User talk:Gab4gab

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Hi Gab4Gab. In reference to your recent edit on GIIS Wikipedia page, I make the following observations. The current content on the page under section 'Use of Technology in Education' is wrong. I work for GIIS, and it is not our policy to give away devices belonging to the company to a user. These are company devices and have to be returned to the company after the parent/student leaves school. There is no reference to this company policy expect on our own website and FAQ page. I request you to restore the current information archived earlier as it is factual. Also I would like to bring to your attention that the earlier information about ' students are permitted to take the devices as their own after graduation or leaving the school if they so wish' also lacks citation. It is not from a reliable source, and I fear it is from someone trying to spread false information about the school. Hope you will help restore the changes made by me. I would also like to bring to your notice that GIIS wikipedia page is regularly vandalised by miscreants who insert foul language next to the names of our Management personnel. There is also false information on the use of Sanskrit in the school curricula, which I have changed multiple times, but which seems to change back to false information. Sanskrit as a subject is optional in Singapore, unlike in India. I do hope Wikipedia has stricter rules in place for vandals, and keep a hawk-eye on them as much as they do on genuine content providers like me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupali Karekar (talk • contribs) 14:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rupali Karekar: I reverted your edit because you did not provide a citation to a reliable published source. You can again add your material if you wish, as long as you provide the required citation(s). Meanwhile I've removed that section and the one below it because neither was sourced. Verifiability is an important policy of Wikipedia. I remember your Sanskrit edits. The source cited clearly said the subject was compulsory and yet you changed that to optional multiple times in the article without providing a source to support your version. I suggest you make more of an effort to follow Wikipedia policy. Repeatedly adding unsourced content after you are warned that published sources are needed could be considered disruptive editing which can result in being blocked from editing. Gab4gab (talk) 15:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I wrote a journalism article about volunteers, including you specifically, protecting public knowledge despite disruption by people self-promoting and causing chaos. Thank you. Supurb (talk) 06:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Regarding this edit I didn't happen to see it in the source but now I do. RYLELT7 (talk) 00:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RYLELT7: That happens to me too. Maybe we're working too hard. Gab4gab (talk) 05:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gab4gab, I noticed you reverted an edit by an IP on the article as it looked like the IP had removed sourced content. Upon reading the actual reference I believe the IP was right. The source given is only about the UAE policy of 96h PCR test validity for arriving passengers and does not mention the school, misbehavior by the school, risks for pupils due to the school's actions or a general 96h PCR test validity. I have thus removed the content as original research. NJD-DE (talk) 19:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Njd-de: Thanks for following up and thanks for letting me know. Gab4gab (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Gab4gab you have edited content on our Wikipedia page that we have only just updated. The recent update had approval from the management of this organisation and i would really appreciate it if you could restore my edits. While I am aware that some content had been removed, management felt that a simpler page was preferred. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChurchillAve (talk • contribs) 03:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ChurchillAve: I've begun a discussion regarding this on the article talk page which is the best place to reach consensus. See Talk:Tasmanian_University_Student_Association#Major revisions by ChurchillAve. You should go there to make your case. I note that you say "we have only just updated" which suggested your account is being used by a group rather than an individual. Group use of an account is not allowed by Wikipedia policy Gab4gab (talk) 17:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noted that you have deleted a huge amount of data under the Notable Alumni section. I understand that one needs notability to create and justify a wiki-page for a natural or legal person and I know the requirements of NOTABLE. Secondly, you need a valid citation to support any data quoted on a page. For a listing of person notable to the school in the Alumni section [not on their own pages]) you need a citation. You don't need a citation AND a link to a wiki-page to make that list notable in terms of the school. So I have retained the deletions where there are no citations but I have reverted the deletions that had valid citations in accordance with WP:ANYBIO. Its always better to discuss first before deleting such huge chunks of data. Farawayman (talk) 23:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - I have just read Wikipedia:Notable alumni and you do indeed need both a Link to a Wiki-page and a citation. Farawayman (talk) 23:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Farawayman: No need to apologize. The notable alumni list often has surprises for editors and can lead to extended debates. Many schools have an alumni honor roll and often editors want to add all of those names to the list. I understand it's disturbing to have a large amount of work reverted but everything is available in the edit history. I expect that a least some of the names I removed will eventually be re-added after either a biography article is written or convincing sources are referenced. It is unfortunate that we've been in conflict recently. I edit primarily school articles and try to follow the advice at WP:WPSCH/AG. I appreciate all the work you've put into the article and your willingness to discuss issues. Gab4gab (talk) 00:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

let me tell you this really dumb story. so I'm in college and I like to get a little baked and listen to this website that turns wikipedia edits into music in real time while I study. (its called listen.hatnote you should check it out) anyway I saw that a high schools page had made an edit and decided to just go and stalk the page and by the end of it I was laughing so hard. then I found your page and now here I am. I just thought that was kinda crazy and that you're appreciated. I don't really know how Wikipedia works so if you wanna chat some more my instagram is @grace.c.richardson or if we never have any contact ever again, I hope you live a happy life :) Gracecaro1ine (talk) 17:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 - "I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hal Lindes, but you didn't provide a reliable source."

I included a reference to the Wikipedia entry for the BBC TV series Between the Lines and it is mentioned on that page that Hal Lindes composed the theme music for the series. Implicitly, the reference is thus any publicly available copy of the TV programme as Hal Lindes will be found on the closing credits. Indeed, this is where I saw his name after watching repeats of the series on BBC 4. 31.125.76.2 (talk) 17:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just checked Wiki page. Sorry, it looks as if composer was somebody else, but performed by Hal Lindes. 31.125.76.2 (talk) 17:31, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BTW. WRT, not written by me but I have a reference for: "and a TRIC award for Best TV Theme Music.[citation needed]"

https://www.apmmusic.com/artists-composers/hal-lindes

"TRIC award for Best TV Theme Music – THIEF TAKERS." 31.125.76.2 (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on your talk page. Gab4gab (talk) 19:39, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources:

Confusingly this implies he did compose the theme(?) music! "Between the Lines - Composer" - https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0511771/

Hal Lindes's own website - http://hallindes.com/discography.html - "Between the Lines"

The Wikipedia page for "Between the Lines" credits Colin Towns as the "composer". But his website does not seem to mention BtL. However, the Wikipedia page for Colin Towns does say he composed the music for BtL. This also says he did: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0870061/

So, theme music composed by Colin Towns, played by Hal Lindes? Or theme music by Hal Lindes, incidental music by Colin Towns? 31.125.76.2 (talk) 23:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on your talk page. Gab4gab (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I noticed that you seem to have a really bad misunderstanding how sourcing from Allmusic works, I noticed this when you added "pop rock" to the genre of this hardcore album and then continuously reverted the proceeding edits of editors who were trying to fix this very erroneous claim just because the sidebar of Allmusic said it's "pop rock". Well I'm here to inform you that you should take look at WP:A/S; AllMusic's genre sidebar should be avoided. Previous discussions at WP:ALBUMS and RSN have evinced that they can be incongruous with the reviewer's prose, which should take precedent over the sidebar. So yeah, the sidebar of Allmusic means virtually nothing, and trust me when I say that that album is verrrrrrryyyyyyyyy far from "pop rock" my friend. Second Skin (talk) 20:21, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Second Skin: My apologies, today's my day to learn something new. Gab4gab (talk) 20:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of this page (Draft:ශ්‍රී සුමංගල ජාතික පාසල - නිල්දණ්ඩාහින්න) is currently restricted to administrators because the page title matches an entry on the local or global blacklists.

@Tharusha Theekshana: sorry, I can't locate the draft you refer to. I wouldn't be inclined to create a school article if the school wasn't clearly notable. Gab4gab (talk) 16:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gab4Gab. I am Rupali Karekar I contacted you last on January 2021. I spoke to you last about the changes to the GIIS Wikipedia page. At the time, I had brought to your attention that some changes are made to the factual accuracy of GIIS Brand on its Wiki page by miscreants playing the truant. I work for the company so I should know. These changes made by unauthorized people are falling through the scrutiny cracks, but Every time I have made a change, you have been prompt enough to cross-check.

This time around, someone changed the fact that GIIS is a Singapore-headquartered school. They replaced Singapore with Hyderabad throughout the page, and it has gone unnoticed. I have corrected the changes now, but I am unable to figure out who is tampering with our official page time and again. Requesting you to help.

@Rupali Karekar: I've responded on your talk page. Gab4gab (talk) 15:36, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gab5gab, thank you for pointing out that my citation did not refer to Ysgol Penglais. I had copied the wrong reference from the Andrew John article. I hope what I have now put is OK. I shall also include the citation as a multiple reference on the Andrew John page itself. As you say, his education was not properly referenced there.Ntmr (talk) 14:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ntmr: Thanks for cleaning that up. I often see mentions of high school in biographies that are appear along with higher education with only the later supported by a citation. Gab4gab (talk) 18:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gab5gab: can you point me to any Wikipedia policy on WHO should be counted as a Notable Alumnus? Clearly Andrew John would qualify in respect of Ysgol Penglais, but I was considering who was named on the University of Reading page; someone had deleted most that I had seen a year or two ago, and those that were left were a random selection. I deleted the few that remained, leaving a link to the Alumni List. But is there any guidance giving criteria to be applied to (a) schools and (b) colleges and universities?Ntmr (talk) 19:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ntmr: opinions differ and there is a recent discussion related to this on the school articles talk page, see [1]. There is some guidance in both the school and university article advice essays. (WP:WPSCH/AG and WP:HED/AG) My view is that an alumnus is any former student/attendee, whether they graduated or not. A notable alumni needs to qualify for a Wikipedia biography article. The policy that applies is not very specific to the issue: WP:LISTBIO. There are more essays: Wikipedia:Notable_alumni and WP:ALMA. Many schools and universities maintain list of alumni they consider notable. Their criteria for notability is not the same as what we use here at Wikipedia and they have a bias toward promoting their former students. So I view their lists as most useful for confirming that names are former attendees. Just my opinion. Gab4gab (talk) 21:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you for the clarification! There are many accomplished people who have attended Central, will continue searching for opportunities to highlight them in ways that adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines.

ZoeyBella (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, the reason I deleted the school closure part is because the Brooks college is active now (please check the status from this link: https://bebizfile.sos.ca.gov/Certification/index?certificateNumber=Y8M7G4Y), I don’t want people to think this college is closed, so I will delete the closure part again. Thanks!

(talk page stalker) This is a new entity incorporated yesterday. This appears to be a WP:COI editor attempting to take over the article for the original school, which closed 14 years ago. Meters (talk) 04:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gab4gab,

Could you kindly explain your reasoning behind constantly flagging the edits to the page Vinod G. Khandare as COI?

Fuwimo2021 (talk) 14:39, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fuwimo2021: if you review the article history you'll find that I haven't flagged any edits as COI. What I have done is revert the removal of the COI tag because it has been done without justification. The tag has been removed multiple times, most recently at 12:25, 17 September 2021‎ by Veekay2020. I've asked Veekay2020 for their reasoning for removal of the tag and they have not yet responded. The article continues to be cluttered with multiple citations where one would suffice - suggesting that some editors are attempting to promote the subject. Gab4gab (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why you have changed Bangladesh army page with misinformation?😡🤬 i have added the bell 407 that was commissioned a few days ago. MF😡 Tanvir Ahmed Siddiqi (talk) 04:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tanvir Ahmed Siddiqi: I reverted your edit because you cited Wikipedia content. Wikipedia is not a reliable source and should only be cited when writing about Wikipedia. Gab4gab (talk) 04:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why'd you remove my edits? I sourced it exactly like you said. -_- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.215.177.155 (talk) 14:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Gab4gab:, I was looking over the Katherine Parr (actress) article last night and I think it's appropriate that we restore the death details. The British Film Institute and Aveleyman are two places which pass WP:RS that give a 2009 death year, and the GRO Index and Ancestry both hold the death record (I've put a screenshot of it here in case you can't access it manually). The only claim that she was still alive that I can find is from User:WelshDragon18 and a random IP which has similar editing patterns to WelshDragon18. I had him/her permanently blocked from Wiki earlier this year for persistent vandalism, which included, but was not limited to, resurrecting dead people and killing off living people. He/she then returned under the sock puppet account User:Susan1621, which I also had blocked! Their claim that she appears in the 2020 electoral register is utter nonsense. I checked this last night. The last time she appeared on it was in 2003 (the fact that she didn't appear on it between 03–09 may suggest invalidity/a move to a care home). If there are no objections, I'll restore the death date. Thanks --Jkaharper (talk) 20:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jkaharper: Sounds good to me, thanks for digging into this. Gab4gab (talk) 20:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Gabe,

I saw a while ago that you left me a message regarding my edit on the American Heritage Wiki Page, thank you for letting me know! I will try to find a reliable message to back up my edit. Muditm006 (talk) 23:17, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Reliable Source***

Muditm006 (talk) 23:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is customary to respect the

This user talk page is actively undergoing a major edit for a short while. To help avoid edit conflicts, please do not edit this page while this message is displayed. This page was last edited at 16:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC) (13 days ago) – this estimate is cached, update. Please remove this template if this page hasn't been edited for a significant time. If you are the editor who added this template, please be sure to remove it or replace it with {{Under construction}} between editing sessions.

template on a page. KJP1 (talk) 12:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@KJP1: Yes, if I had seen the template I would have respected it - as I did by reverting my edit (and explaining what happened in my edit summary) four minutes before you left this message for me. Gab4gab (talk) 12:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Over to you. KJP1 (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Gab4gab. I posted a request on the ATP Flight School Talk page about getting the infobox updated with the correct number of flight school locations. I work with ATP so I'd rather not make the update myself. I see you've made some edits to the article recently, so I'm hoping you can take a look at my request. Happy to answer any questions, thanks. Addison at ATP Flight School (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the notability tag from this article; I'm not sure where you were searching, but I was able to find at least two in-depth "mainstream critical reviews" from major newspapers on ProQuest. I'm not sure whether you have access to Wikipedia Library, but it has ProQuest access, and I would suggest searching it when looking for book reviews, especially pre-1990s. (There was also one extensive journal article on the book, though that hadn't been written yet when you tagged it.) Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion and your updates. I'll attempt to learn to use ProQuest. Gab4gab (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was working through copy-paste articles with URLs provided when I came across this article you tagged. Could you please provide some more information? The page you linked, and a normal Earwig tool test both don't seem to show any significant copyright violations. See [2] and [3]. Thanks for the help! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ARandomName123: Sorry about that, I put the wrong url in the copy-paste. Fixed it now, it's a 93.9% score but I couldn't be sure it wasn't a mirror of Wikipedia. Gab4gab (talk) 21:56, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks! I'll look into it. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 22:56, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Guideline and policy news

• Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
• The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
• Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.

---

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Arbitration

• Following the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Aoidh, Cabayi, Firefly, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree, Z1720.
• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
• The arbitration case Industrial agriculture has been closed.

Miscellaneous

• The New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

---

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

• Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
• Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
• Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
• The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

---

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

• Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
• Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.

Technical news

• The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

• The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
• Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.

---

I saw that you edited Conrad A. Nervig's Wikipedia page over a period of 15 years. You have done an amazing job during that time! I found an insanely useful resource that could help both of us. It's called the ACE Second Decade Anniversary Book. It has many biographies and deaths of various film editors that have never been posted on the internet before. Disclaimer, some of the death dates may be inaccurate. For example, they listed Alma Macrorie's death date as September 12, 1969 instead of June 28, 1970. But from my research, the rest of the death dates are accurate.

Here's some changes that I've made using that book as a source:

• Conrad A. Nervig - I used multiple sources to highlight his time in the military before he began work as film editor.
• American Cinema Editors Award for Best Edited Feature Film - They gave out TWO awards in 1969!
• George Boemler - I completed his birth and death date using a combination of Ancestry.com (which I didn't cite) and the ACE book (which I did cite).
• George Tomasini - Added more context to his death date using a partially available film journal and the ACE book in hand.

Let me know if you want to collaborate with me, and we can knock these editors out of the park. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 01:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. Although I do sometimes edit film articles my current approach is to randomly view articles rather than concentrate on any particular areas. I do hope you continue to enjoy your time with Wikipedia and I appreciate the work you are doing. Gab4gab (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gab4gab: You are very welcome! Let me know if you need any assistance. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 04:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

• Kbdank71
• Kosack
• NrDg
• TLSuda

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.

Technical news

• The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

• An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".

Miscellaneous

• Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

---