User talk:CyberSach/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Regarding your edits in the Advance Wars 2: Black Hole Rising. We appreciate the effort you put in adding information. However, most of that information does not fit in Wikipedia. We want the common reader to say "What is Advance Wars?" and find all the introductory information there. Afterwards, if he wants more precise (movement ranges, stage descriptions, CO caracteristics, etc) he should check the corresponding wikibook, where I redirect you.

Please, feel free to add as much information there, and to wikify the article to make it a high quality one! -- ReyBrujo 02:02, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

I answered your comment on my talk page. --Scott Davis ^Talk 06:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi there. I see you've reverted to the "Given without context..." formula at the top of Scarborough. I assumed that User:Atemperman's removal was a challenge to its legitimacy (it may not have been: it may just have been a good-faith tidy-up attempt). I added the "named after..." bit, because I'm more certain that it's true. I can't say I've looked for a source for the assertion that Scarborough, N Yorks is the most likely target without context, but I'm not sure that's verifiable. While I'm happy with the status quo (because it justifies the N Yorks Scarborough being at the top of the list, which should otherwise be alphabetised), would it be more prudent (and less POV) to arrange the page along the lines of Exeter (disambiguation), with a comment and then proper alphabetic listing? Thanks for your thoughts. — mholland 02:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

(Response on User_talk:Mholland)

I don't especially mind. I'll leave it alone. — mholland 12:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)#Capitalization for guidelines on on capitalization of headings.

Peter ^Isotalo 01:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip, Peter, I appreciate it. <3 bunny 01:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Advance Wars Boxart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:HSM.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi CyberSach,

I stopped by because I saw this edit on my watchlist, and I wanted to let you know that the content you reverted doesn't really qualify as vandalism; rather, it was simply an unsourced statement added by an anonymous user. It may not seem like a big deal, but it's important to keep in mind that most new contributors are simply not familiar with our policies and are just trying to improve the encylopedia as best as they can.

Incidentally, if you haven't already I would suggest checking out Friendly, a JavaScript tool that makes it easy to welcome new users while informing them of any potential problems with their first edits. Thanks! --jonny-mt 08:42, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

• The reason why I put it was vandalism, is because there is NO way that a person could conceive Olaf to have helped Sturm, because that isn't a possible plot twist, and the meteor hits an area with radius 3. Incidentally I classify incorrect unreferenced information to be vandalism, so I wrote rvv with that intention. I'll watch for the first edits thing though. <3 bunny 03:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

• I see what you're saying, but the difference between vandalism and what you reverted is that incorrect, unreferenced information can be added with the best of intentions, while vandalism is added with the intent to harm. Even in the latter case, it's generally a good idea to assume good faith and mark it as a test edit in all but the most blatant of circumstances. --jonny-mt 01:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Advance Wars COs, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Advance Wars COs. Thank you. jonny-mt 01:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I've removed your prod. Lack of references is not grounds for deletion. If you disagree, you can propose it for AfD. Corvus cornix_talk 04:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

The reason I nominated it was lack of significance, noting all the information comes from one page (ghits returned no credible sources, except maybe the site you referenced), and it being unreferenced. <3 bunny 04:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

One of the first women to file a sexual discrimination lawsuit is notable. I repeat, lack of sources is not grounds for deletion. Note in the article's history, there was an attempt at deletion once before, and it was removed. Corvus cornix_talk 04:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Do those sources help? Corvus cornix_talk 04:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

And try these ghits. Corvus cornix_talk 04:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the clear-up, and I hope you took no offense from my prod. <3 bunny 04:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Nope, no offense taken.  :) Corvus cornix_talk 05:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I approved you for AWB because you have the required 500 edits, but I will tell you AWB is not a tool for vandalism reverting (more for tedious editing).   jj137 (talk) 21:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I've done some editing on Smolny Convent to improve the NPOV. Although it is still in need of references, do you think the article as it is now can have the {{npov}} tag removed? MishaPan (talk) 22:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I think the following lines need a bit of editing, otherwise, it looks good =). Oh, feel free to argue these lines are NPOV.

• a stunning blue-and-white building ("stunning", maybe "architectural masterpiece" afterwards)
• completing this grand design ("grand")
• huge bell-tower (word choice "huge")

Thanks! <3 bunny 02:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Cybersach, I like your username. Bye :) Frac2 (talk) 23:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Anyone other than the article's creator is permitted to remove a speedy tag. See Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, which states: "Any editor who is not the creator of a page may remove a speedy tag from it. The creator may not do this. A creator who disagrees with the speedy deletion should instead add {{hangon}} to the page, and explain the rationale on the page's discussion page." Please restore my latest version of the article. --Eastmain (talk) 04:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

My bad, sorry. <3 bunny 04:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Would you please kindly re-review the article and reconsider your delete recommendation? Thanks, JERRY ^talk _contribs 16:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I have now added rollback privileges to you account. Please use them well! Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! <3 bunny 17:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks for resolving this for me - Fritzpoll (talk) 18:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. <3 bunny 18:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Infinity Theory isn't mine, thanks for advising me but it's not my article. --Thebluesharpdude (talk) 02:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, sorry my fault. --Thebluesharpdude (talk) 02:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand your proposed deletions. Please explain to me why these should be changed from anything other than a redirect to a list page. We have been redirecting thousands of links like this. MilkTaco 02:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

All the highway redirects are created this way as indicated on pages like this. MilkTaco 02:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.