin999 23:43, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Calvin999!!! :) GagaNutella^talk 23:56, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So, what next, Gaga's awards list? Wow! In a career spanning less than ten years, she is the recipient of six Grammys and thirteen Guinness. -- Frankie _talk 10:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: Yes, I'm gonna nominate it, just gonna take a last look. By the way, that is the article I edited more time. GagaNutella^talk 12:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just took a fresh look and copy-edited the article. I also made quite some changes which you might wanna look. -- Frankie _talk 12:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: I've just seen! Thank you for archiving some sources and rephrasing the lead. I don't know if someone else will join me in this FL. IndianBio has contributed a lot too. Thoughts? GagaNutella^talk 12:25, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For me, it was fun to have five nominators, but since you're the major contributor of this one, do as you wish. -- Frankie _talk 12:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: It was lmao I really don't care to have many nominators. I will nominate it and then if you or IB, SNUGGUMS and Calvin999 want to join, just add your name in there. Is that ok? GagaNutella^talk 12:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I could join you but having made only 32 edits, I don't think I can. -- Frankie _talk 12:45, 30 October 2015 (UTC) Could you, er, maybe hold on for a while? I find some instances of questionable sources, which I/you should replace. -- Frankie _talk 12:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm gonna nominate it after the weekend. I need to fix some wikilinks. GagaNutella^talk 13:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"I need to fix some wikilinks" – I have already beaten you to that ;). Also, my work on references is done. Guess I can join you now at the FLC. -- Frankie _talk 11:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:American_Horror_Story:_Hotel#Recurring_and_Guest I would really apprecite you voicing your opnion on this rediclous matter. THANK YOU! LLArrow (talk) 19:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GagaNutella. List of accolades received by The Hunger Games film series, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated  to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 20:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I request your input on the above discussion? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I do not think you saw my message here. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Believe me, I did not. I'm gonna leave some comments tonight. Sorry lol GagaNutella^talk 13:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how is it helpful not to point out which show she's getting the award for? It'd be like not saying at the Grammys for which album she got the award, or which single. --Lluvia Roja (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was thinking that once Gaga's awards list is promoted, we can request it for the Main Page for February 15. It's the day when 58th Grammy Awards will be held, and as she has been nominated for "Til It Happens to You" (I hope she wins), it will be a pretty relevant day (one can request it at WP:TFLS). I was pretty upset when it didn't receive nomination for Best Original Song at Golden Globe although I am happy that she has been nominated for Best Actress for Hotel. I didn't watch American Horror Story before but after starting to watch Hotel I watch all of the previous four seasons of AHS. I must say all (especially Asylum, my favorite season) are very creepy. -- Frankie _talk 20:13, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: Hey, I'm with you, let's do it! I also hope she wins, this song is amazing and has a beautiful message. About the Golden Globe, it wasn't nominated because "TIHTY" is from a documentary, so it's not eligible. And yes, she is killing in AHS and deserves all these nominations. Asylum is my favorite too, but I love all seasons, even Freak Show. GagaNutella^talk 16:57, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! I remember the day when we both were talking about turning her lists to featured and we did it! I was thinking to nominate Lady Gaga for featured topic. What do you think - should we wait until we turn her biography to FA or nominate it now. Either way is okay for me. -- Frankie _talk 12:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: I also remember it. I'm very happy! I think we should wait, because now we're gonna focus on it, I hope in the next few months her biography becomes a FA. GagaNutella^talk 14:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A few months ago you asked me if I was interested in List of accolades received by The Hunger Games film series, which I denied. I believe you have done good work on it. Why don't you take it to FLC - or are you waiting for the final film to receive awards? -- Frankie _talk 16:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: thanks, that list was very hard because I had to start from the very beginning. I want to wait until the final film, but sure, I will nominate it. GagaNutella^talk 16:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Wouldn't it be unfair for Katy Perry when her contemporaries like Lady Gaga and Taylor Swift's awards are FL but not hers? Well, I and SNUGGUMS have nominated her awards page for FL. Can you review it? -- Frankie _talk 21:04, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: Sure, I'm gonna review it. By the way, you're going hard with the FLCs, congrats!!! GagaNutella^talk 15:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Have you got time to review the article above against the GA status? Thanks in advance! Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Cartoon network freak, I'm not very good in reviewing GA. If it was a FLC I would lol GagaNutella^talk 20:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coincidence, I've also nominated Inna discography for FL status. Maybe you can take a look at that! Thanks! Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I might tonight, Cartoon network freak. GagaNutella^talk 15:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GagaNutella: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Frankie _talk 14:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

I loved it, FrB.TG. I wish you the same!!! Happy holidays :) GagaNutella^talk 04:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To You and Yours! LLArrow (talk) 19:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@LLArrow: Much appreciated! I hope you also have an wonderful Christmas and new year. GagaNutella^talk 04:11, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy birthday
	Wishing you many happy returns of the day. Have a good one. :) -- Frankie talk 09:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: Thank you for remembering my bday!!! I'm very happy :) GagaNutella^talk 23:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Oh, could you revisit Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Katy Perry/archive2? -- Frankie _talk 08:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy belated from me. Did you have a good day yesterday? Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: thank you Snuggs, I had an amazing day!!! GagaNutella^talk 16:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: I supported the list, I'm proud of you guys! GagaNutella^talk 16:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you did :). Have a happy new year! Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:58, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	There are things that are sometimes left undone and there are things that can be left sometimes unsaid. There are things that can be sometimes left unsaid, but wishing someone like you can’t ever be left, so I take this moment to wish you and your loved ones a joyous and wonderful New Year. Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, Gaga won the Golden Globe Award for AHS Hotel. 2015 was a very good year for her. I hope she recaptures her past glory with LG5. -- Frankie _talk 10:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't contain my excitement while updating the pages lol, 2015 was a really good year, and 2016 has everything to be even better! GagaNutella^talk 15:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What was that for? :D -- Frankie _talk 16:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay, I forgot to answer. Shame on me, FrB.TG. So, I read she hit him because he was laughing about her for being nominated as best actress. I don't know if it is true, but that's what people are saying. I don't think so. I also read that he and Gaga hugged backstage and partied together. Difficult to understand what actually happened lol GagaNutella^talk 01:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously doubt he did what the press seems to think he did (it's at least exaggerated), but I was pumped either way myself when finding out she won. Very well deserved and 2015 indeed was quite a year for her. Not sure if either of you saw The Revanent, but DiCaprio very much deserved to win at the Globes as well for that performance. I also do hope they both win at the Oscars. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Snuggs, here in Brazil his movie still didn't release, but I'm gonna watch it for sure. I can't understand why he laughed and what happened but their vine became viral, it's the 4th or 5th most watched vine with 100 million loop. About 2015, it was a big year, but 2016 has everything to be even better! I can't wait for LG5, new tour, possibly season 6 of AHS and much more. GagaNutella^talk 05:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The film just might be his best work to date. One thing I will warn you about is that it is very intense, though I still found it very fascinating. I'm also well aware of how quickly that event spread, but there's no way things were as bad as the press suggests. Very likely misinterpreted. I'm also looking forward to LG5 and we'll see whether your girlfriend returns for more AHS :P. She's back to the spotlight :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that Wikipedia users have edited the plot a little but it does not mean it is wikipedia's. Atleast sourcing Wikia would be appropriate but it still doesn't work out. As you can see here: http://americanhorrorstory.wikia.com/index.php?title=Be_Our_Guest&diff=96239&oldid=96238 FishTank step by step added in the plot and it is their OWN work. I though Wikipedia takes plagiarism seriously and what, copying the whole plot off another website is totally fine? That's why wikia and Wikipedia always conflict. Wikipedia will always be more popular but they take info from Wikia and copy and paste it. Just like Black Beauty (song) how they copied everything and I had to delete it because it is plagiarism and so on. :/

Thanks, I hope you understand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.200.236.19 (talk) 11:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr. Nutella (lol). I and Snuggums have nominated Ms Katy Perry for featured topic, Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Overview of Katy Perry/archive1. I would appreciate it if you could review it. Hopefully someday you could do the same to Ms Gaga. :D -- Frankie _talk 19:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have already left my support. Congrats!!!! GagaNutella^talk 03:11, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm officially disgusted now with "Bore You Again" and "Whore-y". —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 22:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@IndianBio: I just can't believe it. But the predictions were sayng that Glory would win it. At least the Oscars is ours!!! GagaNutella^talk 22:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GagaNutella! I am very grateful for all of your edits on Wikipedia, especially edits for music articles! Personally, I am very passionate about all things Gwen Stefani and No Doubt. A WikiProject Gwen Stefani has recently been started and is currently on the hunt for new members! Even if you're not familiar with their work, your substantially HIGH level of expertise is very welcome here! WP would appreciate your membership if it works for you, and we look forward to seeing you there! Thanks so much for your time! Cheers! Carbrera (talk) 23:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now I know why I stopped watching the Oscars, and why I never liked Sam Smith. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@IndianBio: I'm disgusted! Gaga and Warren had everything to win this Oscar. All critics were prediciting, Spotilght, a film about abuse, won best picture and best original screenplay, and The Academy invited the VP to present Gaga. I won't say Sam's song is bad, but it's not even close to "TIHTY". Again, I'm disgusted. I hope she gets another nom soon and win it!!! PS: Diane is the Katy of the Oscars lol GagaNutella^talk 11:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Sam Smith's song is disgusting and I love hating. Period. And Lol and Diane being Katy of Oscars, lmao! —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For now, EGOT cancelled :( I hope she gets an Emmy nom for best actress!!! GagaNutella^talk 12:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I mean.... racial diversity with sexuality? Boy the Academy's gone Madonna this year. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 12:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a point, but not a reason, Frankie. Anyway, this is just her first nom and there are more to come. I believe Gaga will be EGOT one day, or at least will win the Oscar and Emmy. GagaNutella^talk 13:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"What happened with the song Oscar: most people voted without seeing all the nominees and the singer/songwriters names weren't on the ballot." - a reporter and columnist expert from THR said about Gaga losing the Oscars. I knew there was something wrong! In history, just 5 songs from documentaries were nominated, 2 won. I mean, they don't give a damn about documentaries, 007 is a big franchise and will give them profit. At the end of the day, that's what matter! GagaNutella^talk 15:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, GagaNutella. I'm just posting to let you know that List of songs recorded by Lady Gaga – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 28. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Giants2008: WOW, that's very nice!!! Thanks :) GagaNutella^talk 01:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GagaNutella. List of Lady Gaga live performances, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated  to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 03:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of Lady Gaga live performances, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lady Gaga's performance at the 87th Academy Awards triggered 214,000 interactions per minute on Facebook? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of Lady Gaga live performances. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GagaN, did you address the concerns raised by that IP user? If so can I request to add the missing performances in the article? You can refer to each and every song article and maybe tally it up. The song articles seem pretty succinct and complete. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@IndianBio: hey, I'm really busy during these days. I still didn't have time to add more performances, but I will anytime soon. I also would like to ask you what do you think to include her "festivals" concerts? Like Glastonbury, iTunes, etc. Maybe we could create a new section "festival concert" and add them in there. GagaNutella^talk 17:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GagaN, would be possible for you to add those remaining entries in Gaga's performance list? IMO it's close to promotion just that is what it awaits. FrB.TG (talk) 05:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC) We made it!!! It's FL now :) GagaNutella^talk 02:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Woohoo, congratulations to both of us. :-) BTW I opened another FLC, try to take a look. FrB.TG (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't stop lol I will review it asap, thanks for letting me know. GagaNutella^talk 16:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Someone just added something about her performance on American Horror Story receiving "mixed reviews" without adding a source that actually included the term "mixed reviews". Just wanted to let you know as I'm sure you'd want to revert that. Reece Leonard (talk) 22:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs recorded by Amy Winehouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Green. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you might like to contribute your two-cents worth to this talk page disscussion. LLArrow (talk) 22:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'd really appreciate you weighing in on this discussion. Thanks :)! LLArrow (talk) 19:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GagaNutella! I know you are likely busy doing something important as always, but if you had the time, could you check this out and perhaps leave some comments? It would be much appreciated. Thank you so much! Carbrera (talk) 02:53, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GagaNutella. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How is it not the next single? The source I cited was reliable [1].

@Cloverboy19: here's why ;) GagaNutella^talk 23:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, GagaNutella. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, GagaNutella. I'm just posting to let you know that List of awards and nominations received by American Horror Story – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 29. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! It's been a while since we last spoke. I see you also haven't been very active these days. This notice is to let you know that I've added your name to the list linked above. Please remember to remove yourself if you return to Wikipedia. Best regards, Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: Hey there, how are you? I've been off but as long as Chromatica is out and now I have more time because of quarantine, I'm back. Missing it :) --GagaNutella^talk 02:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you come back! I thankfully have been managing to stay safe and healthy with COVID-19 still thriving. Still active on Wikipedia and have (among other things) been helping keep Gaga's main article in good shape. Unfortunately, our friend IndianBio seems to have disappeared after May 2019 aside from one final edit last October where he shared plans to become active again, but hasn't been around since. Chances are his offline life took even more precedence than expected. Regardless, I hope to see more contributions from you soon. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: Good to know you're safe. This COVID-19 is driving everybody crazy, but we're gonna survive! About IndianBio, that's sad, he was one of the best editors out there, I hope he comes backs ASAP. I confess I'm a very rusty, so please correct me if I make a mistake while editing Gaga's articles hahaha bye xx --GagaNutella^talk 03:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feeling rusty is quite understandable given your absence. With enough practice, you'll get back into the rhythm. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked them for disruptive editing. If this happens in the future just report them at WP:AN3. I keep an eye on those pages so will look out as well. FYI lived in Sao Paulo until last year and loved it! Obrigado! Glen (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Glen: De nada lol! He's so annoying and I've just seen he's created a new user. About SP, it's one of the best places I know. Love it too! GagaNutella^talk 18:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd let you know that Hits is indeed a reliable source. They're a 35 year old music industry trade publication with direct ties to Neilsen SoundScan and Broadcast Data Systems, which track sales and airplay data. I won't revert because I don't really mind, but just thought I should let you know. ;) Happy editing. BTW, I really don't like your username. You have me sitting here right craving that smooth, delicious chocolatey hazelnut-y velvet loveliness. =(

Hey @Homeostasis07:, I didn't know it either and I actually made this edit. Who warned me was @SNUGGUMS:, a much more veteran and experienced editor than me. BTW, I don't care if you don't like my username. Good night! GagaNutella^talk 23:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Snuggums was incorrect. But I've made a note that you can't detect a joking tone. Good night indeed. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 00:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this can indeed be trusted, then it's beyond me why so many others said otherwise when removing such inclusions. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GagaNutella!

Can we start a conversation about Gaga, kindness punks and wikiKind?

I just came looking at the article history for Lady Gaga, wanting to find who within wikipedia has been helping make her article so beautiful and here you are! I would really like to connect. I’ve been working on bringing more inclusivity and kindness into the free knowledge movement and, as part of that, launching wikiKind - something we want to invite all kindness punks to be part of! I would love to include you in the fun.

I LOVE Gaga. This past year Chromatica has been the most inspiring collection of genius and I lost count of how many times I’ve listened and watched every song.

So... I have a feeling we’ll have a great time connecting! And I want to commend your work on making all Gaga related wikipages as high quality as possible! Have you had the opportunity to connect directly with Gaga yet? I’m sure she’s very grateful for your work too!

Made this especially for you. Happy Valentine’s Day, my friend!

It’s a maze of twisty passages all around here. Sometimes it’s hard to feel appreciated. This Heart-shaped Labyrinth is to say Thank YOU, Wikipedian, for all your hard work!!! from Me to YOU, GagaNutella. I appreciate your work. I really do.

With love, always, from DrMel (talk) 19:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Olá, sei que você é brasileiro e controla 90% das páginas da Gaga aqui na Wikipédia. Vim te dar parabéns por todo esse trabalho duro e lindo que você vem fazendo durante esses anos. Mas também vim te recomendar uma reforma em um artigo em específico: o dos prêmios.

Tenho uma lista com todos os prêmios da Gaga, e deram 460 no total... estou aqui com o objetivo de melhorar o artigo, não sou um fã com ego inflado. Ficaria feliz caso você aceitasse dar uma olhadinha nessa lista.

Atenciosamente, Roberto Castro. Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 00:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Desculpa por ter alterado os dados antes de entrar em contato com você.. é que é a primeira vez que entro na Wikipédia e só consegui te enviar mensagem agora Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Barbrastreisandworld: Oi, tudo bem? Obrigado pelo reconhecimento! Sobre a lista, vou reverter o que você editou, pois aqui na Wikipédia tudo baseia-se em referência, não se pode mudar algo sem adicionar uma referência confiável. Onde posso encontrar sua lista para dar uma olhada? GagaNutella^talk 01:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Que bom receber sua resposta! Eu não deveria ter editado a página logo de cara sem falar com o administrador, mas é minha primeira vez na Wikipédia e não estava conseguindo entrar em contato. Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 01:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Não sei mexer nesse site... tem whatsapp? Te mando a lista e a gente discute prêmio por premio Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Barbrastreisandworld: Pior que prefiro manter o anonimato aqui, mas você pode subir a lista no Google Planilhas e me mandar o link aqui ou algo assim. O que acha? GagaNutella^talk 02:44, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Não sei por quê, mas não consigo dar reply no último tópico. Primeira vez aqui na Wikipedia e estou meio perdido. Vc tem uma conta anônima no twitter? Assim a gente pode permanecer em anonimato... eu tenho e é @CLGSupport, pode me chamar na DM lá e continuaremos anônimos. Enfim, aqui está o link da lista: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lcpLLmIPahBHRP8ZQo9kDA4AYBtcR4t-pqsMYLUBHmQ/edit# Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 04:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recomendo que você abra a lista no pc, pois assim verá a contagem certinha até o 460. É normal que haja divergências, mas a gente resolve sem problemas... uma questão bastante polêmica é o certificado da VEVO, contei apenas até 2016 quando eles entregavam prêmio físico. Muita gente conta em 2021, mas acho desespero kk. Espero que goste da lista, e se não concordar com alguma coisa, só me avisar! Diálogo é tudo. Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 04:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Barbrastreisandworld: Pode deixar, vou olhar com calma e acrescentar todos os prêmios que forem considerados "reliable" pela Wikepédia, como por exemplo o Gold Derby Award não deve ser inserido. Agradeço a colaboração desde já. GagaNutella^talk 19:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

E ai? Nenhum prêmio foi relevante de acordo com seus critérios? Há vários prêmios faltando. Vou contar alguns aqui sem nem olhar a lista: 12 prêmios da VEVO que tem até vídeo dela agradacendo, Queerty Awards, M6 Music Awards... todos prêmios físicos. Me ajude a te ajudar! sei que infelizmente há uma hierarquia nesse site e não posso colocar os números reais. Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 03:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Barbrastreisandworld: Eu ainda estou olhando e buscando referências para poder adicionar, relaxa que vou editar assim que possível. GagaNutella^talk 23:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, amigo. Vou esperar! Quando eu editei o número sem seu consentimento, tinha 335 prêmios. Agora tem 322... só fiz piorar a situação kkkkkkk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barbrastreisandworld (talk • contribs) 21:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Barbrastreisandworld: Então, o Guinness não é exatamente um prêmio e sim um recorde, então ele foi pra uma nova seção. Eu ainda estou olhando a lista que você fez e adicionando aos poucos porque não tenho muito tempo. Vai dar boa. GagaNutella^talk 01:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Barbrastreisandworld: Oi, terminei de adicionar todos os prêmios possíveis na lista. Agradeço sua colaboração, ajudou muito! Muitos do que não consegui porque não eram notáveis, enquetes online, certificados ou a Gaga não é creditada (principalmente os da BTWF), enfim, mas eu adicionei todos que deu. GagaNutella^talk 00:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tudo bem amigo, aumentou muito o número dos prêmios. Obrigado! Tem alguns ali que realmente nao aconselho colocar, tipo o Omega Hitz kkk. Você está certíssimo em não colocar algumas enquetes. Só fico com uma pergunta: pq não coloca os prêmios da Vevo que ela ganhou? Barbrastreisandworld (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Barbrastreisandworld: Porque o VEVO, Official Charts, RIAA Diamante, etc, não são bem prêmios e sim certificados ou uma placa de comemoração por atingir o #1. Levando isso em consideração, não se deve adicionar ali e sim em sua discografia. GagaNutella^talk 20:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed this nomination. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:36, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you by any chance able to leave comments for this peer review? SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have just done, SNUGGUMS! :) GagaNutella^talk 00:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lady Gaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 500 Greatest Albums of All Time. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed that you added the Dawn of Chromatica remixes to the original song pages' Release history sections. In the future, please refrain from doing this. #Release history is supposed to be how we detail independent releases of a song. If a song is released to radio, we include that. If a song is released independently on streaming services, we include that. However, we don't include it when a song/remix is just part of an album, like the Dawn of Chromatica remixes, because that is not an independent release. I saw that someone already reverted your edits, so you don't need to worry this time around, but just for the future, please keep this in mind. I hope that this makes sense. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 14:16, 31 August 2021 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you reverted the recent edit regarding the languages, but per Template:Infobox album states — “This field should identify what language(s) are used in the lyrics of the album.” Doesn’t state anywhere that just because the whole song isn’t in another language that it can’t be included. I will include Spanish as well, but what song contains French lyrics?? Pillowdelight (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, fine @Pillowdelight:! Gaga performs a few words in French and German on "Bloody Mary" and a few words in Italian on "Born This Way". GagaNutella^talk 16:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added a source stating that Bloody Mary includes French lyrics. But I was unable to find anything regarding Born This Way having any Italian lyrics but I’ll keep looking. I’ve opened up a discussion on its talk page regarding the languages in the infobox, another user has also reverted it. Pillowdelight (talk) 16:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey congrats for nominating the article, do you want to archive all links? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 18:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, this is my first GAN. I think that would be nice, IndianBio! GagaNutella^talk 19:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's a tool which does it, maybe ask @Sricsi?? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 18:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) https://iabot.toolforge.org/index.php?page=runbotsingle&pagesearch=Born_This_Way_(album) FrB.TG (talk) 20:45, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IndianBio did it, FrB.TG. Thank you!!! GagaNutella^talk 21:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, GagaNutella. I'm just posting to let you know that List of accolades received by Titanic – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for November 14. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's great, Giants2008! GagaNutella^talk 02:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article One Last Time: An Evening with Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:One Last Time: An Evening with Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please do the Bloody Mary English page please? It exists in other languages but not English yet and I can't do it since it won't translate as I rarely make English wikis. JulienSorel1965 (talk) 16:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 3-Way (The Golden Rule) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 3-Way (The Golden Rule) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:3-Way (The Golden Rule) and Talk:3-Way (The Golden Rule)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 3-Way (The Golden Rule) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:3-Way (The Golden Rule) for comments about the article, and Talk:3-Way (The Golden Rule)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, is there anyway you could tell me the code you used to get your name split into 2 colors in your sig? I've been trying to figure out how to best do it with my name and then I saw your signature.

Edit: Never mind, I figured it out -- Zoo (talk) 02:50, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZooBlazer:, sorry for the delay I was traveling, but nice you've figured it out! GagaNutella^talk 16:09, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Born This Way (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Born This Way (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Born This Way (album) and Talk:Born This Way (album)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Super Bowl LI halftime show you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Super Bowl LI halftime show you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Super Bowl LI halftime show and Talk:Super Bowl LI halftime show/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 16:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Super Bowl LI halftime show you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Super Bowl LI halftime show for comments about the article, and Talk:Super Bowl LI halftime show/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 00:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Way to go! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It finally happened, SNUGGUMS! By the way, thanks for the amazing review, Grk1011. GagaNutella^talk 01:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like Congrats! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 02:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Born This Way (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Born This Way (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Born This Way (album) for comments about the article, and Talk:Born This Way (album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, congrats! Finally! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joanne (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 20:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joanne (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Joanne (album) and Talk:Joanne (album)/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joanne (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joanne (album) for comments about the article, and Talk:Joanne (album)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 01:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats again! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]