User talk:Frank R 1981

Welcome, Frank R 1981!

Jimmy Pitt talk 16:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Arequipa City, landmarks.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:19, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Arequipa  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe _talk 19:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alder may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[Alnus viridis]]'' <small>(Chaix) DC. 1805) —</small> Temperate and subarctic Europe, Asia, North America.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I recently edited the climate box with a summary explaining why it was changed. I don't see the rationale in presenting the parameters in horizontal format since it is very difficult for those willing to add data to it. As well, it makes no difference if you put the parameters in horizontal format or in vertical format as shown by how the climate box appeared the same. Most city articles put it in vertical format such as the one I did since it is easier to edit by other users. I hope that clarifies my reason of editing the climate box. Ssbbplayer (talk) 01:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

 Not done This page is not protected. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, happy editing to you. One tip, when making posts in discussion areas (such as User Talk pages), you should sign your name by type 4 tildes (~~~~) at the end of your posting, it will leave a link you your username and the timestamp. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:21, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Sulimana a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Solimana (volcano). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santa Cruz (mountain), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Cruz District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see a notice I left for the other party which is also worthy of your attention. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cutervo National Park you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cutervo National Park for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Abel (talk) 18:16, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cordillera Blanca you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tisquesusa -- Tisquesusa (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Huascarán National Park you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 16:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you've added some geography categories to various plant articles, such as Dysoxylum excelsum. In this case Category:Trees of Nepal is part of Category:Trees of the Indian Subcontinent. Typically articles don't go in both a parent and child category. In this case Dysoxylum excelsum is widely distributed, so we use more general categories. Thanks Declangi (talk) 03:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Declangi. Thank you for pointing out the listing criteria of the Trees of the Indian Subcontinent category. However, I've also noticed that similar categories share species for the sake of more refined searches (e.g: if I only were to look for tree species of Nepal I'd wish to have all the Nepali species listed, including those that are also present in neighboring countries). Because of that, I suggest we keep Dysoxylum excelsum present on both lists. Thank you. Frank R 1981 (talk) 05:09, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree that it's more difficult to determine all the species which are present in Nepal. However I don't think using both parent and child categories follows generally accepted practice regarding geographical (and other) categories. For plants, the general ideas on geographical categories are here: WP:PLANTS/WGSRPD. And for categories in general: WP:SUBCAT. When you edited Alstonia scholaris to add Nepal as a category, this now implies something special about Nepal re: this species versus other regional countries. You are now making rather a lot of changes of this kind. The Category:Trees of Asia was previously placed here due to the wide distribution of the species and to avoid over-categorization. My best suggestion to you is that you try to read the above notes on category practice and that, if you still feel opposed, you might raise the matter at the Plants project talk page at WT:PLANTS, where someone may be able to explain these ideas better than myself. Thanks Declangi (talk) 10:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Huascarán National Park you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Huascarán National Park for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Huascarán National Park you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Huascarán National Park for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 17:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bad links fixed by Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cordillera Blanca you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cordillera Blanca for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tisquesusa -- Tisquesusa (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add copyright content to this wiki, not even temporarily for editing. Please do your amendments before you save the page, or use an external editor. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phragmipedium kovachii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labellum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Sierra del Divisor National Park, Frank R 1981!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 07:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think Paraxra could go to Paraccra (archeological site)? EdJohnston (talk) 03:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for adding {{taxonbar}} to various articles. However, it should be placed earlier on the page than you typically place it. Taxonbar should be placed before any categories or stub templates. Plantdrew (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It might be good to provide a bit more information on the trees you are creating. Maybe state how tall it grows and how high it can be found. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 17:51, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Septotheca, Frank R 1981!

Wikipedia editor Bfpage just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You are an excellent editor and have made some great contributions to Wikipedia. I am putting a helpful search template on the talk page of the article. Bfpage (talk) 23:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Bfpage's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating Geonoma maxima, Frank R 1981!

Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

If possible, kindly try to expand the article. Thanks. :)

To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

—usernamekiran(talk) 19:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Diospyros inconstans, Frank R 1981!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added links through Wikidata to pages in other languages and tagged the talk page. Hope that's OK.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 22:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frank R 1981, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Nakon 15:59, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phragmipedium kovachii you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your work on plants. I wanted to comment on a couple things I've seen in some of your recent edits. Please leave the line breaks between each parameter in a taxobox. It makes it very difficult to see what the parameters are when they are all on one line. Also, stub categories should be produced with stub templates, not by directly encoding the category. Use {{Malvales-stub}} not [[Category:Malvales stubs]].Plantdrew (talk) 03:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Frank R 1981, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially your recent creation of Myrcianthes rhopaloides. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 07:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

When a change is reverted, please do not re-revert it. Please discuss on Talk page. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When a page move is reverted the same applies. Please discuss or use RM template to initiate community discussion. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(cur | prev) 21:08, 12 December 2017‎ Frank R 1981 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,286 bytes) (+198)‎ . . (undo | thank) (Tag: Visual edit)

(cur | prev) 21:04, 12 December 2017‎ Frank R 1981 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,088 bytes) (+52)‎ . . (undo | thank) (Tag: Visual edit)

(cur | prev) 21:03, 12 December 2017‎ Frank R 1981 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,036 bytes) (+420)‎ . . (undo | thank) (Tag: Visual edit)

(cur | prev) 21:01, 12 December 2017‎ Frank R 1981 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (3,616 bytes) (+2)‎ . . (undo | thank)

(cur | prev) 21:00, 12 December 2017‎ Frank R 1981 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (3,614 bytes) (+3,568)‎ . . (Removed redirect to Islas Ballestas) (undo | thank) (Tag: Removed redirect)

(cur | prev) 20:59, 12 December 2017‎ In ictu oculi (talk | contribs)‎ . . (46 bytes) (+46)‎ . . (In ictu oculi moved page Ballestas Islands to Islas Ballestas over redirect: reverted, use the RM mechanism please)

Hello? Frank R 1981, can you hear me? Are you getting the yellow "message" tag on your Talk page? .... what you have done above is create a duplicate article by Cut and paste moves after having moved the article twice and been reverted. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I am going to have to alert an admin and request action if you don't stop this. This isn't my wish, these things should be discussed. Please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia In ictu oculi (talk) 21:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Phragmipedium kovachii you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Phragmipedium kovachii for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 04:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions#Using the categorization hierarchy for instructions on how to categorize plant distributions. We use the highest level that makes sense. It's a general principle never to place an article in both a category and one of its subcategories. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Cattleya mooreana, Frank R 1981!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Accepted, but please expand and remove the expansion banner as soon as possible. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:24, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please point me to a Wikipedia policy saying I can't quote the Tajik Encyclopedia, or stop removing cited content from Prunus darvasica‎. Abductive (reasoning) 05:40, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're saying. And by leaving the cyrillic names in the quotes, people will find their way via Google. But you could have used an edit summary... Abductive (reasoning) 06:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how often this will come up in your edits, but note in some of your edits you've retained the parameters |sectio=, |subsectio=, |series=, which aren't recognized by {{speciesbox}} and should be replaced with |parent=, which will look up information in the automated taxobox system. I've corrected all the current instances of this (I think); for instance, here in Quercus pontica. |subgenus= is recognized, but I have been replacing it with |parent= so that the information is centralized.

If the taxonomy template for the parent (Template:Taxonomy/parent name) doesn't exist, it needs to be created, as here with Template:Taxonomy/Quercus sect. Mesobalanus. I only fairly recently started doing this, because it seemed onerous; but it's not actually that bad.

(Please reply here rather than on my talk page. I'd rather not have a discussion split between pages.) — Eru·tuon 23:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, can you please address the concerns raised in Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ubinas/archive1 by Nikkimaria about the map on Ubinas? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please show some consideration and explain why you are removing an improvement to information provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seedan (talk • contribs) 01:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries if you're making massive changes or reverting content. Wikipedia guidelines do not enforce any specific citation style: there's no reason to change a perfectly valid citation format on an article. Your version destroys page numberings that were painstakingly researched. Fraenir (talk) 11:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to review Wikipedia policies on citations (Wikipedia:Citation templates) and copyrights (Wikipedia:Copyrights).

"Because templates can be contentious, editors should not add citation templates, or change an article with a consistent citation format to another, without gaining consensus". You've clearly ignored longstanding Wikipedia policy to enforce your preferred citation style, and did not do any work to gain consensus before doing so.

As I explained either, you still haven't addressed the issue of massive removal of page number information in the citations. Additionally, you stripped a copyright attribution tag away from one of the sources, which damages the integrity of the article when it comes to copyright compliance. If you're insistent on trying to ram through your preferred citation style, the onus is on you to get a consensus to support the change. Stop reverting to your preferred style before you've taken this step to gain consensus for this contentious change. Fraenir (talk) 13:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado Frank R 1981, Vi que revertiste la modificación del título de la página que realicé a la página en inglés de Krapfia weberbaueri. Lo hice porque el nombre científico de la especie aceptado ha sido establecido en Ranunculus weberbaueri (Ulbr.) Lourteig y Krapfia weberbaueri es un sinónimo. La última revisión del taxón fue realizada por Michael Hassler en mayo de 2018.[1] Saludos cordiales, --Cbrescia (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting. I've asked you to use the talk page to discuss the issue. Your refusal to discuss your edits is a real problem. Please see WP:BRD. Guettarda (talk) 17:23, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason why this edit was reverted Lachay National Reserve: Difference between revisions ? Please follow Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. User:Abune (talk) 12:59, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]