User talk:Elias Ziade

Time Machine

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304 Online events: New: Alphabet run S & T | Gender studies | Health Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman. Tip of the month: If you run into technical problems, you might find help on our Tools and technical support page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hierombalus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 02:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering I did what the nominator asked. Why was the submission declined? el.ziade (talkallam) 09:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering correct me if I'm wrong but the drafting was because of lacking references, not notability... el.ziade (talkallam) 09:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I read the draftification note "more sources needed" as "more sources needed to show notability", so I don't think the draftification and the decline are for different reasons. asilvering (talk) 15:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elias Ziade! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 02:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that alongside a 7th-century BC Phoenician shipwreck, two additional wrecks from various historical periods were unearthed in Bajo de la Campana, situated off the coast of Cartagena, Spain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bajo de la Campana Phoenician shipwreck), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elias Ziade. I noticed that in Special:Diff/1166783025 you obscured the paid editing disclosure on your user page by making the text white, matching the page background. This is a breach of your unblock conditions imposed by Salvio giuliano, and appears to be an attempt to game the system. Please ensure that the paid editing disclosure is displayed appropriately and in compliance with the paid contribution disclosure policy and your unblock conditions.

For the avoidance of doubt, have you been paid or do you expect to be paid for any edits you have made since 23 July 2023? AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elias, I agree with ACN. As things stand now, you are violating my unblock conditions. Unless you restore (and update, if necessary) the required notice, I will reimpose the block. —  Salvio ^giuliano 20:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Salvio giuliano looks better now el.ziade (talkallam) 21:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiCompositeNumber No I have not el.ziade (talkallam) 21:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiCompositeNumber@Salvio giuliano By the way, since the sheriff is in town, and since I woke up feeling extra petty today; are rules applied selectively? I mentioned a company that approached me, and I declined to write their article, yet their article is live (after being once deleted when initially created by a paid editor_whom I also reported_), and yet no one was even notified or warned ;) el.ziade (talkallam) 08:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If they are not investigated and if they don't display the shame badge too I will have to remove mine. el.ziade (talkallam) 08:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]