User talk:Davism0703

Hi Davism0703. I'm really sorry to nitpick, but there is a convention regarding the formatting of posts that I think you should know about. When one posts a reply, the convention is to put a colon at the start of each paragraph, so that it is indented (I'm surprised this isn't automated, it's really quite clunky). PS Thanks for the great contributions you've made across various articles and Talk page discussions. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 22:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eg here is a reply to my message.

And this is the second paragraph of my self-reply. Cheers (again!), 1292simon (talk) 22:35, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Simon, Thanks for letting me know. Sorry, I wasn't quite aware of that. I'm a little bit newer to Wikipedia, but I'll take any help or advice I can get. Do I have to put a colon in front of each individual sentence that is written? I'm not too sure. Thanks, Davism0703 (talk) 22:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. It's just at the start of each paragraph, not each sentence. Sorry, it's actually more complicated that my original explanation... it's about adding an extra indent compared to the previous reply (which is why this reply of mine has two colons at the start). To save yourself from having to count the colons each time, I suggest just copying them from the previous reply and adding one extra colon. Thanks for your efforts to do learn this process, I realise it's quite a clunky system (perhaps there is a Macro or Script that people use to automate this, I've never looked into it). Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 08:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good work. Two things, engine articles should have 'engine' in it's name. 2nd: do check them for copyright violations and reword if nececssary. Use Earwig's Copyvio Detector. Best. YBSOne (talk) 07:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Porsche 917 into Porsche flat-twelve engine. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 16:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Lancia LC2 into Ferrari 268/282C/308C engine. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when adding refs for the circuit length, in race infoboxes, could you please use the "details ref" parameter (as I have done here). If you add a bare link, could you also add {{link rot}} to the top of the page. Many thanks, SSSB (talk) 07:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, and no problem, thank you for letting me know. Yeah, I wasn't sure about that before. I'm just trying to add and improve to some of these motorsport articles. I enjoy helping to expand these articles. Kind regards, Davism0703 (talk) 07:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I really thank you for improving the lap record sections of the tracks you made, and I look at your contributions. But I noticed that you are just copying the URL of the lap records. And every time, I have to improve your contributions in order to make the reference as structured. It would be better also to indicate the title and access date for the lap record references, so the reference will be more structured and reliable. Example:

<ref>{{cite web|title= 2020 Super Formula Suzuka Race 1 Statistics| url= https://motorsportstats.com/results/super-formula/2020/suzuka/stats/race|access-date= 30 October 2021}}</ref>Apeiro94 (talk) 18:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Apeiro94, thank you for letting me know. My apologies, I may have been a bit too quick and hasty with my edits. I will take note and use that format and make the reference more structured and reliable. I really enjoy editing and improving articles, especially adding knowledge and information where it's needed, and I will take this into consideration. Thank you also for helping to improve Wikipedia articles, and adding your valuable knowledge and information, it means a lot, and really goes a long way (especially on some of the vaguer and more bare articles!). Kind regards, Davism0703 (talk) 09:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your all contributions, but I have to remind you again about the referencing of circuit fastest lap records. Since you did not indicate any title and access date for the web records, your references were always fixed with Bare URL automatically. And I am interested for looking at the lap records, but I am not keen of always fixing your references as more structured. Kind regards. Apeiro94 (talk) 22:37, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. My intention was to go back and fix the cited references and URLs, but I overlooked. Anyway, thank you for all your help and hard work. You're help adding to these articles to make them look much better doesn't go unnoticed, and it means a lot. And yes, I enjoy looking at the race lap records too. Also, if you're wondering why some of the lap times on the Suzuka Circuit page in the race lap records section are qualifying (pole position) times, it's because that's the best I could find on the page of that era of the track. You're welcome to change it if you can find the actual race lap records, but that's the best I could I find, and I did try very hard to look for reliable sources. All the pages would display on some of these old track layouts is the qualifying times, not the lap records for the race. Same goes for Mario Andretti's CART time on the old Laguna Seca track layout. Yes, it's a qualifying/pole position time (52.926 s), but that's the best I could find, and that's all the page would tell me. But at least it gives the reader some idea of the lap times! I'm sure some of the race lap records wouldn't be that far off the qualifying/pole position times. Thank you for all your help and contributions too. Kind regards, Davism0703 (talk) 02:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand your concern about the lap records in older layouts or older times. It is very hard to find the actual race lap record; since it is not indicated which driver actually held the lap record or whether the lap was held on the qualifying or race sessions. I can agree you for giving qualifying times for older layouts of some circuits for having an idea of lap times. Kind regards. Apeiro94 (talk) 06:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I want to say thank you for your all work for adding and improving lap records on the various circuits and I appreciate your work much. But I have to warn you again about one issue: one reference can be used multiple times, but the reference is repeated unnecessarily. To avoid this, you can write <ref name> structure, I will give you an example for the FL records on Silverstone 1996 international circuit layout:

As it was seen, all three FL records were taken the same race, and same reference is used: https://www.racingsportscars.com/race/Silverstone-1996-05-30.html

To avoid this repetition, I will firstly create the reference as: <ref name='1996_britishgt_silverstone'>{{cite web|url=https://www.racingsportscars.com/race/Silverstone-1996-05-30.html|title=British GT Championship Silverstone 1996|access-date=17 May 2022}}</ref>

Then, I will write the same reference as "<ref name='1996_britishgt_silverstone' />" in order to avoid unnecessary repetition of the mentioned reference. I made the change for you now, you can look and compare the circuit page versions to do this.

Thanks and kind regards. Apeiro94 (talk) 19:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again and again, please use <ref name> structure when you will use a reference multiple times for the lap records. Look at my fix on Charlotte Motor Speedway now. Apeiro94 (talk) 09:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your contributions - I've marked a handful of your articles about vehicles under WikiProject Motorsport. I marked most articles about championship-winning cars as mid-level importance. ~XyNq^t_c 13:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davism0703, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 14:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw Lola T850 said it was copied content from the German Wikipedia. If you're doing translating work you should use the template from Template:Translated page on the talk pages to provide proper attribution where possible. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reynard 2KF is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reynard 2KF until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Thompson Raceway. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Thompson Speedway Motorsports Park. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Thompson Speedway Motorsports Park. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. --Finngall ^talk 18:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sebring International Raceway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Hall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dallas street circuit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dubious notability. If the race itself was notable, then a redirect to it might be useful: but the "circuit" on its own is just some streets used for a few days, no permanent or even recurring fixture.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alba AR5 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alba AR5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 08:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article March-BMW M1/C has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass notability for sports prototypes; I have a book regarding the topic (IMSA GTP) and this car was only given a brief mention. Scant resources on the Internet, too.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you edited the Ford Indigo article not too long ago and I'm at my wits end about Ghia Microsport notability, which was at the same auction, interested in taking a look at it and improving it? Thanks! Chadnibal (talk) 21:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Davism0703. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Helmut Fath sidecars, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article March-BMW M1/C is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/March-BMW M1/C until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 09:27, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Audi DTM V8 engine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audi DTM V8 engine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Davism0703. Thank you for your work on Audi/Bentley 90° twin-turbocharged V8 racing engine. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]