User talk:Findingmoney100

Hello Findingmoney100! Your additions to SAMPSON have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. In hindsight, I did copy a small phrase from the source instead of paraphrasing it. Now I know I should paraphrase better to avoid copyright problems. Thanks for bringing this up. Findingmoney100 (talk) 02:37, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...about some of your edits. In this edit, you removed the sclass template in exchange for standard, piped wiki-link. I'm not sure why, but it has since been reverted. Please don't remove these templates, instead we add them in place of the standard wiki-links when found.

Also, adding/changing wiki-links such as [[guided missile cruiser|guided-missile cruiser]] and [[Guided-missile destroyer|guided-missile destroyers]] is not necessary. You will usually find there is a redirect for both hyphenated and non-hyphenated versions, and, wiki-links do not need to be piped to begin with in lower case and simply adding an 's' on the end will make it appear as part of the link. Hope this helps - wolf 21:29, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arleigh Burke-class destroyer Flight IIA armament (5"/54, SeaRAM) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arleigh Burke-class destroyer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mark83 -- Mark83 (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Arleigh Burke-class destroyer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arleigh Burke-class destroyer for comments about the article, and Talk:Arleigh Burke-class destroyer/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mark83 -- Mark83 (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Arleigh Burke-class destoyers are hardened against electromagnetic pulses? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arleigh Burke-class destroyer. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Arleigh Burke-class destroyer), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw your edit here and was wondering if there's a source confirming that those Burkes have only one SeaRAM launcher. I can believe that there's one per hull, since other ships of similar size have only one, but I'd rather make sure before stating it in the infobox. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 05:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep happy to address this. Two of the SeaRAM sources in the article—for DDG-84 and for DDG-80—explicitly say their config is one Phalanx + one SeaRAM. The source for DDG-117 refers to its SeaRAM as "the SEARAM" (maybe not the best evidence, but worth mentioning). All this obviously on top of actual images showing the Phalanx + SeaRAM configuration—for example: DDG-51, DDG-64, DDG-71, DDG-75, DDG-78 (I'm not sure if images can be used as sources for this, but just to show they do indeed have a single SeaRAM).

There's this (not cited in the wiki article) that says: "The idea [...] was to replace the aft mount with SeaRAM".

If you still feel the article needs a source that explicitly confirms these ships have one SeaRAM, let me know. Findingmoney100 (talk) 06:35, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Seawolf35 ^T--C 03:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]