User talk:EnjoyableWiki1

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Redalert2fan was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Free Republic of Verdis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Free Republic of Verdis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Redalert2fan (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EnjoyableWiki1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Redalert2fan (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Free Republic of Verdis, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:20, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Draft talk:Free Republic of Verdis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Draft talk:Free Republic of Verdis was changed by EnjoyableWiki1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877004 on 2019-06-12T09:46:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:46, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EnjoyableWiki1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked as I am aware that I have made multiple accounts over time especially since I'd been forgetting my passwords etc. I want to be unblocked so I can properly contribute to wikipedia. I was also blocked because they called 'Free Republic of Verdis' a hoax with the articles also being a hoax, although it is proven that the articles are not hoaxes, especially with an article being made by RTL. I also wish for Free Republic of Verdis to be unprotected so I can actually work on it and I ask that it is not protected again. If you don't want me to make it, at least unprotect it so someone else can. Thank you. All I ask is to be unblocked and have all my pages unblocked as a fresh start. I believe there has been a lot of confusion between me and the admins. I have left everything on my talk page to show what has been going on. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You know perfectly well you are not eligible for unblock consideration here. If you keep on forgetting your passwords, you lack sufficient competence to edit here. Until your original account is unblocked, you are not permitted to set up new accounts to WP:EVADE your block. Yamla (talk) 07:46, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.