User talk:Editor1722

Hello, Editor1722!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timofei Moșneaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moldovan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Vasile Procopișin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://usmf.md/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Savanti_Medici_Ilustri_web.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:52, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Democratic Party of Moldova, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Constitutional Court of Moldova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While it looks like you are correct in that this is the correct name, you need to request that this article be moved at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Since both pages have history, you should also request a history merge. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Andrei Uncuța, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editor1722. Thank you for your work on List of international trips made by Natalia Gavrilița. User:M.Ashraf333, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Plz see this page for ref, List of international prime ministerial trips made by Shehbaz Sharif for map visit, https://paintmaps.com/map-charts/293/World-map-chart

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|M.Ashraf333}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

M.Ashraf333 (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Valeriu Pasat has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ASUKITE 21:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You've created several articles with one single source. While this is enough for them to exist, there is a policy in Wikipedia, WP:ONESOURCE, which recommends adding a minimum of two sources due to a set of several reasons. I was here only to note that if you could be do this, there would probably be no problems with your articles; because they only have one source, one was proposed for deletion and another was moved to draftspace (aka, readers cannot read them). I moved the latter back to mainspace. This all comes to WP:NOTABILITY if you wish to know what I mean, an article having one single source might indicate a lack of notability to users not familiarised with the subject.

Thank you for your contributions on Moldovan politics. It is good to see that someone keeps pages up to date. Super Ψ Dro 21:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed content from Recean Cabinet without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ost (talk) 23:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Andrei Gherman

added a link pointing to Dumeni

Gheorghe Ghidirim

added a link pointing to Palanca

Mihai Coșcodan

added a link pointing to Macedonia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Andrei Gherman

added a link pointing to Dumeni

Gheorghe Papuc

added a link pointing to Măcărești

Maria Postoico

added a link pointing to Horodiște

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mihai Cotorobai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puhoi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Margareta Timofti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parcani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anatol Chiriac, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Florești and Coșernița.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reviewed a couple of your recent Moldova politician stubs, just a reminder that when you create a References section, to put {{reflist}} after to place the references list. The list will still show at the bottom of the page when there are citations, but without the reflist template they may be placed outside the references section or below tags. Thanks! ASUKITE 14:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ion Cuțelaba, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 06:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, FMF Beach Soccer Arena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editor1722,

Please always leave an explanatory edit summary so other editors understand why, for example, you moved an article from one page title to another. You can do what I did and set your Wikipedia Preferences (upper right hand) so that you get a notice when you forget to leave an edit summary. Some of your edits raise questions and what seems obvious to you might not be clear to other editors. Leaving a brief edit summary would help with this issue. It is also considered a best practice for editors. Please try to do this in your future editing. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tony Chimel, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editor1722. Thank you for your work on Dmitri Todoroglo. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! Hopefully you have a nice day today. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by creating an article. As your article have adhered to the policies of Wikipedia, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:11, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anatolie Popușoi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order of the Republic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Moldova Super Liga.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 09:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Moldova Super Liga.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 09:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolae Grigorișin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolae Grigorișin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hey man im josh (talk) 15:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephan Negru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Florești.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stephan Negru. GiantSnowman 11:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. PS Whenever you update player's caps and goals, you also have to update the date. --BlameRuiner (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--BlameRuiner (talk) 06:55, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --BlameRuiner (talk) 06:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Utrecht University, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Serghei Rogaciov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dynamo Saint Petersburg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:B425:7B63:A013:9724. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:B425:7B63:A013:9724 (talk) 03:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia English yes edit Sherzod V (talk) 17:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editor1722. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Inga Ionesii, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Editor1722, I am @Archer1234. I noticed that you are making dozens and maybe hundreds of edits to add or change |native name= in infoboxes of biographies (primarily, if not, exclusively, of living people). The edits include, in many cases, the addition of "<br />" tags.

MOS:NOBR says:

Do not separate list items with line breaks (<br />). Use {{plainlist}} / {{unbulleted list}} if the list is to remain vertical; ...

In some cases, the edits actually removed the use of "{{ubl}}" (e.g., at Mikheil Saakashvili), which is contrary to the MOS guidance.

In addition, the edits sometimes remove use of the {{native name}} template with no explanation (see the same edit at Mikheil Saakashvili linked above).

In support of MOS:ACCESSIBILITY, MOS:OTHERLANG says:

Non-English words or phrases should be encased in {{lang}},...

The use of {{native name}} (which uses {{lang}}), is helpful not only for accessibility reasons, but also for sighted readers who do not recognize the script used for those native names. If including the name of the language in parentheses is not desired, {{native name|italics=off|paren=omit}} or using {{lang}} instead could be used to suppress that.

I am not against the addition of native names or specifying that the names are not bolded, but I think the edits could be tweaked to align better with the MOS.

For example, the |native name= for Mikheil Saakashvili could be specified as:

| native_name = {{Nobold | {{Ubl
  | {{native name|ka|მიხეილ სააკაშვილი|italics=no|paren=omit}}
  | {{native name|uk|Міхеіл Саакашвілі|italics=no|paren=omit}}
  }}}}

This would appear to readers as:

• მიხეილ სააკაშვილი
• Міхеіл Саакашвілі

Is there any valid reason not to follow the guidance from the MOS?

Thanks.  — Archer (t·c) 03:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again @Editor1722. I noticed that you continue to add/change native names in biography articles with edits that are not congruent with Wikipedia's Manual of Style (MOS) (particularly MOS:ACCESSIBILITY / MOS:OTHERLANG, but also MOS:NOBR). I asked above if there was a valid reason not to follow the MOS. At this time, I have seen no response to that question. Instead, the problematic additions/changes continue.

If you believe there are valid reasons for editing in this manner, please reply here to explain. Keep in mind that WP:Communication is required on Wikipedia. Lack of communication with good faith inquiries is disruptive as Wikipedia is a collaborative project. I look forward to your response.  — Archer (t·c) 17:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editor1722. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inga Ionesii".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Editor1722!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me the reason for replacing the Nastaliq template to Nobold in many articles? The WikiProject Pakistan members have agreed to use this style for articles related to Pakistan.  samee  converse  14:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sergiu Lazarencu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stăuceni.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]