User talk:Epluribusunumyall

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

/Archive 1 - 2019-2022

Hello, Epluribusunumyall. I noticed that your recent edit to Lorient Agglomération added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 08:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi, thanks for letting me know. I'll look into it as i believe it wasn't copyrighted and has been used elsewhere on the commons Epluribusunumyall (talk) 08:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epluribusunumyall. Thank you for your work on Nurieux station. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Alpine Skiing at the 2023 Winter World University Games indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Liz, I do not contest the nomination of the proposed speedy deletion as it is mis-spelling of target category at this Category:Alpine skiing at the 2023 Winter World University Games. Feel free to go ahead a delete the category if possible.

- Epluribusunumyall (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Epluribusunumyall. You recently added dates of birth to a few politician articles. Per WP:DOB, we shouldn't be including these unless they are reliably sourced. Could you please add citations or remove the dates? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 06:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Firefangledfeathers, I merely copying over DOB's that already existed in the article to the headline so it was readably and well organized. As I don't believe WP:DOB applies to such action and I am unsure about the context around the information originally being included, I believe it should just be left as it is for now. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 06:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would encourage the opposite approach. If you see unsourced dates in the body/infobox, you should remove them. We're potentially spreading misinformation or enabling identity theft by including dates that are incorrect or not widely disseminated. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 06:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kenly Kiya Kato. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Let'srun (talk) 19:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epluribusunumyall. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Ministers of Foreign Affairs (France), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epluribusunumyall. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Ministers of Foreign Affairs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2023 Oregon Ducks football team

added a link pointing to ABC

2023 Washington State Cougars football team

added a link pointing to ABC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Golf at the 2023 Pan American Games – Women's individual. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. dxneo (talk) 12:58, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite your work on articles. The references provided on this article for ex. [4] are not correct. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sportsfan 1234 Thanks for letting me, just want to point out there's much better ways to deal with a poorly formatted reference then moving the article to draftspace. Especially since both these articles where already fully built out.- Epluribusunumyall (talk) 22:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its easier to cite correctly instead of citing the same reference multiple times incorrectly. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not my point. The point is that I didn't realize that the URL would corrupt itself like that and it would have overall easier for both of us and other editors if you had just let me know, or fixed the issue yourself (I do this often when there's a poorly formatted ref). The article was fully created, a poor reference is not a reason to move it out of mainspace.

ngl, I don't see why you have such an issue right now with unformatted references on articles about the pan am games. the mass-deletion of such edits is counterproductive and goes against the ethos of wikipedia. - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 22:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can follow another editor whose formatting and referencing is better here [5]. Its literally copying and pasting at this point and changing the info to reflect the article. Nothing is being deleted, you can move it back to article space after the references are fixed. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:03, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're still not getting the point though, poorly formatted refs aren't a basis for moving an article unilaterally (or deleting edits) which you have done on numerous pages (not just mine). i dont get this obsession with what's a proper edit and not. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 23:32, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You don't 'own' an article fwiw. Poorly formatted references are certainly a good reason to move to draft space. If you aren't sure how to reference, I would review the citing pages on Wikipedia before editing again. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:59, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i'm well aware i don't own an article (it was just a figure of speach, given that I had - up until that point - been responsible for most of the content on that page) and how to reference. where's the guideline on moving it to the draftspace, because i'm pretty sure it doesn't exist? - Epluribusunumyall (talk) 00:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Golf at the 2023 Pan American Games – Women's individual, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 13:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have drafted this article as its not ready for article space. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Golf at the 2023 Pan American Games, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop changing 64 to 62. The sources all say 64 golfers would qualify to compete. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Epluribusunumyall! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Davis Phinney that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Changing categories on a page is regarded as a major edit not a minor one. Paulpat99 (talk) 06:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swimming at the 1987 Pan American Games – Men's 4 × 200 metre freestyle relay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darren Ward.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- FIXED. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 12:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States at the 2015 Parapan American Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diogo Sousa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is your source for Canada using the MM-DD-YYYY format for dates? I have found that the Canadian Passport uses DD-MM-YYYY else the government has said it recommends using YYYY-MM-DD. None of these are the option you have been changing it to. Paulpat99 (talk) 05:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey User:Paulpat99, good question. This might be a bit long, but hand in there. To start, both the wikipedia articles Date format by country and Date and time notation in Canada, provide a good context for the complicated nature of noting dates in Canada. ISO 8601 is the official government standard for numeric dates (but this a clunky way of expressing dates in writing text), but from there my reading of the issue is that it diverges heavily if we are talking about English speaking or French speaking parts of the country. Whereas English Canada mostly uses MDY (influenced from the United States), French Canada mostly uses DMY (influenced from France & UK). For context I have lived most of my life in an English speaking part of the country. In terms of CND passports, it normally makes sense to adopt the DMY context as they are bilingual documents that require international recognition, that being said the CND government has not always been consistent of this (Source).

In terms of references to using the MDY format on English wikipedia, here are a couple of documents I have found: the "IM/IT DATE AND TIME STANDARD" document of the Government of British Columbia (English-speaking, source), so does the style guide from Thompson Rivers University (source), the government of Ontario also uses DMY in press releases (as do many other provinces, source).

As MDY is most commonly used in English-Canada, I believe that is the standard that should be applied to English-Wikipedia, while French-Wikipedia (which I rarely edit-on), can continue to use DMY. I also acknowledge that this has been heavily debated elsewhere on Wikipedia, with no consensus developed in either way.

Epluribusunumyall (talk) 11:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that makes sense I will revert my edit. Thanks for your explanation. Paulpat99 (talk) 08:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you un-categorizing categories on baseball player articles? Yankees10 17:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I only made edit for American players who have competed at the Pan Am Games and have won a medal. In the past they've been classified as Category:Pan American Games gold medalists for the United States (etc. for silver or bronze) + Category:Pan American Games medalists in baseball (etc. for each sport). However the former of these two categories has gotten rather large, and have created smaller categories such as Category:Pan American Games gold medalists for the United States in baseball, similar to what was done for players who have competed for the United States at the olympics i.e. Category:Olympic silver medalists for the United States in baseball. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 19:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to WBIT bids by school and conference. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]