User talk:David Kernow

This user may have left Wikipedia. David Kernow has not edited Wikipedia since October 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

David Kernow is taking a wikibreak has been missing since May 2007, and apparently didn't drop in from time to time. Yet another good, mature admin burned out by the deletionists cabal!.

Archives
01  Oct – Dec 2005 2006 02  Jan 2006 03  Feb 2006 04  Mar 2006 05  Apr 2006 06  May 2006 07  Jun 2006 08  Jul 2006 09  Aug 2006 11  Sep 2006 12  Oct 2006 13  Nov 2006* 14  Dec 2006 2007 15  Jan 2007 16  Feb 2007 17  Mar 2007 18  Apr 2007 19  May 2007 20 June 2007- April 2008 10  Ëzhiki on Russian admin divisions * incl table wikicode edit

		The Instructor's Barnstar
		This Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who have performed stellar work in the area of instruction & help for other editors. As the author of Template:Columns-list, you helped greatly in developping my user page, which in turn serves as practice for my future edits. As such your legacy is eternal and you will not be forgotten. Thank you so much for your extensive history on this site! Cheers, Double Plus Ungood (talk) 02:24, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Murray_Walker,_motorsports_commentator.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As participated in 2006 regarding the above, could you explain more fully the action taken then? The expression is now expanded into the Final Solution to the Jewish Question. What's your take on that? Thanks. --Ludvikus (talk) 02:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Abidin.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Professor_David_Cesarani.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 17:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged Image:Semyon_Dezhnev_(statue).jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Robert Shaw as Quint in the movie 'Jaws' (1976).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DPN has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Suntag ☼ 17:12, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello David Kernow! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 991 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Alan Opie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:59, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:About2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 23:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are still around, or see this much later, I'm leaving a courtesy note to let you know that I stumbled across User:David Kernow/List of Royal Geographical Society Gold Medal recipients (20th century), and am working to carry on what you were doing there, and to combine it with Gold Medal (RGS). Carcharoth (talk) 00:32, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navigation with image has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:37, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navigation with columns has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nasdbc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TPSRM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 00:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to revive it if it was of some use. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have suggested a move of the above and I note from the history of the article that you have previously held an interest in it. I thought it appropriate to pay you the courtesy of letting you know about this.Felix505 (talk) 14:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So abruptly had you disappeared in 2007 that I seriously started to believe that you were hit by a falling brick and died. Nevertheless, I continued to check back once every few months just in case. Lo and behold, I see that you made a brief appearance in June, so we can be reasonably sure that you you are at least alive, if not particularly active. Anyway, just wanted to let you know that you have been missed, and I, for one, am immensely glad to see you back! Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 16, 2010; 17:34 (UTC)

Hey, I am just glad to know that you are, you know, alive :) It's perfectly understandable about having no time to do much around here—that's life—although I sure hope you will be able to fully return at some point in the future!

Thanks for the picture, too. I like it almost as much as the one I have on my userpage :) Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); July 28, 2010; 13:17 (UTC)

Template:Bkg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Green Giant (talk) 05:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Member states of the Arab League. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Member states of the Arab League redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Green Giant (talk) 06:05, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because you participated in a previous discussion on the subject, I'm letting you know that a discussion has started about opneing a Request for Comments concerning "Bronx" versus "The Bronx" as the article title. You can find it here Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:19, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found List of Marvel vs. Series characters while working Category:Articles lacking sources from October 2006 from Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles, my first impulse was to give it a prod, an long unreferenced orphan without a clear reason to exist. I see you are still active on Wikipedia, is there chance you can do something for this article? JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you just happened to have stopped by recently a couple days ago and are not really active. Went ahead and place a prod, will liberal place notices. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Marvel vs. Series characters

The article List of Marvel vs. Series characters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A long unreferenced orphan without a clear reason to exist, fails WP:N, WP:V and WP:NOT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:41, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of business failures is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of business failures until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Since you took part in this before, you might like to know that there is a revived proposal under discussion at Talk:St Pancras railway station#Requested move. -- Alarics (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of figures in psychiatry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of figures in psychiatry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:19, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:David Kernow/Internet sources re hyphens and adverbs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joe Chill (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User3-small has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 15:43, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 16:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Xeno (talk) at 13:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 12:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bengali culture has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chandan Guha (talk) 13:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Albanians1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Albanians2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Albanians3.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kirsten Bråten Berg, accompanied Ale Møller - Heiemo og Nykkjen (opening verse).ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked for a deletion review of Category:Actresses. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:18, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:A Kiwi/Ego defense mechanisms, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:A Kiwi/Ego defense mechanisms and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:A Kiwi/Ego defense mechanisms during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 12:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:David Kernow/John Wood (explorer), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:David Kernow/John Wood (explorer) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:David Kernow/John Wood (explorer) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 14:30, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adjectivals and demonyms for countries and nations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adjectivals and demonyms for countries and nations (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 01:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of adjectival and demonymic forms for countries and nations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of adjectival and demonymic forms for countries and nations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ninney (talk) 08:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Flag of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands. Since you had some involvement with the Flag of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 06:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electroacoustic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electroacoustic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of business failures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of business failures (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Secret ^account 19:44, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, David! I don't know if you left us for good or if you indeed drop in from time to time (just without making any edits), but I thought I'd bring to your attention the fact that the list of administrative and municipal divisions of the Republic of Adygea is going to be featured on Main Page on February 21, 2014. Your help in developing that list was enormous (and is equally enormously appreciated), so perhaps the fact that it'll be featured might rekindle your interest in Wikipedia (which'd be super). But if not, then best of luck to you in whatever endeavors outside of Wikipedia keep you busy these days! Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 6, 2014; 19:41 (UTC)

Template:Table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Gadget850 ^talk 22:05, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adjectivals and demonyms for fictional regions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 11:22, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ctlf has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 22:18, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Barnowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Barnowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:List of Royal Geographical Society Gold Medal recipients (19th century), from its old location at User:David Kernow/List of Royal Geographical Society Gold Medal recipients (19th century). This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:13, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Table and column templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 06:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Vietnam. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Vietnam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Sudan. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Sudan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Spain. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Spain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:New Zealand. Since you had some involvement with the Template:New Zealand redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Nepal. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Nepal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Kosovo. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Kosovo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Kenya. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Kenya redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Canada. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Canada redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Australia. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Australia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:United Kingdom. Since you had some involvement with the Template:United Kingdom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People executed by single firearm, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of United States First Ladies by Longevity. Since you had some involvement with the List of United States First Ladies by Longevity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 07:43, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, David Kernow. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Royal Geographical Society Gold Medal recipients".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TopCipher (talk) 05:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Largest and smallest census divisions of Canada has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Distinguish2 has been nominated for merging with Template:Distinguish. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. feminist (talk) 11:53, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Middle Ages wide 2 has been nominated for merging with Template:Middle Ages. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Aza24 (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Columns has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 20:52, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:People executed by disembowelment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David Kernow! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marcocapelle (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Smaller has been nominated for merging with Template:Small. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Beland (talk) 00:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South America has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 10:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]