User talk:Di (they-them)

Recently, you have made several edits to the Republic of Pirates page. Instead of a back-and-forth, I've set up a discussion topic on that page's talk page and I welcome you to add your argument to the discussion on the inclusion of the Jolly Roger in the Infobox. RobotGoggles (talk) 03:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Di (they-them)! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
513		Dualistic cosmology (talk)	Add sources
17		Gaucho (currency) (talk)	Add sources
47		Postal codes in Mexico (talk)	Add sources
317		Religious symbol (talk)	Add sources
4,615		Day of the Dead (talk)	Add sources
28		Our Lady of Arantzazu (talk)	Add sources
14		Huei tlamahuiçoltica (talk)	Cleanup
3		Guatemala Health Initiative (talk)	Cleanup
18		Manuel Tolsá (talk)	Cleanup
22		CESNUR (talk)	Expand
252		Erzulie (talk)	Expand
803		Maya peoples (talk)	Expand
1,670		Death (personification) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
133		Zona Rosa, Mexico City (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
47		President pro tempore of the Union of South American Nations (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
303		Demographics of Guatemala (talk)	Merge
103		Guatemalans (talk)	Merge
84		Huastec people (talk)	Merge
154		Name of Mexico (talk)	Wikify
78		Winti (talk)	Wikify
202		Theories about religions (talk)	Wikify
8		Traditionalist Mexican-American Catholic Church (talk)	Orphan
2		Ahrensberg (Habichtswald) (talk)	Orphan
2		Auriol Stevens (talk)	Orphan
163		Mictecacihuatl (talk)	Stub
62		Mam people (talk)	Stub
12		Protocol of Ouro Preto (talk)	Stub
5		Minerita (talk)	Stub
8		San Juan River (Tamaulipas) (talk)	Stub
53		Monterrey metropolitan area (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:44, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yume Nikki: Dream Diary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yume Nikki: Dream Diary, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Neo-völkisch movements into Fundamentalism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of active separatist movements in South America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Cruz Department (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them). It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yume Nikki: Dream Diary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. -- JMHamo (talk) 09:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs context and sources- - it is any particular mythology, and where are the images derived from? DGG ( talk ) 06:11, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the sigils are from the Lesser Key of Solomon, I'm not sure how to cite that as I have no experience citing that type of work. Di (they-them) (talk) 07:33, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of occult symbols, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sigil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of symbols, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sigil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from He whom God shall make manifest into Messianism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:32, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Lord Buckethead sitting in a chair.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lord Buckethead sitting in a chair.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:47, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indigenous American Catholic Saints, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. -- Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Headless men, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huangdi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flag of Australia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- AussieLegend (✉) 15:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indigenous Catholic saints of the Americans, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. -- Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 08:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, sorry. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: It's all good, thanks for helping out on stopping vandalism on the page. Di (they-them) (talk) 00:35, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Roland Barthes 1970s.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crypt TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DLC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tree of Life Barnstar
		For excellent work, including improving articles with new images. awkwafaba (📥) 23:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Awkwafaba: Thank you so much! Di (they-them) (talk) 17:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for: 2022 Earth Day Edit-a-thon 2pm - 4pm EST (April 22nd) online via Zoom and in person This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

-- Environment of New York City Task Force

	The Most Improved Editor's Barnstar
	You have improved immensely since 2019 with your understanding of non-free images. I wanted to recognize that with this award! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL: Thank you so much! Di (they-them) (talk) 17:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Narco-saint, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Fly Breaking Bad.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Whpq (talk) 01:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your move of Untitled Mario film was rather inappropriate considering not only was there an ongoing move discussion regarding it, but there was also prior consensus to wait for them to announce the title in the Direct since "The Super Mario Bros. Movie" might just be a temporary title for them to use as a title for the Direct before they announce the actual title. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: My apologies. Di (they-them) (talk) 19:38, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IT's alright. It's just slightly irritating as yes, the Direct may say it's "The Super Mario Bros. Movie" but that might just be because they don't have anything else to refer to it as before they actually reveal the title. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mellivory, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some microorganisms consume honey despite it having antimicrobial qualities? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mellivory. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mellivory), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 2601:183:4A80:E570:91B8:767C:D326:7CE8 was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gregory Guevara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

2601:183:4A80:E570:91B8:767C:D326:7CE8 (talk) 00:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gregory Guevara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

2601:183:4A80:E570:1063:296D:9870:132C (talk) 16:29, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just to clarify: Assigning any kind of coherent ideology to Francisco Macías Nguema is, to put it mildly, problematic. He was 1) probably insane and 2) regularily changed his official stances. He called himself a "Hitlerian-Marxist" and claimed that Hiltler had intended to liberate Africa. To assume that he was fascist or even a Nazi, based on these extremely confused statements, cannot be made so easily (plus Nazism is a form of fascism, but not the same as fascism - if anything, based on the "Hitlerian" claim, he should be assigned to "African Nazis").
Regarding reliable sources: Some contemporary sources describe Macías as "fascist" in the assumption that he copied Franco's system, but newer (academic) works usually do not seem to construct this link. I found one journal article here which assigns the term "afro-fascism" to Macías government, though it is a literary study more concerned with the contemporary perceptions of the regime, not a political study explaining how exactly Macías was fascist. Based on this evidence, I do not think that listing Macías as a "fascist" is the correct choice. Applodion (talk) 10:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cocaine Bear (bear), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a bear ate 75 pounds (34 kg) of cocaine in 1985, and was nicknamed Pablo Eskobear? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cocaine Bear (bear). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cocaine Bear (bear)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 27,177 views (1,132.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2022 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Public domain characters in the United States has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fram (talk) 08:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them), I see you had been dealing with the page about Blue the Velociraptor, I have two things to say, one, Thank you, and two, I have 4 drafts about other topics related to Jurassic Park, wanna do something to them? Link to the Category:Jurassic Park drafts 114.75.148.198 (talk) 07:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Blue (Jurassic World). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is plainly stated at the top of the article that "cryptids" are animals. Please stop trying to add informatioon about digital creations to the article. - Donald Albury 00:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Donald Albury: Wikipedia covers what sources say. Multiple reliable sources say that digital animals are cryptids. Your opinion doesn't change the fact that the sources say what they say. I will start a discussion on the article's talk page, we can further discuss it there. Di (they-them) (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Cocaine Bear (Bear), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Do not falsely accuse me of vandalism again. Gamowebbed (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not an admin, you're in no position to threaten to block me. Stop making disruptive edits. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:29, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you're quite right, we can't have fragmentary sources sitting about indefinitely concealed inside a Good Article (and probably not in any other kind either). By the same token, we can't have unchecked, semi-broken materials sitting about in plain sight in an article that has been formally reviewed. If anybody had had the actual text to hand, they'd have known the page they were looking at; so the uncomfortable truth about such materials is that somebody was probably casting about for something to use as a "ref", and they decided that the book probably covered the topic, and even if they didn't know the page it would probably "do" for the time being, and anyway they were going to get on with something more interesting, and ... hey presto, we have a flaky, semi WP:OR source that might or might not prove anything if anybody were ever going to look it up, which they never did.

So, to cut the shaggy dog story short, I've cut the ref, and its associated claim. The article has good examples of adaptations of the character already, and doesn't need supplements which are improperly put together or checked. I do hope this is clear and seems reasonable to you as an approach: it is certainly in line with policy. I suppose I may as well confess that I brought the article through GA and omitted to delete the paragraph at the time as I should have done. I don't feel that I own the article (or any other), but I do want it to be "all shipshape and Bristol fashion", as people used to say. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:51, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Neuro-sama.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them). You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/A New World (The Flash).
Message added 08:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mickey Mouse (Last Week Tonight with John Oliver), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Oliver dared Disney to sue him over his version of Mickey Mouse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mickey Mouse (Last Week Tonight). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mickey Mouse (Last Week Tonight with John Oliver)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,442 views (726.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Species named after Barack Obama has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Velociraptors in Jurassic Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vaticidalprophet 19:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So first of all, User:Tataral (who uploaded the other photo you are ok with) agrees with me, that it should not be deleted, and also, I uploaded before they did (If that means anything). The mugshot of Donald Trump is a historic piece of work that should not be deleted simply off of a technicality. Rexxx7777 (talk) 01:46, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter who uploaded it first, we can't have two identical files. One has to be deleted because there can only be one. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them),

Just to let you know that category redirects are not created like article redirects, we use a different code/template. Please look at this code on this page so you can see how category redirects are created in case you have a reason to create another one in the future. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! Di (they-them) (talk) 16:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Untitled Jagged Edge Productions cinematic universe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Jagged Edge Productions cinematic universe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:45, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ronald Reagan filmography has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mika1h (talk) 11:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them). The new pages patrol team is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles and redirects needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help. I believe that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines. Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions. If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here. Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Film series introduced in 2023 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Firefighter calendar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! lullabying (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your work on improving the article Erotic horror.★Trekker (talk) 16:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Di (they-them) (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft makes no mention of the name change from Twitter to X, and appears to omit history after the purchase of Twitter by Elon Musk. Please review and update before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tweet (Twitter) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...applies to recently deceased persons. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, my apologies. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Halloween prep set award
		For your work related to the Halloween prep set at DYK. Your contributions are appreciated! Lightburst (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Di (they-them) (talk) 17:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Erotic horror, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that various online retailers removed hundreds of books featuring erotic horror from their stores? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Erotic horror. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Erotic horror), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Halloween music, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Thriller" is the most popular Halloween song in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Halloween music. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Halloween music), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fakemon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fan-made Fakemon (example pictured) have been confused for genuine unreleased Pokémon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fakemon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fakemon), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 29,030 views (1,209.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Springtrap FNAF.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your contributions. I am writing to you today because one of them, File:2023 Lewiston shooting.jpg, is being considered for upload to Commons as non-copyrightable because it was shot by a pre-positioned security camera. Please join the discussion at c:COM:VPC#What's our current policy on images taken by security cameras in the United States?.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Firefighter calendar at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was an issue with your hook that you need to respond to. Please stop by as soon as possible if you wish to continue with this nomination. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		I'm in awe of your consistent skill in finding unusual and interesting topics to write about - from Fidel Castro and dairy to Firefighter calendar, your articles and DYKs never fail to make me (and certainly many others) laugh. Thanks especially for your work on Internet culture, and happy festive season/New Year!  Frzzl  talk; contribs  00:32, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Frzzl: Thank you so much! Happy holidays! Di (they-them) (talk) 00:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Neuro-sama.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them). This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of fascists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mickey Mouse Last Week Tonight.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them). This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Martin (chess engine), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them). It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of fascists".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you like making lists of fascists (I know that I do!), you might like to contribute to the Fascists by country template.--FeralOink (talk) 13:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them). It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Martin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at American civil religion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 21:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My edit was absolutely not uncontructive, the word "idolatrous" is literally used in the article to describe the phenomenon. It is an accurate term to describe the page. Please assume good faith. Di (they-them) (talk) 00:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Di (they-them) (talk) 00:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you were trying to place the article 2016 Donald Trump Las Vegas rally incident in an assassination-related category, which is quite an understandable instinct. However, as you'll see amply discussed on Talk:2016 Donald Trump Las Vegas rally incident in various ways, as well as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attempted assassination of Donald Trump (2nd nomination), there is a lot of concern over labeling this as such an attempt, particularly in regards to our policy on crime accusations against a living person. I should've removed your attempt right off, rather than putting you through additional steps, but my brain just got fixated on your use of "Presidential" when I first saw your changes. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, thanks for letting me know. Di (they-them) (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Northern pudu did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was a accident i thought it was my userpage for some reason Isla🏳️‍⚧ 09:38, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I believe that the owner of Peggy the Dog runs the Instagam account dogpool. You may want to reach out to her about licensing an image of her. I have reached out to people for photos in the past and they have always been very nice and have offered an image.
I can do stuff! (talk) 03:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I may try that! Di (they-them) (talk) 03:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please have a look also at the information at this page, which appears every time you edit J. K. Rowling. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All the animal actors thank you (woof, meow, grrrr, chirp). And by nominating it you set the navbox's betterment in motion (as well as with your good edits and additions). Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Di (they-them) (talk) 03:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i removed the image of Frank's agent/owner, because that would seemingly mean every actor would likewise have a picture of their agent/management team, which i didn't think would be correct.

the agent/owner has more content in the article than does Frank, the actual star

plus, i was surprised Frank wasn't in the image, instead there's an unknown unidentified other-species actor.

thoughts? Augmented Seventh (talk) 16:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's relevant enough to include, personally. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You would support adding pictures of various talent agents to notable actors pages? Augmented Seventh (talk) 23:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say that. I said that Frank's owner is relevant enough to include an image on Frank's page. I didn't say anything about any other actors. Di (they-them) (talk) 23:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for responding. Augmented Seventh (talk) 03:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tumblr sexyman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sans was crowned as "Ultimate Tumblr Sexyman" on the same day that Elizabeth II died? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tumblr sexyman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tumblr sexyman), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Antarctic English article, you reverted me, see here while telling me not to edit war! I made one change. You are the one who is reverting.

Also, you said that the article has been assessed as B-quality by "several editors" other than yourself, the article creator. I see no evidence of that. I'm not going to argue over this, but I did leave a comment on the talk page. Who are these "several editors" and why aren't their assessments indicated on the talk page? You might want to address that. FeralOink (talk) 13:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Di (they-them). This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Public domain character, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]