User talk:Debankan Mullick

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Kolkata derby, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Some more things: Do not add Indic scripts in the lead and infobox as per MOS:IS. No need to add match-list till 2007. There is a different article for that. And why unnecessarily changing the infobox image? That part is not for mentioning kits, it's already mentioned below. And that's not the right way to add kits. Also, no need to add FC/SC repeatedly.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  16:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for the guidance. Have a good day. Debankan Mullick (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

if there's still any confusions/issues, just let me know. i will try to clarify.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  05:29, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had one doubt. What is the need to add Eden Gardens and Kanchejunga Stadium? Both stadiums were used in exceptional cases like renovation, but they aren't the actual venues. Debankan Mullick (talk) 13:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Debankan Mullick, eden gardens was used before VYBK was constructed. a venue is a venue, whether its exceptional or not.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  16:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But its no more in use for any competitive football match, neither friendlies I guess. Debankan Mullick (talk) 16:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Debankan Mullick, but how can you delete the history? It doesn't say present stadiums.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  16:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 ATK Mohun Bagan FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arindam Bhattacharya. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NZFC. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mohun Bagan A.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 19:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mariners' Base Camp, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. SMB99thx my edits! 00:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mariners' Base Camp. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:02, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the organization, focusing on what the organization says about itself. Corporate notability or organization notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every organization, and not every organization with 501(c)(3) status (or its equivalent in other countries) is notable, and this draft does not establish organizational notability. You may ask for advice about organizational notability at the Teahouse.

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the fan organization, and reads like an information brochure. It does not focus on what third parties have written about the organization.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mariners' Base Camp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mariners' Base Camp, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:08, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Debankan Mullick! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:08, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kashmorwiki. I noticed that you recently removed content from Subha Ghosh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kashmorwiki (talk) 18:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subha Ghosh was involved in decided swap deal with Kerala Blasters, which was cancelled yesterday. The transfer did not happen at the last moment. Debankan Mullick (talk) 06:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know that too. But no reliable sources can confirm that. So until that moment, you cannot change that. We edit here on the basis on reliable sources. Kashmorwiki (talk) 07:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

independent sources are required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mariners' Base Camp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mariners' Base Camp, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Mohun Bagan A.C.. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 16:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 ATK Mohun Bagan FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Fox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey please check the statistics bar of the Kolkata Derby Wikipedia page.Total trophies of Mohun Bagan is 76 given,but it will be 73 after total count. And please add Calcutta Football League honours in the statistics table of both the club's as its also a major trophy to both the club's and at the top of the table write that the following titles titles are recognised by AIFF IFA and AFC. JohnDrp (talk) 08:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only national and international titles are considered as major trophies. Even though CFL is one of the only popular state leagues, state competitions aren't major titles. Debankan talk  04:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for editing the stats of Mohun Bagan from 76 to 73.But please add Calcutta Football League titles stats in the table as its a major title to both the club's.And as you have added IFA Shield in the table you should add Calcutta Football League titles stats because IFA Shield and Calcutta Football League both are the tournaments of IFA.Please add the title and then finally count it and make the total.And at the bottom please mention that the following titles are recognised by AIFF IFA and AFC. JohnDrp (talk) 04:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mariners' Base Camp. Thanks! Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 16:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my apologies RahulG (talk) 08:45, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not an issue. It happens :) Debankan talk  08:59, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix (...athletic club no , first sentence) and (major honours small h)

What about 'Athletic Club'? Debankan talk  08:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

you at least listen so appreciate... no "," after first 4 words also, "current board" needs only first words of each position in capital letter, others not

Ohk got it. Debankan talk  09:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But I still don't get the 'comma' part Debankan talk  09:24, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

that was fixed earlier. one last thing: board members - Satyajit Chatterjee, remove abbreviation 👏 (...)

for latest edits you made (campaign), better if all sections have space (and referee has one space less than others already) try this: | ... =

Where to put '|...='? Debankan talk  19:52, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

changed format so fine 👏 to keep the talk simple, can you check churchill bros' page (renamed), and if can fix title of i league 2nd div. 21-22

I don't think I have the permission to change page titles Debankan talk  07:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

text changed so if can just do...also:

sc east bengal (management), kerala blasters (personnel); both sections locked and correction needed. positions are in small letters after first word. can see pattern i fixed in todays edits.

I usually don't barge into other big club pages, because they have active editors and if I make changes then they would come all over me. Debankan talk  06:41, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Durand Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalyani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Debankan Mullick. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mariners' Base Camp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Durand Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arun Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing a great job by updating and maintaining the 2021 Durand Cup article. I would suggest you try for WP:GA after the tournament gets ends. You can contact me, if you need any help.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  13:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot :) Debankan talk  13:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Durand Cup final

I am planning to make 2021 Durand Cup Final a WP:GA. You are the main contributor here, so if you want, we can do this together  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  18:16, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not. But I don't know the procedure. Debankan talk  19:52, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The first step will be to develop the article. You can refer to articles like UEFA Euro 2020 Final, 2021 FA Cup Final etc for the writing style. We have to start with adding info with appropriate citations.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  20:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Debankan Mullick. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mariners' Base Camp".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence before history part .... Churchill Brothers, Mohun Bagan, and Bengaluru have won the league twice... needs fix (no , after bagan) as locked, asked you please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.140.185.90 (talk) 18:26, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What correction do you intend? Apologise, I couldn't understand your message Debankan talk  08:27, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done...keep good edits please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.141.222.186 (talk) 17:57, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I- leage under head coaches: sudeva has new coach; and sentence "current head coaches are" is repeating the title above — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.137.7.160 (talk) 00:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC) (Caretaker only sounds better / and any sources) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.141.222.212 (talk) 01:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 ATK Mohun Bagan FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Stewart.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 ATK Mohun Bagan FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jorge Ortiz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2014 needs to be deleted from infobox. other years fixed format (2020 as atkmb) example; under coacing staff, javi needs space after flag. bold font should be removed from squad list other fix you see welcome — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.28.186 (talk) 01:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Atkmb - players:

Note:Players in Bold has senior international cap(s)...

Corrected version: Note: Players in bold have senior international cap(s)...

Please fix — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.2.73.164 (talk) 20:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please move petre gigiu from coaching list — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.137.15.169 (talk) 21:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Debankan Mullick! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Calcutta Cup, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20120224201801/http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/The-Calcutta-Cup/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Calcutta Cup and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Calcutta Cup, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Calcutta Cup. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Calcutta Cup with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Calcutta Cup saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calcutta_Cup&type=revision&diff=1012328263&oldid=1009311865 https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1069826360&action=compare&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.historic-uk.com%2FHistoryUK%2FHistoryofBritain%2FThe-Calcutta-Cup%2FBogger (talk) 08:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ATK Mohun Bagan ISL debut season first match team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gokulam Fc - Crest, colours & kits any way to make it look in line with other title rows ☝ 93.140.176.77 (talk) 20:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Take reference to clubs in comparison to Gokulam Kerala FC, and make edits at your own discretion. I would suggest you to compare with the ISL clubs. Old clubs like the Kolkata ones won't be helpful, as they have greater info due to long history. I will try to go through myself when I'll be free. Otherwise, I would recommend you to update the page with more info as it lacks a lot. GK is one of the top clubs, so the page deserve more detailed and regularly updated page. Debankan talk  13:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you will get highest possible reports, who let you add clubs without official sources, not first time having vandalism outbursts!!! Sportski recenzist (talk) 07:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you go through the history page, you can see that I wasn't the one to add Chennai City in the first place. Check your facts before threatening with whatever power or experience you've got. Debankan talk  14:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of football clubs in West Bengal is very outdated and almost duplicates List of football clubs in Kolkata. you are user with enough edits there, should they merge; Sportski recenzist (talk) 21:22, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both pages are outdated and incomplete to some extent. You may initiate a merger if you think its necessary. Debankan talk  09:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1097332611

Please revert or move all foreigners from club squads/own pages information...i cant use that function yet

« Hi dear Debankan, I appreciate your edits, additions, and contributions on this particular article, but as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs, there is need of having a proper club records section as its integral part, with proper citations. Here within this article, the proper records and statistics are NOT JUST A REPETITION (Sometimes IT IS) of the information available in the history section. It comprises multiple things which are ALSO missing above, and similar format is used in articles related to EPL clubs as well. So PLEASE, DO NOT BULLDOZE records—atteched CITATIONS, that harms generosity and simplicity of an article! I hope you'll co-operate with me, in helping the articles of Indian football. Much love and respect from me :) JOY MOHUN BAGAN »

In that case, go ahead with your edit. Apologies for intervening and thanks for educating me about the particular article, as I was unaware of it. As it says, You learn something new everyday. Have a nice day JOY MOHUN BAGAN --Debankan talk  08:07, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing a great job and hope you'll be happy seeing this particular article: List of international tournaments won by Indian football clubs. If you have more data, which are UNKNOWN to us, please help/contribute, to make this even better 😇, Thanking you a lot ;)

An article you recently created, 2022–23 Mohammedan SC season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 17:22, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hindustan FC (website)

Delhi Football League https://theawayend.co/delhi-dsa-senior-division-league/

Manipur State League http://www.indiafooty.com/2019/05/07/classic-group-to-co-own-manipur-premier-league-along-with-amfa/

Assam State Premier League https://theawayend.co/guwahati-gsa-super-division-league/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.3.53.172 (talk) 07:03, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've declined your protection request for now because, as mentioned, I couldn't make sense of it. And it's doubtful any admin would be willing to devote the likely hours needed to gain an understanding of the topic and related data sets. So it's up to you, the editor who is already familiar with these, to better summarize whatever problems (linking pertinent WP:DIFFs will help).

But simply stating that Few individuals continue to edit even after requesting not to do so, that falls short. Because while you're welcome to request that from them, no one is actually going to force them to do so unless you're able to explain why you deem their edits to be disruptive editing (as opposed to a legit content dispute).

Also, only admins can protect pages. Merely adding the protection tag without the page being protected will just get removed by the bot as an error. Feel free to WP:PING me if you have any questions or concerns. Regards, El_C 06:49, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2022 Durand Cup knockout stage, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:17, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ATK Mohun Bagan FC (youth), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATK Mohun Bagan FC (youth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2022 Durand Cup. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There does not appear to be a need for a separate article on the later stages of this competition, when this can be included in the main article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2022 Durand Cup knockout stage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to 2022 Durand Cup group stage. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kaleeb18 was:

This is still just seems to be a content fork with its main article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2022 Durand Cup knockout stage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 12:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to [[User:Debankan Mullick|<b style="border:silver; border-width:5px; border-style:ridge; color:skyblue; font-family:Times New Roman;">Debankan</b>]] [[User talk:Debankan Mullick|<i style="color:green"><sup>talk</sup></i>]]  ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature.

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 12:11, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How to know if its accepting or not. As of now, I didn't face any error regarding it on Wikipedia. Debankan talk 09:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the attempt to change your signature is successful, the software has accepted your signature. Since there are no errors in your signature, you can move on. Sheep (talk) 00:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks. Debankan talk 08:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

31/41 of the references are Twitter. Needs more reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2022–23 Mohammedan SC (Kolkata) season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021–22 ATK Mohun Bagan FC season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Stevie fae Scotland -- Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that unfortunately 2021–22 ATK Mohun Bagan FC season does not meet the Good Article criteria at the moment. Although it has failed the assessment, you've made a really good start to the article and it is in a good position to be taken forward and improved. I've left suggestions on the review page for you but feel free to ask me any questions if you have any. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 17:29, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2021–22 ATK Mohun Bagan FC season you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2021–22 ATK Mohun Bagan FC season for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Stevie fae Scotland -- Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ATK Mohun Bagan FC you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 06:41, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Debankan Mullick, while the review has yet to start in earnest, SounderBruce made some points about sourcing that will need to be addressed, but haven't been in the past six weeks. Are you planning to do so? I don't see how the article can pass a review without this necessary work. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:44, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article ATK Mohun Bagan FC you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:ATK Mohun Bagan FC for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 04:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Debankan Mullick. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Durand Cup knockout stage, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Debankan Mullick. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 Durand Cup knockout stage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Debankan Mullick. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022–23 Mohammedan SC (Kolkata) season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.instagram.com/p/CvHPcMlMLIP/?hl=en

It says only "home", so away and even third can stay 93.143.98.191 (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subroto Cup needs to revert few grammar details, "see also" section and these pages which got removed cup link, same as Football in India and Indian football league system. User targets ip's from personal haterid, and content suffers 93.140.220.51 (talk) 19:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I'll see what info I can collect to improve the page. It's anyway very difficult to gather sources for Indian football tournaments. Debankan talk 10:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]