User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 40

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hallroom Boys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Buidhe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Maybe notable but the sources do not show that he meets WP:GNG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rob Eden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rob Eden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t · c) buidhe 03:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Tommie Moore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 22:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Leo C. Popkin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 22:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

A Game of Pool (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dark Manhattan. Thanks! Eternal Shadow Talk 15:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Dark Manhattan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 15:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:W. P. Haisley. Thanks! Eternal Shadow Talk 15:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gregory C. Huffman. Thanks! Eternal Shadow Talk 15:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Gregory C. Huffman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 15:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Vlada Petrić, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bauhinia yunnanensis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tommie Moore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommie Moore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 06:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

• I'd love to see you participate in the deletion discussion, User:FloridaArmy. You surely have more of an idea for who she was than I do. Looks like you uncovered another interesting person. --DiamondRemley39 (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Alfred Brown Osgood, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 17:30, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas S. Hermansen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Thomas Sørensen Hermansen Info at Aarhus Wiki here FloridaArmy (talk) 00:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Reviews of the performances or academic articles would be a good way to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Blessed and the Damned (Orson Welles) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Blessed and the Damned (Orson Welles), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 19:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Larson-Juhl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laverda Rager".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Buidhe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Eton Boys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Eton Boys, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t · c) buidhe 03:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Ryal Long, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 13:59, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Yemassee Settlement, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

La Union Marti-Maceo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:43, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leopold Levy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Gang Smashers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 22:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

There is already a Gun Moll (film) which redirects to a 1975 film. It is also a common term that was used in the early 1900s. Was thinking it should probably be created as a disambiguation page to point to all three instead of having a redirect since it would be confusing. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

That seems reasonable to me User:CNMall41. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Done. It is possible that someone may just change it to two different redirects for the films and delete the disambiguation but this was the best route in my opinion at this time. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:42, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please indicate her lead roles in major films.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jessie Arnold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jessie Arnold, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Gang War (1940 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 01:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bessie Brown".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:05, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Gosling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

User:Liz I'm pretty sure thus entry has been edited by two different editors recently and submitted for ACH review? FloridaArmy (talk) 19:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "C.E. Shurtleff".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

C. E. Shurtleff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. That's actually quite an interesting subject. Hopefully it will get expanded now that it's in mainsspace. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems to only be notable for one event - the case that was filed against him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wallace E. Sturgis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wallace E. Sturgis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 01:20, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Not only was he a state senator, as the articel notes, he served as president of the senate. Resubmitted. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:06, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Now in article space. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:05, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gilbert & Friedland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

User:Liz, this is another entry that had been recently edited by two different editors. It was also submitted for review. Why was it deleted by you as having not been edited in 6 months? I also don't think it's appropriate to delete content that should be included. This does damage to our encyclopedic coverage. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:24, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

User:Liz this subject was submitted for review on October 13. Why did you delete it the same day? FloridaArmy (talk) 12:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bad Boy (1939 film)

added a link pointing to Herbert Meyer

Robert Emmett Tansey

added a link pointing to The Driftin' Kid

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Fixed. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sid Smith (actor)

added links pointing to Malibu and Better Late Than Never

Bad Boy (1939 film)

added a link pointing to Herbert Meyer

Robert Emmett Tansey

added a link pointing to The Driftin' Kid

The Realization of a Negro's Ambition

added a link pointing to Clarence Brooks

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Fixed. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#FloridaArmy regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. Guy (help! - typo?) 19:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Framing of the Shrew. Thanks! Salimfadhley (talk) 10:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ross Beeckman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for accusing an editor of "slurring murdered victims of White supremacy and enforce punishments on those who point it out", after multiple warnings to stop accusing editors of stuff like that without clear evidence. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Floquenbeam (talk) 13:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

The statement I am blocked for is:

"User:Drmies noted an article I created that I finally took off my watchlist and stopped working on completely because Drmies, a Wikipedia administrator, insisted on changing the description of a man murdered for doing business with African Americans and supporting their right to vote from Radical Republican to Scalawag. Perhaps User:Floquenbeam can provide some kind of defense for editors who slur murdered victims of White supremacy and enforce punishments on those who point it out, but as far as I'm concerned these actions are beyond the pale. When we come across bias, racism, and bigotry on Wikipedia we must speak out against it. Am I now going to be exterminated from Wikipedia for pointing out an administrator's improper slurring of the murdered victim of White supremacy? Is it okay that we don't have an article on African American cinema? How many dishonest attacks and misrepresentations from Guy must I endure? Some of these same editors helped censor the Racial views of Joe Biden entry which is now completely protected in draft space from even editing, IN DRAFT SPACE, while we have lots and lots of other Racial views articles. But surely there is no bias here. And anyone claiming there is must be eliminated. Racism is a phenomenon of the right according to Guy and there was nothing socialist about the Nazis (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei). Might as well ban me and get it over with because I am going to continue to create lots of absolutely awful articles on these subjects and yell from the highest mountain top about the disgraceful and hurtful bigotry one must endure here. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)" (Sorry not formatted)

I stand by it. Scalawag is a term with a long history as a slur. Wikipedia editors must be allowed to point out bigotry and call out those using slurs against article subjects, ESPECIALLY victims of White supremacy.

User:Floquenbeam's blocking action is as egregious as it is expected. Those who stand with the bias and bigotry here are as big a part of the problem as those engaging in it. Promoting or defending bigotry and bias is not okay.

Needless to say, it's problematic that Floquenbeam blocks an editor for a comment calling Floquenbeam out for HIS abusive threats in defense of abusive editors violating Wikipedia's most basic principles. But I take it as a great honor to highlight this corruption and expose the bigotry and bias that pervade Wikipedia. I will not stop talking about the problem and I will not stop creating articles about disdained, disciminated against, and slandered subjects. Do what you will. I will not be bullied into silence or inaction in the face of horrific bigotry and prejudice.FloridaArmy (talk) 13:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

FloridaArmy, how about you just stop the accusations of racism and bigotry against editors? You can state that Wikipedia has systemic bias (absolutely accurate) and that you are struggling to get articles approved in under-covered areas (a valid and unproblematic request for help) but asserting that the only reason for declines is bigotry will almost certainly lead to you being banned sooner or later, and I really don't think anyone wants that.

You have to go via AfC because your personal inclusion/ sourcing standards don't measure up. You've never accepted that, I get it, but that's what any independent onlooker sees in the record, and the wildly inappropriate invective when your drafts are declined only reinforces it.

You really are your own worst enemy here. Guy (help! - typo?) 15:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

I agree with Guy that you are your own worst enemy here. I think you do valuable work finding people who meet our notability guidelines who are from groups that are underrepresented (owing to systemic bias). That takes real work and I don't want to diminish that. However you're also comfortable with articles like this being put into mainspace. The community has indicated that they're not as comfortable with that. Given this you need to be ready for other editors to come in and do substantial work behind you, which is what Drmies did here. I'm loathe to criticize Drmies for spending what I am guessing is more time on this topic than you but I don't love his use of scalawag in this article. However, that kind of content disagreement is not, in my mind, a reason to then accuse Drmies of racism. Someone who wanted to defend white supremacy would not have built out your 1 sentence stub to this. Attacking people like Drmies is indeed evidence of you being your own worst enemy here. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Barkeep49, the word is in an attributed quote, and regardless of the linked article the primary dictionary definition is basically lovable rogue. It's been used in Parliament (see parliamentary language). It's possible that Drmies wasn't even aware of its negative connotation. Guy (help! - typo?) 17:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

This isn't the place to have it but in this context scalawag is a slur. It's qualtatively different in a US Southern Context than British parliament. And I'm sure Drmies, based on his own biographical details did know that which is why he attributed it in the first place rather than put it into Wikipedia's voice. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Let's be honest and clear about the history. Drmies changed the description of a man murdered by White supremacists from Radical Republican to Scalawag. It was pointed out that this bigoted slur was inappropriate diff. He restored it. It was objected to on the talk page. He restored it again. It was moved down in the article so better context and attribution could be given and he restored it again to the opening paragraph. Four times Drmies insisted that a man murdered by White supremacists for defending African American voters be called a Scalawag in the opening paragraph.

As discussed on the talk page I unwatched the article and let Drmies do what he wanted with the article after that point.

Drmies chimed in at the ANI discussion in a dishonest attempt to disparage disparaging me while I am expressly accussd of making false accusations of bigotry. I stand by my comments and the truth is in the article and talk page history.

I've been blocked by an admin and former arbitrator for pointing out the bigoted editing of another admin and former arbitrator in a discussion where I'm being accused of falsely pointing out bigotry. If insisting a man murdered by White supremacists be called a Scalawag in the entry's opening paragraph isn't bigoted then what is?

Let's not defend or make excuses for the indefensible. It's not okay to call someone murdered by White supremacists for trying to defend African Americans and their voting rights a Scalawag. It's not okay in Wikipedia's voice, it's not okay in Mother Theresa's voice, it's not okay.

Bigotry is wrong and those who aid and abet bigots and the language they use are in the wrong. I attempted repeatedly to contextualize the slur and compromise but Drmies insisted on having his way and he's an admin so I let him have it. Now I'm blocked for pointing out how abusive this kind of bigotry is. It's bigotry. Calling murdered victims of White supremacists Scalawags is bigotry. End of story. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

FA, attributing the kinds of motives and intent that you just did to an editor is not OK. We have an extensive dispute resolution page for a reason. That's the way to solve this. Not to make this about individuals. If you can't make that distinction - be hard on content, nice to people - that is going to be an ongoing problem. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

I haven't said anything about Drmies motives in insisting a slur be used to describe the murder victim of White supremacists. But the language is bigoted. And bigotry is not okay. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Cocoa Junior High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cairo2k18 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Other than re-using an already existing citation you haven't really added anything in since the last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Broderick (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert Broderick (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 10:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi FloridaArmy,

I am putting a message here in response to what you said at WP:REFUND. You feel that time is being wasted by having to ask for a restore a second time and then needing to explain how you will improve. What I look for from you is something actual to add to the draft, such as a reference. The idea being to actually improve the draft. Currently you are one of the biggest REFUND requestors. Another (?Abyssal) used to be a big refund requestor, but we persuaded them to move the drafts to their own user space, as other users don't actually help out with drafts. In any case they could also help out in userspace too if they wanted to. I am not sure about your editing restriction, but I suspect you can use your own userspace and submit to AFC when the page is ready. Then you can take as long as you like to work up to article standard. Personally I think 6 months is too short a time for draft retention, as not all have such a short attention span, or small a scope of work. Anyway you are in the company of TakuyaMurata who also has a lot of drafts running at a time. PS I think your block is unfair, and is slowing your valuable work here, but best to keep the complaints as complaints and not turn them into attacks. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

The Framing of the Shrew, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

...I hope we can keep collaborating! You find interesting subjects that I wouldn't otherwise ever learn about. You have a real knack for that. I have a pretty long to-do list of articles to investigate to write, but the ones you find are such good bits of history that the world needs to know about, that I'd usually rather just play around in whatever you've begun than start my own from scratch! I hope you don't mind if I add a little to some of your drafts while you're blocked. If you do mind, reply here if you are allowed, or just let me know when you get back. Thank you for working to make Wikipedia coverage more diverse as well as more encompassing of different time periods. Take care! --DiamondRemley39 (talk) 16:27, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Red Viper".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:40, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "E. J. Salcines".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Snowycats (talk) 21:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Betty Alden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Viola Bartlette".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James F. Sikes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Taking Chances".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laikom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ora Brown".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ivy Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Samuel W. Getzen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eagleash (talk) 20:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmbranum was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Craft soda. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Much of this article discusses Soft Drinks and sodas generally, not specifically craft Sodas.

I see two ways forward to save this content: (1) A rewrite that focuses more squarely on what is distinctly different about craft soda (much as the article on Craft brewery and microbrewery has a distinct difference from the articles on beer and brewing generally, or (2) a merge of the content into the article on soft drinks, maybe as a new section.

I do think this article has a lot of merit and hope those working on it do not give up.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Craft soda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Craft soda, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jmbranum (talk) 19:54, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William Schnackenburg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck███ 00:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rhynchospora latifolia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck███ 00:43, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Fred Hornby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Evergreen Cemetery (Bartow, Florida), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:43, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Straight to Heaven, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All citations are from the same source. We need to see coverage in multiple sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nisha Dubey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nisha Dubey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 20:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Chosen, Florida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Herbert Meneses".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Roberta Hyson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 02:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lactarius psammicola. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

This draft does not really contain enough information for even a stub article. Can it be expanded by adding at least links to the genus and either the family or the order? Robert McClenon (talk) 03:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scrooge200 was:

This article is very short, and I'd suggest to include an infobox, plot summary, and critic reviews. The references are bare URLs, although there are tools that let you fix those easily.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:20,000 Cheers for the Chain Gang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:20,000 Cheers for the Chain Gang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Scrooge200 (talk) 05:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Music Hath Harms and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Music Hath Harms, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 20:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

I resubmitted after making the assertions of the film's notability more overt with an expansion amd the addition of a recent newspaper article. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:56, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Music Hath Harms, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 21:55, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

I added another reference from Google Books and made the draft live. I will leave the categories and project assessment tagging up to you. Also, Spencer Williams looks like a good candidate for cleanup. Could use filmography and discography added. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Thabks User:CNMall41. The Spencer Williams article is on the musician. I think it should be a dab page or on the actor and director because I think they are more famous. I will check to see if I didn't pipe the link properly. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Completely unsourced - seriously FloridaArmy!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward Thompson (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edward Thompson (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sitting Pretty (1933 film)

added links pointing to William Davidson, Arthur Jarrett, Walter Walker and Jerry Tucker

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Fixed by User:Rodw. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nathan Curry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nathan Curry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 07:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tatupiplu was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tom Southern and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tom Southern, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tatupiplu'^talk 07:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NFILM - avoid the use of bare URLs

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Look-Out Sister and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Look-Out Sister, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)