User talk:GMH Melbourne/Archive 2022

2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

Hello, GA Melbourne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jahan Kalantar (lawyer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NPOL. They will need to be elected to meet the notability criteria ("Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels")

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jess Wilson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ary Hoffmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 09:15, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have declined your speedy deletion request for Oliver Yates. Failing to meet notability is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. See Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion for a list of valid criteria. If you the article does not meet notability, then you should nominate it for deletion. Whpq (talk) 14:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I shall do that. Thank you for your help. - Yours Faithfully, GA Melbourne ( T | C ) 14:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GA Melbourne,

Why do you think that google search is important for a person to show the notability? and isn't it better to start a talk page instead of putting a deletion tag! BuxyNanny (talk) 19:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BuxyNanny: I only just proposed the deletion, you may deleted by removing the following tag from the article and then a deletion discussion may be initiated.

{{proposed deletion/dated}}

- Yours Faithfully, GA Melbourne ( T | C ) 02:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If it was just Proposed and asked to delete the tag!! then may i know why you have putted the tag again ? BuxyNanny (talk) 23:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User:BuxyNanny: Initially it was a proposed deletion (WP:PROD) which is a tag that anyone may delete and a debate is not required. Since you deleted the tag, I chose start a deletion discussion (WP:AFD). The discussion on whether or not the article is suitable for Wikipedia can be found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Hamilton Zehl. - Yours Faithfully, GA Melbourne ( T | C ) 02:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:John Cain Jr sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GA Melbourne. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 01:51, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The grant is probationary and expires on Monday, December 12. Have fun and let me know if you need anything. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 01:54, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Swarm: No worries, many thanks! - GA Melbourne (talk) 01:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rupert Arnold has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, first source is unreliable and second source fails WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 08:47, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gamble Breaux has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, with all but one source being either not independent, interviews, or a WP:SIGCOV fail.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 08:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
897		Sex in film (talk)	Add sources
22		David Davis (Australian politician) (talk)	Add sources
5		Clonard College (talk)	Add sources
66		Acting prime minister (talk)	Add sources
9		Bridget Vallence (talk)	Add sources
1,139		Ram Nath Kovind (talk)	Add sources
10		Carl Freedman (talk)	Cleanup
58		Morrison government (talk)	Cleanup
35		Methodist Ladies' College, Melbourne (talk)	Cleanup
15		Al-Kateb v Godwin (talk)	Expand
66		Lucy Turnbull (talk)	Expand
1,565		2022 Victorian state election (talk)	Expand
34		Donkey vote (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
102		Anti-Chilean sentiment (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,883		Operation Blue Star (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
27		Amino acid dating (talk)	Merge
199		Spring green (talk)	Merge
285		Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China (talk)	Merge
6		Sherryl Garbutt (talk)	Wikify
269		Alex Katz (talk)	Wikify
225		Anti-Japanese sentiment (talk)	Wikify
2		Michel Fardeau (talk)	Orphan
3		David Ledy (talk)	Orphan
5		Cure Rare Disease (talk)	Orphan
13		Electoral district of Bundoora (talk)	Stub
41		Richard Cadbury (talk)	Stub
6		Caucus revolt (talk)	Stub
28		Eastern Victoria Region (talk)	Stub
4		Atalanta Mozzanica Calcio Femminile Dilettantistico (talk)	Stub
82		Abdelilah Hafidi (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:22, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gamble Breaux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamble Breaux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 00:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]