User talk:Felixsv7

Archives

Archive 1

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you very much for updating the list of men's footballers with 100 or more caps. Your work definitely doesn't go unnoticed. Madridista 911 (talk) 20:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	:) Hamza (talk) 18:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Regarding the date of the last update (I am talking about this), of course I know that the "As of..." shows when the table was most recently updated, but it's best to not be added until the day is over if the time is not included. With only the date, and not the time, it's possible people to not make updates on numbers due to changes (matches) that take place later within the same day, due to considering the table was already updated. Also, I must point out I have noticed many such cases, i.e. where someone makes an update and updates the day, while there are still, e.g., 4 matches to be played on the same day with players from the list participating.

P.S. As per WP:BRD, you shouldn't revert something that was reverted, because it can lead to an edits' "war", but discuss it first through article's or user's talk page, and that's why I am raising this here, and of course not reverting the reversion.

Kind regards!

Nialarfatem (talk) 22:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Felixsv7!

I must add that I didn't include (with the meaning of "add") that link, it was already there, I just put the note there because the IFFHS' source still states Soh with 224 caps, and hasn't changed to 222 like RSSSF's source, so, obviously, either there should be a note or be removed, since otherwise it would be contradictory to the statement, but of course it's outdated, as obviously IFFHS copies RSSSF and hasn't been updated there yet, like FIFA also does, but of course you are one of the people who know this very well, who know that at the end them who curate that list are RSSSF, which is also the reason why, by the way, Soh's tally will be eventually recognized by FIFA (at least the 198 matches, excluding the ones made for Olympic Games qualifiers and Olympic Games), but the lot needs elaboration of the kind FIFA recognizes/claims this, RSSSF that, and so on. It's sad, but many people who come to edit a statistical list about football know, unfortunately, only FIFA and only FIFA exists to them, and I am sure many of them come across RSSSF and IFFHS for the very first from that list or similar ones, as there is no advertisement for football statistical organizations...

Cheers!

Nialarfatem (talk) 11:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nialarfatem: Hey bud! Believe me, I wasn't trying to be annoying about your edit, just trying to clean up the table and as the IFFHS is currently outdated, I didn't see its necessity as a source, especially as RSSSF provides a detailed rundown of all of Soh Chin Ann's appearances to trawl through. I doubt FIFA will ever get round to ratifying the statistics so we could be arguing Soh's case for some time! Felixsv7 (talk) 12:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

THIS IS THE TRUTH. "ESCAPE" FROM NONSENSE. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 10:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Γεώργιος Τερζής 2: This does not appear to be a rational argument therefore I am unsure how to respond. If it is reference to the "greatest goalscorer" moniker that you've bestowed upon Josef Bican, at least source the quote. Otherwise it is just a superlative that is difficult to quantify therefore shouldn't be used in the article. Felixsv7 (talk) 10:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reference is included in the section : FIFA : THE MASTER OF MARKSMEN. And there was no nead to answer. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 11:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comoros national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moroni.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit restored content at NSPORTS against consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Sports notability, specifically subproposals #3 and #8. The closing statement currently stands, as it has not been overturned. Please consider this your final warning; any further attempts to restore the non-consensus version after page protection is lifted will be reported to ANI. Thank you. –dlthewave ☎ 17:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And, off the back of it, we're now having a discussion as to how the consensus needs to be implemented. I stand by my edit, disruptive though it may have been. Felixsv7 (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you write the Monaco national football team "history" please when there is time? YangerAAS (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@YangerAAS: Hey, I can't imagine that I'll get round to it for a while, there are still 51 FIFA nations that either need their History section expanded or written in their entirety - but you are more than welcome to assist!

The list is as follows:

Cheers,

Felixsv7 (talk) 08:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

O! OK then. When I can, I'll give some support to the Monaco page and the other 51 FIFA notions.

YangerAAS (talk) 18:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Antigua and Barbuda national football team shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GiantSnowman 08:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: As I've fallen foul of 3RR as your message reminds me, can you please apply my change to the Antigua and Barbuda page so that the kits are still accessible via Wiki:Commons rather than being deleted completely? Thanks Felixsv7 (talk) 08:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please stop citing the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of association football league top scorers in Europe (all-time) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of association football league top scorers in North America indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of association football league top scorers in Europe (by season) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Lake (footballer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Lake (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Why did you revert my edit to this article? I mentioned the source for that S.h.t 2007 (talk) 15:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S.h.t 2007: Hey, thanks for reaching out. There were a few reasons that I reverted your edit; I had already made the edit to include all the players listed in the preliminary squad, along with their updated cap information via National Football Teams, I had also put the Dates of Birth in where I'd found the information, leaving the ones that I couldn't find blank (I actually opened a discussion here to confirm that this is best practice), and I sorted the players by their appearances number - as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/National teams.

Why did you change my initial edit, and where did you get the squad numbers that you'd listed? Felixsv7 (talk) 15:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was editing this article and didn't know that you edited that. But some players are not in your edit. I get squad numbers from transfermarket S.h.t 2007 (talk) 17:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Iwai, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Iwai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 160#Current Squad - National Teams, there is an agreement that training camps are not counted as the "current squad", but only the final match squad is listed when it's officially announced, or did I misread this? This Korean squad is not even the preliminary squad, it's a random training camp without any scheduled matches for players who have not had any matches recently. By Google translating, the official Korean source apparently says "The training will be conducted by the national team's physical coaches and will focus on checking the physical condition and fatigue of players who recently completed the season and maintaining their condition through weight training and conditioning." So should we list physical trainings under "current squad" now? Snowflake91 (talk) 15:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Snowflake91: So reading through that debate again it is very unclear so it's not difficult to misread but the final messages say that both a recent squad announcement and a preliminary squad announcement should both be counted as squads and this was ratified by numerous other users. I'm not one to add prelim squads as it appears to be a bit of a pointless effort in my opinion but if another user has, and correctly moved the previous squad into Recent Call-ups, then I don't see any need to revert it! The only reason I'd say to keep it is that it was officially announced by the national team (via their website). Felixsv7 (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Burundi national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Omar Mussa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]