User talk:Discospinster/Archive31

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi, editors KWW and hell in a bucket are vandalizing the page on canadian artist Marc Mysterio. In comments KWW claims that the edits to page were "dubious" ive gone ahead and referenced them and some chump keeps reversing. Te inclusions of his wrestling career, charity single with flo rida and perez hilton, are all well sourced.

Trolls are active. Can u ensure these infos stay put and tell these guys to go away? Im amazed that these editors think im connected to this guy. He is a celebrity and if they dont like it leave wiki. Wats their motive?

Google marc mysterio and he is one of canadas best artists globally — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noobwiki416 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Disco you may want to look at this for a small history [[1]] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Discospinster

Can you delete RAF Portland (currently a redirect) please so I can move Portland Rotor Radar Station there to it's correct name please?

Thank you. Gavbadger (talk) 15:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

The draft is over, these are official: http://www.cbssports.com/nba/draft/drafttracker Rikster2 (talk) 04:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

That link goes in the articles, then. "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." (WP:BURDEN). Otherwise it's unsourced information and liable to be removed. ... discospinster _talk 13:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Discospinster,
I'm here to inform you that I am very sorry for my negligence while using WP:TW to edit 2010–11 NBA season. I assure you that my edit was not for malicious purposes and was out of good faith. I now disabled Twinkle so matters such as these will not happen again.
Respectfully, GuyHimGuy (talk) 02:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Obviously a WP:SPA, intent on removing the DOB of the subject. However their edit was inline with WP:DOB, and I removed the day/month.Martin451 (talk) 02:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Editor continues revert correct information, then remove reliable sources and add spam links So bizarre. Thanks. Postoak (talk) 02:29, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

I've blocked the editor. ... discospinster _talk 02:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Odiously the spelling of the title is wrong its not Meesam its Maytham al-Tammar. Google it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zabranos (talk • contribs) 01:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Then go to WP:Requested moves and ask for the article to be renamed. You cannot simply redirect it because there is a history of contributions by other people that has to be maintained. ... discospinster _talk 01:57, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Has been recreated again after it was CSD. Just letting you know so you can deep six it if you want to....William 16:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Could you please have a look at this article. A little over twenty-four hours after you deleted it a few days ago, it was recreated. Never having seen the two previous versions, I'm not sure whether or not it still meets G3, but suspect it does. Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

I've deleted it and warned the user, thanks! ... discospinster _talk 22:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for any inconvenience caused I deleted by mistake.

Well, it's "bound to break on the slightest changes to VE itself", and the VE team has just completed and deployed a little rewrite to minimise the amount of code loaded on page load (it's currently small enough to be practically unnoticeable – yay!). I'll look at it tomorrow (it's 2 AM in my timezone). Matma Rex talk 23:41, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! No rush; I just wanted to bring it to your attention. ... discospinster _talk 23:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

64.85.243.121 (anonymous) keeps blanking the section I created. Just so you know, I made several good faith edits on the Tami Erin page ... it was a bit of a mess ... before I added the Arrest section. Thank you for stepping in to 'undo' the anonymous vandalism. How did you become aware of it? Checkingfax (talk) 02:02, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

I look at all the new edits that come in and remove any vandalism that pops up. ... discospinster _talk 02:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

You're the best. I was starting to feel like Whack-a-Mole. Checkingfax (talk) 02:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

No problem. ... discospinster _talk 02:38, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

I just noticed to that you issued the 'Level-1, Level-2, Level-3, and Level-4' warnings to the anonymous user. I was not looking forward to doing that. Thank you so much. Checkingfax (talk) 02:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

FreeRangeFrog deleted everything again and a whole lot more. Tami Erin is famous, so IMHO, BLPCRIME does not apply as a reason to blank the section. FreeRangeFrog really set the article back. Can you fix it? Checkingfax (talk) 23:05, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Removing the information about the arrest (not a conviction) is perfectly defensible under WP:BLP and cannot possibly be characterized accurately as vandalism. The subject of the article has been relatively unknown for decades. A citizen's arrest and the resulting tabloid-style coverage that died out within a few days is completely unworthy of inclusion in a BLP. I encourage both of you go study carefully just exactly what WP:VANDALISM means here on Wikipedia. To repeat, removing this gossipy, trivial content from a BLP is not vandalism. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:03, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

It's not defensible under BPLCRIM, if you read it carefully. Blanking sections without explanation is vandalism, IMHO Checkingfax (talk) 04:25, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

I feel very strongly that you are wrong in your interpretation of what vandalism is. Of course, the IP editor could have left an edit summary, but that is optional not mandatory. The IP editor could have discussed the matter on the talk page, but as a newbie, may not have known of that option. But you are experienced enough to know about talk pages. You failed to do so. Removal of content that a reasonable editor might think violates BLP policy is not vandalism. Period. End of story. If you think it is, make your case at WP:BLPN, where this matter is under discussion. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Discospinster gave the anonymous user four warnings, and the user failed to justify the deletions. BLPCRIME and WELLKNOWN#Public_figures both give cogent germane examples of posting such "trivial" information. You use that term a lot? It's rather insulting. Checkingfax (talk) 04:55, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Let's agree to disagree on this issue, and leave this user talk page. Accordingly, I encourage you to make your case at WP:BLPN where I've stated my opinion, and at Talk:Tami Erin. Those are the appropriate places to continue this conversation. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Awarded to Discospinster for being pro-active Checkingfax (talk) 20:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

May i enquire as to why you removed the solitary image on the Sinhagad express page? Superfast1111 (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

I reverted because you changed the spelling without explanation. ... discospinster _talk 21:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Well my mistake. Anyway that issue is now long sorted out. Thank you.

OK, cheers. ... discospinster _talk 13:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello Discospinster,

I am wondering why you kept restoring previously deleted contentious material about an arrest (not a conviction) to a BLP? I don't see how this belongs in the article. What is your opinion? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:31, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

I'd like to know this too. It was a citizen's arrest, no less, and it's unclear whether Erin was ever charged. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

It was sourced content and removed without explanation. ... discospinster _talk 13:50, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello Discospinster,

I'm sure you know my only intentions are to revert vandalism, as you have seen my alerts before; looks like my reversion tool reverted your reversion instead of reverting the vandalism, which you had already done. Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cry_Freedom&diff=cur&oldid=prev. Sorry about the mix-up. --JustBerry (talk) 16:14, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

OK, I was wondering about that. ... discospinster _talk 16:15, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Well, at least you know now ;) --JustBerry (talk) 16:19, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

My response was more for User:Soman than for you. Hopefully he now understands the difference between a "mention" in mainstream media and a source actually offering information that can expand an article. How do you feel about incubation? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

I have no objections to incubation, it seems like a good idea. ... discospinster _talk 14:54, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is underway about images on an article you have contributed to. Please help find a consensus for the article stub at: Talk:17-Mile Drive#17 Mile Drive info box and section images replacement.--Amadscientist (talk) 05:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Just wondering why and which article you are referring too. 72.169.224.99 (talk) 01:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Bob Corker, specifically this edit. ... discospinster _talk 01:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

My edit was to revise already biased sections. They contained a tone that is decidedly against gun rights and placed in the article specifically for that reason. 72.169.224.99 (talk) 01:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

The original wording explained that there was a bill to expand background checks and that he voted against it. I don't see how that is anti-gun-rights. ... discospinster _talk 01:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Do you think that suggesting the fansite to be put on the spam blacklist would be a good idea? Two IPs, that likely belong to the editor, have added his fansite as well. SL93 (talk) 03:52, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Let's see what happens after his block is expired, or if the behaviour continues with other IPs then blacklist would be an option. ... discospinster _talk 03:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Alright. SL93 (talk) 03:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

In response to me trying to discuss it with him on his talk page, he said "I fully disagree with you, SL93. You are a narc, a vigilante and an unsavory person. Perhaps you could find something better to do with your time, like finding a girlfriend... and good luck with that. Fuck you." That was shortly after the block. SL93 (talk) 04:00, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

I removed the personal attack. Don't sweat it; there are always a few editors like that around. ... discospinster _talk 04:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

I guess I'm just not used to those type of things. I never do vandalism patrol and only fix that and similar issues when they show up on my watchlist. SL93 (talk) 04:06, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Don't let it get you down. ... discospinster _talk 04:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	I appreciate the revert on my talk page. Thank you. WadeSimMiser (talk) 22:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. ... discospinster _talk 22:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry to tell you but there has been huge misinformation and irrelevant details about Rudra Veena in your edit. Uou have talked about players of this instrument without giving the due credits to its ancient Vedic Roots. I am trying to add the origin of this Indian instrument so that its true roots are told to the puclic.

Thanks for your co-operation.

I am sorry to tell you but there has been huge misinformation and irrelevant details about Rudra Veena in your edit. Uou have talked about players of this instrument without giving the due credits to its ancient Vedic Roots. I am trying to add the origin of this Indian instrument so that its true roots are told to the puclic.

Thanks for your co-operation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VedicRoots (talk • contribs) 22:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

I reverted because you removed disambiguation templates, maintenance templates, the infobox, and sourced information, without explaining why in the edit summary. ... discospinster _talk 22:52, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Dear Discospinster. Thanks for blocking that ip-number. I wonder if you could make the block a little bit longer. That ip is blocked for a month in svwp for the same reason. Best regards, Adville (talk) 01:27, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

OK I have extended the block to two weeks. ... discospinster _talk 01:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Adville (talk) 01:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey Discospinster, would you mind semi-protecting that article and throwing around a couple of blocks? Don't know what that player did, but it must be awfully important. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:25, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

There have been some good edits by IPs and new editors, so I'll keep an eye on it for a bit and then protect if the vandalism gets too frequent. ... discospinster _talk 23:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Doesn't it make you feel good, to know that we're working for a club that gives so many distressed souls a way to vent? If it weren't for us, they might be out on the street keying cars or robbing liquor stores. Drmies (talk) 23:43, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Well that would require leaving the house... ;-) ... discospinster _talk 02:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Keron Thomas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• New York Daily News |accessdate=24 July 2013 | author=Perlman, Matthew J.; Hutchinson, Bill}})</ref> is primarily known for posing as [[New York City Subway]] [[motorman]] "Regoberto Sabio" on

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Freddie Freeman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I was curious as to why my name page has been redirected to Pierre Fabre Laboratories- twice. I'm the cofounder of Lone Signal, I work as an editor in NYC, and, although I often wish I was related to the Pharmaceutical Fabres, I am not. Please let me know. email me at [email protected] cheers, Pierre — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.200.236.205 (talk) 03:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

It's because there is an existing article on Laboratoires Pierre Fabre which was founded by someone of that name. In order to have a separate article about yourself, you would have to show that you meet Wikipedia's notability criteria, which can be found at WP:Notability. I would suggest that you create a draft of the article somewhere (for example, if you created an account you could write it in your user space), or alternatively use the Articles for Creation wizard to request someone post it for you. ... discospinster _talk 03:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, someone, I think the same person who made our page, had created a page with my name and basic info linked to the Lone Signal company page. It was wiped clean and replaced with a redirect by user Giantsnowman, I tried to erase the redirect, and now it's back. I don't see how linking people from Lone Signal to a corporation that has no relation is appropriate. Laboratoires Pierre Fabre is not a person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.200.236.205 (talk) 04:00, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

According to the article's history, it was originally created as a redirect to the Laboratoires Pierre Fabre article. ... discospinster _talk 04:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Honestly, I'm no wikipedia expert, but the Pierre Fabre page was created in June, weeks before the first redirect shown in the history. Is it possible that the original page was deleted and this one created instead? I could ask the guy who created the lone signal page because he probably created the Pierre Fabre one as well. Whatever the problem is, I don't see how wikipedia users will be better served by a misleading page that, because of its link to my name in the Lone Signal article, gives the erroneous impression that I am the Pierre Fabre Laboratories guy -as opposed to the one sentence bio which was in there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.200.236.205 (talk) 04:16, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Pardon the interruption, but discospinster...do you think it would be worth turning Pierre Fabre from a redirect into a disambiguation page, pointing to both the labs and Lone Signal? —C.Fred (talk) 04:25, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

@Pierre — There's no deleted version of the article according to its history. Maybe it was under another spelling? @C.Fred — I don't have any objection to that. ... discospinster _talk 04:47, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed you reverted one of my previous edits of the article Munich Massacre. I wanted to say that the edit is constructive, because it does not change the meaning, form or information found in the text. That sentence defines casualties, which includes all persons deceased in the event, not only one side (a general definition for casualties includes the perpetrators). An interested reader may found more informations in the rest of the text. Regards, 89.164.226.254 (talk) 15:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

They were the perpetrators, and that needs to be mentioned in the leading paragraph. ... discospinster _talk 15:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings Discospinster. Thanks for keeping an eye on my talk page. I've just seen that you've edited here and would like to point out that the IP in question is one of 5 that in a very short period of time have been obviously trolling relating to a banned user, Timothy Sheridan. I was going to delete the edit (together with yours) but thought I'd mention it to you first, as it would obviously be better if you removed it yourself. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 19:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

If it's a troll post, then I'm OK with having the whole exchange deleted. ... discospinster _talk 20:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. For some reason Twinkle didn't tell me you'd just protected it. Please change it to anything you like. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

It's no problem, these things happen. You can leave it as is if you'd like. ... discospinster _talk 03:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Actually, I'll leave it so people don't think I'm nuts, and will monitor the page. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

• 2602:304:8924:B109:9953:B8C8:950:7026 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

Hello. Are you sure you want to block this IP address indefinitely? If you did the block with Huggle, I believe it does have a bug where it will still block IPv6 IPs indefinitely.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

No I did not want to block it indefinitely. Thank you for letting me know; I've fixed it. ... discospinster _talk 03:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

--Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 20:03, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello! :) I wanted to delete the article because the formal name of the school is Korea University College of Medicine, and an article under that name has also been created. Hence, I thought that the article under the name of Korea University School of Medicine would be redundant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidirectt (talk • contribs) 19:47, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

OK, but the history of the original article should be preserved, so normally the original article would be moved to the new name. So I moved it there and kept the text that you added. ... discospinster _talk 19:50, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I wanted to bring this to your attention. Thanks. [2] Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

OK thanks for letting me know. ... discospinster _talk 02:23, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello Discospinster, I'm here to inform you that I am very sorry for my negligence while using WP:TW to edit Hannah Scezene. I assure you that my edit was not for malicious purposes and I was just testing out that Wiki Edit was working.

Sincerely,

JEMISCUTE.

Hello Discospinster, I'm here to inform you that I am very sorry for my negligence while using WP:TW to edit Hannah Scezene. I assure you that my edit was not for malicious purposes and I was just testing out that Wiki Edit was working.

Sincerely,

JEMISCUTE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jemiscute1 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Discospinster,

Thank you for editing the Kellie Loder article. Because of your involvement with the article, I thought that you should be notified of the article's FAC. Any comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 16:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

For this Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 12:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

No problem. ... discospinster _talk 13:12, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Yer mate, this is a Uni computer, so anyone could have edited it. Maybe a partial control is needed to check any edits for this IP address. ta. See User Enlil Ninlil if youhave a reply. 131.172.36.44 (talk) 22:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Check the references on septic shock, they are legitimate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.25.215.94 (talk) 01:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Just about to report you to an admin

Be my guest. ... discospinster _talk 21:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi

I am currently working on this page - iDonate do not wish it to appear on Wikipedia as it currently is as the grammar is exceptionally poor (I did not create it!). They wish the content temporarily removed whilst it is tidied up. Apologies for not explaining this.

The page has just been created - it might be better if it deleted altogether until I am ready to publish, but I don't think I can do this!

JRD — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackRubysDog (talk • contribs) 14:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps you should talk to the editor who created the page and see if you can work something out? Alternatively, you can add {{under construction}} to the top of the page to let readers know that the problems are being fixed (then remove the tag when you are done). ... discospinster _talk 14:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

please reinstate word coinage cross-referencing Aspies usages of words, like Mundane to mainstream.

This page was a keep - please reinstate.

They were voted to keep, but was history shows instead redirected to Asperger syndrome.

If you check talk:asperger's syndrome, talk:Aspies and talk:Damon Matthew Wise you will see considerable discussion and discovery of evidence of pre-1999 references to such cultural lingo used by Aspies, and removing Aspie cultural. It should start coming out of talk pages and come into the public area.

Aspies around the world, who have now been using Aspies, Cousins, and Auties for around 20 years have no problem using their referenced lingo. It should not be classed as a subculture, to be hidden away, but identified as a unique cultural language and meaning.

If talk:Aspies is subculture and is not the right place, help cancel the redirection, reinstate Aspies article, and help edit from these diverse sources into a properly referenced compendium on Aspie culture, behaviour and lingo?

Please do the right thing and reinstate.

We are now, after 20 years talking, over 2000 references in google for aspies still out there, some of which are still existing pre-1999 redirection (when very few websites and groups are readily searchable.

It is no longer only used in closed groups and channels where Aspies hide from scorn and bullying by mundanes ... it is now an unique cultural identity, and thus ought to be in Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AspieNo1 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks in advance ... lets get these issues fixed - if we can get original Aspies article and contents in sources referenced in Talk:aspies good enough standard to get included in a proprly resourced article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AspieNo1 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Seems we have a solution, if you can help and play the part ...

In that case undelete Aspies and Talk:Aspies temporarily and move content in full to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism, and then we can relink the from Aspies to Sociological and cultural aspects of autism and then redirect Talk:Aspies to Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism, and I can get everyone else to work on merging Aspies and Talk: Aspies into that document?

Is this possible solution to your problems? Please have my userpage undeleted, then we can get to work? AspieNo1 (talk) 18:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your user page only consisted of a post that someone else put there by accident instead of on your talk page, and then they removed it. So it was blank anyway.

As for the Aspies page, it was originally created as a redirect. If you think there should be a specific article for this (and not as part of the larger Asperger's Syndrome article), then you should try creating it in your user space at first so it won't be deleted. Please consult WP:Your first article for helpful tips about writing an article that keeps within Wikipedia's criteria. ... discospinster _talk 20:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Taken from the first listing in 2004 - almost 6 years before redirection an early pre-dictionary definition existed in Aspies:

Abbreviation of the word aspergers as in aspergers syndrome. It is a colloquial term used within the autistic community for someone with aspergers syndrome.

This is similar to a dictionary definition, which after over 20 years of verbal used were documented and confirmed in first written (copy of a hand-out in 1994 and time-stamp in a word document in 1996 use as respective use and definition) all first developed by Damon Matthew Wise and recorded on AUTINET and Autismlist newsgroups both dated in 1995 use resemble thus:

1) Group noun, used in casual communication for self-referencing by people within a community of people with Asperger's and similar diagnosis in the autistic spectrum.(1996, Ireland) or ; 2) Abbreviation used by persons with Asperger's Syndrome or Asperger's Disorder, Tourettes, Savants, High-Functional Autism, PDD-NPS or a similar diagnosis of an Autistic Spectrum Disorder of themselves, and thus identifying membership of the greater community of people with Asperger's and related disorder type. (1994, Ireland)

Does that mean that contents of Talk:Aspies can be temporarily reinstated and contents added to Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism and then the redirect it and for Aspies to be correctly relocated to: Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism which handles partially language and cultural expression, so these can be reintegrated?

AspieNo1 (talk) 02:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

The anonymous editor editing from 99.242.16.28 quite likely needs to be blocked once again for persistent inappropriate edits to Death of Sammy Yatim. This editor just returned from a block imposed by you. Thanks for your time. ChakaKong^{Let's talk about it} 01:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

that magyar page is all LIES .. delete this page because it is full of lies, if you don't believe me look it up. it speaks about a region within romania that it does not belong to romania ... my grandfader died defending this land in ww2 just for some people to post on the internet that my land for wich my family spilled blood belong to them and I AM DISRUPTIVE ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.112.255.109 (talk) 15:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes, you are being disruptive by deleting content and replacing it with "LIES LIES LIES". If you have a concern about the article's content or bias, please take it up on the talk page. ... discospinster _talk 15:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

As a living biography I am most disturbed at how difficult it appears to be to remove biased and inaccurate material and I would welcome your input in addressing same.

On the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Morrison page we have tried to remove the inaccurate and libellious word ‘socialite’ to describe Ms. Rocca (in the Personal Life section) as well as removing the obvious inaccuracy of the statement that Ms. Rocca has only appeared on one album cover when the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Rocca page itself uses as images the two examples of said different album covers.

Will you please revert back to me as your earliest convenience

Yours

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.111.101.114 (talk) 16:05, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Johnny Rogan is a respected biographer. We don't just use subject-approved biographies. Your Van Morrison edits were reverted because they had no sources. Van Morrison is a Good Article so sources are a must. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me so quickly, Neil. May I enquire as to whether there is a less public forum in which to discuss this matter? - apologies for having to Talk like this but your link to Talk doesn't appear to permit the leaving of a message Z — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.111.101.114 (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Have a look at Wikipedia:Contact us - Subjects. Did you email that address? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes, this one [email protected]. Is that correct, Neil, and to whom should I address it as I haven't heard anything back as yet? If this is the correct way in which to proceed to discuss the validity of using just one biographer, apologies for taking up your time (this TALK page made very interesting reading, it's great to see how interactive WikiP is). Z

I've contacted an OTRS volunteer on your behalf. Hopefully you should hear something back. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

@discospinster - Sorry about having this play out on your talk page. Probably be better on the IP's. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't mind, it makes me feel popular. :-) ... discospinster _talk 17:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bank rate, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. greenrd (talk) 17:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi discospinster: I am trying to make sure that the article I posted does not sound as an advertisement. Please this is my first and I want to do it good. Can you please help me to make sure it is right? thank you! Frante Camar (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Frante Camar

barcelona rentals vacation

It may not be an advertisement, but the article has to indicate how the company is notable. For example, have there been newspaper or magazine articles written about it, or has a travel web site talked about it in detail? ... discospinster _talk 16:05, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Yes! Discospinster, as you said, a travel web site is talking about it in detail same as travelers as posting reviews, you can see it at: https://www.airbnb.com/users/show/4958560 ( it is a profile in famous airbnb.com about Luciana Kandes, Barcelona Rentals Vacation founder. Please help me to restore the article. thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frante Camar (talk • contribs) 17:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

The link you provided (a brief listing confirming the place exists) does not come close to proving notability. As discospinster asked, have there been newspaper or magazine articles written about it? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for blocking that IP. I am glad I don't have to do any more reverts for at least another 12 hours. What do you think of this unblock request? Cathfolant (talk) 20:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

I think it's safe to say it will be declined. ... discospinster _talk 20:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

As I thought. Cathfolant (talk) 20:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Revoke talk page access please. Ginsuloft (talk) 15:59, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. ... discospinster _talk 16:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind that I've changed the block notice to reflect this. Cathfolant (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Not at all, I just forgot to do that. Thanks, ... discospinster _talk 16:37, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Would you mind explaining to me how this IP was disruptively editing? The only problems I could see were failure to cite sources and VisualEditor bugs messing up links; the additions seemed to be made in good faith. I'm not challenging you, just trying to understand. Cathfolant (talk) 16:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

The user has a habit of changing release dates to false ones (i.e. different from what the source says). When warned about it on the his/her page, the user ignores the warning and continues. It's also a long-standing problem with other anonymous users who may or may not be the same person. ... discospinster _talk 16:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

I see, thanks. Cathfolant (talk) 16:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)