User talk:Epicgenius/Archive/2019/Sep

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

I didn't notice your edit summary for this edit - "this is really poorly written and probably doesn't need it's own article". Some wikipedia contributors are one step above functionally illiterate. At the other end of the spectrum we have contributors as capable as the best professional writers working today.

I am under no illusion that I fall somewhere in between. I never thought my writing measured up to the quality of the best writers of today.

However, our policies don't require this. Poorly written articles are not supposed to be deleted, they are supposed to be improved, or marked for improvement.

In what looks like your final comment about 14th Street busway at Talk:14th Street (Manhattan)#Proposed merge with 14th Street busway you wrote: "... but feel that the RS's don't justify the standalone notability of the bus lanes."

Clarification please. Are you referring to the RS already included in the 14th Street busway? IMO that would wrong, terribly wrong. The notability of topics should be assessed by looking at ALL the available references. I barely scratched the surface. 00:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

@Geo Swan: Don't sweat it that much. When I was first looking at the article, there were lots of grammatical errors, but most of these are now fixed. In regards to the sources mentioned in my comment - no, I wasn't referring to the existing sources in the 14th Street busway article. I was referring to sources in general (like those that have been published already), which i feel are focused mostly on 14th Street itself, or the L train shutdown. The busway is really only a secondary afterthought. That's my opinion anyway. But your argument to disagree is made of pretty good points, so lets leave it at that. epicgenius (talk) 01:43, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Industry City at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parachute Jump you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Parachute Jump you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Parachute Jump for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:40, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

I hope you are doing well. I finally scanned and uploaded the book Tracks of New York Volume 2 Brooklyn Elevated Railroads to the Internet Archive, and added it to NYCS Const. When you have a chance could you create track maps to put on the articles of old elevated stations. Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Kew Gardens 613, sure. I will do these on my free time. epicgenius (talk) 12:29, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I really appreciate it.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 13:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Battery (Manhattan) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Parachute Jump you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Parachute Jump for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Sept 7, 12:30pm: Met Fashion Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for Met Fashion Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art on the Upper East Side. Together, we'll expand Wikipedia:WikiProject Fashion topics for basic clothing types that can be illustrated by the Met collection, and also past Costume Institute exhibitions! It's the last weekend for Camp: Notes on Fashion, and we will have an intro talk to the exhibit by a guest from the Costume Institute, and participants will then be able to visit it on their own. Galleries will be open this evening until 9 pm. With refreshments, and there will be a wiki-cake! Open to everyone at all levels of experience, wiki instructional workshop and one-on-one support will be provided. Saturday Sept 7 Met Fashion Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art (RSVP on-wiki or at meetup.com). 12:30pm - 4:30 pm at Uris Center for Education, Metropolitan Museum of Art (81st Street entrance) at 1000 Fifth Avenue, Manhattan (note this is just south of the main entrance) Galleries will be open this evening until 9 pm, and some wiki-visitors may wish to take this opportunity to see Camp: Notes on Fashion together after the formal event. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends, colleagues and students! --Wikimedia New York City Team 19:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Hi.

I often come by here to complain about this or that, so I wanted to do the same to compliment you on the addition of material on this subject - good stuff!

Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Beyond My Ken, thanks! I appreciate it. I'm currently working on a more in-depth article on this topic, so hopefully soon, this won't be a redirect anymore. epicgenius (talk) 01:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Carroll Street Bridge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 05:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

valereee (talk) 12:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations. It was joy to review it. -Nizil (talk) 14:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Well done. I see you have a few nominations that have been hanging around a while. I like your work, so I'd be happy to look at some of the older nominations if you wish, but I am aware that I can be a little strict and picky, so I'm not the easiest of reviewers to work with. Let me know if you want me to look at one or more of your older nominations. SilkTork (talk) 08:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@SilkTork: Thanks. I appreciate it. I do have one nitpick though - the bolt image should probably be in the article, if only to provide context for the main "Planning" subsection. epicgenius (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

My view is always that I am passing or failing the article at the time of the review. Obviously there will be edits afterwards, so if you wish to put the image back, I wouldn't have a problem with that. And I agree with you that there is encyclopedic value to the image. I just looked, and I like what you have done - the two images are there, and they are not spilling over into the next section. Nice one! SilkTork (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

The article The Battery (Manhattan) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Battery (Manhattan) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Ramble and Lake you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

The article The Battery (Manhattan) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Battery (Manhattan) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 14:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

The article The Ramble and Lake you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Ramble and Lake for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 14:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Triborough Bridge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Josephua -- Josephua (talk) 23:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 63rd Street Tunnel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dom497 -- Dom497 (talk) 12:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thanks for your help updating the 2019 GTA ranking at roller coaster articles. It's a tedious task each year, and it's nice to have some help this time around! --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sheep Meadow you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Sheep Meadow you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sheep Meadow for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Shore Theater at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 20:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mill Basin, Brooklyn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 14:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

valereee (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Sheep Meadow you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sheep Meadow for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

valereee (talk) 12:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Starrett City, Brooklyn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

valereee (talk) 00:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Mill Basin, Brooklyn you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mill Basin, Brooklyn for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 15:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure this was a pass, no? Not sure what happened to legobot here... Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Lee Vilenski, you're correct, it was a pass. Legobot's been acting weird for the past few days. First it was failing to transclude anything related to Talk:Central Park/GA2 (the reviewer notified me themselves), and now this. I wonder if this is related to the {{FailedGA}} that was already on the page, though. epicgenius (talk) 15:57, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Starrett City, Brooklyn you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Starrett City, Brooklyn for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Can you look at this edit, where an IP editor has been warring about removing a notable with a Wikipedia article and a source? Alansohn (talk) 19:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Starrett City, Brooklyn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Starrett City, Brooklyn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

• Template:Did you know nominations/Fifth Avenue/53rd Street station
• Template:Did you know nominations/Mill Basin, Brooklyn
• Template:Did you know nominations/Rockaways' Playland
• Template:Did you know nominations/Sheep Meadow
• Template:Did you know nominations/Starrett City, Brooklyn
• Template:Did you know nominations/The Dairy
• Template:Did you know nominations/The Ramble and Lake

Potential DYKN

• Brooklyn Manor station

epicgenius (talk) 15:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Taiwan. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Seneca Village you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Central Park at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

valereee (talk) 12:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

The article 63rd Street Tunnel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:63rd Street Tunnel for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dom497 -- Dom497 (talk) 23:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

I've started to test modified service templates, does the infobox for Seventh Avenue station (IND Culver Line) look correct to you? Cards84664 (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

I've started with Template:NYCS Culver IND north, I'm assuming that a local template will have to be created for the skipped stations. Cards84664 (talk) 16:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

@Cards84664: On the Seventh Avenue station's article, I see the following:

Station succession
Next north	Jay Street–MetroTech (express): F limited rush-hour trips in the peak direction
Bergen Street (express): no regular service
Fourth Avenue (local): F all times <F> two rush hour trains, peak direction ​G all times

The express entry shows a plain "F" icon for express, not a diamond as of yet. I did that because it would be less work than to create all of the header templates with "F <F>". Anyway, there's a discussion at WT:NYCS that you may be interested in. epicgenius (talk) 16:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

valereee (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Seneca Village you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Seneca Village for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

valereee (talk) 12:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

The article 63rd Street Tunnel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:63rd Street Tunnel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dom497 -- Dom497 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites: Hey, I just sent a reply. epicgenius (talk) 17:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

valereee (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit. Flatbush though also includes Prospect-Lefferts Gardens, which is another subsection of Flatbush. Prospect-Lefferts Garden borders are roughly Ocean Avenue (West), Empire Blvd (North), New York Avenue (East) and roughly Parkside Ave (South) G. Capo (talk) 19:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

G. Capo, no problem. However, there may be differing interpretations of what constitutes the border of greater Flatbush vs. just the parts of Flatbush that aren't in any other neighborhood. Even the borders may differ according to the person you ask. epicgenius (talk) 20:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Mill Basin, Brooklyn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

valereee (talk) 00:01, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spring Creek, Brooklyn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 08:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Spring Creek, Brooklyn you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Spring Creek, Brooklyn for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

valereee (talk) 00:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Spring Creek, Brooklyn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Spring Creek, Brooklyn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 18:41, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kings Plaza you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TenPoundHammer -- TenPoundHammer (talk) 01:40, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

The article New York Public Library Main Branch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:New York Public Library Main Branch for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 03:02, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Kings Plaza you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kings Plaza for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TenPoundHammer -- TenPoundHammer (talk) 03:21, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Triborough Bridge you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Triborough Bridge for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Josephua -- Josephua (talk) 22:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Triborough Bridge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Josephua -- Josephua (talk) 00:40, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

The article Triborough Bridge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Triborough Bridge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Josephua -- Josephua (talk) 01:01, 30 September 2019 (UTC)